At the cutting-edge of grape and wine biotechnology

Trends in Genetics

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 263-271

  Borneman, Anthony R ^a   Schmidt, Simon A ^a   Pretorius, Isak S ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN WINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Biotechnology; Grapes; Malolactic bacteria; Wine yeast; Winemaking

Indexed keywords

BIOTECHNOLOGY; DNA MODIFICATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; GRAPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; WINE;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; FERMENTATION; GENETIC VARIATION; PHENOTYPE; PLANTS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; TASTE; VITIS; WINE; YEASTS;

VITACEAE;

EID: 84880514653     PISSN: 01689525     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2012.10.014     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. McGovern P.E., et al. Neolithic resinated wine. Nature 1996, 381:480-481.
2. This P., et al. Historical origins and genetic diversity of wine grapes. Trends Genet. 2006, 22:511-519.
3. Barnett J.A. The taxonomy of the genus Saccharomyces meyen ex reess: a short review for non-taxonomists. Yeast 1992, 8:1-23.
4. Garvie E.I. Leuconostoc oenos sp. nov. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1967, 48:431-438.
5. Pretorius I.S., et al. The winemaker's bug: from ancient wisdom to opening new vistas with frontier yeast science. Bioeng. Bugs 2012, 3:147-156.
6. Vivier M.A., Pretorius I.S. Genetically tailored grapevines for the wine industry. Trends Biotechnol. 2002, 20:472-478.
7. Goffeau A., et al. Life with 6000 genes. Science 1996, 274:546-567.
8. Akao T., et al. Whole-genome sequencing of sake yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Kyokai no. 7. DNA Res. 2011, 18:423-434.
9. Argueso J.L., et al. Genome structure of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain widely used in bioethanol production. Genome Res. 2009, 19:2258-2270.
10. Babrzadeh F., et al. Whole-genome sequencing of the efficient industrial fuel-ethanol fermentative Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain CAT-1. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2012, 287:485-494.
11. Borneman A.R., et al. Whole-genome comparison reveals novel genetic elements that characterize the genome of industrial strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1001287.
12. Borneman A.R., et al. The genome sequence of the wine yeast VIN7 reveals an allotriploid hybrid genome with Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces kudriavzevii origins. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012, 12:88-96.
13. Borneman A.R., et al. Comparative genome analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8:1185-1195.
14. Doniger S.W., et al. A catalog of neutral and deleterious polymorphism in yeast. PLoS Genet. 2008, 4:e1000183.
15. Dowell R.D., et al. Genotype to phenotype: a complex problem. Science 2010, 328:469.
16. Halfmann R., et al. Prions are a common mechanism for phenotypic inheritance in wild yeasts. Nature 2012, 482:363-368.
17. Nijkamp J.F., et al. De novo sequencing, assembly and analysis of the genome of the laboratory strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D, a model for modern industrial biotechnology. Microb. Cell Fact. 2012, 11:36.
18. Novo M., et al. Eukaryote-to-eukaryote gene transfer events revealed by the genome sequence of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:16333-16338.
19. Swinnen S., et al. Identification of novel causative genes determining the complex trait of high ethanol tolerance in yeast using pooled-segregant whole-genome sequence analysis. Genome Res. 2012, 22:975-984.
20. Wei W., et al. Genome sequencing and comparative analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain YJM789. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:12825-12830.
21. Liti G., et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 2009, 458:337-341.
22. Dunn B., et al. Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pan-genome reveals a pool of copy number variants distributed in diverse yeast strains from differing industrial environments. Genome Res. 2012, 22:908-924.
23. Tettelin H., et al. Comparative genomics: the bacterial pan-genome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2008, 11:472-477.
24. + symporter. Microbiology 2010, 156:3754-3761.
25. Damon C., et al. A novel fungal family of oligopeptide transporters identified by functional metatranscriptomics of soil eukaryotes. ISME J. 2011, 5:1871-1880.
26. Wenger J.W., et al. Bulk segregant analysis by high-throughput sequencing reveals a novel xylose utilization gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2010, 6:e1000942.
27. Fujimura K., et al. Circular DNA intermediate in the duplication of Nile tilapia vasa genes. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e29477.
28. Durkin K., et al. Serial translocation by means of circular intermediates underlies colour sidedness in cattle. Nature 2012, 482:81-84.
29. Makarova K., et al. Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:15611-15616.
30. Mills D., et al. Genomic analysis of PSU-1 and its relevance to winemaking. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2005, 29:465-475.
31. Borneman A.R., et al. Genotypic diversity in Oenococcus oeni by high-density microarray comparative genome hybridization and whole genome sequencing. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86:681-691.
32. Borneman A.R., et al. Comparative analysis of the Oenococcus oeni pan genome reveals genetic diversity in industrially-relevant pathways. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:373.
33. Borneman A.R., et al. Functional divergence in the genus Oenococcus as predicted by genome sequencing of the newly-described species, Oenococcus kitaharae. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e29626.
34. Dimopoulou M., et al. Exploration of phenomena contributing to the diversity of Oenococcus oeni exopolysaccharides. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 153:114-122.
35. Velasco R., et al. A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e1326.
36. Jaillon O., et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 2007, 449:463-467.
37. Moroldo M., et al. A physical map of the heterozygous grapevine 'Cabernet Sauvignon' allows mapping candidate genes for disease resistance. BMC Plant Biol. 2008, 8:66.
38. Scalabrin S., et al. Physical mapping in highly heterozygous genomes: a physical contig map of the Pinot Noir grapevine cultivar. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:204.
39. Falginella L., et al. Expansion and subfunctionalisation of flavonoid 3',5'-hydroxylases in the grapevine lineage. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:562.
40. Martin D.M., et al. Functional annotation, genome organization and phylogeny of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) terpene synthase gene family based on genome assembly, FLcDNA cloning, and enzyme assays. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10:226.
41. Di Gaspero G., et al. Linkage maps of grapevine displaying the chromosomal locations of 420 microsatellite markers and 82 markers for R-gene candidates. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 114:1249-1263.
42. Malacarne G., et al. Deconstruction of the (paleo)polyploid grapevine genome based on the analysis of transposition events involving NBS resistance genes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e29762.
43. Ali K., et al. Monitoring biochemical changes during grape berry development in Portuguese cultivars by NMR spectroscopy. Food Chem. 2011, 124:1760-1769.
44. Fernandez L., et al. Transposon-induced gene activation as a mechanism generating cluster shape somatic variation in grapevine. Plant J. 2010, 61:545-557.
45. Toffali K., et al. Novel aspects of grape berry ripening and post-harvest withering revealed by untargeted LC-ESI-MS metabolomics analysis. Metabolomics 2011, 7:424-436.
46. Mica E., et al. High throughput approaches reveal splicing of primary microRNA transcripts and tissue specific expression of mature microRNAs in Vitis vinifera. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:558.
47. Lijavetzky D., et al. Berry flesh and skin ripening features in Vitis vinifera as assessed by transcriptional profiling. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e39547.
48. Guillaumie S., et al. Transcriptional analysis of late ripening stages of grapevine berry. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11:165.
49. Fortes A.M., et al. Transcript and metabolite analysis in Trincadeira cultivar reveals novel information regarding the dynamics of grape ripening. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11:149.
50. Fasoli M., et al. The grapevine expression alas reveals a deep transcriptome shift driving the entire plant into a maturation program. Plant Cell 2012, 24:3489-3505.
51. Milli A., et al. Proteomic analysis of the compatible interaction between Vitis vinifera and Plasmopara viticola. J. Proteomics 2012, 75:1284-1302.
52. Polesani M., et al. General and species-specific transcriptional responses to downy mildew infection in a susceptible (Vitis vinifera) and a resistant (V. riparia) grapevine species. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:117.
53. Grimplet J., et al. Proteomic and selected metabolite analysis of grape berry tissues under well-watered and water-deficit stress conditions. Proteomics 2009, 9:2503-2528.
54. Sreekantan L., et al. Differential floral development and gene expression in grapevines during long and short photoperiods suggests a role for floral genes in dormancy transitioning. Plant Mol. Biol. 2010, 73:191-205.
55. Tillett R.L., et al. Identification of tissue-specific, abiotic stress-responsive gene expression patterns in wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) based on curation and mining of large-scale EST data sets. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11:86.
56. Grimplet J., et al. VitisNet: 'Omics' integration through grapevine molecular networks. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e8365.
57. Zamboni A., et al. Identification of putative stage-specific grapevine berry biomarkers and omics data integration into networks. Plant Physiol. 2010, 154:1439-1459.
58. Richards S.E., et al. Intra- and inter-omic fusion of metabolic profiling data in a systems biology framework. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2010, 104:121-131.
59. Sawada Y., et al. RIKEN tandem mass spectral database (ReSpect) for phytochemicals: a plant-specific MS/MS-based data resource and database. Phytochemistry 2012, 82:38-45.
60. DeRisi J.L., et al. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 1997, 278:680-686.
61. Nagalakshmi U., et al. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 2008, 320:1344-1349.
62. Rossignol T., et al. Analysis of the genomic response of a wine yeast to rehydration and inoculation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 71:699-712.
63. Winter G., et al. Effects of rehydration nutrients on H2S metabolism and formation of volatile sulfur compounds by the wine yeast VL3. AMB Express 2011, 1:36.
64. Marks V.D., et al. Dynamics of the yeast transcriptome during wine fermentation reveals a novel fermentation stress response. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008, 8:35-52.
65. Rossouw D., et al. The impact of co-inoculation with Oenococcus oeni on the trancriptome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and on the flavour-active metabolite profiles during fermentation in synthetic must. Food Microbiol. 2012, 29:121-131.
66. Rossouw D., et al. Transcriptional regulation and the diversification of metabolism in wine yeast strains. Genetics 2012, 190:251-261.
67. Rossouw D., et al. Linking gene regulation and the exo-metabolome: a comparative transcriptomics approach to identify genes that impact on the production of volatile aroma compounds in yeast. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:530.
68. Celton M., et al. A comparative transcriptomic, fluxomic and metabolomic analysis of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increases in NADPH oxidation. BMC Genomics 2012, 13:317.
69. Fischer B.M., et al. Quantitative trait locus analysis of fungal disease resistance factors on a molecular map of grapevine. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2004, 108:501-515.
70. Walker A.R., et al. White grapes arose through the mutation of two similar and adjacent regulatory genes. Plant J. 2007, 49:772-785.
71. Battilana J., et al. Functional effect of grapevine 1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase substitution K284N on Muscat flavour formation. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:5497-5508.
72. Boss P.K., Thomas M.R. Association of dwarfism and floral induction with a grape 'green revolution' mutation. Nature 2002, 416:847-850.
73. Riaz S., et al. Refined mapping of the Pierce's disease resistance locus, PdR1, and Sex on an extended genetic map of Vitis rupestris x V. arizonica. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2006, 113:1317-1329.
74. Hwang C-F., et al. Cloning and characterization of XiR1, a locus responsible for dagger nematode resistance in grape. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121:789-799.
75. Barker C.L., et al. Genetic and physical mapping of the grapevine powdery mildew resistance gene, Run1, using a bacterial artificial chromosome library. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2005, 111:370-377.
76. Laucou V., et al. High throughput analysis of grape genetic diversity as a tool for germplasm collection management. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 122:1233-1245.
77. Cipriani G., et al. The SSR-based molecular profile of 1005 grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) accessions uncovers new synonymy and parentages, and reveals a large admixture amongst varieties of different geographic origin. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2010, 121:1569-1585.
78. Myles S., et al. Genetic structure and domestication history of the grape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:3530-3535.
79. Myles S., et al. Rapid genomic characterization of the genus Vitis. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e8219.
80. Elshire R.J., et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e19379.
81. Riedelsheimer C., et al. Genome-wide association mapping of leaf metabolic profiles for dissecting complex traits in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:8872-8877.
82. Winzeler E.A., et al. Direct allelic variation scanning of the yeast genome. Science 1998, 281:1194-1197.
83. Ehrenreich I.M., et al. Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants. Nature 2010, 464:1039-1042.
84. Katou T., et al. QTL mapping of sake brewing characteristics of yeast. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2009, 107:383-393.
85. Marullo P., et al. Single QTL mapping and nucleotide-level resolution of a physiologic trait in wine Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007, 7:941-952.
86. Ambroset C., et al. Deciphering the molecular basis of wine yeast fermentation traits using a combined genetic and genomic approach. G3 (Bethesda) 2011, 1:263-281.
87. Kutyna D.R., et al. Microbiological approaches to lowering ethanol concentration in wine. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 21:293-302.
88. Varela C., et al. Taking control of alcohol. Aust. N. Z. Wine Ind. J. 2008, 23:41-43.
89. Kutyna D.R., et al. Adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to generate strains with enhanced glycerol production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93:1175-1184.
90. Gadoury D.M., et al. Grapevine powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator): a fascinating system for the study of the biology, ecology and epidemiology of an obligate biotroph. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012, 13:1-16.
91. Chaïb J., et al. The grape microvine - a model system for rapid forward and reverse genetics of grapevines. Plant J. 2010, 62:1083-1092.
92. Bouquet A. Recurrent selection in grapevine breeding. Agronomie 1981, 1:65-73.
93. Di Gaspero G., Cattonaro F. Application of genomics to grapevine improvement. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2010, 16:122-130.
94. Dandekar A.M., et al. An engineered innate immune defense protects grapevines from Pierce disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:3721-3725.
95. Casagrande K., et al. Defence responses in Rpv3-dependent resistance to grapevine downy mildew. Planta 2011, 234:1097-1109.
96. Di Gaspero G., et al. Selective sweep at the Rpv3 locus during grapevine breeding for downy mildew resistance. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 124:277-286.
97. Bellin D., et al. Resistance to Plasmopara viticola in grapevine 'Bianca' is controlled by a major dominant gene causing localised necrosis at the infection site. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 120:163-176.
98. Merdinoglu D., et al. Genetic analysis of downy mildew resistance derived from Muscadinia rotundifolia. Acta Horticult. 2003, 1:451-456.
99. Schwander F., et al. Rpv10: a new locus from the Asian Vitis gene pool for pyramiding downy mildew resistance loci in grapevine. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 124:163-176.
100. Blasi P., et al. Construction of a reference linkage map of Vitis amurensis and genetic mapping of Rpv8, a locus conferring resistance to grapevine downy mildew. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2011, 123:43-53.
101. Peressotti E., et al. Breakdown of resistance to grapevine downy mildew upon limited deployment of a resistant variety. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10:147.