Identification of tissue-specific, abiotic stress-responsive gene expression patterns in wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) based on curation and mining of large-scale EST data sets

BMC Plant Biology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Tillett, Richard L ^a   Ergül, Ali ^b   Albion, Rebecca L ^a   Schlauch, Karen A ^a   Cramer, Grant R ^a   Cushman, John C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE; VITIS VINIFERA;

PLANT RNA;

ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA MINING; DNA MICROARRAY; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAG; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LIBRARY; GENETICS; GRAPE; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT GENE; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DATA MINING; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; FRUIT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENE LIBRARY; GENES, PLANT; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, PLANT; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; VITIS;

EID: 79955961678     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-86     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Jaillon O, Aury J, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, Choisne N, Aubourg S, Vitulo N, Jubin C, Vezzi A, Legeai F, Hugueney P, Dasilva C, Horner D, Mica E, Jublot D, Poulain J, Bruyère C, Billault A, Segurens B, Gouyvenoux M, Ugarte E, Cattonaro F, Anthouard V, Vico V, Del Fabbro C, Alaux M, Di Gaspero G, Dumas V, et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature 2007, 449:463-467. 10.1038/nature06148, 17721507.
2. Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Troggio M, Cartwright D, Cestaro A, Pruss D, Pindo M, Fitzgerald L, Vezzulli S, Reid J, Malacarne G, Iliev D, Coppola G, Wardell B, Micheletti D, Macalma T, Facci M, Mitchell J, Perazzolli M, Eldredge G, Gatto P, Oyzerski R, Moretto M, Gutin N, Stefanini M, Chen Y, Segala C, Davenport C, Demattè L, Mraz A, et al. A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. PLoS ONE 2007, 2:e1326. 10.1371/journal.pone.0001326, 2147077, 18094749.
3. Scalabrin S, Troggio M, Moroldo M, Pindo M, Felice N, Coppola G, Prete G, Malacarne G, Marconi R, Faes G, Jurman I, Grando S, Jesse T, Segala C, Valle G, Policriti A, Fontana P, Morgante M, Velasco R. Physical mapping in highly heterozygous genomes: a physical contig map of the Pinot Noir grapevine cultivar. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:204. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-204, 2865496, 20346114.
4. Romieu C, Kappel C, Delrot S. Functional genomics: Closed system approaches for transcriptome analysis. Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Grapes 2011, 270-298. New York, NY: CRC Press, Adam-Blondon A-F, Martinez-Zapata J, Kole C.
5. Tillett R, Cushman J. Vitis functional genomics: Open systems for transcriptome analysis. Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Grapes 2011, 235-269. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers, Adam-Blondon A-F, Martinez-Zapata J, Kole C.
6. da Silva F, Iandolino A, Al-Kayal F, Bohlmann M, Cushman M, Lim H, Ergul A, Figueroa R, Kabuloglu E, Osborne C, Rowe J, Tattersall E, Leslie A, Xu J, Baek J, Cramer G, Cushman J, Cook D. Characterizing the grape transcriptome. Analysis of expressed sequence tags from multiple Vitis species and development of a compendium of gene expression during berry development. Plant Physiol 2005, 139:574-597. 10.1104/pp.105.065748, 1255978, 16219919.
7. Iandolino A, Nobuta K, da Silva F, Cook D, Meyers B. Comparative expression profiling in grape (Vitis vinifera) berries derived from frequency analysis of ESTs and MPSS signatures. BMC Plant Biol 2008, 8:53. 10.1186/1471-2229-8-53, 2423195, 18474095.
8. Mica E, Piccolo V, Delledonne M, Ferrarini A, Pezzotti M, Casati C, Del Fabbro C, Valle G, Policriti A, Morgante M, Pesole G, Pe ME, Horner D. Correction: High throughput approaches reveal splicing of primary microRNA transcripts and tissue specific expression of mature microRNAs in Vitis vinifera. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:109. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-109, 2831844, 20152027.
9. Zenoni S, Ferrarini A, Giacomelli E, Xumerle L, Fasoli M, Malerba G, Bellin D, Pezzotti M, Delledonne M. Characterization of transcriptional complexity during berry development in Vitis vinifera using RNA-Seq. Plant Physiol 2010, 152:1787-1795. 10.1104/pp.109.149716, 2850006, 20118272.
10. Cramer G, Ergül A, Grimplet J, Tillett R, Tattersall E, Bohlman M, Vincent D, Sonderegger J, Evans J, Osborne C, Quilici D, Schlauch K, Schooley D, Cushman J. Water and salinity stress in grapevines: early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles. Funct Integr Genomics 2007, 7:111-134. 10.1007/s10142-006-0039-y, 17136344.
11. Grimplet J, Deluc L, Tillett R, Wheatley M, Schlauch K, Cramer G, Cushman J. Tissue-specific mRNA expression profiling in grape berry tissues. BMC Genomics 2007, 8:187. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-187, 1925093, 17584945.
12. Chervin C, Tira-Umphon A, Terrier N, Zouine M, Severac D, Roustan J. Stimulation of the grape berry expansion by ethylene and effects on related gene transcripts, over the ripening phase. Physiol Plant 2008, 134:534-546. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01158.x, 18785902.
13. Polesani M, Bortesi L, Ferrarini A, Zamboni A, Fasoli M, Zadra C, Lovato A, Pezzotti M, Delledonne M, Polverari A. General and species-specific transcriptional responses to downy mildew infection in a susceptible (Vitis vinifera) and a resistant (V. riparia) grapevine species. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:117. 10.1186/1471-2164-11-117, 2831845, 20167053.
14. Walker RR, Törökfalvy E, Scott NS, Kriedemann PE. An analysis of photosynthetic response to salt treatment in Vitis vinifera. Aust J Plant Physiol 1981, 8:359-374.
15. Prior L, Grieve A, Cullis B. Sodium chloride and soil texture interactions in irrigated field grown Sultana grapevines. 1. Yield and fruit quality. Aust J Plant Physiol 1992, 43:1067-1083.
16. Stevens R, Harvey G, Partington D, Coombe B. Irrigation of grapevines with saline water at different growth stages 1. Effects on soil, vegetative growth, and yield. Austral J Agric Res 1999, 50:343-355.
17. Sinclair C, Hoffmann AA. Monitoring salt stress in grapevines: are measures of plant trait variability useful?. J Appl Ecol 2003, 40:928-937.
18. Mullins MG, Bouquet A, Williams LE. Biology of the grapevine. 1992, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Castellarin S, Pfeiffer A, Sivilotti P, Degan M, Peterlunger E, DI Gaspero G. Transcriptional regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in ripening fruits of grapevine under seasonal water deficit. Plant Cell Environ 2007, 30:1381-1399. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01716.x, 17897409.
20. Esteban M, Villanueva M, Lissarrague J. Effect of irrigation on changes in the anthocyanin composition of the skin of cv Tempranillo (Vitis vinifera L.) grape berries during ripening. J Sci Food Agric 2001, 81:409-420.
21. Kennedy JA, Matthews MA, Waterhouse AL. Effect of maturity and vine water status on grape skin and wine flavonoids. Am J Enol Vitic 2002, 53:268-274.
22. Castellarin S, Matthews M, Di Gaspero G, Gambetta G. Water deficits accelerate ripening and induce changes in gene expression regulating flavonoid biosynthesis in grape berries. Planta 2007, 227:101-112. 10.1007/s00425-007-0598-8, 17694320.
23. Waters DLE, Holton TA, Ablett EM, Slade Lee L, Henry RJ. The ripening wine grape berry skin transcriptome. Plant Science 2006, 171:132-138.
24. Deluc L, Grimplet J, Wheatley M, Tillett R, Quilici D, Osborne C, Schooley D, Schlauch K, Cushman J, Cramer G. Transcriptomic and metabolite analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon grape berry development. BMC Genomics 2007, 8:429. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-429, 2220006, 18034876.
25. Chen JY, Wen PF, Kong WF, Pan QH, Wan SB, Huang WD. Changes and subcellular localizations of the enzymes involved in phenylpropanoid metabolism during grape berry development. J Plant Physiol 2006, 163:115-127. 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.07.006, 16399002.
26. Davies C, Robinson S. Differential screening indicates a dramatic change in mRNA profiles during grape berry ripening. Cloning and characterization of cDNAs encoding putative cell wall and stress response proteins. Plant Physiol 2000, 122:803-812. 10.1104/pp.122.3.803, 58916, 10712544.
27. Deluc LG, Quilici DR, Decendit A, Grimplet J, Wheatley MD, Schlauch KA, Merillon JM, Cushman JC, Cramer GR. Water deficit alters differentially metabolic pathways affecting important flavor and quality traits in grape berries of Cabernet Sauvignon and Chardonnay. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:212. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-212, 2701440, 19426499.
28. Pilati S, Perazzolli M, Malossini A, Cestaro A, Demattè L, Fontana P, Dal Ri A, Viola R, Velasco R, Moser C. Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of grapevine berry ripening reveals a set of genes similarly modulated during three seasons and the occurrence of an oxidative burst at vèraison. BMC Genomics 2007, 8:428. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-428, 2228314, 18034875.
29. Waters DLE, Holton TA, Ablett EM, Lee LS, Henry RJ. cDNA microarray analysis of developing grape (Vitis vinifera cv. Shiraz) berry skin. Funct Integr Genomics 2005, 5:40-58. 10.1007/s10142-004-0124-z, 15480888.
30. Terrier N, Glissant D, Grimplet J, Barrieu F, Abbal P, Couture C, Ageorges A, Atanassova R, Leon C, Renaudin J, Dedaldechamp F, Romieu C, Delrot S, Hamdi S. Isogene specific oligo arrays reveal multifaceted changes in gene expression during grape berry (Vitis vinifera L.) development. Planta 2005, 222:832-847. 10.1007/s00425-005-0017-y, 16151847.
31. Tattersall E, Grimplet J, DeLuc L, Wheatley M, Vincent D, Osborne C, Ergül A, Lomen E, Blank R, Schlauch K, Cushman J, Cramer G. Transcript abundance profiles reveal larger and more complex responses of grapevine to chilling compared to osmotic and salinity stress. Funct Integr Genomics 2007, 7:317-333. 10.1007/s10142-007-0051-x, 17578611.
32. Figueiredo A, Fortes A, Ferreira S, Sebastiana M, Choi Y, Sousa L, Acioli-Santos B, Pessoa F, Verpoorte R, Pais M. Transcriptional and metabolic profiling of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) leaves unravel possible innate resistance against pathogenic fungi. J Exp Bot 2008, 59:3371-3381. 10.1093/jxb/ern187, 18648103.
33. Rotter A, Camps C, Lohse M, Kappel C, Pilati S, Hren M, Stitt M, Coutos-Thevenot P, Moser C, Usadel B, Delrot S, Gruden K. Gene expression profiling in susceptible interaction of grapevine with its fungal pathogen Eutypa lata: extending MapMan ontology for grapevine. BMC Plant Biol 2009, 9:104. 10.1186/1471-2229-9-104, 2731041, 19656401.
34. Keilin T, Pang X, Venkateswari J, Halaly T, Crane O, Keren A, Ogrodovitch A, Ophir R, Volpin H, Galbraith D, Or E. Digital expression profiling of a grape-bud EST collection leads to new insight into molecular events during grape-bud dormancy release. Plant Sci 2007, 173:446-457.
35. Mathiason K, He D, Grimplet J, Venkateswari J, Galbraith D, Or E, Fennell A. Transcript profiling in Vitis riparia during chilling requirement fulfillment reveals coordination of gene expression patterns with optimized bud break. Funct Integr Genomics 2009, 9:81-96. 10.1007/s10142-008-0090-y, 18633655.
36. Sreekantan L, Mathiason K, Grimplet J, Schlauch K, Dickerson JA, Fennell AY. Differential floral development and gene expression in grapevines during long and short photoperiods suggests a role for floral genes in dormancy transitioning. Plant Mol Biol 2010, 73:191-205. 10.1007/s11103-010-9611-x, 20151315.
37. Cushman JC, Bohnert HJ. Genomic approaches to plant stress tolerance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2000, 3:117-124. 10.1016/S1369-5266(99)00052-7, 10712956.
38. Chinnusamy V, Jagendorf A, Zhu JK. Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci 2005, 45:437-448.
39. Brunet J, Varrault G, Zuily-Fodil Y, Repellin A. Accumulation of lead in the roots of grass pea (Lathyrus sativus L.) plants triggers systemic variation in gene expression in the shoots. Chemosphere 2009, 77:1113-1120. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.058, 19726070.
40. Huang KS, Lin M, Cheng GF. Anti-inflammatory tetramers of resveratrol from the roots of Vitis amurensis and the conformations of the seven-membered ring in some oligostilbenes. Phytochem 2001, 58:357-362.
41. Zhu YJ, Agbayani R, Jackson MC, Tang CS, Moore PH. Expression of the grapevine stilbene synthase gene VST1 in papaya provides increased resistance against diseases caused by Phytophthora palmivora. Planta 2004, 220:241-250. 10.1007/s00425-004-1343-1, 15309535.
42. Moser C, Segala C, Fontana P, Salakhudtinov I, Gatto P, Pindo M, Zyprian E, Toepfer R, Grando M, Velasco R. Comparative analysis of expressed sequence tags from different organs of Vitis vinifera L. Funct Integ Genomics 2005, 5:208-217.
43. Zhang J, Hausmann L, Eibach R, Welter LJ, Topfer R, Zyprian EM. A framework map from grapevine V3125 (Vitis vinifera 'Schiava grossa' x 'Riesling') x rootstock cultivar 'Borner' (Vitis riparia x Vitis cinerea) to localize genetic determinants of phylloxera root resistance. Theor Appl Genet 2009, 119:1039-1051. 10.1007/s00122-009-1107-1, 19626311.
44. Choi YJ, Yun HK, Park KS, Noh JH, Heo YY, Kim SH, Kim DW, Lee HJ. Transcriptional profiling of ESTs responsive to Rhizobium vitis from 'Tamnara' grapevines (Vitis sp.). J Plant Physiol 2010, 167:1084-1092. 10.1016/j.jplph.2010.02.005, 20398958.
45. Terrier N, Ageorges A, Abbal P, Romieu C. Generation of EST from grape berry at various developmental stages. J Plant Physiol 2001, 158:1575-1583.
46. Peng F, Reid K, Liao N, Schlosser J, Lijavetzky D, Holt R, Martínez Zapater J, Jones S, Marra M, Bohlmann J, Lund S. Generation of ESTs in Vitis vinifera wine grape (Cabernet Sauvignon) and table grape (Muscat Hamburg) and discovery of new candidate genes with potential roles in berry development. Gene 2007, 402:40-50. 10.1016/j.gene.2007.07.016, 17761391.
47. Lin H, Doddapaneni H, Takahashi Y, Walker M. Comparative analysis of ESTs involved in grape responses to Xylella fastidiosa infection. BMC Plant Biol 2007, 7:8. 10.1186/1471-2229-7-8, 1821027, 17316447.
48. Vitis vinifera-UniGene Build #12. , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/UniGene/UGOrg.cgi?TAXID=29760
49. DFCI - Grape Gene Index. , http://compbio.dfci.harvard.edu/tgi/cgi-bin/tgi/gimain.pl?gudb=grape
50. Iandolino AB, da Silva FG, Lim H, Choi H, Williams LE, Cook DR. High-quality RNA, cDNA, and derived EST libraries from grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant Mol Biol Rep 2004, 22:269-278.
51. Gibbs AJ, McIntyre GA. The diagram method for comparing sequences. its use with amino acid and nucleotide sequences. Eur J Biochem 1970, 16:1-11. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1970.tb01046.x, 5456129.
52. Haverty PM, Hsiao LL, Gullans SR, Hansen U, Weng Z. Limited agreement among three global gene expression methods highlights the requirement for non-global validation. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:3431-3441. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth421, 15256402.
53. Romualdi C, Bortoluzzi S, D'Alessi F, Danieli GA. IDEG6: a web tool for detection of differentially expressed genes in multiple tag sampling experiments. Physiol Genomics 2003, 12:159-162.
54. Romualdi C, Bortoluzzi S, Danieli GA. Detecting differentially expressed genes in multiple tag sampling experiments: comparative evaluation of statistical tests. Hum Mol Genet 2001, 10:2133-2141. 10.1093/hmg/10.19.2133, 11590130.
55. Grimplet J, Cramer GR, Dickerson JA, Mathiason K, Van Hemert J, Fennell AY. VitisNet: "Omics" integration through grapevine molecular networks. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e8365. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008365, 2791446, 20027228.
56. Grandbastien MA, Audeon C, Bonnivard E, Casacuberta JM, Chalhoub B, Costa AP, Le QH, Melayah D, Petit M, Poncet C, Tam SM, Van Sluys MA, Mhiri C. Stress activation and genomic impact of Tnt1 retrotransposons in Solanaceae. Cytogenet Genome Res 2005, 110:229-241. 10.1159/000084957, 16093677.
57. van Ruissen F, Ruijter JM, Schaaf GJ, Asgharnegad L, Zwijnenburg DA, Kool M, Baas F. Evaluation of the similarity of gene expression data estimated with SAGE and Affymetrix GeneChips. BMC Genomics 2005, 6:91. 10.1186/1471-2164-6-91, 1186021, 15955238.
58. Li S, Li YH, Wei T, Su EW, Duffin K, Liao B. Too much data, but little inter-changeability: a lesson learned from mining public data on tissue specificity of gene expression. Biol Direct 2006, 1:33. 10.1186/1745-6150-1-33, 1634740, 17064414.
59. Pertea G, Huang X, Liang F, Antonescu V, Sultana R, Karamycheva S, Lee Y, White J, Cheung F, Parvizi B, Tsai J, Quackenbush J. TIGR Gene Indices clustering tools (TGICL): a software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:651-652. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg034, 12651724.
60. Audic S, Claverie J. The significance of digital gene expression profiles. Genome Res 1997, 7:986-995.
61. Martin D, Aubourg S, Schouwey M, Daviet L, Schalk M, Toub O, Lund S, Bohlmann J. Functional annotation, genome organization and phylogeny of the grapevine (Vitis vinifera) terpene synthase gene family based on genome assembly, FLcDNA cloning, and enzyme assays. BMC Plant Biology 2010, 10:226. 10.1186/1471-2229-10-226, 3017849, 20964856.
62. Stekel DJ, Git Y, Falciani F. The comparison of gene expression from multiple cDNA libraries. Genome Res 2000, 10:2055-2061. 10.1101/gr.GR-1325RR, 313085, 11116099.
63. Hornshoj H, Bendixen E, Conley LN, Andersen PK, Hedegaard J, Panitz F, Bendixen C. Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of two porcine tissues using high-throughput technologies. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:30. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-30, 2633351, 19152685.
64. Weinl S, Kudla J. The CBL-CIPK Ca2+-decoding signaling network: function and perspectives. New Phytol 2009, 184:517-528. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02938.x, 19860013.
65. Batistic O, Waadt R, Steinhorst L, Held K, Kudla J. CBL-mediated targeting of CIPKs facilitates the decoding of calcium signals emanating from distinct cellular stores. Plant J 2010, 61:211-222.
66. Hanana M, Deluc L, Fouquet R, Daldoul S, Léon C, Barrieu F, Ghorbel A, Mliki A, Hamdi S. Identification and characterization of "rd22" dehydration responsive gene in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). C R Biol 2008, 331:569-578. 10.1016/j.crvi.2008.05.002, 18606386.
67. Almasia N, Bazzini A, Hopp H, azquez-Rovere C. Overexpression of snakin-1 gene enhances resistance to Rhizoctonia solani and Erwinia carotovora in transgenic potato plants. Mol Plant Pathol 2008, 9:329-338. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00469.x, 18705874.
68. Bonaldo M, Lennon G, Soares M. Normalization and subtraction: two approaches to facilitate gene discovery. Genome Res 1996, 6:791-806. 10.1101/gr.6.9.791, 8889548.
69. Fouquet R, Leon C, Ollat N, Barrieu F. Identification of grapevine aquaporins and expression analysis in developing berries. Plant Cell Rep 2008, 27:1541-1550. 10.1007/s00299-008-0566-1, 18560835.
70. Shelden M, Howitt S, Kaiser B, Tyerman S. Identification and functional characterisation of aquaporins in the grapevine, Vitis vinifera. Funct Plant Biol 2009, 36:1065-1078.
71. Schmidlin L, Poutaraud A, Claudel P, Mestre P, Prado E, Santos-Rosa M, Wiedemann-Merdinoglu S, Karst F, Merdinoglu D, Hugueney P. A stress-inducible resveratrol O-methyltransferase involved in the biosynthesis of pterostilbene in grapevine. Plant Physiol 2008, 148:1630-1639. 10.1104/pp.108.126003, 2577258, 18799660.
72. Deluc LG, Decendit A, Papastamoulis Y, Merillon JM, Cushman JC, Cramer GR. Water deficit increases stilbene metabolism in Cabernet Sauvignon berries. J Agric Food Chem 2010, 59:289-297. 3015458, 21128664.
73. Kim SJ, Kim KW, Cho MH, Franceschi VR, Davin LB, Lewis NG. Expression of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenases and their putative homologues during Arabidopsis thaliana growth and development: Lessons for database annotations?. Phytochem 2007, 68:1957-1974.
74. Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Fong JH, Geer LY, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, He S, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke Z, Lanczycki CJ, Liebert CA, Liu C, Lu F, Lu S, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Song JS, Tasneem A, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zhang D, Zhang N, Bryant SH. CDD: specific functional annotation with the Conserved Domain Database. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D205-210. 10.1093/nar/gkn845, 2686570, 18984618.
75. He XZ, Wang X, Dixon RA. Mutational analysis of the Medicago glycosyltransferase UGT71G1 reveals residues that control regioselectivity for (iso)flavonoid glycosylation. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:34441-34447. 10.1074/jbc.M605767200, 16982612.
76. Kubo A, Arai Y, Nagashima S, Yoshikawa T. Alteration of sugar donor specificities of plant glycosyltransferases by a single point mutation. Arch Biochem Biophys 2004, 429:198-203. 10.1016/j.abb.2004.06.021, 15313223.
77. Tattersall EAR, Ergul A, AlKayal F, DeLuc L, Cushman JC, Cramer GR. Comparison of methods for isolating high-quality RNA from leaves of grapevine. Am J Enol Vitic 2005, 56:400-406.
78. Murashige T, Skoog F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Plantarum 1962, 15:473-497.
79. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res 1968, 50:151-158. 10.1016/0014-4827(68)90403-5, 5650857.
80. Mao C, Cushman JC, May GD, Weller JW. ESTAP-an automated system for the analysis of EST data. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:1720-1722. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg205, 15593407.
81. Burke J, Davison D, Hide W. d2_cluster: a validated method for clustering EST and full-length cDNA sequences. Genome Res 1999, 9:1135-1142. 10.1101/gr.9.11.1135, 310833, 10568753.
82. Huang X, Madan A. CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program. Genome Res 1999, 9:868-877. 10.1101/gr.9.9.868, 310812, 10508846.
83. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res 1998, 8:175-185.
84. Altschul S, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E, Lipman D. Basic local alignment search tool. J Molec Biol 1990, 215:403-410.
85. cDNA Library 22274 [Vitis vinifera]. , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/UniGene/library.cgi?ORG=Vvi&LID=22274
86. Batch Entrez. , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/batchentrez
87. Index of /externe/Download/Projets/Projet_ML/data. , http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/externe/Download/Projets/Projet_ML/data/
88. Pontius JU, Wagner L, Schuler GD. UniGene: a unified view of the transcriptome. The NCBI Handbook 2003, Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information.
89. DotPlot | Download DotPlot software for free at SourceForge.net. , http://sourceforge.net/projects/dotplot/
90. Eclipse - The Eclipse Foundation open source community website. , http://www.eclipse.org/
91. Journet EP, van Tuinen D, Gouzy J, Crespeau H, Carreau V, Farmer MJ, Niebel A, Schiex T, Jaillon O, Chatagnier O, Godiard L, Micheli F, Kahn D, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gamas P. Exploring root symbiotic programs in the model legume Medicago truncatula using EST analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30:5579-5592. 10.1093/nar/gkf685, 140066, 12490726.
92. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:14863-14868. 10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863, 24541, 9843981.
93. VitisNet. , http://www.sdstate.edu/aes/vitis/pathways.cfm
94. IDEG6 software home page. , http://telethon.bio.unipd.it/bioinfo/IDEG6_form/
95. Primer designing tool. , http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/index.cgi?LINK_LOC=BlastHome
96. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 2000, 132:365-386.
97. Reid KE, Olsson N, Schlosser J, Peng F, Lund ST. An optimized grapevine RNA isolation procedure and statistical determination of reference genes for real-time RT-PCR during berry development. BMC Plant Biol 2006, 6:27. 10.1186/1471-2229-6-27, 1654153, 17105665.