Early morphological decomposition during visual word recognition: Evidence from masked transposed-letter priming

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 937-942

  Beyersmann, Elisabeth ^a   Castles, Anne ^a   Coltheart, Max ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Masked priming; Morphological decomposition; Morphological processing; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 80053109266     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0120-y     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Andrews, S. (1996). Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 775-800. doi: 10. 1006/jmla. 1996. 0040.
2. Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
4. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
5. Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representations. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 257-294). London: Academic Press.
6. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.
7. Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 1327-1339.
8. Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2010). "Fell" primes "fall", but does "bell" prime "ball"? Masked priming with irregularly-inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 83-99. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2010. 03. 002.
9. Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713-758.
10. Diependaele, K., Sandra, D., & Grainger, J. (2009). Semantic transparency and masked morphological priming: The case of prefixed words. Memory & Cognition, 37, 895-908. doi: 10. 3758/MC. 37. 6. 895.
11. Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703.
12. Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251. doi: 10. 1080/14640748708401785.
13. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
14. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2000). Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 421-444. doi: 10. 1080/01690960050119652.
15. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence for supralexical representation of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 127-131. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196148.
16. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2003). A supralexical lexical model for French derivational morphology. In E. M. H. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words: Cross-language studies (pp. 139-157). New York: Kluwer Academic.
17. Longtin, C.-M., & Meunier, F. (2005). Morphological decomposition in early visual word processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 26-41.
18. Longtin, C.-M., Segui, J., & Hallé, P. A. (2003). Morphological priming without morphological relationship. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 313-334. doi: 10. 1080/01690960244000036.
19. Manelis, L., & Tharp, D. (1977). The processing of affixed words. Memory & Cognition, 5, 690-695.
20. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33. doi: 10. 1037/0033-295X. 101. 1. 3.
21. McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2008). Is there a "fete" in "fetish"? Effects of orthographic opacity on morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 307-326. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2007. 05. 006.
22. McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2009). Adore-able not adorable? Orthographic underspecification studied with masked repetition priming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 813-836.
23. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 97-120). New York: Psychology Press.
24. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246. doi: 10. 1016/j. jml. 2004. 05. 005.
25. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2007). The role of external letter positions in visual word recognition. Psicothema, 19, 559-564.
26. R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 2. 7. 1). Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from www.R-project.org.
27. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507-537. doi: 10. 1080/01690960050119689.
28. Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1090-1098.
29. Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358, 534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1339-1362. doi: 10. 1080/02724980244000099.
30. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647. doi: 10. 1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X.
31. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221-243. doi: 10. 3758/BF03196158.