The interaction between CtIP and BRCA1 is not essential for resection-mediated DNA repair or tumor suppression

Journal of Cell Biology

Volumn 201, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 693-707

  Reczek, Colleen R ^a   Szabolcs, Matthias ^a   Stark, Jeremy M ^b   Ludwig, Thomas ^a,c   Baer, Richard ^a  

^a NewYork Presbyterian Hospital   (United States)

^b CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRCA1 PROTEIN; CTIP PROTEIN; DNA; PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CANCER INHIBITION; CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY; CELL MUTANT; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; MALE; MAMMAL CELL; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION;

ANIMALS; BRCA1 PROTEIN; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; MICE; NEOPLASMS; PHOSPHORYLATION; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; REPLICATION PROTEIN A;

MAMMALIA; MUS;

EID: 84878551708     PISSN: 00219525     EISSN: 15408140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201302145     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Bennardo, N., A. Cheng, N. Huang, and J.M. Stark. 2008. Alternative-NHEJ is a mechanistically distinct pathway of mammalian chromosome break repair. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen .1000110
2. Botuyan, M.V., Y. Nominé, X. Yu, N. Juranic, S. Macura, J. Chen, and G. Mer. 2004. Structural basis of BACH1 phosphopeptide recognition by BRCA1 tandem BRCT domains. Structure. 12:1137-1146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2004.06.002
3. Chen, L., C.J. Nievera, A.Y. Lee, and X. Wu. 2008. Cell cycle-dependent complex formation of BRCA1.CtIP.MRN is important for DNA double-strand break repair. J. Biol. Chem. 283:7713-7720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/ jbc.M710245200
4. Chen, P.L., F. Liu, S. Cai, X. Lin, A. Li, Y. Chen, B. Gu, E.Y. Lee, and W.H. Lee. 2005. Inactivation of CtIP leads to early embryonic lethality mediated by G1 restraint and to tumorigenesis by haploid insufficiency. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:3535-3542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.9.3535-3542.2005
5. Chinnadurai, G. 2006. CtIP, a candidate tumor susceptibility gene is a team player with luminaries. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1765:67-73.
6. Clapperton, J.A., I.A. Manke, D.M. Lowery, T. Ho, L.F. Haire, M.B. Yaffe, and S.J. Smerdon. 2004. Structure and mechanism of BRCA1 BRCT domain recognition of phosphorylated BACH1 with implications for cancer. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:512-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb775
7. Escribano-Díaz, C., A. Orthwein, A. Fradet-Turcotte, M. Xing, J.T. Young, J. Tkác̊, M.A. Cook, A.P. Rosebrock, M. Munro, M.D. Canny, et al. 2013. A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell. 49:872-883. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.001
8. Greenberg, R.A., B. Sobhian, S. Pathania, S.B. Cantor, Y. Nakatani, and D.M. Livingston. 2006. Multifactorial contributions to an acute DNA damage response by BRCA1/BARD1-containing complexes. Genes Dev. 20:34-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1381306
9. Hakem, R., J.L. de la Pompa, A. Elia, J. Potter, and T.W. Mak. 1997. Partial rescue of Brca1 (5-6) early embryonic lethality by p53 or p21 null mutation. Nat. Genet. 16:298-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ng0797-298
10. Hartsuiker, E., M.J. Neale, and A.M. Carr. 2009. Distinct requirements for the Rad32(Mre11) nuclease and Ctp1(CtIP) in the removal of covalently bound topoisomerase I and II from DNA. Mol. Cell. 33:117-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2008.11.021
11. Huen, M.S., S.M. Sy, and J. Chen. 2010. BRCA1 and its toolbox for the maintenance of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:138-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2831
12. Kim, H., J. Huang, and J. Chen. 2007. CCDC98 is a BRCA1-BRCT domainbinding protein involved in the DNA damage response. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:710-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1277
13. Lee, K., and S.E. Lee. 2007. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2-and Tel1-dependent single-strand DNA formation at DNA break promotes microhomologymediated end joining. Genetics. 176:2003-2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.076539
14. Li, M.L., and R.A. Greenberg. 2012. Links between genome integrity and BRCA1 tumor suppression. Trends Biochem. Sci. 37:418-424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2012.06.007
15. Limbo, O., C. Chahwan, Y. Yamada, R.A. de Bruin, C. Wittenberg, and P. Russell. 2007. Ctp1 is a cell-cycle-regulated protein that functions with Mre11 complex to control double-strand break repair by homologous recombination. Mol. Cell. 28:134-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.09.009
16. Liu, C.-Y., A. Flesken-Nikitin, S. Li, Y. Zeng, and W.-H. Lee. 1996. Inactivation of the mouse Brca1 gene leads to failure in the morphogenesis of the egg cylinder in early postimplantation development. Genes Dev. 10:1835-1843. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.10.14.1835
17. Liu, Z., J. Wu, and X. Yu. 2007. CCDC98 targets BRCA1 to DNA damage sites. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:716-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb1279
18. Ludwig, T., D.L. Chapman, V.E. Papaioannou, and A. Efstratiadis. 1997. Targeted mutations of breast cancer susceptibility gene homologs in mice: lethal phenotypes of Brca1, Brca2, Brca1/Brca2, Brca1/p53, and Brca2/p53 nullizygous embryos. Genes Dev. 11:1226-1241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.10.1226
19. McKee, A.H., and N. Kleckner. 1997. A general method for identifying recessive diploid-specific mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, its application to the isolation of mutants blocked at intermediate stages of meiotic prophase and characterization of a new gene SAE2. Genetics. 146:797-816.
20. McVey, M., and S.E. Lee. 2008. MMEJ repair of double-strand breaks (director's cut): deleted sequences and alternative endings. Trends Genet. 24:529-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2008.08.007
21. Mimitou, E.P., and L.S. Symington. 2008. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature. 455:770-774. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07312
22. Moynahan, M.E., and M. Jasin. 2010. Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:196-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2851
23. Moynahan, M.E., J.W. Chiu, B.H. Koller, and M. Jasin. 1999. Brca1 controls homology-directed DNA repair. Mol. Cell. 4:511-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80202-6
24. Moynahan, M.E., T.Y. Cui, and M. Jasin. 2001a. Homology-directed dna repair, mitomycin-c resistance, and chromosome stability is restored with correction of a Brca1 mutation. Cancer Res. 61:4842-4850.
25. Moynahan, M.E., A.J. Pierce, and M. Jasin. 2001b. BRCA2 is required for homology-directed repair of chromosomal breaks. Mol. Cell. 7:263-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00174-5
26. Nakamura, K., T. Kogame, H. Oshiumi, A. Shinohara, Y. Sumitomo, K. Agama, Y. Pommier, K.M. Tsutsui, K. Tsutsui, E. Hartsuiker, et al. 2010. Collaborative action of Brca1 and CtIP in elimination of covalent modifications from double-strand breaks to facilitate subsequent break repair. PLoS Genet. 6:e1000828. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000828
27. Nicolette, M.L., K. Lee, Z. Guo, M. Rani, J.M. Chow, S.E. Lee, and T.T. Paull. 2010. Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and Sae2 promote 5 strand resection of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17:1478-1485. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1957
28. Niu, H., W.H. Chung, Z. Zhu, Y. Kwon, W. Zhao, P. Chi, R. Prakash, C. Seong, D. Liu, L. Lu, et al. 2010. Mechanism of the ATP-dependent DNA endresection machinery from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 467:108-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09318
29. Nussenzweig, A., and M.C. Nussenzweig. 2007. A backup DNA repair pathway moves to the forefront. Cell. 131:223-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.005
30. Penkner, A., Z. Portik-Dobos, L. Tang, R. Schnabel, M. Novatchkova, V. Jantsch, and J. Loidl. 2007. A conserved function for a Caenorhabditis elegans Com1/Sae2/CtIP protein homolog in meiotic recombination. EMBO J. 26:5071-5082. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601916
31. Peterson, S.E., Y. Li, B.T. Chait, M.E. Gottesman, R. Baer, and J. Gautier. 2011. Cdk1 uncouples CtIP-dependent resection and Rad51 filament formation during M-phase double-strand break repair. J. Cell Biol. 194:705-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201103103
32. Pierce, A.J., P. Hu, M. Han, N. Ellis, and M. Jasin. 2001. Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Genes Dev. 15:3237-3242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.946401
33. Prinz, S., A. Amon, and F. Klein. 1997. Isolation of COM1, a new gene required to complete meiotic double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 146:781-795.
34. Reid, L.J., R. Shakya, A.P. Modi, M. Lokshin, J.-T. Cheng, M. Jasin, R. Baer, and T. Ludwig. 2008. E3 ligase activity of BRCA1 is not essential for mammalian cell viability or homology-directed repair of double-strand DNA breaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:20876-20881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811203106
35. Roy, R., J. Chun, and S.N. Powell. 2012. BRCA1 and BRCA2: different roles in a common pathway of genome protection. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 12:68-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc3181
36. Sartori, A.A., C. Lukas, J. Coates, M. Mistrik, S. Fu, J. Bartek, R. Baer, J. Lukas, and S.P. Jackson. 2007. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature. 450:509-514. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06337
37. Schlegel, B.P., F.M. Jodelka, and R. Nunez. 2006. BRCA1 promotes induction of ssDNA by ionizing radiation. Cancer Res. 66:5181-5189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3209
38. Schuermann, M. 1990. An expression vector system for stable expression of oncogenes. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:4945-4946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.16.4945
39. Shakya, R., L.J. Reid, C.R. Reczek, F. Cole, D. Egli, C.-S. Lin, D.G. de Rooij, S. Hirsch, R. Kandasamy, J.B. Hicks, et al. 2011. BRCT phosphoprotein recognition, but not E3 ligase activity, is essential for BRCA1 tumor suppression. Science. 334:525-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1209909
40. Shiozaki, E.N., L. Gu, N. Yan, and Y. Shi. 2004. Structure of the BRCT repeats of BRCA1 bound to a BACH1 phosphopeptide: implications for signaling. Mol. Cell. 14:405-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765 (04)00238-2
41. Snouwaert, J.N., L.C. Gowen, A.M. Latour, A.R. Mohn, A. Xiao, L. Di Biase, and B.H. Koller. 1999. BRCA1 deficient embryonic stem cells display a decreased homologous recombination frequency and an increased frequency of non-homologous recombination that is corrected by expression of a brca1 transgene. Oncogene. 18:7900-7907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203334
42. Söderberg, O., M. Gullberg, M. Jarvius, K. Ridderstrale, K.J. Leuchowius, J. Jarvius, K. Wester, P. Hydbring, F. Bahram, L.G. Larsson, and U. Landegren. 2006. Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation. Nat. Methods. 3:995-1000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth947
43. Stark, J.M., A.J. Pierce, J. Oh, A. Pastink, and M. Jasin. 2004. Genetic steps of mammalian homologous repair with distinct mutagenic consequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:9305-9316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.21.9305-9316.2004
44. Symington, L.S., and J. Gautier. 2011. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45:247-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132435
45. Uanschou, C., T. Siwiec, A. Pedrosa-Harand, C. Kerzendorfer, E. Sanchez-Moran, M. Novatchkova, S. Akimcheva, A. Woglar, F. Klein, and P. Schlögelhofer. 2007. A novel plant gene essential for meiosis is related to the human CtIP and the yeast COM1/SAE2 gene. EMBO J. 26:5061-5070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7601913
46. Varma, A.K., R.S. Brown, G. Birrane, and J.A. Ladias. 2005. Structural basis for cell cycle checkpoint control by the BRCA1-CtIP complex. Biochemistry. 44:10941-10946. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bi0509651
47. Wang, B., S. Matsuoka, B.A. Ballif, D. Zhang, A. Smogorzewska, S.P. Gygi, and S.J. Elledge. 2007. Abraxas and RAP80 form a BRCA1 protein complex required for the DNA damage response. Science. 316:1194-1198. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1139476
48. Warren, A.J., W.H. Colledge, M.B.L. Carlton, M.J. Evans, A.J.H. Smith, and T.H. Rabbitts. 1994. The oncogenic cysteine-rich LIM domain protein rbtn2 is essential for erythroid development. Cell. 78:45-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90571-1
49. Williams, R.S., M.S. Lee, D.D. Hau, and J.N. Glover. 2004. Structural basis of phosphopeptide recognition by the BRCT domain of BRCA1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 11:519-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb776
50. Wong, A.K., P.A. Ormonde, R. Pero, Y. Chen, L. Lian, G. Salada, S. Berry, Q. Lawrence, P. Dayananth, P. Ha, et al. 1998. Characterization of a carboxy-terminal BRCA1 interacting protein. Oncogene. 17:2279-2285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1202150
51. Yang, H., Q. Li, J. Fan, W.K. Holloman, and N.P. Pavletich. 2005. The BRCA2 homologue Brh2 nucleates RAD51 filament formation at a dsDNA-ssDNA junction. Nature. 433:653-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03234
52. You, Z., and J.M. Bailis. 2010. DNA damage and decisions: CtIP coordinates DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoints. Trends Cell Biol. 20:402-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2010.04.002
53. You, Z., L.Z. Shi, Q. Zhu, P. Wu, Y.W. Zhang, A. Basilio, N. Tonnu, I.M. Verma, M.W. Berns, and T. Hunter. 2009. CtIP links DNA doublestrand break sensing to resection. Mol. Cell. 36:954-969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.002
54. Yu, X., and R. Baer. 2000. Nuclear localization and cell cycle-specific expression of CtIP, a protein that associates with the BRCA1 tumor suppressor. J. Biol. Chem. 275:18541-18549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M909494199
55. Yu, X., and J. Chen. 2004. DNA damage-induced cell cycle checkpoint control requires CtIP, a phosphorylation-dependent binding partner of BRCA1 C-terminal domains. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:9478-9486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.21.9478-9486.2004
56. Yu, X., L.C. Wu, A.M. Bowcock, A. Aronheim, and R. Baer. 1998. The C-terminal (BRCT) domains of BRCA1 interact in vivo with CtIP, a protein implicated in the CtBP pathway of transcriptional repression. J. Biol. Chem. 273:25388-25392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.39.25388
57. Yun, M.H., and K. Hiom. 2009. CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle. Nature. 459:460-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07955
58. Zhang, Y., and M. Jasin. 2011. An essential role for CtIP in chromosomal translocation formation through an alternative end-joining pathway. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18:80-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1940
59. Zhao, G.Y., E. Sonoda, L.J. Barber, H. Oka, Y. Murakawa, K. Yamada, T. Ikura, X. Wang, M. Kobayashi, K. Yamamoto, et al. 2007. A critical role for the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme Ubc13 in initiating homologous recombination. Mol. Cell. 25:663-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.01.029
60. Zhu, Z., W.H. Chung, E.Y. Shim, S.E. Lee, and G. Ira. 2008. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell. 134:981-994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.08.037