Progress and challenges for abiotic stress proteomics of crop plants

Proteomics

Volumn 13, Issue 12-13, 2013, Pages 1801-1815

  Barkla, Bronwyn J ^a   Vera Estrella, Rosario ^a   Pantoja, Omar ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Abiotic stress; Crop plants; Mass spectrometry; Plant proteomics

Indexed keywords

CELL EXTRACT; HEXAPEPTIDE; PROTEIN 14 3 3; STABLE ISOTOPE;

ABIOTIC STRESS; ARTICLE; CELL MEMBRANE; CENTRIFUGATION; CHROMATOGRAPHY; CROP; ELECTROPHORESIS; ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY; FACTUAL DATABASE; FRACTIONATION; GOLGI COMPLEX; MICROSOME MEMBRANE; MITOCHONDRION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SAMPLING; SUCROSE DENSITY GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION; TONOPLAST; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ABIOTIC STRESS; CROP PLANTS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PLANT PROTEOMICS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PLANT PROTEINS; PROTEOMICS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 84880085784     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201200401     Document Type: Article

References (170)

1. Boyer, J. S., Plant productivity and environment. Science 1982, 218, 443-448.
2. Cramer, G. R., Urano, K., Delrot, S., Pezzoti, M. et al., Effect of abiotic stress on plants: a systems biology perspective. BMC Plant Biol. 2011, 11, 163.
3. Tester, M., Langridge, P., Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 2010, 327, 818-822.
4. Gisladottir, G., Stocking, M., Land degradation control and its global environmental benefits. Land Degrad. Dev. 2005, 16, 99-112.
5. Bohnert, H. J., Gong, Q., Li, P., Ma, S., Unraveling abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms-getting genomics going. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2006, 9, 180-188.
6. Weston, D. J., Gunter, L. E., Rogers, A., Wullschleger, S. D., Connecting genes, coexpression modules, and molecular signatures to environmental stress phenotypes in plants. BMC Systems Biol. 2008, 2, 16.
7. Dassanayake, M., Oh, D. H., Haas, J. S., Hernandez, A. et al., The genome of the extremophile crucifer Thellungiella parvula. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 913-918.
8. Wu, H. J., Zhang, Z., Wang, J. Y., Oh, D. H., Dassanayake, M. et al., Insights into salt tolerance from the genome of Thellungiella salsuginea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 12219-12224.
9. Afroz, A., Ali, G. M., Mir, A., Komatsu, S., Application of proteomics to investigate stress-induced proteins for improvement in crop protection. Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 30, 745-763.
10. Kosová, K., Vitamvas, P., Prasil, I. T., Renaut, J., Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress-contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. J. Proteomics 2011, 74, 1301-1322.
11. Nanjo, Y., Nouri, M.-Z., Komatsu, S., Quantitative proteomic analysis of crop seedlings subjected to stress conditions; a commentary. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 1263-1272.
12. Villiers, F., Ducruix, C., Hugouvieux, V., Jarno, N. et al., Investigating the plant response to cadmium exposure by proteomic and metabolomic approaches. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1650-1663.
13. Hashiguchi, A., Ahsan, N., Komatsu, S., Proteomics applications of crops in the context of climate changes. Food Res. Int. 2010, 43, 1803-1813.
14. Bohnert, H. J., Sheveleva, E., Plant stress adaptations-making metabolism move. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1998, 1, 267-274.
15. Obata, T., Fernie, A. R., The use of metabolomics to dissect plant responses to abiotic stresses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 3225-3243.
16. Suzuki, N., Koussevitzky, S., Mittler, R., Miller, G., ROS and redox signalling in the response of plants to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 259-270.
17. Gill, S. S., Tuteja, N., Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909-930.
18. Vítámvás, P., Prášil, L. T., Kosová, K., Planchon, S. et al., Analysis of proteome and frost tolerance in chromosome 5A and 5B reciprocal substitution lines between two winter wheat during long-term cold acclimation. Proteomics 2012, 12, 68-85.
19. Zheng, M., Wang, Y., Liu, K., Hu, H. et al., Protein expression changes during cotton fiber elongation in response to low temperature stress. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 399-409.
20. Hashimoto, M., Komatsu, S., Proteomic analysis of rice seedlings during cold stress. Proteomics 2007, 7, 1293-1302.
21. Balbuena, T. S., Salas, J. J., Martínez-Force, E., Garcés, R. et al., Proteome analysis of cold acclimation in sunflower. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 2330-2346.
22. Cui, S., Huang, F., Wang, J., Cheng, Y. et al., A proteomic analysis of cold stress responses in rice seedlings. Proteomics 2005, 5, 3162-3172.
23. Yan, S.-P., Zhang, Q.-Y., Tang, Z.-C., Su, W.-A. et al., Comparative proteomic analysis provides new insights into chilling stress responses in rice. Mol. Cell Proteomics 2006, 5, 484-496.
24. Neilson, K. A., Ali, N. A., Muralidharan, S., Mirzaei, M. et al., Less label, more free: approaches in label-free quantitative mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2011, 11, 535-553.
25. Taylor, N. L., Heazlewood, J. L., Day, D. A., Millar, A. H., Differential impact of environmental stresses on the pea mitochondrial proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 1122-1133.
26. Evers, D., Legay, S., Lamoureux, D., Hausman, J. F. et al., Towards a synthetic view of potato cold and salt stress response by transcriptomic and proteomic analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2012, 78, 503-514.
27. Gammulla, A. G., Pascovici, D., Atwell, B. J., Haynes, P. A., Differential proteomics response of rice (Oryza sativa) leaves exposed to high- and low-temperature stress. Proteomics 2011, 11, 2839-2850.
28. Bushan, D., Pandey, A., Choudhary, M. K., Datta, A. et al., Comparative proteomics analysis of differentially expressed proteins in chickpea extracellular matrix during dehydration stress. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6, 1868-1884.
29. Pandey, A., Chakraborty, S., Datta, A., Chakraborty, N., Proteomics approach to identify dehydration responsive nuclear proteins from chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 88-107.
30. Pandey, A., Rajaman, U., Verma, J., Subba, P. et al., Identification of extracellular matrix proteins of rice (Oryza sativa L.) involved in dehydration-responsive network: a proteomic approach. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 3443-3464.
31. Choudhary, M. K., Basu, D., Datta, A., Chakraborty, N. et al., Dehydration-responsive nuclear proteome of rice (Oryza sativa L.) illustrates protein network, novel regulators of cellular adaptation, and evolutionary perspective. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 1579-1598.
32. Mushtaq, R., Katiyar, S., Bennett, J., Proteomic analysis of drought stress-responsive proteins in rice endosperm affecting grain quality. J. Crop Sci. Biotech. 2008, 11, 227-232.
33. Ali, G. M., Komatsu, S., Proteomic analysis of rice leaf sheath during drought stress. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 396-403.
34. Deeba, F., Pandey, A. K., Ranjan, S., Mishra, A. et al., Physiological and proteomic responses of cotton (Gossypium herbaceum L.) to drought stress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 53, 6-18.
35. Salekdeha, G. H., Siopongcoa, J., Wadea, L. J., Ghareyazieb, B. et al., A proteomic approach to analyzing drought- and salt-responsiveness in rice. Field Crops Res. 2002, 76, 199-219.
36. Salekdeha, G. H., Siopongco, J., Wade, L. J., Ghareyazie, B. et al., Proteomic analysis of rice leaves during drought stress and recovery. Proteomics 2002, 2, 1131-1145.
37. Ji, K., Wang, Y., Sun, W., Lou, Q. et al., Drought-responsive mechanisms in rice genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance during reproductive stage. J. Plant Physiol. 2012, 169, 336-344.
38. Shu, L. S., Lou, Q., Ma, C., Ding, W. et al., Genetic, proteomic and metabolomics analysis of the regulation of energy storage in rice seedlings in response to drought. Proteomics 2011, 11, 4122-4138.
39. Ke, Y., Han, G., He, H., Li, J., Differential regulation of proteins and phosphoproteins in rice under drought stress. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 2009, 379, 133-138.
40. Jangpromma, N., Kitthaisong, S., Lomthaisong, K., Daduang, S. et al., A proteomic analysis of drought stress responsive proteins as biomarkers for drought tolerant sugarcane cultivars. Am. J. Biochem. Biotech. 2010, 6, 89-102.
41. Ford, K. L., Cassin, A., Bacic, A., Quantitative proteomic analysis of wheat cultivars with differing drought stress tolerance. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2, 1-11.
42. Riccardi, F., Gazeau, P., Jacquemot, M.-P., Vincent, D. et al., Deciphering genetic variations of proteome responses to water deficit in maize leaves. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2004, 42, 1003-1011.
43. Mohammadi, P. P., Moieni, A., Komatsu, S., Comparative proteome analysis of drought-sensitive and drought-tolerant rapeseed roots and their hybrid F1 line under drought stress. Amino Acids 2012, 43, 2337-2152.
44. Mirzaei, M., Soltani, N., Sarhadi, E., Pascovici, D. et al., Shotgun proteomic analysis of long-distance drought signaling in rice roots. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 348-358.
45. Bazargani, M. M., Sarhadi, E., Shahnejat Bushehri, A.-A., Matros, A. et al., Proteomics view on the role of drought-induced senescence and oxidative stress defense in enhanced stem reserves mobilization in wheat. J. Proteomics 2011, 74, 1959-1973.
46. Komatsu, S., Yamamoto, A., Nanjo, Y., Mikami, Y. et al., A comprehensive analysis of the soybean genes and proteins expressed under flooding stress using transcriptome and proteome techniques. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 4766-4778.
47. Komatsu, S., Wada, T., Abaléa, Y., Nouri, M.-Z. et al., Analysis of plasma membrane proteome in soybean and application to flooding stress response. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 4487-4499.
48. Komatsu, S., Yamamoto, A., Nakamura, T., Nouri, M.-Z. et al., Comprehensive analysis of mitochondria in roots and hypocotyls of soybean under flooding stress using proteomics and metabolomic techniques. J. Proteomics Res. 2011, 10, 3993-4004.
49. Komatsu, S., Kobayashi, Y., Nishizawa, K., Nanjo, Y. et al., Comparative proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in soybean cell wall during flooding stress. Amino Acids 2010, 39, 1435-1449.
50. Nanjo, Y., Skultety, L., Uváčková, L., Klubicová, K. et al., Mass spectrometry-based analysis of proteomic changes in the root tips of flooded soybean seedlings. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 372-385.
51. Salavati, A., Khatoon, A., Nanjo, Y., Komatsu, S., Analysis of proteomic changes in roots of soybean seedlings during recovery after flooding. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 878-893.
52. Kong, F. J., Oyanagi, A., Komatsu, S., Cell wall proteome of wheat roots under flooding stress using gel-based and LC MS/MS-based proteomics approaches. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1804, 124-136.
53. Nanjo, Y., Skultety, L., Ashraf, Y., Komatsu, S., Comparative proteomic analysis of early-stage soybean seedlings responses to flooding by using gel and gel-free techniques. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 3989-4002.
54. Majoul, T., Bancel, E., Triboï, E., Hamidam, J. B. et al., Proteomic analysis of the effect of heat stress on hexaploid wheat grain: characterization of heat-responsive proteins from total endosperm. Proteomics 2003, 3, 175-183.
55. Majoul, T., Bancel, E., Triboï, E., Hamida, J. B. et al., Proteomic analysis of the effect of heat stress on hexaploid wheat grain: characterization of heat-responsive proteins from non-prolamins fraction. Proteomics 2004, 4, 505-513.
56. Chaki, M., Valderrama, R., Fernández-Ocaña, A. M., Carreras, F. et al., High temperature triggers the metabolism of S-nitrosothiols in sunflower mediating a process of nitrosative stress which provokes the inhibition of ferrodoxin-NADP reductase by tyrosine nitration. Plant Cell Environ. 2011, 34, 1803-1818.
57. Ahsan, N., Donnart, T., Nouri, M.-Z., Komatsu, S., Tissue-specific defense and thermo-adaptive mechanisms of soybean seedlings under heat stress revealed by proteomics approach. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 4189-4204.
58. Lara, M. V., Borsani, J., Lauxmann, M. A., Lombardo, V. A. et al., Biochemical and proteomic analysis of "Dixiland" peach fruit (Prunus persica) upon heat treatment. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60, 4315-4333.
59. Laino, P., Shelton, D., Finnie, C., De Leonardis, A. et al., Comparative proteome analysis of metabolic proteins from seed of durum wheat (cv. Svevo) subjected to heat stress. Proteomics 2010, 10, 2359-2368.
60. Shen, Z., Li, P., Ni, R.-J., Ritchie, M. et al., Label-free quantitative proteomics analysis of etiolated maize seedling leaves during greening. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 2443-2460.
61. Zhen, Y., Qi, J.-L, Wang, S.-S., Su, J. et al., Comparative proteome analysis of differentially expressed proteins by Al toxicity in soybean. Physiol. Plant. 2007, 131, 542-554.
62. Yang, Q., Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Shi, W. et al., Identification of aluminum-responsive proteins in rice roots by a proteomic approach: cysteine synthase as a key player in Al response. Proteomics 2007, 7, 737-749.
63. Ahsan, N., Lee, D.-G., Kim, K.-H., Alam, I. et al., Analysis of arsenic stress-induced differentially expressed proteins in rice leaves by two dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry. Chemosphere 2012, 78, 224-231.
64. Ahsan, N., Lee, D.-G., Alam, I., Kim, P. J. et al., Comparative proteomic study of arsenic-induced differentially expressed proteins in rice roots reveals glutathione plays a central role during As stress. Proteomics 2008, 8, 3561-3576.
65. Requejo, R., Tena, M., Proteome analysis of maize roots reveals that oxidative stress is a main contributing factor to plant arsenic toxicity. Phytochemistry 2005, 66, 1519-1528.
66. Requejo, R., Tena, M., Maize response to acute arsenic toxicity as revealed by proteome analysis of plant shoots. Proteomics 2006, 6, S156-S162.
67. Sobkowiak, R., Deckert, J., Proteins induced by cadmium in soybean cells. J. Plant Physiol. 2006, 163, 1203-1206.
68. Hradilová, J., Řhulka, R., Řehulková, H., Vrbovám, M. et al., Comparative analysis of proteomic changes in contrasting flax cultivars upon cadmium exposure. Electrophoresis 2010, 31, 421-431.
69. Nwugo, C. C., Huerta, A. J., The effect of silicon on the leaf proteome of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants under cadmium-stress. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 518-528.
70. Alvarez, S., Berla, B. M., Sheffield, J., Cahoon, R. E. et al., Comprehensive analysis of the Brassica juncea root proteome in response to cadmium exposure by complementary proteomic approaches. Proteomics 2009, 9, 2419-2431.
71. Ahsan, N., Nakamura, T., Komatsu, S., Differential response of microsomal proteins and metabolites in two contrasting cadmium (Cd)-accumulating soybean cultivars under Cd stress. Amino Acids 2012, 42, 317-327.
72. Chen, Y.-A., Chi, W.-C., Huang, T.-S., Lin, C.-Y. et al., Mercury-induced biochemical and proteomic changes in rice roots. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 55, 23-32.
73. Carpentier, S. C., Witters, E., Laukens, K., Onckelen, H. V. et al., Banana (Musa spp.) as a model to study the meristem proteome: acclimation to osmotic stress. Proteomics 2007, 7, 92-105.
74. Mohammadi, P. P., Moieni, A., Hiraga, S., Komatsu, S., Organ-specific proteomic analysis of drought-stressed soybean seedlings. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 1906-1923.
75. Zang, X., Komatsu, S., A proteomics approach for identifying osmotic-stress-related proteins in rice. Phytochemistry 2007, 68, 426-437.
76. Vanhove, A. C., Vermaelen, W., Panis, B., Swennen, R. et al., Screening the banana biodiversity for drought tolerance: can an in vitro growth model and proteomics be used as a tool to discover tolerant varieties and understand homeostasis. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 1-10.
77. Zhou, G., Yang, L.-T., Li, Y.-R., Zou, C.-L. et al., Proteomic analysis of osmotic stress-responsive proteins in sugarcane leaves. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 30, 349-359.
78. Toorchi, M., Yakawa, K., Nouri, M.-Z., Komatsu, S., Proteomics approach for identifying osmotic-stress-related proteins in soybean roots. Peptides 2009, 30, 2108-2117.
79. Nouri, M.-Z., Komatsu, S., Comparative analysis of soybean plasma membrane proteins under osmotic stress using gel-based and LC MS/MS-based proteomics approaches. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1930-1945.
80. Meng, Y., Liu, F., Pamg, C., Fan, S. et al., Label-free quantitative proteomics analysis of cotton leaf response to nitric oxide. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 5416-5432.
81. Ahsam, N., Lee, D.-G., Lee, K.-W., Alam, I. A. et al., Glyphosate-induced oxidative stress in rice leaves revealed by proteomic approach. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 46, 1062-1070.
82. Ahsan, N., Nanjo, Y., Sawada, H., Kohno, Y. et al., Ozone stress-induced proteomic changes in leaf total soluble and chloroplast proteins of soybean reveal that carbon allocation in involved in adaptation in the early developmental stage. Proteomics 2010, 10, 2605-2619.
83. Jain, S., Srivastava, S., Sarin, N. B., Kav, N. N. V., Proteomics reveals elevated levels of PR10 proteins in saline-tolerant peanut (Arachis hypogaea) calli. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2006, 44, 253-259.
84. Khan, M., Takasaki, H., Komatsu, S., Comprehensive phosphoproteome analysis in rice and identification of phosphoproteins responsive to different hormone/stresses. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 1592-1599.
85. Bandehagh, A., Salekdeh, G. H., Toorchi, M., Mohammadi, A., Komatsu, S., Comparative proteomics analysis of canola leaves under salinity stress. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1965-1975.
86. Dani, A., Simon, W. J., Duranti, M., Croy, R. R. D., Changes in the tobacco leaf apoplast proteome in response to salt stress. Proteomics 2004, 5, 737-745.
87. Parker, R., Flowers, T. J., Moore, A. L., Harpham, N. V. J., An accurate and reproducible method for proteome profiling of the effects of salt stress in the rice leaf lamina. J. Exp. Bot. 2006, 57, 1109-1118.
88. Gao, L., Yan, X., Li, X., Guo, G. et al., Proteome analysis of wheat leaf under salt stress by two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2-D-DIGE). Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 1180-1191.
89. Jacoby, R. P., Miller, H., Taylor, N. L., Wheat mitochondrial proteomes provide new links between antioxidant defense and plant salinity tolerance. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 6595-6604.
90. Caruso, G., Cavaliere, C., Guarino, C., Gubbiotti, R. et al., Identification of changes in Triticum durum L. leaf proteome in response to salt stress by two-dimensional electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2008, 391, 381-390.
91. Dooki, A. D., Mayer-Posner, F. J., Askari, H., Zaiee, A.-A., Salekdeh, G. H., Proteomic responses of rice young panicles to salinity. Proteomics 2006, 6, 6498-6507.
92. Zörb, C., Schmitt, S., Neeb, A., Karl, S. et al., The biochemical reaction of maize (Zea mays L.) to salt stress is characterized by a mitigation of symptoms and not by a specific adaptation. Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 91-100.
93. Zörb, C., Schmitt, S., Mϋhling, K. H., Proteomic changes in maize roots after short-term adjustment to saline growth conditions. Proteomics 2010, 10, 4441-4449.
94. Du, C.-X., Fan, H.-F., Guo, S.-R., Tezaka, T. et al., Proteomic analysis of cucumber seedlings roots subjected to salt stress. Phytochemistry 2010, 71, 1450-1459.
95. Cheng, Y., Qi, Y., Zhu, Q., Chen, X. et al., New changes in the plasma-membrane-associated proteome of rice roots under salt stress. Proteomics 2009, 9, 3100-3114.
96. Chitteti, B. R., Peng, Z., Proteome and phosphoproteome differential expression under salinity stress in rice (Oryza sativa) roots. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 1718-1727.
97. Yan, S., Tang, Z., Su, W., Sun, W., Proteomic analysis of salt stress-responsive proteins in rice root. Proteomics 2005, 5, 235-244.
98. Nohzadeh, M. S., Habibi, R. M., Heidari, M., Salekdeh, G. H., Proteomics reveals new salt responsive proteins associated with rice plasma membrane. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2007, 71, 2144-2154.
99. Malakshah, S. N., Rezaei, M. H., Heidari, M., Salekdeh, G. H., Proteomics reveals new salt responsive proteins associated with rice plasma membrane. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2007, 71, 2144-2154.
100. Guo, G., Ge, P., Ma, C., Li, X. et al., Comparative proteomic analysis of salt response proteins in seedling roots of two wheat varieties. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 1867-1885.
101. Wang, M.-C., Peng, Z.-Y., Li, C.-L., Li, F. et al., Proteomic analysis on a high salt tolerance introgression strain of Triticum aestivum/Thinopyrum ponticum. Proteomics 2008, 8, 1470-1489.
102. Xu, X.-Y., Fan, R., Zheng, R., Li, C.-M., Yu, D.-Y., Proteomic analysis of seed germination under salt stress in soybeans. J. Zheijang Univ. Sci. B 2011, 12, 507-517.
103. Vincent, D., Ergul, A., Bohlman, M. C., Tattersall, E. A. R. et al., Proteomic analysis reveals differences between Vitis vinifera L. cv. Chardonnay and cv. Cabernet Sauvignon and their response to water deficit and salinity. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1873-1892.
104. Chang, C.-W., Hsu, J.-L., Hsu, P.-H., Sheng, W.-A. et al., Comparative phosphoproteomic analysis of microsomal fractions of Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa subjected to high salinity. Plant Sci. 2012, 186, 131-142.
105. Grimplet, J., Cramer, G. R., Dickerson, J. A., Mathiason, K. et al. VitisNet: "Omics" integration through grapevine molecular networks. PLOS One 2009, 4, e8365.
106. Kottapalli, K. R., Pakwal, R., Shibato, J., Buriw, G. et al., Physiology and proteomics of the water-deficit stress response in three contrasting peanut genotypes. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 380-407.
107. Yamaguchi, M., Valliyodan, B., Zhang, B., Zhang, J. et al., Regulation of growth response to water stress in the soybean primary root. I. Proteomic analysis reveals region-specific regulation of phenylpropanoid metabolism and control of free iron in the elongation zone. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33, 223-243.
108. Zhu, J., Alvarez, S., Marsh, E. L., LeNoble, M. E. et al., Cell wall proteome in the maize primary root elongation zone. II. Region-specific changes in water soluble and lightly ionically bound proteins under water deficit. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 1533-1548.
109. Pedersen, S. K., Harry, J. L., Sebastian, L., Baker, J. et al., Unseen proteome:| mining below the tip of the iceberg to find low abundance and membrane proteins. J. Proteome Res. 2003, 2, 303-311.
110. Stevens, T. J., Arkin, I. T., Do more complex organisms have a greater proportion of membrane proteins in their genomes? Proteins 2000, 39, 417-420.
111. Schwacke, R., Schneider, A., van der Graaff, E., Fischer, K. et al., Aramemnon, a novel database for Arabidopsis integral membrane proteins. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 16-26.
112. Martinoia, E., Meyer, S., De Angeli, A., Nagy, R., Vacuolar transporters in their physiological context. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 183-213.
113. Qin, F., Shinosaki, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Achievements and challenges in understanding plant abiotic stress responses and tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 1569-1582.
114. Nogueira, F. T. S., De Rosa, V. E., Jr., Menossi, M., Ulian, E. C. et al., RNA expression profiles and data mining of sugarcane response to low temperature. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 1811-1824.
115. Zhang, J., He, Z., Tian, H., Zhu, G. et al., Identification of aluminum-responsive genes in rice cultivars with different aluminum sensitivities. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 2269-2278.
116. Xue, G.-P., McIntyre, C. L., Glassop, D., Shorter, R., Use of expression analysis to dissect alterations in carbohydrate metabolism in wheat leaves during drought stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67, 197-214.
117. Dubey, S., Misra, P., Dwivedi, S., Chatterjee, S. et al., Transcriptomic and metabolomic shifts in rice roots in response to Cr (VI) stress. BMC Genomics 2010, 11, 1-19.
118. Lorenz, W. W., Alba, R., Yu, Y. S., Bordeaux, J. M. et al., Microarray analysis and scale-free gene networks identify candidate regulators in drought-stressed roots of loblolly pine (P. taeda L.). BMC Genomics 2011, 24, 12-264.
119. Gygi, S. P., Corthals, G. L., Zhang, Y., Rochon, Y. et al., Evaluation of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis based proteome analysis technology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 9390-9395.
120. Chevalier, F., Highlights on the capacities of "gel-based" proteomics. Proteome Sci. 2010, 8, 1-10.
121. Lee, Y. H., Tan, H. T., Chung, M. C., Subcellular fractionation methods and strategies for proteomics. Proteomics 2010, 10, 3935-3956.
122. Righetti, G. P., Castagna, A., Antonioli, P., Boschetti, E., Prefractionation techniques in proteome analysis: the mining tools of the third millennium. Electrophoresis 2005, 26, 297-319.
123. Weber, G., Wildgruber, R., Free-flow electrophoresis system for proteomics applications. Methods Mol. Biol. 2008, 384, 703-716.
124. Barkla, B. J., Vera-Estrella, R., Pantoja, O., Enhanced separation of membranes during free flow zonal electrophoresis in plants. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 5181-5187.
125. Eubel, H., Lee, C. P., Kuo, J., Meyer, E. H. et al., Free-flow electrophoresis for purification of plant mitochondria by surface charge. Plant J. 2007, 52, 583-594.
126. Brightman, A. O., Morré, D. J., Sidedness of plant plasma membrane vesicles altered by conditions of preparation. Plant Physiol. 1992, 98, 183-190.
127. Parsons, H. T., Christiansen, K., Knierim, B., Carroll, A. et al., Isolation and proteomic characterization of the Arabidopsis Golgi defines functional and novel components involved in plant cell wall biosynthesis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159, 12-26.
128. Barkla, B. J., Vera-Estrella, R., Hernández-Coronado, M., Pantoja, O., Quantitative proteomics of the tonoplast reveals a role for glycolytic enzymes in salt tolerance. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 4044-4058.
129. Lee, C. P., Eubel, H., O'Toole, N., Millar, A. H., Heterogeneity of the mitochondrial proteome for photosynthetic and non-photosynthetic Arabidopsis metabolism. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 1297- 1316.
130. Lee, C. P., Eubel, H., Solheim, C., Millar, A. H., Mitochondrial proteome heterogeneity between tissues from the vegetative and reproductive stages of Arabidopsis thaliana development. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 3326-3343.
131. Boschetti, E., Righetti, P. G., The art of observing rare protein species in proteomes with peptide ligand libraries. Proteomics 2009, 9, 1492-1510.
132. Ellis, R. J., The most abundant protein on earth. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1979, 4, 241-244.
133. Sun, W., Wu, S., Wang, X., Zheng, D. et al., An analysis of protein abundance suppression in data dependent liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry with tryptic peptide mixtures of five known proteins. Eur. J. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 11, 575-580.
134. Fonslow, B. R., Carvalho, P. C., Academia, K., Freeby, S. et al., Improvements in proteomic metrics of low abundance proteins through proteome equalization using ProteoMiner prior to MudPIT. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 3690-3700.
135. TM): an innovative fractionation tool for differential quantitative clinical proteomics. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2009, 115, 155-160.
136. Qin, F., Shinozaki, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., Achievements and challenges in understanding plant abiotic stress responses and tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 1569-1582.
137. Rampitsch, C., Bykova, N. V., The beginnings of crop phosphoproteomics: exploring early warning systems of stress. Front. Plant Proteomics 2012, 3, 1-15.
138. Agrawal, G. K., Bourguignon, J., Rolland, N., Ephritikhine, G. et al., Plant organelle proteomics: collaborating for optimal cell function. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 2011, 30, 772-853.
139. Santoni, V., Malloy, M., Rabilloud, T., Membrane proteins and proteomics: un amour impossible? Electrophoresis 2000, 21, 1054-1070.
140. Wu, C. C., Yates, J. R., A method for the comprehensive proteomic analysis of membrane proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 262-267.
141. Henningsen, R., Gale, B. L., Straub, K. M., DeNagel, D. C., Application of zwitterionic detergents to the solubilization of integral membrane proteins for two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2002, 2, 1479-1488.
142. Speers, A. E., Wu, C. C., Proteomics of integral membrane proteins: theory and application. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 3687-3714.
143. Rabilloud, T., Membrane proteins and proteomics: love is possible, but so difficult. Electrophoresis 2009, 30, S174-S180.
144. Lim, H., Eng, J., Yates, J. R., III, Tollaksen, S. L. et al., Identification of 2D-gel proteins: a comparison of MALDI/TOF peptide mass mapping to LC-ESI tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2003, 14, 957-970.
145. Campostrini, N., Areces, L. B., Rappsilber, J., Pietrogrande, M. C. et al., Spot overlapping in two-dimensional maps: a serious problem ignored for much too long. Proteomics 2005, 5, 2385-2395.
146. Yang, Y., Thannhauser, T. W., Li, L., Zhang, S., Development of an integrated approach for evaluation of 2-D gel image analysis: impact of multiple proteins in single spots on comparative proteomics in conventional 2-D gel/MALDI workflow. Electrophoresis 2007, 28, 2080-2094.
147. Corthals, G. L., Gygi, S. P., Aebersold, R., Patterson, S. D., in: Rabilloud, T. (Eds.), Proteome Research: Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis and Detection Methods, Springer, New York 1999, pp. 193-231.
148. Westermeier, R., Marouga, R., Protein detection methods in proteomics research. Biosci. Rep. 2005, 25, 19-32.
149. Hunt, S. M., Thomas, M. R., Sebastian, L. T., Pedersen, S. K. et al., Optimal replication and the importance of experimental design for gel-based quantitative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 809-819.
150. Cottingham, K., Designing a powerful 2DE experiment. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 809-819.
151. Matros, A., Kaspar, S., Witzel, K., Mock, H.-P., Recent progress in liquid chromatography-based separation and label-free quantitative plant proteomics. Phytochemistry 2011, 72, 963-974.
152. Ong, S. E., Mann, M., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 252-262.
153. Schaff, J. E., Mbeunkui, F., Blackburn, K., Bird, D. M. et al., SILIP: a novel stable isotope labeling method for in planta quantitative proteomic analysis. Plant J. 2008, 56, 840-854.
154. 18O labeling for comparative proteomics: model studies with two serotypes of adenovirus. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 2836-2842.
155. Mueller, L. N., Brusniak, M. Y., Mani, D. R., Aebersold, R., An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 51-61.
156. Cooper, B., Feng, J., Garrett, J. M., Relative, label-free protein quantitation: spectral counting error statistics from nine replicate MudPIT samples. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 21, 1534-1546.
157. Larrainzar, E., Wienkoop, S., Weckwerth, W., Ladrera, R., Arrese-Igor, C. et al., Medicago truncatula root nodule proteome analysis reveals differential plant and bacteroid responses to drought stress. Plant Physiol. 2007, 144, 1495-1507.
158. Elmore, J. M., Liu, J., Smith, B., Phinney, B. et al., Quantitative proteomics reveals dynamic changes in the plasma membrane during Arabidopsis immune signaling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2012, 11, 1-13.
159. Poliakov, A., Russell, C. W., Ponnala, L., Hoops, H. J. et al., Large-scale label-free quantitative proteomics of the pea aphid-Buchnera symbiosis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2011, 10, 1-17.
160. Rodrigues, S. P., Ventura, J. A., Aguilar, C., Nakayasu, E. S. et al., Label-free quantitative proteomics reveals differentially regulated proteins in the latex of sticky diseased Carica papaya L. plants. J. Proteomics 2012, 75, 3191-3198.
161. Lee, J., Feng, J., Campbell, K. B., Scheffler, B. E. et al., Quantitative proteomic analysis of bean plants infected by a virulent and avirulent obligate rust fungus. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 19-31.
162. Moore, B. D., Bifunctional and moonlighting enzymes: lighting the way to regulatory control. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9, 221-228.
163. Huberts, D. H. E. W., van der Klei, I. J., Moonlighting proteins: an intriguing mode of multitasking. Biochem. Biophy. Acta 2010, 1803, 520-525.
164. Cho, Y.-H., Yoo, S.-D., Sheen, J., Regulatory functions of nuclear hexokinase 1 complex in glucose signaling. Cell 2006, 127, 579-589.
165. Joshi, H. J., Hirsch-Hoffmann, M., Baerenfaller, K., Gruissem, W. et al., MASCP gator: an aggregation portal for the visualization of Arabidopsis proteomics data. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155, 259-270.
166. Gfeller, A., Baerenfaller, K., Loscos, J., Chételat, A. et al., Jasmonate controls polypeptide patterning in undamaged tissue in wounded Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1797-1807.
167. Komatsu, S., Tanaka, N., Rice proteome analysis: a step toward functional analysis of the rice genome. Proteomics 2004, 4, 938-949.
168. Komatsu, S., Rice proteome database: a step toward functional analysis of the rice genome. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 59, 179-190.
169. Sakata, K., Ohyanagi, H., Nobori, H., Nakamura, T. et al., Soybean proteome database: a data resource for plant differential omics. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 3539-5348.
170. Ohyanagi, H., Sakata, K., Komatsu, S. Soybean proteome database 2012: update on the comprehensive data repository for soybean proteomics. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3, 1-6.