The front end of visual word recognition

Visual Word Recognition Volume 1: Models and Methods, Orthography, and Phonology

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 159-184

  Grainger, Jonathan ^a   Dufau, Stéphane ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880446125     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203107010     Document Type: Chapter

References (111)

1. Adelman, J.S. (2011). Letters in time and retinotopic space. Psychological Review, 118, 570-582.
2. Adelman, J.S., Marquis, S.J., & Sabatos-DeVito, M.G. (2010). Letters in words are read simultaneously, not in left-to-right sequence. Psychological Science, 21, 1799-1801.
3. Atkinson, J., Anker, S., Evans, C., Hall, R., & Pimm-Smith, E. (1988). Visual acuity testing of young children with the Cambridge Crowding Cards at 3 and 6 m. Acta Opthalmologica, 66, 505-508.
4. Averbach, E. & Coriell, A.S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision. Bell Telephone Technical Journal, 40, 19-31.
5. Bar, M., Kassam, K.S., Ghuman, A.S., Boshyan, J., Schmidt, A.M., Dale, A.M., Hamalainen, M.S., Marinkovic, K., Schacter, D.L., Rosen, B.R., & Halgren, E. (2006). Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 449-454.
6. Barnhart, A.S. & Goldinger, S.D. (2011). Interpreting chicken-scratch: Lexical access with handwritten words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 906-923
7. Bendahman, L. A., Vitu, F., and Grainger, J. (2010). Ultra-fast processing of printed words? Perception, 39 (ECVP Abstract Supplement), 147.
8. Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177-8.
9. Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 767-782.
10. Brysbaert, M., Speybroeck, S., & Vanderelst, D. (2009). Is there room for the BBC in the mental lexicon? On the recognition of acronyms. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1832-1842.
11. Butler, B.E. (1975). Selective attention and target search with brief visual displays. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 467-477.
12. Butler, B.E. & Merikle, P.M. (1973). Selective masking and processing strategy. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 542-548.
13. Caramazza, A. & Hillis, A. E. (1990). Spatial representation of words in the brain implied by studies of a unilateral neglect patient. Nature, 346, 267-269.
14. Cattell, J. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 53-65.
15. Chanceaux, M., Vitu, F., Bendahman, L., Thorpe, S., & Grainger, J. (2011). Word processing speed in peripheral vision measured with a saccadic choice task. Vision Research, 56, 10-19.
16. Chauncey, K., Holcomb, P.J., & Grainger, J. (2008). Effects of stimulus font and size on masked repetition priming: An ERP investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 183-200.
17. Chung, S.T.L. (2007). Learning to identify crowded letters: Does it improve reading speed? Vision Research, 47, 3150-3159.
18. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dualroute and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
19. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J.C. (2001). DRC: A dualroute cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
20. Courrieu, P., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J. (2004). Inverse discrimination time as a perceptual distance for alphabetic characters. Visual Cognition, 11, 901-919.
21. Crystal, D. (1987). How many words? English Today, 12, 11-14.
22. Dandurand, F., Grainger, J., Duñabeitia, J.A., & Granier, J.P. (2011). On coding noncontiguous letter combinations. Frontiers in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 136. DOI: 10.3389/ fpsyg.2011.00136.
23. Davis, C.J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word recognition. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758.
24. Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: a proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 335-341.
25. Diependaele, K., Ziegler, J., & Grainger, J. (2010). Fast phonology and the bi-modal interactive activation model. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 764-778.
26. Ducrot, S. & Grainger, J. (2007). Deployment of spatial attention to words in central and peripheral vision. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 578-590.
27. Estes, W.K. (1972). Interactions of signal and background variables in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 278-286.
28. Estes, W.K., Allmeyer, D.H., & Reder, S.M. (1976). Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure durations. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 1-15.
29. Finkbeiner, M. & Coltheart, M. (2009). Letter recognition: From perception to representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26 (1), 1-6.
30. Fischer-Baum, S., McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2010). Representation of letter position in spelling: Evidence from acquired dysgraphia. Cognition, 115, 466-490.
31. Fiset, D., Blais, C., Ethier-Majcher, C., Arguin, M., Bubu, D., & Gosselin, F. (2007). Features for uppercase and lowercase letter identification. Psychological Science, 19, 1161-1168.
32. Geyer, L.H. & DeWald, C.G. (1973). Feature lists and confusion matrices. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 471-482.
33. Gibson, E.J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
34. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601.
35. Gosselin, F. & Schyns, P.G. (2001). Bubbles: A technique to reveal the use of information in recognition. Vision Research, 41, 2261-2271.
36. Grainger, J. & Ferrand, L. (1994). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Effects of masked homophone primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 218-233.
37. Grainger, J. & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: on the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 128-156.
38. Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A.M. (1994). A dual read-out model of word context effects in letter perception: Further investigations of the word superiority effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1158-1176.
39. Grainger, J. & Jacobs, A. (2005). Pseudoword context effects on letter perception: The role of word misperception. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 289-318.
40. Grainger, J. & van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The Mental Lexicon (pp. 1-24). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
41. Grainger, J. & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mind raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 58-59.
42. Grainger, J. & Ziegler, J. (2008). Cross-code consistency effects in visual word recognition. In E.L. Grigorenko and A. Naples (Eds) Single-word reading: Biological and behavioral perspectives (pp. 129-157). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Grainger, J., Diependaele, K., Spinelli, E., Ferrand, L., & Farioli, F. (2003). Masked repetition and phonological priming within and across modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29, 1256-1269.
44. Grainger, J., Granier, J.P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W.J. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 865-884.
45. Grainger, J., Rey, A., & Dufau, S. (2008). Letter perception: From pixels to pandemonium. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 381-387.
46. Grainger, J., Tydgat, I., & Isselé, J. (2010). Crowding affects letters and symbols differently. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 673-688.
47. Grossberg, S. (1978). A theory of human memory: Self-organization and performance of sensory-motor codes, maps, and plans. In R. Rosen & F. Snell (Eds) Progress in Theoretical Biology (pp. 233-374). New York: Academic Press.
48. Haber, R.N. & Standing, L. (1969). Location of errors with a poststimulus indicator. Psychonomic Science, 17, 345-346.
49. Hammond, E.J. & Green, D.W. (1982). Detecting targets in letter and non-letter arrays. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 67-82.
50. Hannagan, T., Dupoux, E., & Christophe, A. (2011). Holographic string encoding. Cognitive Science, 35, 79-118.
51. Heron, W. (1957). Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. American Journal of Psychology, 70, 38-48.
52. Hinton, G.E. (2007). Learning multiple layers of representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 428-434.
53. Hubel, D. & Wiesel, T. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology of London, 160, 106-154.
54. Huckauf, A. & Nazir, T.A. (2007). How odgcrnwi becomes crowding: Stimulus-specific learning reduces crowding. Journal of Vision, 7(2):18, 1-12.
55. Jacobs, A.M., Nazir, T.A., & Heller, O. (1989). Letter perception in peripheral vision: a temporal discrimination matrix using eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 95-102.
56. Jacobs, A.M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J.C., & Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A.M. Jacobs (Eds), Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition (pp. 147-188). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Just, M.A. & Carpenter, P.A. (1987). The Psychology of Reading and Language Comprehension. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
58. Keren, G. & Baggen, S. (1981). Recognition models of alphanumeric characters. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 452-466.
59. Kirchner, H. & Thorpe, S.J. (2006). Ultra-rapid object detection with saccadic eye movements: visual processing speed revisited. Vision Research, 46, 1762-1776.
60. Ktori, M. & Pitchford, N.J. (2008). Effect of orthographic transparency on letter position encoding: A comparison of Greek and English monoscriptal and biscriptal readers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 258-281.
61. Ktori, M., Grainger, J., & Dufau, S. (2012). Letter string processing and visual short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, in press, Doi:10.1080/174702 18.2011.611889.
62. Kwon, M.Y. & Legge, G.E. (2006). Developmental changes in the size of the visual span for reading: effects of crowding. Journal of Vision, 6, 1003a (Abstract).
63. Kwon, M.Y., Legge, G.E., & Dubbels, B.R. (2007). Developmental changes in the visual span for reading. Vision Research, 47, 2889-2890.
64. Lavidor, M. (2010). Whole-word shape effect in dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 34, 443-454.
65. Levi, D.M. (2008). Crowding-an essential bottleneck for object recognition: A minireview. Vision Research, 48, 635-654.
66. McCandliss, B.D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 155-161.
67. McClelland, J.L. & Rumelhart, D.E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
68. Mason, M. (1975). Reading ability and letter search time: Effects of orthographic structure defined by single-letter positional frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 104, 146-166.
69. Mason, M. (1982). Recognition time for letters and nonletters: Effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 724-738.
70. Mason, M. and Katz, L. (1976). Visual processing of nonlinguistic strings: Redundancy effects and reading ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 105, 338-348.
71. Massaro, D.W. & Cohen, M.M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1107-1128.
72. Maurer, U., Brem, S., Kranz, F., Bucher, K., Benz, R., Halder, P., Steinhausen, H.C., & Brandeis, D. (2006). Coarse neural tuning for print peaks when children learn to read. NeuroImage, 33, 749-758.
73. Mayall, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Olson, A. (1997). Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1275-1286.
74. Merikle, P.M., Coltheart, M., & Lowe, D.G. (1971a). On the selective effects of a patterned masking stimulus. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 25, 264-279.
75. Merikle, P.M., Lowe, D.G., & Coltheart, M. (1971b). Familiarity and method of report as determinants of tachistoscopic performance. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 25, 167-174.
76. Mewhort, D.J.K. & Campbell, A.J. (1978). Processing spatial information and the selective-masking effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 93-101.
77. Paap, K., Newsome, S.L., McDonald, J.E., & Schvaneveldt, R.W. (1982). An activationverification model for letter and word recognition: The word superiority effect. Psychological Review, 89, 573-594.
78. Paap, K.R., Newsome, S.L., & Noel, R.W. (1984). Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 413-428.
79. Pelli, D.G. & Tillman, K.A. (2007). Parts, wholes, and context in reading: A triple dissociation. PLoS ONE, 2 (8): e680. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000680
80. Pelli, D.G. & Tillman, K.A. (2008). The uncrowded window of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1129-1135.
81. Pelli, D.G., Burns, C.W., Farrell, B., & Moore-Page, D.C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46, 4646-4674.
82. Pelli, D.G., Tillman, K.A., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, T.D., & Majaj, N.J. (2007). Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision, 7(2):20, 1-36.
83. Perea, M. & Lupker, S.J. (2004). Can caniso activate casino? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
84. Perea, M. & Rosa, E. (2002). Does 'whole-word shape' play a role in visual word recognition? Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 785-794.
85. Peressotti, F. & Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 691-706.
86. Perry, C., Ziegler, J.C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP + model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273-315.
87. Pitchford, N.J., Ledgeway, T., & Masterson, J. (2008). Effect of orthographic processes in letter position encoding. Journal of Research in Reading: Special Issue-Orthographic Processes in Reading, 31, 97-116.
88. Plaut, D.C., McClelland, J.L., Seidenberg, M.S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
89. Podgorny, P. & Garner, W. (1979). Reaction time as a measure of inter-and intraobject visual similarity: Letters of the alphabet. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 37-52.
90. Rayner, K. (1979). Eye guidance in reading: Fixation location within words. Perception, 8, 21-30.
91. Reicher, G.M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 275-280.
92. Rey, A., Dufau, S., Massol, S., & Grainger, J. (2009). Testing computational models of letter perception with item-level ERPs. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 7-22.
93. Riesenhuber, M. & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1019-1025.
94. Schoonbaert, S. & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
95. Schwantes, F.M. (1978). Stimulus position functions in tachistoscopic identification tasks: Scanning, rehearsal, and order of report. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 219-226.
96. Seidenberg, M.S. & McClelland, J.L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
97. Selfridge, O.G. (1959). Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning. In D. V. Blake & A. M. Uttley (Eds), Proceedings of the Symposium on Mechanisation of Thought Processes (pp. 511-529). London: H. M. Stationery Office.
98. Selfridge, O.G. & Neisser, U. (1960). Pattern recognition by machine. Scientific American, 20, 60-68.
99. Solomon, J.A. & Pelli, D.G. (1994). The visual filter mediating letter identification. Nature, 369, 395-397.
100. Stevens, M. & Grainger, J. (2003). Letter visibility and the viewing position effect in visual word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 133-151.
101. Tydgat, I. & Grainger, J. (2009). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 480-498.
102. Van Assche, E. & Grainger, J. (2006). A study of relative-position priming with superset primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 399-415.
103. Van der Heijden, A.H.C. (1992). Selective attention in vision. London: Routledge.
104. Welvaert, M., Farioli, F., & Grainger, J. (2008). Graded effects of number of inserted letters in superset priming. Experimental Psychology, 55, 54-63.
105. Wheeler, D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59-85.
106. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: the SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243.
107. Whitney, C. (2008). Supporting the serial in the SERIOL model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 824-865.
108. Whitney, C. & Cornelissen, P. (2008). SERIOL reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 143-164.
109. Williamson, K., Scolari, M., Jeong, S., Kim, M.S., & Awh, E. (2009). Experiencedependent changes in the topography of visual crowding. Journal of Vision, 9, 1-9.
110. Wolford, G. & Hollingsworth, S. (1974). Retinal location and string position as important variables in visual information processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 437-442.
111. Ziegler, J.C., Pech-Georgel, C., Dufau, S., & Grainger, J. (2010). Rapid processing of letters, digits, and symbols: What purely visual-attentional deficit in developmental dyslexia? Developmental Science, 13, 8-14.