Nuclear pore complexes in the maintenance of genome integrity

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 378-386

  Bukata, Lucas ^a   Parker, Stephanie L ^a   D'Angelo, Maximiliano A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUB3 PROTEIN; LAMIN A; NUCLEOPORIN; PROTEIN MAD1; PROTEIN MAD2; PROTEIN UBC9; SECURIN;

CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CENTROMERE; CENTROSOME; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CYTOKINESIS; CYTOPLASM; DELETION MUTANT; DNA DAMAGE; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; GENOME; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; M PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MULTINUCLEAR CELL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; NUCLEOCYTOPLASMIC TRANSPORT; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHASE; RECOMBINATION REPAIR; REVIEW; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; SISTER CHROMATID; SUMOYLATION; TELOMERE HOMEOSTASIS;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMOSOMES; CYTOPLASM; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; NUCLEAR PORE;

EID: 84879219040     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: 18790410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2013.03.002     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Raices M., D'Angelo M.A. Nuclear pore complex composition: a new regulator of tissue-specific and developmental functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2012, 13:687-699.
2. Rout M.P., Aitchison J.D., Suprapto A., Hjertaas K., Zhao Y., Chait B.T. The yeast nuclear pore complex: composition, architecture, and transport mechanism. J Cell Biol 2000, 148:635-651.
3. Cronshaw J.M., Krutchinsky A.N., Zhang W., Chait B.T., Matunis M.J. Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex. J Cell Biol 2002, 158:915-927.
4. Alber F., Dokudovskaya S., Veenhoff L.M., Zhang W., Kipper J., Devos D., Suprapto A., Karni-Schmidt O., Williams R., Chait B.T., Sali A., et al. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 2007, 450:695-701.
5. Bennett C.B., Lewis L.K., Karthikeyan G., Lobachev K.S., Jin Y.H., Sterling J.F., Snipe J.R., Resnick M.A. Genes required for ionizing radiation resistance in yeast. Nat Genet 2001, 29:426-434.
6. Kolling R., Nguyen T., Chen E.Y., Botstein D. A new yeast gene with a myosin-like heptad repeat structure. Mol Gen Genet 1993, 237:359-369.
7. Kosova B., Pante N., Rollenhagen C., Podtelejnikov A., Mann M., Aebi U., Hurt E. Mlp2p, a component of nuclear pore attached intranuclear filaments, associates with nic96p. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:343-350.
8. Galy V., Olivo-Marin J.C., Scherthan H., Doye V., Rascalou N., Nehrbass U. Nuclear pore complexes in the organization of silent telomeric chromatin. Nature 2000, 403:108-112.
9. Chang M., Bellaoui M., Boone C., Brown G.W. A genome-wide screen for methyl methanesulfonate-sensitive mutants reveals genes required for s phase progression in the presence of DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:16934-16939.
10. Begley T.J., Rosenbach A.S., Ideker T., Samson L.D. Damage recovery pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae revealed by genomic phenotyping and interactome mapping. Mol Cancer Res 2002, 1:103-112.
11. Hediger F., Dubrana K., Gasser S.M. Myosin-like proteins 1 and 2 are not required for silencing or telomere anchoring, but act in the tel1 pathway of telomere length control. J Struct Biol 2002, 140:79-91.
12. Loeillet S., Palancade B., Cartron M., Thierry A., Richard G.F., Dujon B., Doye V., Nicolas A. Genetic network interactions among replication, repair and nuclear pore deficiencies in yeast. DNA Repair (Amst) 2005, 4:459-468.
13. Palancade B., Liu X., Garcia-Rubio M., Aguilera A., Zhao X., Doye V. Nucleoporins prevent DNA damage accumulation by modulating ulp1-dependent sumoylation processes. Mol Biol Cell 2007, 18:2912-2923.
14. Zhao X., Wu C.Y., Blobel G. Mlp-dependent anchorage and stabilization of a desumoylating enzyme is required to prevent clonal lethality. J Cell Biol 2004, 167:605-611.
15. Chen X.L., Silver H.R., Xiong L., Belichenko I., Adegite C., Johnson E.S. Topoisomerase I-dependent viability loss in Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants defective in both sumo conjugation and DNA repair. Genetics 2007, 177:17-30.
16. Morio T., Kim H. Ku, artemis, and ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated: signalling networks in DNA damage. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2008, 40:598-603.
17. Dou H., Huang C., Van Nguyen T., Lu L.S., Yeh E.T. Sumoylation and de-sumoylation in response to DNA damage. FEBS Lett 2011, 585:2891-2896.
18. Nagai S., Dubrana K., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., Davidson M.B., Roberts T.M., Brown G.W., Varela E., Hediger F., Gasser S.M., Krogan N.J. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated sumo-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 2008, 322:597-602.
19. Perry J.J., Tainer J.A., Boddy M.N. A simultaneous role for sumo and ubiquitin. Trends Biochem Sci 2008, 33:201-208.
20. Carballo J.A., Cha R.S. Meiotic roles of mec1, a budding yeast homolog of mammalian atr/atm. Chromosome Res 2007, 15:539-550.
21. Usui T., Petrini J.H., Morales M. Rad50s alleles of the mre11 complex: questions answered and questions raised. Exp Cell Res 2006, 312:2694-2699.
22. Muller S., Ledl A., Schmidt D., Schmidt D. Sumo: a regulator of gene expression and genome integrity. Oncogene 2004, 23:1998-2008.
23. Zhang H., Saitoh H., Matunis M.J. Enzymes of the sumo modification pathway localize to filaments of the nuclear pore complex. Mol Cell Biol 2002, 22:6498-6508.
24. Xu X.M., Rose A., Muthuswamy S., Jeong S.Y., Venkatakrishnan S., Zhao Q., Meier I. Nuclear pore anchor, the Arabidopsis homolog of tpr/mlp1/mlp2/megator, is involved in mrna export and sumo homeostasis and affects diverse aspects of plant development. Plant Cell 2007, 19:1537-1548.
25. Palancade B., Doye V. Sumoylating and desumoylating enzymes at nuclear pores: underpinning their unexpected duties?. Trends Cell Biol 2008, 18:174-183.
26. Lemaitre C., Fischer B., Kalousi A., Hoffbeck A.S., Guirouilh-Barbat J., Shahar O.D., Genet D., Goldberg M., Betrand P., Lopez B., Brino L., et al. The nucleoporin 153, a novel factor in double-strand break repair and DNA damage response. Oncogene 2012, 31:4803-4809.
27. Moudry P., Lukas C., Macurek L., Neumann B., Heriche J.K., Pepperkok R., Ellenberg J., Hodny Z., Lukas J., Bartek J. Nucleoporin nup153 guards genome integrity by promoting nuclear import of 53bp1. Cell Death Differ 2012, 19:798-807.
28. Noon A.T., Goodarzi AA 53bp1-mediated DNA double strand break repair: insert bad pun here. DNA Repair (Amst) 2011, 10:1071-1076.
29. Gillespie P.J., Khoudoli G.A., Stewart G., Swedlow J.R., Blow J.J. Elys/mel-28 chromatin association coordinates nuclear pore complex assembly and replication licensing. Curr Biol 2007, 17:1657-1662.
30. Davuluri G., Gong W., Yusuff S., Lorent K., Muthumani M., Dolan A.C., Pack M. Mutation of the zebrafish nucleoporin elys sensitizes tissue progenitors to replication stress. PLoS Genet 2008, 4:e1000240.
31. Gao N., Davuluri G., Gong W., Seiler C., Lorent K., Furth E.E., Kaestner K.H., Pack M. The nuclear pore complex protein elys is required for genome stability in mouse intestinal epithelial progenitor cells. Gastroenterology 2011, 140:1547-1555. e1510.
32. Bermejo R., Capra T., Jossen R., Colosio A., Frattini C., Carotenuto W., Cocito A., Doksani Y., Klein H., Gomez-Gonzalez B., Aguilera A., et al. The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores. Cell 2011, 146:233-246.
33. De Lange T. Telomere-related genome instability in cancer. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2005, 70:197-204.
34. Verdun R.E., Karlseder J. Replication and protection of telomeres. Nature 2007, 447:924-931.
35. Taddei A., Gasser S.M. Structure and function in the budding yeast nucleus. Genetics 2012, 192:107-129.
36. Feuerbach F., Galy V., Trelles-Sticken E., Fromont-Racine M., Jacquier A., Gilson E., Olivo-Marin J.C., Scherthan H., Nehrbass U. Nuclear architecture and spatial positioning help establish transcriptional states of telomeres in yeast. Nat Cell Biol 2002, 4:214-221.
37. Therizols P., Fairhead C., Cabal G.G., Genovesio A., Olivo-Marin J.C., Dujon B., Fabre E. Telomere tethering at the nuclear periphery is essential for efficient DNA double strand break repair in subtelomeric region. J Cell Biol 2006, 172:189-199.
38. Schober H., Ferreira H., Kalck V., Gehlen L.R., Gasser S.M. Yeast telomerase and the sun domain protein mps3 anchor telomeres and repress subtelomeric recombination. Genes Dev 2009, 23:928-938.
39. Khadaroo B., Teixeira M.T., Luciano P., Eckert-Boulet N., Germann S.M., Simon M.N., Gallina I., Abdallah P., Gilson E., Geli V., Lisby M. The DNA damage response at eroded telomeres and tethering to the nuclear pore complex. Nat Cell Biol 2009, 11:980-987.
40. Ricchetti M., Dujon B., Fairhead C. Distance from the chromosome end determines the efficiency of double strand break repair in subtelomeres of haploid yeast. J Mol Biol 2003, 328:847-862.
41. Crabbe L., Cesare A.J., Kasuboski J.M., Fitzpatrick J.A., Karlseder J. Human telomeres are tethered to the nuclear envelope during postmitotic nuclear assembly. Cell Rep 2012, 2:1521-1529.
42. Gonzalez-Suarez I., Redwood A.B., Perkins S.M., Vermolen B., Lichtensztejin D., Grotsky D.A., Morgado-Palacin L., Gapud E.J., Sleckman B.P., Sullivan T., Sage J., et al. Novel roles for a-type lamins in telomere biology and the DNA damage response pathway. EMBO J 2009, 28:2414-2427.
43. Thompson S.L., Bakhoum S.F., Compton D.A. Mechanisms of chromosomal instability. Curr Biol 2010, 20:R285-R295.
44. Ito D., Matsumoto T. Molecular mechanisms and function of the spindle checkpoint, a guardian of the chromosome stability. Adv Exp Med Biol 2010, 676:15-26.
45. Chatel G., Fahrenkrog B Nucleoporins: leaving the nuclear pore complex for a successful mitosis. Cell Signal 2011, 23:1555-1562.
46. Nakano H., Wang W., Hashizume C., Funasaka T., Sato H., Wong R.W. Unexpected role of nucleoporins in coordination of cell cycle progression. Cell Cycle 2011, 10:425-433.
47. Wozniak R., Burke B., Doye V. Nuclear transport and the mitotic apparatus: an evolving relationship. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010, 67:2215-2230.
48. Kerscher O., Hieter P., Winey M., Basrai M.A. Novel role for a Saccharomyces cerevisiae nucleoporin, nup170p, in chromosome segregation. Genetics 2001, 157:1543-1553.
49. Pichler A., Knipscheer P., Saitoh H., Sixma T.K., Melchior F. The ranbp2 sumo e3 ligase is neither hect- nor ring-type. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004, 11:984-991.
50. Pichler A., Gast A., Seeler J.S., Dejean A., Melchior F. The nucleoporin ranbp2 has sumo1 e3 ligase activity. Cell 2002, 108:109-120.
51. Saitoh H., Pu R., Cavenagh M., Dasso M. Ranbp2 associates with ubc9p and a modified form of rangap1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1997, 94:3736-3741.
52. Salina D., Enarson P., Rattner J.B., Burke B. Nup358 integrates nuclear envelope breakdown with kinetochore assembly. J Cell Biol 2003, 162:991-1001.
53. Joseph J., Liu S.T., Jablonski S.A., Yen T.J., Dasso M. The rangap1-ranbp2 complex is essential for microtubule-kinetochore interactions in vivo. Curr Biol 2004, 14:611-617.
54. Dawlaty M.M., Malureanu L., Jeganathan K.B., Kao E., Sustmann C., Tahk S., Shuai K., Grosschedl R., van Deursen JM Resolution of sister centromeres requires ranbp2-mediated sumoylation of topoisomerase II alpha. Cell 2008, 133:103-115.
55. Klein U.R., Haindl M., Nigg E.A., Muller S. Ranbp2 and senp3 function in a mitotic sumo2/3 conjugation-deconjugation cycle on borealin. Mol Biol Cell 2009, 20:410-418.
56. Babu J.R., Jeganathan K.B., Baker D.J., Wu X., Kang-Decker N., van Deursen JM Rae1 is an essential mitotic checkpoint regulator that cooperates with bub3 to prevent chromosome missegregation. J Cell Biol 2003, 160:341-353.
57. Blower M.D., Nachury M., Heald R., Weis K. A rae1-containing ribonucleoprotein complex is required for mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 2005, 121:223-234.
58. Radulescu A.E., Cleveland D.W. Numa after 30 years: the matrix revisited. Trends Cell Biol 2010, 20:214-222.
59. Wong R.W., Blobel G., Coutavas E. Rae1 interaction with numa is required for bipolar spindle formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:19783-19787.
60. Jeganathan K.B., Malureanu L., van Deursen JM The rae1-nup98 complex prevents aneuploidy by inhibiting securin degradation. Nature 2005, 438:1036-1039.
61. Jeganathan K.B., Baker D.J., van Deursen JM Securin associates with apccdh1 in prometaphase but its destruction is delayed by rae1 and nup98 until the metaphase/anaphase transition. Cell Cycle 2006, 5:366-370.
62. Wong R.W. Interaction between rae1 and cohesin subunit smc1 is required for proper spindle formation. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:198-200.
63. Loiodice I., Alves A., Rabut G., Van Overbeek M., Ellenberg J., Sibarita J.B., Doye V. The entire nup107-160 complex, including three new members, is targeted as one entity to kinetochores in mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 2004, 15:3333-3344.
64. Zuccolo M., Alves A., Galy V., Bolhy S., Formstecher E., Racine V., Sibarita J.B., Fukagawa T., Shiekhattar R., Yen T., Doye V. The human nup107-160 nuclear pore subcomplex contributes to proper kinetochore functions. EMBO J 2007, 26:1853-1864.
65. Galy V., Askjaer P., Franz C., Lopez-Iglesias C., Mattaj IW Mel-28, a novel nuclear-envelope and kinetochore protein essential for zygotic nuclear-envelope assembly in C. elegans. Curr Biol 2006, 16:1748-1756.
66. Platani M., Santarella-Mellwig R., Posch M., Walczak R., Swedlow J.R., Mattaj I.W. The nup107-160 nucleoporin complex promotes mitotic events via control of the localization state of the chromosome passenger complex. Mol Biol Cell 2009, 20:5260-5275.
67. Orjalo A.V., Arnaoutov A., Shen Z., Boyarchuk Y., Zeitlin S.G., Fontoura B., Briggs S., Dasso M., Forbes D.J. The nup107-160 nucleoporin complex is required for correct bipolar spindle assembly. Mol Biol Cell 2006, 17:3806-3818.
68. Bai S.W., Rouquette J., Umeda M., Faigle W., Loew D., Sazer S., Doye V. The fission yeast nup107-120 complex functionally interacts with the small gtpase ran/spi1 and is required for mrna export, nuclear pore distribution, and proper cell division. Mol Cell Biol 2004, 24:6379-6392.
69. Mishra R.K., Chakraborty P., Arnaoutov A., Fontoura B.M., Dasso M. The nup107-160 complex and gamma-turc regulate microtubule polymerization at kinetochores. Nat Cell Biol 2010, 12:164-169.
70. Bolhy S., Bouhlel I., Dultz E., Nayak T., Zuccolo M., Gatti X., Vallee R., Ellenberg J., Doye V. A nup133-dependent npc-anchored network tethers centrosomes to the nuclear envelope in prophase. J Cell Biol 2011, 192:855-871.
71. Hachet V., Busso C., Toya M., Sugimoto A., Askjaer P., Gonczy P. The nucleoporin nup205/npp-3 is lost near centrosomes at mitotic onset and can modulate the timing of this process in caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Mol Biol Cell 2012, 23:3111-3121.
72. Mackay D.R., Makise M., Ullman K.S. Defects in nuclear pore assembly lead to activation of an aurora b-mediated abscission checkpoint. J Cell Biol 2010, 191:923-931.
73. Lussi Y.C., Shumaker D.K., Shimi T., Fahrenkrog B. The nucleoporin nup153 affects spindle checkpoint activity due to an association with mad1. Nucleus 2010, 1:71-84.
74. Mackay D.R., Elgort S.W., Ullman K.S. The nucleoporin nup153 has separable roles in both early mitotic progression and the resolution of mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 2009, 20:1652-1660.
75. Nakano H., Funasaka T., Hashizume C., Wong R.W. Nucleoporin translocated promoter region (tpr) associates with dynein complex, preventing chromosome lagging formation during mitosis. J Biol Chem 2010, 285:10841-10849.
76. Lee S.H., Sterling H., Burlingame A., McCormick F. Tpr directly binds to mad1 and mad2 and is important for the mad1-mad2-mediated mitotic spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 2008, 22:2926-2931.
77. Hashizume C., Nakano H., Yoshida K., Wong R.W. Characterization of the role of the tumor marker nup88 in mitosis. Mol Cancer 2010, 9:119.
78. Van de Vosse D.W., Wan Y., Wozniak R.W., Aitchison JD Role of the nuclear envelope in genome organization and gene expression. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 2011, 3:147-166.
79. Capelson M., Doucet C., Hetzer M.W. Nuclear pore complexes: guardians of the nuclear genome. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2010, 75:585-597.