Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 555-561

  Zimmermann, Markus ^a   Feibicke, Thomas ^a   Keyl, Cornelius ^b   Prasser, Christopher ^a   Moritz, Stefan ^a   Graf, Bernhard M ^a   Wiesenack, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b Heart Centre Bad Krozingen   (Germany)

Author keywords

Fluid responsiveness; Major abdominal surgery; Pleth variability index; Pulse oximeter plethysmography; Stroke volume variation

Indexed keywords

HETASTARCH;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; MAJOR SURGERY; MALE; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY;

BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HETASTARCH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; PLASMA SUBSTITUTES; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY MECHANICS; ROC CURVE; STROKE VOLUME; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, ELECTIVE;

EID: 77953799075     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: 13652346     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328335fbd1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134:172-178.
2. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32:691-699.
3. Hofer CK, Müller SM, Furrer L, et al. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest 2005; 128:848-854.
4. Michard F, Teboul JL. Using heart-lung interactions to assess fluid responsiveness during mechanical ventilation. Crit Care 2000; 4:282-289.
5. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, et al. Assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2005; 22:658-665.
6. Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VO, et al. Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 2007; 11:R100.
7. Perel A. The value of functional hemodynamic parameters in hemodynamic monitoring of ventilated patients. Anaesthesist 2003; 52:1003-1004.
8. Mayer J, Boldt J, Beschmann R, et al. Uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis for less-invasive cardiac output determination in obese patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2009; 103:185-190.
9. Mayer J, Boldt J, Wolf MW, et al. Cardiac output derived from arterial pressure waveform analysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: validity of a second generation device. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:867-872.
10. Prasser C, Trabold B, Schwab A, et al. Evaluation of an improved algorithm for arterial pressure-based cardiac output assessment without external calibration. Intensive Care Med 2007; 33:2223-2225. (Pubitemid 350164566)
11. Biais M, Nouette-Gaulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:761-768.
12. Cannesson M, Musard H, Desebbe O, et al. The ability of stroke volume variations obtained with Vigileo/FloTrac system to monitor fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2009; 108:513-517.
13. Hofer CK, Senn A, Weibel L, Zollinger A. Assessment of stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness using the modified FloTrac and PiCCOplus system. Crit Care 2008; 12:R82.
14. Desebbe O, Cannesson M. Using ventilation-induced plethysmographic variations to optimize patient fluid status. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008; 21:772-778.
15. Cannesson M, Delannoy B, Morand A, et al. Does the pleth variability index indicate the respiratory-induced variation in the plethysmogram and arterial pressure waveforms? Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1189-1194.
16. Cannesson M, Desebbe O, Rosamel P, et al. Pleth variability index to monitor the respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter plethysmographic waveform amplitude and predict fluid responsiveness in the operating theatre. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101:200-206.
17. Keller G, Cassar E, Desebbe O, et al. Ability of pleth variability index to detect hemodynamic changes induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing volunteers. Crit Care 2008; 12:R37.
18. Manecke GR. Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: Easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev Med Devices 2005; 2:523-527.
19. Boulain T, Achard J-M, Teboul J-L, et al. Changes in BP induced by passive leg raising predict response to fluid loading in critically ill patients. Chest 2002; 121:1245-1252.
20. Langewouters GJ, Wesseling KH, Goedhard WJ. The pressure dependent dynamic elasticity of 35 thoracic and 16 abdominal human aortas in vitro described by a five component model. J Biomech 1985; 18:613-620.
21. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148:839-843.
22. de Waal EE, Rex S, Kruitwagen CL, et al. Stroke volume variation obtained with FloTrac/Vigileo fails to predict fluid responsiveness in coronary artery bypass graft patients. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100:725-726.
23. Landsverk SA, Hoiseth LO, Kvandal P, et al. Poor agreement between respiratory variations in pulse oximetry photoplethysmographic waveform amplitude and pulse pressure in intensive care unit patients. Anesthesiology 2008; 109:849-855.
24. Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Keyl C, Rödg G. Assessment of intrathoracic blood volume as an indicator of cardiac preload: single transpulmonary thermodilution technique versus assessment of pressure preload parameters derived from a pulmonary artery catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001; 15:584-588.
25. Perel A. Automated assessment of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1031-1033.
26. Lima A, Bakker J. Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31:1316-1326.
27. de Waal EE, Wappler F, Buhre WF. Cardiac output monitoring. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2009; 22:71-77.