Breaking boundaries: Letter transpositions and morphological processing

Language and Cognitive Processes

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 988-1003

  Diependaele, Kevin ^a   Morris, Joanna ^b   Serota, Raphael M ^b   Bertrand, Daisy ^c   Grainger, Jonathan ^c  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^b HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE   (United States)

^c AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

Morphological priming; Semantic transparency; Transposed letters

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LETTER TRANSPOSITION; MALE; MORPHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; SEMANTICS; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 84880414182     PISSN: 01690965     EISSN: 14640732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01690965.2012.719082     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Acha, J. and Perea, M. 2010. Does kaniso activate CASINO? Input coding schemes and phonology in visual-word recognition. Experimental Psychology, 57: 245 - 251.
2. Andrews, S. and Davis, C. J. 1999. Interactive activation accounts of morphological decomposition: Finding the trap in Mousetrap?. Brain and Language, 68: 355 - 361.
3. Baayen, R. H. 2011. languageR: Data sets and functions with "Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics" [R package version 1.2]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=languageR
4. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J. and Bates, D. M. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59: 387 - 556.
5. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. and Gulikers, L. 1995. The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM), Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
6. Bates, D., Maechler M., & Bolker, B. 2011. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes [R package version 0.999375-40]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4
7. Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 57: 289 - 300.
8. Beyersmann, E., Castles, A. and Coltheart, M. 2011. Early morphological decomposition during visual word recognition: Evidence from masked transposed-letter priming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18: 937 - 942.
9. Beyersmann, E., Duñabeitia, J. A., Carreiras, M., Coltheart, M., & Castles, A. 2012. Early morphological decomposition of suffixed words: Masked priming evidence with transposed-letter nonword primes. Applied Psycholinguistics. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000057.
10. Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L. and Rayner, K. 2005. Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 31: 1327 - 1339.
11. Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M. and Nickels, L. 2010. 'Fell' primes 'Fall', but does 'Bell' prime 'Ball'? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63: 83 - 99.
12. Davis, C. J. 1999. The self-organizing lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of New South Wales, Australia.
13. Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. 2010. Form and meaning in early morphological processing: Comment on Feldman, O'Connor and Moscoso del Prado Martin. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 749 - 755.
14. Diependaele, K., Grainger, J. and Sandra, D. 2012. " Derivational morphology and skilled reading: An empirical overview ". In The Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics, Edited by: Spivey, M., Joanisse, M. and McRae, K. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D. and Grainger, J. 2005. Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unraveling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20: 75 - 114.
16. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D. and Grainger, J. 2009. Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37: 895 - 908.
17. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M. and Carreiras, M. 2007. Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105: 691 - 703.
18. Feldman, L. B., O'Connor, P. A. and Moscoso del Prado Martin, F. 2009. Early morphological processing is morpho-semantic and not simply morpho-orthographic: A violation of form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16: 684 - 691.
19. Forster, K. I. and Forster, J. 2003. DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35: 116 - 124.
20. Giraudo, H. and Grainger, J. 2001. Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8: 127 - 131.
21. Grainger, J. 2008. Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23: 1 - 35.
22. Grainger, J., Colé, P. and Segui, J. 1991. Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 30: 370 - 384.
23. Grainger, J. and Dufau, S. 2012. " The front-end of visual word recognition ". In Visual word recognition, vol. 1: Models and methods, orthography and phonology, Edited by: Adelman, J. S. 159 - 185. Hove: Psychology Press.
24. Grainger, J. and Holcomb, P. J. 2009. Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3: 128 - 156.
25. Grainger, J., Lété, B., Bertrand, D., Dufau, S. and Ziegler, J. C. 2012. Evidence for multiple routes in learning to read. Cognition, 123: 280 - 292.
26. Grainger, J. and Whitney, C. 2004. Does the huamn mind raed wrods as a wlohe?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 58 - 59.
27. Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. 2011. A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
28. Landauer, T. K. and Dumais, S. T. 1997. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104: 211 - 240.
29. Longtin, C.-M. and Meunier, F. 2005. Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53: 26 - 41.
30. Morris, J., Frank, T., Grainger, J. and Holcomb, P. J. 2007. Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: An ERP investigation. Psychophysiology, 44: 506 - 521.
31. Morris, J., Porter, J. H., Grainger, J. and Holcomb, P. J. 2011. Effects of lexical status and morphological complexity in masked priming: An ERP study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26: 558 - 599.
32. New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M. and Ferrand, L. 2004. Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36: 516 - 524.
33. Perea, M. and Lupker, S. J. 2004. Can Caniso activate Casino? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51: 231 - 246.
34. R Development Core Team 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0; Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
35. Rastle, K. and Davis, M. H. 2008. Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23: 942 - 971.
36. Rayner, K., White, S. J., Johnson, R. L. and Liversedge, S. P. 2006. Raeding wrods with jubmled lettres: There is a cost. Psychological Science, 17: 192 - 193.
37. Rueckl, J. G. and Rimzhim, A. 2011. On the interaction of letter transpositions and morphemic boundaries. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26: 482 - 508.
38. Schreuder, R. and Baayen, R. H. 1995. " Modeling morphological processing ". In Morphological aspects of language processing, Edited by: Feldman, L. B. 131 - 156. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.