Prediction of success in teamwork of secondary students;Predicción del éxito en el trabajo en equipo de estudiantes de Secundaria

Revista de Psicodidactica

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 235-255

  Monereo, Carles ^a   Castelló, Montserrat ^b   Reinaldo Martinez Fernandez J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT RAMON LLULL   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cooperative learning; Integration of ideas; Secondary students; Social atmosphere; Writing task

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879517625     PISSN: 11361034     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1387/RevPsicodidact.6776     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aritzeta, A., y Balluerka, N. (2006). Cooperation, competition and goal interdependence in work teams: A multilevel approach. Psicothema, 18(4), 757-765.
2. Arvaja, M., Salovaara, H., Häkkinen, P., y Järvelä, S. (2007). Combining individual and group-level perspectives for studying collaborative knowledge construction in context. Learning & Instruction, 17, 448-459. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.04.003.
3. Batelaan, P., y Van Hoof, V. (1996). Cooperative learning in intercultural education. European Journal of Intercultural studies, 7(3), 5-16.
4. Cannon-Bowers, J. A., y Salas, E. (1997). Teamwork competencies: The integration of team member knowledge, skills, and attitudes. En H. F. O'Neil (Ed.), Workforce readiness. Competencies and assessment (pp. 151-174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum Associates.
5. nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. DeSeCo (2002). Definition and selection of competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundations. Recovered from http://www.deseco.admin.ch/bfs/deseco/en/index/02.parsys.43469.download-List.2296.DownloadFile.tmp/2005.dskcexecutivesummary.en.pdf
7. Elboj, C., y Niemela, R. (2010). Subommunities of mutual learners in the classroom: The case of interactive groups. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 15(2), 177-189.
8. Gillies, R. M., y Ashman, A. F. (1996). Teaching collaborative skills to primary school children in classroombased work groups. Learning & Instruction, 6(3), 187-200.
9. Glaser, B., y Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
10. Grummon, P. (1997). Assessing teamwork skills for workforce readiness. En H. O'Neil (Ed.), Workforce readiness. Competencies and assessment 0(pp. 383-410). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum Associates.
11. Hadwin, A., y Järvelä, S.(2011). Introduction to a special issue on social aspects of self-regulated learning: where social and self. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 235-256.
12. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., y Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis Multivariante. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
13. Harskamp, E., Ding, N., y Suhre, C. (2008). Group composition and its effect on female and male problemsolving in science education. Educational Research, 50(4), 307-318. do: 10.1080/00131880802499688.
14. Hawkins, K. (1999). Gender differences in questions asked during small decision-making group discussions. Small Group Research, 30(2), 235-256.
15. Holt, D. D. (Ed.). (1993). Cooperative Learning: A response to linguistic and cultural diversity. McHenry, IL: Centre for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems, Inc.
16. Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Laru, J., y Luokkanen, T. (2007). Structuring and regulating collaborative learning in higher education with wireless networks and mobile tools. Educational Technology and Society, 10(4), 71-79.
17. Järvenoja, H., y Järvelä, S. (2005). How students describe the sources of their emotional and motivational experiences during the learning process: A qualitative approach. Learning & Instruction, 15, 465-480. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.012.
18. Jermann, P., y Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Group mirrors to support interaction regulation in collaborative problem solving. Computers and Education, 51, 279-296. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.012.
19. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., y Holubec, E. (1988). Advanced cooperative learning. Edin, MN: Interaction Book Company.
20. Johnson, D., Johnson, R., y Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods. A meta-analysis. Recuperado de http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B.pdf
21. Kagan, S. (1998). New cooperative learning, multiple inteligences and inclusion. En J. W. Putnam (Ed.), Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion (pp. 105-136). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing Co.
22. Kapur, M., Voiklis, J., y Kinzer, Ch. (2008). Sensitivities to early exchange in synchronous computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) groups. Computers & Education, 51, 54-66. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.04.007.
23. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., y van Buuren, H. (2004). Measuring perceived quality of social space in distributed learning groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(5), 607-632. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2003.11.002.
24. López, D., y Alvarez, I. (2009). Socio-cognitive regulation strategies in cooperative learning tasks in virtual contexts. En D.G. Sampson, M. Spector, P. Isaías, y D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS international conference on cognition and exploratory learning in digital age (CELDA 2009, 22-24 November) (pp. 273-289). Roma: IADIS Press.
25. Manlove, S., Lazonder, A., y De Jong, T. (2006). Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(2), 87-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00162.x.
26. Martínez-Fernández, J. R., Corcelles, M., y Cerrato, M. (2011). The conceptions about teamwork questionnaire: Design, reliability and validity with secondary students. Educational Psychology, 31(7), 857-871. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2011.610295.
27. McCaslin, M. (2009). Co-regulation of student motivation and emergent identity. Educational Psychologist, 44 (2), 137-146. doi: 10.1080/00461520902832384.
28. Mebane, E., Sorace, R., Solimeno, A., y Tomai, M. (2007). Gender differences in online collaborative learning groups promoting affective education and social capital. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 11, 27-36.
29. Olaniran, B. (1995). Perceived communication outcomes in computer-mediated communication: An analysis of 3 systems among new users. Information Processing and Management, 31(4), 525-541. doi: 10.1016/0306-4573(95)00006-3.
30. O'Neil, H., Chung, G., y Brown, R. (1997). Use of networked simulations as a context to measure team competencies. En H. F. O'Neil (Ed.), Workforce readiness. Competencies and assessment (pp. 411-452). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum Associates.
31. Perrenoud, P. (2001). La formación de los docentes en el siglo XXI. Revista de Tecnología Educativa, XIV(3), 503-523.
32. Pidgeon, N., y Henwood, K. (1997). Grounded theory: practical implementation. En John T. E. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences (pp. 86-101). Leicester: BPS Books.
33. Rodríguez-Fernández, A., Droguett, L., y Revuelta, L. (2012). School and personal adjustment in adolescence: The role of academic self-concept and perceived social support. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 17(2), 397-414. doi: 10.1387/Rev.Psicodidact.3002.
34. Roschelle, J., y Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. En C. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-97). Berlin: Springer.
35. Salonen, P., Vauras, M., y Efklides, A. (2005). Social interaction: What can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? European Psychologist, 10, 199-208. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.199.
36. Savicki, V., y Kelley, M. (2000). Computer mediated communication: Gender and group composition. CyberPsychology Behavior, 3(5), 817-826. doi: 10.1089/10949310050191791.
37. Sebba, J., Crick, R. D., Yu, G., Lawson, H., Harlen W., y Durant, K. (2008). Systematic review of research evidence of the impact on students in secondary schools of self and peer assessment. London: EPPI.
38. Sharan, S. (1994). Handbook of cooperative learning methods. Westport: Greenwood Press.
39. Sins, P. H., van Joolingen, W. R., Savelsbergh, E. R., y van Hout-Wolters, B. H. (2008). Motivation and performance within a collaborative computer-based modeling task: Relations between students' achievement goal orientation, self-efficacy, cognitive processing, and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 58-77. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.12.004.
40. Slavin, R. (1996). Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educationa Psychology, 21, 43-69. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0004.
41. Strom, P. S., y Strom, R. D. (2011) Teamwork skills assessment for cooperative Learning Educational Research and Evaluation, 17(4), 233-251.
42. Topping, K. J. (2010). Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20 (4), 339-343. doi: 10.1016/j. learninstruc.2009.08.003.
43. Van Gennip, N., Segers, M., y Tillema, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning & Instruction, 20(4), 280-290. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010.
44. Vauras, M., Iiskala, T., Kajamies, A., Kinnunen, R., y Lehtinen, E. (2003). Shared-regulation and motivation of collaborating peers: A case analysis. An Psychologia, 46(1), 19-37. doi: 10.2117/psysoc.2003.19.
45. Volet, S., Summers, M., y Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulaion in collaborative learning: How does it merge and how is it sustained. Learning & Instruction, 19 (2), 128-143. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001.
46. Wang, S. L., y Lin, S. (2007). The effects of group composition of self-efficacy and collective efficacy on computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2256-2268. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.005.
47. Wells, G. (1999) Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
48. Yoon, S. W. (2006). Two group development patterns of virtual learning teams. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(3), 297-312.
49. Yoon, S. W., y Johnson, S. D. (2008). Phases and patterns of group development in virtual learning teams. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 56, 595-618. doi: 10.1007/s11423-007-9078-x.