Discourse practices in inclusive elementary mathematics classrooms

Learning Disability Quarterly

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 9-20

  Griffin, Cynthia C ^a   League, Martha B ^a   Griffin, Valerie L ^a   Bae, Jungah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Low performing students; Mathematics discourse practices; Teacher observation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84879322740     PISSN: 07319487     EISSN: 2168376X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0731948712465188     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baker, S., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (1997). Vocabulary acquisition: Research bases. In D. C. Simmons, & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (pp. 183-217). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90, 449-466.
3. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
4. Ball, D. L., & Rowan, B. (2004). Introduction: Measuring instruction. Elementary School Journal, 105, 3-10. (Pubitemid 39427415)
5. Baxter, J. A., Woodward, J., & Olson, D. (2001). Effects of reform-based mathematics instruction on low achievers in five third-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 101, 529-547. doi:10.1086/499686
6. Baxter, J., Woodward, J., Voorhies, J., & Wong, J. (2002). We talk about it, but do they get it? Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 17, 173-185. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00043
7. Berkeley, S., Bender, W. N., Peaster, L. G., & Saunders, L. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85-95. doi:10.1177/0022219408326214
8. Bottge, B. A., Heinrichs, M., Mehta, Z. D., & Hung, Y. (2002). Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. Journal of Special Education, 35, 186-200. doi:10.1177/002246690203500401
9. Brownell, M. T., Griffin, C. C., Leko, M. M., & Stephens, J. (2011). Improving collaborative teacher education research: Creating tighter linkages. Teacher Education and Special Education, 34, 235-249. doi:10.1177/ 0888406411404570
10. Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Gersten, R., Scammacca, N., & Chavez, M. (2008). Mathematics intervention for first-And second-grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of Tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 20-32. doi:10.1177/ 0741932507309712
11. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1992). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. A. Forman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 91-119). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12. Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., Fishman, B., Cameron Ponitz, C., Glasney, S., Underwood, P., & ⋯Schatschneider, C. (2009). The ISI classroom observation system: Examining the literacy instruction provided to individual students. Educational Researcher, 38, 85-99. doi:10.3102/0013189X09332373
13. Connor, C. M., Morrison, F. J., & Katch, L. E. (2004). Beyond the reading wars: Exploring the effect of child-instruction interactions on growth in early reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 305-336. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0804-1 (Pubitemid 39508139)
14. Edyburn, D. L., & Basham, J. (2008). Collecting and coding observational data. Journal of Special Education Technology, 23, 56-60.
15. Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test. (2007). Reading and mathematics: Technical report for 2006 FCAT test administrations. Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education. Retrieved from http://fcat.fldoe.org/fcatpub5.asp
16. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 93-99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4 (Pubitemid 43188227)
17. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Stecker, P. M. (2010). The "blurring" of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76, 301-323.
18. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Allinder, R. M. (1989). The reliability and validity of skills analysis within curriculumbased measurement. Diagnostique, 14, 203-221.
19. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic math computational manual (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
20. Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4-15. doi:10.1177/00222194 040370010201 (Pubitemid 38157438)
21. Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., & Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009-4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, USDOE.
22. Gersten, R., Chard, D. J., Jayanthi, M., Baker, S. K., Morphy, P., & Flojo, J. R. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-Analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202-1242. doi:10.3102/0034654309334431
23. Gersten, R., Jordan, N., & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and interventions for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 293-304. doi:10.1177/0 0222194050380040301 (Pubitemid 41095919)
24. Griffin, C. C., Jitendra, A. K., & League, M. (2009). Novice special educators' instructional practices, communication patterns, and content knowledge for teaching mathematics. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32, 319-336. doi:10.1177/0888406409343540
25. Harn, B. A., Chard, D. J., Biancarosa, G., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2011). Coordinating instructional supports to accelerate atrisk first-grade readers' performance. Elementary School Journal, 112, 332-355. doi:10.1086/661997
26. Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 614 et seq.
27. Jackson, H. G., & Neel, R. S. (2006). Observing mathematics: Do students with EBD have access to standards-based mathematics instruction? Education & Treatment of Children, 29, 593-614. (Pubitemid 44727824)
28. Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains (MET Project Policy & Practice Brief). Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.metproject.org/ downloads/MET-Gathering-Feedback-Practioner-Brief.pdf
29. Kunsch, C. A., Jitendra, A. K., & Sood, S. (2007). The effects of peer-mediated instruction in mathematics for students with learning problems: A research synthesis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 1-12. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00226.x
30. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31. Maletsky, E. M., Andrews, A. G., Burton, G. M., Bennett, J. M., Johnson, H. C., Luckie, L., ⋯ & Schultz, K. A. (2002). Harcourt math. Orlando, FL: Harcourt School Publishers.
32. Mazzocco, M. (2007). Defining and differentiating mathematical learning disabilities and difficulties. In D. Berch, & M. Mazzocco (Eds.), Why is math so hard for some children? The nature and origins of mathematical learning difficulties and disabilities (pp. 29-47). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
33. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
34. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: USDOE.
35. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. In J. Kilpatrick, J. Swafford, & B. Findell (Eds.), Mathematics Learning Study Committee, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education (p. 115-156). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237-257. doi:10.3102/01623737026003237 (Pubitemid 39666122)
37. Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417-458. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x (Pubitemid 41623689)
38. Sartain, L., Stoelinga, S. R., & Brown, E. (2011). Rethinking teacher evaluation in Chicago: Lessons learned from classroom observations, principal-Teacher conferences, and district implementation. Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago Urban Education Institute, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/publications/rethinking- Teacher-evaluation-chicago-lessons-learned-classroomobservations-principal
39. Schacter, J., Thum, Y. M., & Zifkin, D. (2006). How much does creative teaching enhance elementary school students' achievement? Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 47-72. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01266.x (Pubitemid 43735115)
40. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-Analysis of treatment outcomes. New York, NY: Guilford.
41. Walshaw, M., & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher's role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of Educational Research, 78, 516-551. doi:10.3102/0034654308320292
42. White, D. Y. (2003). Promoting productive mathematical classroom discourse with diverse students. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 37-53. doi:10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00003-8 (Pubitemid 36598303)
43. Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57-67.
44. Yackel, E., & Hanna, G. (2005). Reasoning and proof. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 227-236). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.