Mathematics intervention for first- and second-grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons (Remedial and Special Education (2008) 29:1 (20-32) DOI:10.1177/0741932507309712);Mathematics intervention for first- and second-grade students with mathematics difficulties: The effects of tier 2 intervention delivered as booster lessons

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 20-32

  Bryant, Diane Pedrotty ^a   Bryant, Brian R ^a   Gersten, Russell ^b   Scammacca, Nancy ^a   Chavez, Melissa M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Instructional Research Group   (United States)

Author keywords

Mathematics difficulties; Mathematics intervention; Response to intervention; Tier 2 intervention

Indexed keywords

EID: 39749153430     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741932508318665     Document Type: Erratum

References (48)

1. Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 51-73.
2. Bell, M., Bell, J., Bretzlaugh, J., Dillard, A., Hartfield, R., Isaacs, A., McBride, J., Pitvorec, K., & Saecker, P. (2001). Everday mathematics: The University of Chicago School mathematics project. Chicago, IL: SRA/McGraw-Hill.
3. Bryant, B. R., Bryant, D. P., Gersten, R., Roberts, G., Wagner, R., Kim, S. A., Seo, Y.-J., & Shih, M. (2007). The development of early mathematics measures for identification and progress monitoring purposes. Manuscript in preparation.
4. Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., & Hammill, D. D. (2000). Characteristic behaviors of students with learning disabilities who have teacher-identified math weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(2), 168-177, 199.
5. Bryant, D. P., Smith, D. D., & Bryant, B. R. (2008). Teaching students with special needs in inclusive classrooms. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., Babbit, B., & Pierce, T. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 99-111.
7. Chard, D. J., Clarke, B., Baker, S., Otterstedt, J., Braun, D., & Katz, R. (2005). Using measures of number sense to screen for difficulties in mathematics: Preliminary findings. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 30(2), 3-14.
8. Charles, R. I., Chancellor, D., Moore, D., Schielack, J. F., Van de Walle, J., et al. (1999). Math. Menlo Park, CA: Scott Foresman - Addison Wesley.
9. Clarke, B., & Shinn, M. R. (2004). A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 33(2), 234-238.
10. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (Eds.). (2004). Engaging young children in mathematics standards for early childhood education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Paulsen, K., Bryant, J. D., & Hamlett, C. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493-513.
12. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2001). Principles for the prevention and intervention of mathematics difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 85-95.
13. Fuchs, L. S, & Fuchs, D. (2005). Enhancing mathematical problem solving for students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 45-57.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlet, C. L., Powell, S. R., Capizzi, A. M., & Seethaler, P. M. (2006). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on number combination skill in at-risk first graders. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(5), 467-475.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hollenbeck, K. N. (2007). Extending responsiveness to intervention to mathematics at first and third grade. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 22(1), 13-24.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergarteners' mathematical development: Effects of peer-assisted learning strategies. The Elementary School Journal, 101,495-511.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C. L., Owen, R., et al. (2003). Enhancing third-grade students' mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 306-315.
18. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L., & Powell, S. R. (2002). Enhancing first-grade children's mathematical development with peer-assisted learning strategies. School Psychology Review, 31, 569-583.
19. Geary, D. C. (1990). A componential analysis of an early learning deficit in mathematics. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 33, 386-404.
20. Geary, D. C. (1993). Mathematical disabilities: Cognitive, neuropsychological, and genetic components. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 345-362.
21. Geary, D. C. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4-15.
22. Geary, D. C, Hamson, C. O., & Hoard, M. K. (2000). Numerical and arithmetical cognition: A longitudinal study of process and concept deficits in children with learning disability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 77, 236-263.
23. Gersten, R., & Chard, D. (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 33, 18-28.
24. Gersten, R., Jordan, N. C, & Flojo, J. R. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(4), 293-304.
25. Griffin, S. A., Case, R., & Siegler, R. S. (1994). Rightstart: Providing the central conceptual prerequisites for first formal learning of arithmetic to students at risk for school failure. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 24-49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Gross-Tsur, V., Manor, O., & Shalev, R. S. (1996). Developmental dyscalculia: Prevalence and demographic features. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38, 25-33.
27. Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
28. Hanich, L. Jordan, N. C, Kaplan, D., & Dick, J. (2001). Performance across different areas of mathematical cognition in children with learning difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 615-626.
29. Harcourt Assessment. (2003). Stanford Achievement Test-l0th Edition. San Antonio, TX: Author.
30. Individuals With Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004,20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
31. Jordan, N. C., Hanich, L. B., & Kaplan, D. (2003). Arithmetic fact mastery in young children: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85, 103-119.
32. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., & Hanich, L. B. (2002). Achievement growth in children with learning difficulties in mathematics: Findings of a two-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 586-597.
33. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Oláh, L. N., & Locuniak, M. N. (2006). Number sense growth in kindergarten: A longitudinal investigation of children at risk for mathematics difficulties. Child Development, 77(1), 153-175.
34. Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97-115.
35. Lewis, C., Hitch, G. J., & Walker, P. (1994). The prevalence of specific arithmetic difficulties and specific reading difficulties in 9- to 10-year-old boys and girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35, 283-292.
36. Mercer, C. D., Jordan, L., & Miller, S. P. (1996). Constructivistic math instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11, 147-156.
37. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
38. Ostad, S. (1998). Developmental differences in solving simple arithmetic word problems and simple number-fact problems: A comparison of mathematically disabled children. Mathematical Cognition, 4(1), 1-19.
39. Parmar, R. S., Cawley, J. F, & Frazita, R. R. (1996). Word problem-solving by students with and without mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62(5), 415-429.
40. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
41. Swanson, H. L. (2001). Reading intervention research outcomes and students with learning disabilities: What are the major instructional ingredients for successful outcomes? Perspectives, 27(2), 18-20.
42. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York: Guilford.
43. Trochim, W. (1984). Research design for program evaluation: The regression-discontinuity approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
44. Van de Walle, J. A. (2004). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
45. Vaughn, S., & Fuchs, L. (2003). Redefining learning disabilities as inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18(3), 137-146.
46. Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman-Davis, P. (2003). Response to treatment as a means of identifying students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 69, 391-409.
47. Vaughn, S., Moody, S. W., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in die resource room. Exceptional Children, 64(2), 211-225.
48. Woodward, J., & Baxter, J. (1997). The effects of an innovative approach to mathematics on academically low-achieving students in inclusive settings. Exceptional Children, 63, 373-388.