The teacher's role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 516-551

  Walshaw, Margaret ^a   Anthony, Glenda ^a  

^a MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Discourse processes; Mathematics education; Qualitative research

Indexed keywords

EID: 68049118355     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0034654308320292     Document Type: Review

References (136)

1. Adler, J. (1998). A language of teaching dilemmas: Unlocking the complex multilingual secondary mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18, 24-33.
2. Adler, J. (2001). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
3. Alton-Lee, A. (2003). Quality teaching for diverse students in schooling: Best evidence synthesis. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
4. Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 33-52.
5. Anthony, G. (1996). Classroom instructional factors affecting mathematics students' strategic learning behaviours. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics education (Proceedings of the 19th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 38-48). Melbourne, Australia: MERGA.
6. Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2002). Children's notions of commutativity: Do we need more than "turn-arounds"? SET: Research Information for Teachers, 3, 8-11.
7. Anthony, G., & Walshaw, M. (2007). Effective pedagogy in mathematics/pãngarau: Best evidence synthesis iteration (BES). Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
8. Askew, M., & Millet, A. (in press). Changing teaching in Year 4: The impact of a national intervention. In M. Askew, M. Brown, & A. Millet (Eds.), Learning about number: Interactions and outcomes in primary classrooms. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
9. Ball, D. L. (1993). With an eye on the mathematical horizon: Dilemmas of teaching elementary school mathematics. Elementary School Journal, 93, 373-397.
10. Ball, D. L. (Ed.). (2003). Mathematics proficiency for all students: Towards a strategic research development program in mathematics education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
11. Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S. T., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers' mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433-456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
12. Baxter, J., Woodward, J., & Olson, D. (2001). Effects of reform-based mathematics instruction on low achievers in five third-grade classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 101, 529-549.
13. Bicknell, B. (1998). The writing of explanations and justifications in mathematics. Unpublished master's thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
14. Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 412-446.
15. Boaler, J. (2003). Exploring the nature of mathematical activity: Using theory, research and "working hypothesis" to broaden conceptions of mathematics knowing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51, 3-21.
16. Boaler, J., Wiliam, D., & Brown, M. (2000). Students' experiences of ability grouping: Disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure. British Educational Research Journal, 26, 631-648.
17. Brophy, J. (1999). Teaching (Educational Practices Series No. 1). Geneva, Switzerland: International Bureau of Education.
18. Brophy, J. (Ed.). (2001). Introduction. In Subject-specific instructional methods and activities (pp. 1-23). Amsterdam: JAI.
19. Carpenter, T., Franke, M., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
20. Carpenter, T., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Chamberlain, M. T. (2005). Teachers' discussion of students' thinking: Meeting the challenge of attending to students' thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 141-170.
22. Christensen, I. (2004). An evaluation of Te Poutama Tau 2003: Exploring issues in mathematical education. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
23. Clark, M. (1997). Comfort in the mathematics classroom. New Zealand Mathematics Magazine, 34(2), 14-22.
24. Clarkson, P. (1992). Language and mathematics: A comparison of bilingual and monolingual students of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 417-430.
25. Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 258-277.
26. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and class-room practice. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development (pp. 91-119). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27. Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31, 175-190.
28. Coburn, C. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19, 476-509.
29. Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Davies, N., & Walker, K. (2005). Learning to notice: One aspect of teachers' content knowledge in numeracy classrooms. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche (Eds.), Building connections: Theory, research and practice (Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 1, pp. 273-280). Sydney, Australia: MERGA.
31. Davis, B. (1997). Listening for difference: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 355-376.
32. Davydov, V. V., & Radzikhovskii, L. A. (1985). Vygotsky's theory and the activity-oriented approach in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 35-65). New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Dawe, L. (1983). Bilingualism and mathematical reasoning in English as a second language. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 325-353.
34. Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 39-65.
35. Ding, M., Li, X., Piccolo, D., & Kulm, G. (2007). Teacher interventions in cooperative learning mathematic classes. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 163-175.
36. Doyle, W., & Carter, K. (1984). Academic tasks in classrooms. Curriculum Inquiry, 14,129-149.
37. Empson, S. (2003). Low performing students and teaching fractions for understanding: An interactions analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 305-343.
38. Engeström, Y. (1999). Innovative learning in work teams: Analysing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377-404). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. English, L. (Ed.). (2002). Handbook of international research in mathematics education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Fasi, U. M. L. (1999). Bilingualism and learning mathematics in English as a second language in Tonga. Unpublished master's thesis, Reading University, UK.
41. Forman, E., & Ansell, E. (2001). The multiple voices of a mathematics classroom community. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 114-142.
42. Forman, E., Larreamendy-Joerns, J., Stein, K., & Brown, M. (1998). "You're going to want to find out which and prove it": Collective argumentation in a mathematics classroom. Learning and Instruction, 8, 527-548.
43. Fraivillig, J. L., Murphy, L. A., & Fuson, K. C. (1999). Advancing children's mathematical thinking in everyday mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 148-170.
44. Franke, M. L., & Kazemi, E. (2001). Teaching as learning within a community of practice: Characterizing generative growth. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson-Scott, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 47-74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45. Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., Phillips, N., Karns, K., & Dutka, S. (1997). Enhancing students' helping behavior during peer-mediated instruction with conceptual mathematical explanations. Elementary School Journal, 97, 223-249.
46. Gamoran, A. (1992). The variable effects of high school tracking. American Sociological Review, 57, 812-828.
47. Gee, J. P., & Clinton, K. (2000). An African American child's science talk: Co-construction of meaning from the perspectives of multiple discourses. In M. Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 118-138). New York: Teachers College Press.
48. Gillies, R., & Boyle, M. (2006). Ten Australian elementary teachers' discourse and reported pedagogical practices during cooperative learning. Elementary School Journal, 106, 429-451.
49. Gipps, C., McCallum, B., & Hargreaves, E. (2000). What makes a good primary school teacher? London: RoutledgeFalmer.
50. Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 258-291.
51. Hicks, D. (1998). Closing reflections on mathematical talk and mathematics teaching. In M. Lampert & M. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 241-252). New York: Cambridge University Press.
52. Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., et al. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
53. Hill, H., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371-406.
54. Hill, J., & Hawk, K. (2000). Making a difference in the classroom: Effective teaching practice in low decile, multicultural schools. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education Research Division.
55. Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching. London: Falmer.
56. Jaworski, B. (2004). Grappling with complexity: Co-learning in inquiry communities in mathematics teaching development. In M. Høines & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 17-36). Bergen, Norway: PME.
57. Jones, A. (1991). "At school I've got a chance": Culture/privilege: Pacific Islands and Pakeha girls at schools. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore.
58. Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 203-235.
59. Kazemi, E., & Stipek, D. (2001). Promoting conceptual thinking in four upper-elementary mathematics classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 102, 59-80.
60. Khisty, L. (1995). Making inequality: Issues of language and meaning in mathematics teaching with Hispanic students. In W. Secada, E. Fennema, & L. B. Adajian (Eds.), New directions for equity in mathematics education (pp. 279-297). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61. Khisty, L., & Chval, K. (2002). Pedagogic discourse and equity in mathematics: When teachers' talk matters. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14, 154-168.
62. Knight, N. (2003). Teacher feedback to students in numeracy lessons: Are students getting good value? SET: Research Information for Teachers, 3, 40-45.
63. Koehler, M., & Grouws, D. (1992). Mathematics teaching practices and their effects. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 11-48). New York: Macmillan.
64. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 29-63.
65. Lampert, M., & Blunk, M. (Eds.). (1998). Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
66. Latu, V. (2005). Language factors that affect mathematics teaching and learning of Pasifika students. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, & A. Roche. (Eds.), Building connections: Research, theory and practice (Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 483-490). Sydney, Australia: MERGA.
67. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
68. Lubienski, S. T. (2002). Research, reform, and equity in U.S. mathematics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 103-125.
69. Luke, A., & Hogan, D. (2006). Redesigning what counts as evidence in educational policy: The Singapore model. In J. Ozga, T. Popkewitz, & T. Seddon (Eds.), Education research and policy: Steering the knowledge-based economy. World handbook of education (pp. 170-184). London: Routledge.
70. Maddern, S., & Court, R. (1989). Improving mathematics practice and classroom teaching. Nottingham, UK: Shell Centre for Mathematics Education.
71. Manouchehri, A., & Enderson, M. C. (1999). Promoting mathematical discourse: Learning from classroom examples. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 4(4), 216-222.
72. Marton, F., & Tsui, A. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
73. Maxwell, J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3-11.
74. McChesney, J. (2005, April). Student-initiated interactions: Student agency in mathematics classrooms. Paper presented at the AERA annual meeting, Montreal, Canada, as part of the NZARE symposium titled Making Meaning: Students Agency in Four Curriculum Contexts.
75. McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). An analysis of development of sociomathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32,236-266.
76. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
77. Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds. London: Routledge.
78. Mewborn, D. (1999). Reflective thinking among pre-service elementary mathematics teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 316-341.
79. Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2002). Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37, 17-25.
80. Millet, A., Brown, M., & Askew, M. (Eds.). (2004). Primary mathematics and the developing professional. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
81. Morrone, A., Harkness, S., D'Ambrosio, B., & Caulfield, R. (2004). Patterns of instructional discourse that promote the perception of mastery goals in a social constructivist mathematics course. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 19-38.
82. Moschkovich, J. (1999). Supporting the participation of English language learners in mathematical discussions. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19, 11-19.
83. Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective of bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 189-212.
84. Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). Effective teaching: Evidence and practice. London: Paul Chapman.
85. Nathan, M., & Knuth, E. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 175-207.
86. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
87. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics (Report prepared by the Mathematics Learning Study Committee). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
88. Neville-Barton, P., & Barton, B. (2005). The relationship between English-language and mathematics learning for non-native speakers (Teaching and Learning Research Initiative final report). Retrieved August 2005 from http://www.tlri.org.nz/index.html
89. O'Connor, M. C. (1998). Language socialisation in the mathematics classroom: Discourse practices and mathematical thinking. In M. Blunk (Ed.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 17-55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
90. O'Connor, M. C. (2001). "Can any fraction be turned into a decimal?" A case study of the mathematical group discussion. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 143-185.
91. O'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. (1996). Shifting participant frameworks: Orchestrating thinking practices in group discussion. In D. Hicks (Ed.), Discourse, learning and schooling (pp. 63-103). New York: Cambridge University Press.
92. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2004). Program for International Student Assessment. Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003 (OECD Pub. No. 53799 2004). Paris: Author.
93. Pape, S., Bell, C., & Yetkin, I. (2003). Developing mathematical thinking and self-regulated learning: A teaching experiment in a seventh-grade mathematics class-room. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53, 179-202.
94. Planas, N., & Gorgorió, N. (2004). Are different students expected to learn norms differently in the mathematics classroom? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16,19-40.
95. Popkewitz, T. S. (1988). Institutional issues in the study of school mathematics: Curriculum research. In A. J. Bishop (Ed.), Mathematics education and culture (pp. 221-249). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
96. Richardson, V. (Ed.). (2001). Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
97. Rowe, K. (2004, December). The importance of teaching: Ensuring better schooling by building teacher capacities that maximise the quality of teaching and learning provision-Implications of findings from emerging international and Australian-evidence-based research. Paper presented at the Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne.
98. Ruthven, K. (2002). Assessment in mathematics education. In L. Haggarty (Ed.), Teaching mathematics in secondary schools (pp. 176-191). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
99. Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
100. Schifter, D. (2001). Learning to see the invisible. In T. Wood, B. Scott-Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 109-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
101. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-370). New York: Macmillan.
102. Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
103. Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2001). Code-switching in a senior primary class of secondary-language mathematics learners. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18, 34-42.
104. Sfard, A., Forman, E., & Kieran, C. (2001). Guest editorial. Learning discourse: Sociocultural approaches to research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 1-11.
105. Sfard, A., & Kieran, C. (2001). Cognition as communication: Rethinking learning-by-talking through multi-faceted analysis of students' mathematical interactions. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8(1), 42-76.
106. Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a professional vision of classroom events. In T. Wood, B. Scott-Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond classical pedagogy: Teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 75-93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
107. Sherin, M. G. (2002). When teaching becomes learning. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 119-150.
108. Shulman, L., & Shulman, J. (2004). How and what teachers learn: A shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 257-271.
109. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
110. Simon, M., & Blume, G. W. (1996). Justification in the mathematics classroom: A study of prospective elementary teachers. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 15, 3-31.
111. Stein, M. (2001). Teaching and learning mathematics: How instruction can foster the knowing and understanding of number. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Subject-specific instructional methods and activities (Vol. 8, pp. 111-144). Amsterdam: JAI.
112. Stein, M., Grover, B., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455-488.
113. Steinberg, R., Empson, S., & Carpenter, T. (2004). Inquiry into children's mathematical thinking as a means to teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7, 237-267.
114. Stigler, J. W. (1988). Research into practice: The use of verbal explanation in Japanese and American classrooms. Arithmetic Teacher, 36(2), 27-29.
115. Sullivan, P., Zevenbergen, R., & Mousley, J. (2003). The contexts of mathematics tasks and the context of the classroom: Are we including all students? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 15, 107-121.
116. Taylor, J., & Cox, B. D. (1997). Microgenetic analysis of group-based solution of complex two-step mathematical word problems by fourth graders. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 183-226.
117. Turner, J. C., Meyer, D., Cox, K., Logan, C., & DiCintio, M., & Thomas, C. (1998). Creating contexts for involvement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 730-745.
118. Turner, J. C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D. K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E. M., Kang, J., et al. (2002). The classroom environment and students' reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 88-106.
119. Veenman, S., Denessen, E., van den Akker, A., & van der Rijt, J. (2005). Effects of a cooperative learning program on the elaborations of students during help seeking and help giving. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 115-151.
120. Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.
121. Watson, A. (2002). Instances of mathematical thinking among low attaining students in an ordinary secondary classroom. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 20, 461-475.
122. Watson, A., De Geest, E., & Prestage, S. (2003). Deep progress in mathematics: The Improving Attainment in Mathematics Project. Oxford, UK: Universities of Oxford and Birmingham.
123. Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behaviour in peer-directed groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 63-119.
124. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
125. White, D. (2003). Promoting productive mathematical classroom discourse. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 37-53.
126. Whitenack, J. W., Knipping, N., & Kim, O. (2001). The teacher's and students' important roles in sustaining and enabling classroom mathematical practices: A case for realistic mathematics education. In Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 415-422). Utrecht: PME.
127. Wiliam, D. (1999). Formative assessment in mathematics: Part 2: Feedback. Equals 5(3),8-11.
128. Wood, T. (2001). Learning to teach mathematics differently: Reflection matters. In M. Heuvel-Panhizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 431-438). Utrecht: PME.
129. Wood, T. (2002). What does it mean to teach mathematics differently? In B. Barton, K. Irwin, M. Pfannkuch, & M. Thomas (Eds.), Mathematics education in the South Pacific (Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 1, pp. 61-67). Sydney: MERGA.
130. Wood, T., & McNeal, B. (2003). Complexity in teaching and children's mathematical thinking. In N. Pateman, B. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 435-441). Honolulu, HI: PME & PMENA.
131. Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children's mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37, 222-252.
132. Woodward, J., & Irwin, K. (2005). Language appropriate for the New Zealand numeracy project. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough, R. Pierce, et al. (Eds.), Building connection: Theory, research and practice (Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Vol. 2, pp. 799-806). Sydney: MERGA.
133. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2, 458-477.
134. Yackel, E., Cobb, P., & Wood, T. (1998). The interactive constitution of mathematical meaning in one second grade classroom: An illustrative example. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 17, 469-488.
135. Zack, V., & Graves, B. (2002). Making mathematics meaning through dialogue: "Once you think of it, the z minus three seems pretty weird." Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 229-271.
136. Zevenbergen, R. (2005). The construction of a mathematical habitus: Implications of ability grouping in the middle years. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 607-619.