Interpreting chicken-scratch: Lexical access for handwritten words

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 906-923

  Barnhart, Anthony S ^a   Goldinger, Stephen D ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Handwriting; Lexical access; Reading; Top down processing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HANDWRITING; HUMAN; LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; READING; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS;

ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; HANDWRITING; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; READING; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS;

EID: 77955822801     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019258     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Allport D.A., Funnell E. Components of the mental lexicon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences 1981, 295:397-410.
2. Balota D.A., Chumbley J.I. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:340-357.
3. Balota D.A., Cortese M.J., Sergent-Marshall S.D., Spieler D.H., Yap M.J. Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133:283-316.
4. Balota D.A., Spieler D.H. Word frequency, repetition, and lexicality effects in word recognition tasks: Beyond measures of central tendency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1999, 128:32-55.
5. Balota D.A., Yap M.J., Cortese M.J., Watson J.M. Beyond mean response latency: Response time distributional analyses of semantic priming. Journal of Memory and Language 2008, 59:495-523.
6. Becker C.A., Killion T. Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1977, 3:389-401.
7. Besner D., Johnston J.C. Reading and the mental lexicon: On the uptake of visual information. Lexical representation and process 1989, 291-316. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. W. Marslen-Wilson (Ed.).
8. Brown J.S., Carr T.H. Limits on perceptual abstraction in reading: Asymmetric transfer between surface forms differing in typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1993, 19:1277-1296.
9. Cole R.A., Coltheart M., Allard F. Memory of a speaker's voice: Reaction time to same- or different-voiced letters. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1974, 26:1-7.
10. Coltheart M., Curtis B., Atkins P., Haller M. Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review 1993, 100:589-608.
11. Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J. DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review 2001, 108:204-256.
12. Corcoran D.W., Rouse R.O. An aspect of perceptual organization involved in reading typed and handwritten words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1970, 22:526-530.
13. Cortese M.J., Khanna M.M. Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2007, 60:1072-1082.
14. Cortese M.J., Khanna M.M. Age of acquisition ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words. Behavior Research Methods 2008, 40:791-794.
15. Duffy S.A., Pisoni D.B. Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: A review and theoretical interpretation. Language & Speech 1992, 35:351-389.
16. Faust M.E., Balota D.A., Spieler D.H., Ferraro F.R. Individual differences in information processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency. Psychological Bulletin 1999, 125:777-799.
17. Fowler C.A. Parsing coarticulated speech in perception: Effects of coarticulation resistance. Journal of Phonetics 2005, 33:199-213.
18. Furnham A., Gunter B. Graphology and personality: Another failure to validate graphological analysis. Personality and Individual Differences 1987, 8:433-435.
19. Galantucci B., Fowler C.A., Turvey M.T. The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:361-377.
20. Glushko R.J. The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1979, 5:674-691.
21. Goldinger S.D. Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1996, 22:1166-1183.
22. Goldinger S.D., Pisoni D.B., Luce P.A. Speech perception and spoken word recognition: Research and theory. Principles of experimental phonetics 1996, 277-327. Mosby, St. Louis. N.J. Laas (Ed.).
23. Graham S., Harris K.R., Fink B. Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology 2000, 92:620-633.
24. Grainger J., Jacobs A.M. Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review 1996, 103:518-565.
25. Harm M.W., Seidenberg M.S. Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review 2004, 111:662-720.
26. Hellige J.B., Adamson M.M. Hemispheric differences in processing handwritten cursive. Brain and Language 2007, 102:215-227.
27. Inhoff A.W. Word frequency during copytyping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1991, 17:478-487.
28. Jared D. Spelling-sound consistency and regularity effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language 2002, 46:723-750.
29. Jared D., McRae K., Seidenberg M.S. The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language 1990, 29:687-715.
30. King R.N., Koehler D.J. Illusory correlations in graphological inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2000, 6:336-348.
31. Lacouture Y., Cousineau D. How to use MATLAB to fit the ex-Gaussian and other probability functions to a distribution of response times. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 2008, 4:35-45.
32. Lacruz I., Folk J.R. Feedforward and feedback consistency effects for high- and low-frequency words in lexical decision and naming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 57A:1261-1284.
33. Liberman A.M., Cooper F.S., Shankweiler D.P., Studdert-Kennedy M. Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review 1967, 74:431-461.
34. Liberman A.M., Mattingly I.G. The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 1985, 21:1-36.
35. Loewenthal K. Handwriting and self-presentation. Journal of Social Psychology 1975, 96:267-270.
36. Longcamp M., Tanskanen T., Hari R. The imprint of action: Motor cortex involvement in visual perception of handwritten letters. NeuroImage 2006, 33:681-688.
37. Lorette G. Handwriting recognition or reading? What is the situation at the dawn of the 3rd millennium?. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition 1999, 2:2-12.
38. Manso De Zuniga C., Humphreys G.W., Evett L.J. Additive and interactive effects of repetition, degradation, and word frequency in the reading of handwriting. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition 1991, 10-33. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ. D. Besner, G.W. Humphreys (Eds.).
39. Marsolek C.J. Abstractionist versus exemplar-based theories of visual word priming: A subsystems resolution. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 57A:1233-1259.
40. Massaro D.W., Jesse A. The magic of reading: Too many influences for quick and easy explanations. From orthography to pedagogy: Essays in honor of Richard L. Venezky 2005, 37-61. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. T. Trabasso, J. Sabatini, D.W. Massaro, R.C. Calfee (Eds.).
41. McClelland J.L., Rumelhart D.E. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review 1981, 88:375-407.
42. Monaghan J., Ellis A.W. What exactly interacts with spelling-sound consistency in word naming?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:183-206.
43. Neter E., Ben-Shakhar G. The predictive validity of graphological inferences: A meta-analystic approach. Personality and Individual Differences 1989, 10:737-745.
44. Peereman R., Content A., Bonin P. Is perception a two-way street? The case of feedback consistency in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language 1998, 39:151-174.
45. Perry C., Ziegler J.C., Zorzi M. Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review 2007, 114:273-315.
46. Pisoni D.B., Luce P.A. Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition. Cognition 1987, 25:21-52.
47. Plaut D.C., McClelland J.L., Seidenberg M.S., Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review 1996, 103:56-115.
48. Pressler M.W. Handwriting is on the wall [electronic version]. Washington Post 2006, October 11, Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com.
49. Rumelhart D.E., McClelland J.L. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review 1982, 89:60-94.
50. Samuel A.G. Phonemic restoration: Insights from a new methodology. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1981, 110:474-494.
51. Schneider W., Eschman A., Zuccolotto A. E-Prime user's guide 2002, Psychology Software Tools Inc, Pittsburgh.
52. Seidenberg M.S., McClelland J.L. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 1989, 96:523-568.
53. Seidenberg M.S., Waters G.S., Barnes M.A., Tanenhaus M.K. When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition?. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1984, 23:383-404.
54. Shibahara N., Zorzi M., Hill M.P., Wydell T., Butterworth B. Semantic effects in word naming: Evidence from English and Japanese Kanji. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2003, 56A:263-286.
55. Stone G.O., Vanhoy M., Van Orden G.C. Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 36:337-359.
56. Strain E., Herdman C.M. Imageability effects in word naming: An individual differences analysis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 1999, 53:347-359.
57. Strain E., Patterson K., Seidenberg M.S. Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1995, 21:1140-1154.
58. Toglia M.P., Battig W.F. Handbook of semantic word norms 1978, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
59. Van Orden G.C. A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition 1987, 15:181-198.
60. Van Orden G.C., Goldinger S.D. Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994, 20:1269-1291.
61. Walker P. Font tuning: A review and new experimental evidence. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:1022-1058.
62. Ziegler J.C., Montant M., Jacobs A.M. The feedback consistency effect in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language 1997, 37:533-554.
63. Ziegler J.C., Petrova A., Ferrand L. Feedback consistency effects in visual and auditory word recognition: Where do we stand after more than a decade?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 2008, 34:643-661.