Engineering Saccharomyces cerevisiae for next generation ethanol production

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 983-991

  Den Haan, Riaan ^a   Kroukamp, Heinrich ^a   Mert, Marlin ^a   Bloom, Marinda ^a   Görgens, Johann F ^a   Van Zyl, Willem H ^a  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Bioethanol; Cellulose; Raw starch; Second generation biofuels; Strain engineering

Indexed keywords

AMYLOLYTIC MICROORGANISMS; CONSOLIDATED BIO-PROCESSING; ENZYMATIC CONVERSIONS; FERMENTATION INHIBITORS; FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES; RAW STARCH; SECOND GENERATION; STRAIN ENGINEERING;

BIOETHANOL; BIOLOGY; CELLULOSE; ENZYMES; ETHANOL; STARCH; STRAIN;

YEAST;

CELLOBIOSE; CELLULOSE; HEMICELLULOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSE; STARCH; XYLAN;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOPROCESS; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; COST MINIMIZATION ANALYSIS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME CHEMISTRY; ENZYME ENGINEERING; ENZYME RELEASE; FERMENTATION; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS CULTURE; HETEROLOGOUS EXPRESSION; HOST CELL; HYDROLYSIS; LIQUEFACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SHORT SURVEY; STRAIN IMPROVEMENT;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84877921123     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.4068     Document Type: Short Survey

References (114)

1. Van Zyl WH, Chimphango AFA, Den Haan R, Gorgens JF and Chirwa PWC, Next-generation cellulosic ethanol technologies and their contribution to a sustainable Africa. Interf Focus 1:196-211 (2011).
2. Hill J, Nelson E, Tilman D, Polasky S and Tiffany D, Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:11206-11210 (2006).
3. Stephanopoulos G, Challenges in engineering microbes for biofuels production. Science 315:801-804 (2007).
4. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Van Zyl WH and Pretorius IS, Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:506-577 (2002).
5. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Spencer-Martins I and Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 74:937-953 (2007).
6. Hamelinck CN, Van Hooijdonk G and Faaij APC, Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: techno-economic performance in short-, middle- and long-term. Biomass Bioenerg 28:384-410 (2005).
7. Anex RP, Aden A, Kazi FK, Fortman J, Swanson RM, Wright MM, Satrio JA, Brown RC, Daugaard DE, Platon A, Kothandaraman G, Hsu DD and Dutta A, Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways. Fuel 89 (Supplement 1):S29-S35 (2010).
8. Van Zyl WH, Bloom M and Viktor MJ, Engineering yeasts for raw starch conversion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95:1377-1388 (2012).
9. Kuyper M, Toirkens MJ, Diderich JA, Winkler AA, Van Dijken JP and Pronk JT, Evolutionary engineering of mixed-sugar utilization by a xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res 5:925-934 (2005).
10. Van Dijken JP, Bauer J, Brambilla L, Duboc P, Francois JM, Gancedo C, Giuseppin ML, Heijnen JJ, Hoare M, Lange HC, Madden EA, Niederberger P, Nielsen J, Parrou JL, Petit T, Porro D, Reuss M, van Riel N, Rizzi M, Steensma HY, Verrips CT, Vindelov J and Pronk JT, An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 26:706-714 (2000).
11. Van Zyl WH, Lynd LR, Den Haan R and McBride JE, Consolidated bioprocessing for bioethanol production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108:205-235 (2007).
12. La Grange DC, Den Haan R and Van Zyl WH, Engineering cellulolytic ability into bioprocessing organisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:1195-1208 (2010).
13. de Moraes LM, Astolfi-Filho S and Oliver SG, Development of yeast strains for the efficient utilisation of starch: evaluation of constructs that express alpha-amylase and glucoamylase separately or as bifunctional fusion proteins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 43:1067-1076 (1995).
14. Favaro L, Jooste T, Basaglia M, Rose SH, Saayman M, Gorgens JF, Casella S and Van Zyl WH, Codon-optimized glucoamylase sGAI of Aspergillus awamori improves starch utilization in an industrial yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 95:957-968 (2012).
15. Liao B, Hill GA and Roesler WJ, Amylolytic activity and fermentative ability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains that express barley α-amylase. Biochem Eng J 53:63-70 (2010).
16. Liao B, Hill GA and Roesler WJ, Stable expression of barley α-amylase in S. cerevisiae for conversion of starch into bioethanol. Biochem Eng J 64:8-16 (2012).
17. Wong DW, Batt SB, Lee CC, Wagschal K and Robertson GH, Characterization of active Lentinula edodes glucoamylase expressed and secreted by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Protein J 24:455-463 (2005).
18. Kim JH, Kim HR, Lim MH, Ko HM, Chin JE, Lee HB, Kim IC and Bai S, Construction of a direct starch-fermenting industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae producing glucoamylase, alpha-amylase and debranching enzyme. Biotechnol Lett 32:713-719 (2010).
19. Kim MD, Rhee SK and Seo JH, Enhanced production of anticoagulant hirudin in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae by chromosomal delta-integration. J Biotechnol 85:41-48 (2001).
20. Chen JP, Wu KW and Fukuda H, Bioethanol production from uncooked raw starch by immobilized surface-engineered yeast cells. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 145:59-67 (2008).
21. Hasunuma T and Kondo A, Development of yeast cell factories for consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose to bioethanol through cell surface engineering. Biotechnol Adv 30:1207-1218 (2012).
22. Khaw TS, Katakura Y, Koh J, Kondo A, Ueda M and Shioya S, Evaluation of performance of different surface-engineered yeast strains for direct ethanol production from raw starch. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 70:573-579 (2006).
23. Kotaka A, Sahara H, Hata Y, Abe Y, Kondo A, Kato-Murai M, Kuroda K and Ueda M, Efficient and direct fermentation of starch to ethanol by sake yeast strains displaying fungal glucoamylases. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 72:1376-1379 (2008).
24. Shigechi H, Koh J, Fujita Y, Matsumoto T, Bito Y, Ueda M, Satoh E, Fukuda H and Kondo A, Direct production of ethanol from raw corn starch via fermentation by use of a novel surface-engineered yeast strain codisplaying glucoamylase and alpha-amylase. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5037-5040 (2004).
25. Yamada R, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H and Kondo A, Novel strategy for yeast construction using delta-integration and cell fusion to efficiently produce ethanol from raw starch. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:1491-1498 (2010).
26. Yamakawa S, Yamada R, Tanaka T, Ogino C and Kondo A, Repeated batch fermentation from raw starch using a maltose transporter and amylase expressing diploid yeast strain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87:109-115 (2010).
27. Bothast RJ, Schlicher MA, Biotechnological processes for conversion of corn into ethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 67:19-25 (2005).
28. Bevill K, Pinching Pennies. Ethanol Producer Magazine September (2012).
29. Apiwatanapiwat W, Murata Y, Kosugi A, Yamada R, Kondo A, Arai T, Rugthaworn P and Mori Y, Direct ethanol production from cassava pulp using a surface-engineered yeast strain co-displaying two amylases, two cellulases, and b-glucosidase. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:377-384 (2011).
30. Sun Y and Cheng J, Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresource Technol 83:1-11 (2002).
31. Zhang YH and Lynd LR, Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 88:797-824 (2004).
32. van Rooyen R, Hahn-Hagerdal B, La Grange DC and Van Zyl WH, Construction of cellobiose-growing and fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. J Biotechnol 120:284-295 (2005).
33. Galazka JM, Tian C, Beeson WT, Martinez B, Glass NL and Cate JH, Cellodextrin transport in yeast for improved biofuel production. Science 330:84-86 (2010).
34. Sadie CJ, Rose SH, Den Haan R and Van Zyl WH, Co-expression of a cellobiose phosphorylase and lactose permease enables intracellular cellobiose utilisation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:1373-1380 (2011).
35. Aeling KA, Salmon KA, Laplaza JM, Li L, Headman JR, Hutagalung AH and Picataggio S, Co-fermentation of xylose and cellobiose by an engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 39:1597-1604 (2012).
36. Cho KM, Yoo YJ and Kang HS, δ-Integration of endo/exo-glucanase and β-glucosidase genes into the yeast chromosomes for direct conversion of cellulose to ethanol. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 25:23-30 (1999).
37. Fujita Y, Takahashi S, Ueda M, Tanaka A, Okada H, Morikawa Y, Kawaguchi T, Arai M, Fukuda H and Kondo A, Direct and efficient production of ethanol from cellulosic material with a yeast strain displaying cellulolytic enzymes. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:5136-5141 (2002).
38. Fujita Y, Ito J, Ueda M, Fukuda H and Kondo A, Synergistic saccharification, and direct fermentation to ethanol, of amorphous cellulose by use of an engineered yeast strain codisplaying three types of cellulolytic enzyme. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1207-1212 (2004).
39. Den Haan R, Rose SH, Lynd LR and Van Zyl WH, Hydrolysis and fermentation of amorphous cellulose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 9:87-94 (2007).
40. Jeon E, Hyeon JE, Suh DJ, Suh YW, Kim SW, Song KH and Han SO, Production of cellulosic ethanol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae heterologous expressing Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase and Saccharomycopsis fibuligera β-glucosidase genes. Mol Cells 28:369-373 (2009).
41. Yamada R, Taniguchi N, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H and Kondo A, Cocktail δ-integration: a novel method to construct cellulolytic enzyme expression ratio-optimized yeast strains. Microbiol Cell Fact 9:32 (2010).
42. Bayer EA, Lamed R, White BA and Flint HJ, From cellulosomes to cellulosomics. Chem Rec 8:364-377 (2008).
43. Himmel ME, Xu Q, Luo Y, Ding SY, Lamed R and Bayer EA, Micobial enzyme systems for biomass conversion: emerging paradigms. Biofuels 1:323-341 (2010).
44. Fierobe HP, Bayer EA, Tardif C, Czjzek M, Mechaly A, Belaich A, Lamed R, Shoham Yand Belaich JP, Degradation of cellulose substrates by cellulosome chimeras. Substrate targeting versus proximity of enzyme components. J Biol Chem 277:49621-49630 (2002).
45. Lu Y, Zhang YH, and Lynd LR, Enzyme-microbe synergy during cellulose hydrolysis by Clostridium thermocellum. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 103:16165-16169 (2006).
46. Ito J, Kosugi A, Tanaka T, Kuroda K, Shibasaki S, Ogino C, Ueda M, Fukuda H, Doi RH and Kondo A, Regulation of the display ratio of enzymes on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell surface by the immunoglobulin G and cellulosomal enzyme binding domains. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4149-4154 (2009).
47. Tsai SL, Oh J, Singh S, Chen R and Chen W, Functional assembly of minicellulosomes on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell surface for cellulose hydrolysis and ethanol production. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:6087-6093 (2009).
48. Wen F, Sun J and Zhao H, Yeast surface display of trifunctional minicellulosomes for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose to ethanol. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:1251-1260 (2010).
49. Ilmén M, Den Haan R, Brevnova E, McBride J, Wiswall E, Froehlich A, Koivula A, Voutilainen SP, Siika-aho M, Lagrange DC, Thorngren N, Ahlgren S, Mellon M, Deleault K, Rajgarhia V, Van Zyl WH and Penttila M, High level secretion of cellobiohydrolases by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 4:30 (2011).
50. McBride JE, Brevnova E, Ghandi C, Mellon M, Froehlich A, Delaault K, Rajgarhia V, Flatt J, Van Zyl WH, Den Haan R, La Grange DC, Rose SH, Penttilä M, Ilmen M, Siika-aho M, Uusitalo J, Hau HH, Rice C, Villari J, Stonehouse EA, Gilbert A, Keating JD, Xu H, Willes D, Shikhare I, Thorngren N, Warner AK and Murphy D, Yeast expressing cellulases for simultaneous saccharification and fermentation using cellulose. PCT/US2009/065571 (2010).
51. Khramtsov N, McDade L, Amerik A, Yu E, Divatia K, Tikhonov A, Minto M, Kabongo-Mubalamate G, Markovic Z, Ruiz-Martinez M and Henck S, Industrial yeast strain engineered to ferment ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technol 102:8310-8313 (2011).
52. Mansfield SD, Mooney C and Saddler JN, Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 15:804-816 (1999).
53. Tester RF, Karkalas J and Qi X, Starch - composition, fine structure and architecture. J Cereal Sci 39:151-165 (2004).
54. Jordan DB, Bowman MJ, Braker JD, Dien BS, Hector RE, Lee CC, Mertens JA and Wagschal K, Plant cell walls to ethanol. Biochem J 442:241-252 (2012).
55. Scheller HV and Ulvskov P, Hemicelluloses. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:263-289 (2010).
56. Gomez LD, Steele-King CG and McQueen-Mason SJ, Sustainable liquid biofuels from biomass: the writing's on the walls. New Phytol 178:473-485 (2008).
57. Qing Q, Yang B and Wyman CE, Xylooligomers are strong inhibitors of cellulose hydrolysis by enzymes. Bioresource Technol 101:9624-9630 (2010).
58. Berlin A, Gilkes N, Kilburn D, Bura R, Markov A, Skomarovsky A, Okunev O, Gusakov A, Maximenko V, Gregg D, Sinitsyn A and Saddler J, Evaluation of novel fungal cellulase preparations for ability to hydrolyze softwood substrates - evidence for the role of accessory enzymes. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 37:175-184 (2005).
59. Varnai A, Siika-aho M and Viikari L, Restriction of the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce by lignin and hemicellulose. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 46:185-193 (2010).
60. Matsushika A, Inoue H, Kodaki T and Sawayama S, Ethanol production from xylose in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 84:37-53 (2009).
61. Van Vleet JH and Jeffries TW, Yeast metabolic engineering for hemicellulosic ethanol production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:300-306 (2009).
62. Träff KL, Otero CR, Van Zyl WH and Hahn-Hägerdal B, Deletion of the GRE3 aldose reductase gene and its influence on xylose metabolism in recombinant strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing the xylA and XKS1 genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5668-5674 (2001).
63. Zhou H, Cheng JS, Wang B, Fink GR and Stephanopoulos G, Xylose isomerase overexpression along with engineering of the pentose phosphate pathway and evolutionary engineering enable rapid xylose utilization and ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 14:611-622 (2012).
64. La Grange DC, Pretorius IS, Claeyssens M and Van Zyl WH, Degradation of xylan to D-xylose by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae coexpressing the Aspergillus niger β-xylosidase (xlnD) and the Trichoderma reesei xylanase II (xyn2) genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5512-5519 (2001).
65. Katahira S, Fujita Y, Mizuike A, Fukuda H and Kondo A, Construction of a xylan-fermenting yeast strain through codisplay of xylanolytic enzymes on the surface of xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5407-5414 (2004).
66. Sakamoto T, Hasunuma T, Hori Y, Yamada R and Kondo A, Direct ethanol production from hemicellulosic materials of rice straw by use of an engineered yeast strain codisplaying three types of hemicellulolytic enzymes on the surface of xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. J Biotechnol 158:203-210 (2012).
67. Sun J, Wen F, Si T, Xu JH and Zhao H, Direct conversion of xylan to ethanol by recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains displaying an engineered mini-hemicellulosome. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:3837-3845 (2012).
68. Srikrishnan S, Chen W and Da Silva NA, Functional assembly and characterization of a modular xylanosome for hemicellulose hydrolysis in yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 110:275-285 (2013).
69. Yang B and Wyman CE, Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol. Biofuel Bioprod Bioref 2:26-40 (2008).
70. Almeida JRM, Modig T, Petersson A, Hähn-Hägerdal B, Liden G and Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82:340-349 (2007).
71. Palmqvist E and Hahn-Hägerdal B, Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresource Technol 74:25-33 (2000).
72. Larsson S, Reimann A, Nilvebrant N-O and Jonsson LJ, Comparison for different methods of detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolyzates of spruce. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 77-79:91-103 (1999).
73. Olsson L and Hahn-Hägerdal B, Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 18:312-331 (1996).
74. von Sivers M, Zacchi G, Olsson L and Hahn-Hagerdal B, Cost analysis of ethanol production from willow using recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Prog 10:555-560 (1994).
75. Hahn-Hagerdal B, Pamment 'n, Microbial pentose metabolism. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 113-116:1207-1209 (2004).
76. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Wahlbom CF, Gardonyi M, Van Zyl WH, Cordero OR and Jonsson LJ, Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for xylose utilization. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 73:53-84 (2001).
77. Almeida JR, Karhumaa K, Bengtsson O and Gorwa-Grauslund MF, Screening of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with respect to anaerobic growth in non-detoxified lignocellulose hydrolysate. Bioresource Technol 100:3674-3677 (2009).
78. Gorsich SW, Dien BS, Nichols NN, Slininger PJ, Liu ZL and Skory CD, Tolerance to furfural-induced stress is associated with pentose phosphate pathway genes ZWF1, GND1, RPE1, and TKL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71:339-349 (2006).
79. Petersson A, Almeida JR, Modig T, Karhumaa K, Hahn-Hagerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF and Liden G, A 5-hydroxymethyl furfural reducing enzyme encoded by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ADH6 gene conveys HMF tolerance. Yeast 23:455-464 (2006).
80. Larsson S, Cassland P and Jonsson LJ, Development of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with enhanced resistance to phenolic fermentation inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates by heterologous expression of laccase. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1163-1170 (2001).
81. Liu ZL, Slininger PJ and Gorsich SW, Enhanced biotransformation of furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural by newly developed ethanologenic yeast strains. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 121-124:451-460 (2005).
82. Martin C, Marcet M, Almazan O and Jonsson LJ, Adaptation of a recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain to a sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate with high content of fermentation inhibitors. Bioresource Technol 98:1767-1773 (2007).
83. Sonderegger M and Sauer U, Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for anaerobic growth on xylose. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1990-1998 (2003).
84. Teunissen A, Dumortier F, Gorwa MF, Bauer J, Tanghe A, Loiez A, Smet P, Van Dijck P and Thevelein JM, Isolation and characterization of a freeze-tolerant diploid derivative of an industrial baker's yeast strain and its use in frozen doughs. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4780-4787 (2002).
85. Heer D and Sauer U, Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microbiol Biotechnol 1:497-506 (2008).
86. Tomas-Pejo E, Ballesteros M, Oliva JM and Olsson L, Adaptation of the xylose fermenting yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae F12 for improving ethanol production in different fed-batch SSF processes. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37:1211-1220 (2010).
87. Dykhuizen DE and Hartl DL, Selection in chemostats. Microbiol Rev 47:150-168 (1983).
88. Koppram R, Albers E and Olsson L, Evolutionary engineering strategies to enhance tolerance of xylose utilizing recombinant yeast to inhibitors derived from spruce biomass. Biotechnol Biofuels 5:32 (2012).
89. Pinel D, D'Aoust F, del Cardayre SB, Bajwa PK, Lee H and Martin VJ, Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome shuffling through recursive population mating leads to improved tolerance to spent sulfite liquor. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:4736-4743 (2011).
90. Almeida JR, Roder A, Modig T, Laadan B, Liden G and Gorwa-Grauslund MF, NADH- vs NADPH-coupled reduction of 5-hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) and its implications on product distribution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 78:939-945 (2008).
91. Liu ZL, Moon J, Andersh BJ, Slininger PJ and Weber S, Multiple gene-mediated NAD(P)H-dependent aldehyde reduction is a mechanism of in situ detoxification of furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 81:743-753 (2008).
92. Liu ZL, Molecular mechanisms of yeast tolerance and in situ detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 90:809-825 (2011).
93. Idiris A, Tohda H, Kumagai H and Takegawa K, Engineering of protein secretion in yeast: strategies and impact on protein production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86:403-417 (2010).
94. Swinnen S, Thevelein JM and Nevoigt E, Genetic mapping of quantitative phenotypic traits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 12:215-227 (2012).
95. Endo A, Nakamura T, Ando A, Tokuyasu K and Shima J, Genome-wide screening of the genes required for tolerance to vanillin, which is a potential inhibitor of bioethanol fermentation, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Biofuels 1:3 (2008).
96. Van Dyk JS and Pletschke BI, A review of lignocellulose bioconversion using enzymatic hydrolysis and synergistic cooperation between enzymes - factors affecting enzymes, conversion and synergy. Biotechnol Adv 30:1458-1480 (2012).
97. Ximenes E, Kim Y, Mosier N, Dien B and Ladisch M, Deactivation of cellulases by phenols. Enzyme Microbiol Technol 48:54-60 (2011).
98. Gurgu L, Lafraya A, Polaina J and Marin-Navarro J, Fermentation of cellobiose to ethanol by industrial Saccharomyces strains carrying the β-glucosidase gene (BGL1) from Saccharomycopsis fibuligera. Bioresource Technol 102:5229-5236 (2011).
99. Schroder M, The unfolded protein response. Mol Biotechnol 34:279-290 (2006).
100. Wentz AE and Shusta EV, A novel high-throughput screen reveals yeast genes that increase secretion of heterologous proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1189-1198 (2007).
101. Kauffman KJ, Pridgen EM, Doyle FJ, III, Dhurjati PS and Robinson AS, Decreased protein expression and intermittent recoveries in BiP levels result from cellular stress during heterologous protein expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Prog 18:942-950 (2002).
102. Shusta EV, Raines RT, Pluckthun A and Wittrup KD, Increasing the secretory capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of single-chain antibody fragments. Nat Biotechnol 16:773-777 (1998).
103. van der Heide M, Hollenberg CP, van der Klei I and Veenhuis M, Overproduction of BiP negatively affects the secretion of Aspergillus niger glucose oxidase by the yeast Hansenula polymorpha. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 58:487-494 (2002).
104. Kroukamp H, Den Haan R, Van Wyk N and Van Zyl WH, Overexpression of native PSE1 and SOD1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae improved heterologous cellulase secretion. Appl Energy 102:150-156 (2013).
105. Parts L, Cubillos FA, Warringer J, Jain K, Salinas F, Bumpstead SJ, Molin M, Zia A, Simpson JT, Quail MA, Moses A, Louis EJ, Durbin R and Liti G, Revealing the genetic structure of a trait by sequencing a population under selection. Genome Res 21:1131-1138 (2011).
106. Swinnen S, Schaerlaekens K, Pais T, Claesen J, Hubmann G, Yang Y, Demeke M, Foulquie-Moreno MR, Goovaerts A, Souvereyns K, Clement L, Dumortier F and Thevelein JM, Identification of novel causative genes determining the complex trait of high ethanol tolerance in yeast using pooled-segregant whole-genome sequence analysis. Genome Res 22:975-984 (2012).
107. Casolaro K, Consolidated bioprocessing for biofuel production. Ind Bioprocess 31:2 (2009).
108. Lynd LR, Van Zyl WH, McBride JE and Laser M, Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16:577-583 (2005).
109. Olson DG, McBride JE, Joe Shaw A and Lynd LR, Recent progress in consolidated bioprocessing. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:396-405 (2012).
110. Galbe M, Liden G and Zacchi G, Production of ethanol from biomass - research in Sweden. J Sci Ind Res India 64:905-919 (2005).
111. Leibbrandt NH, Knoetze JH and Görgens JF, Comparing biological and thermochemical processing of sugarcane bagasse: an energy balance perspective. Biomass Bioenergy 35:2117-2126 (2011).
112. Banerjee S, Mudliar S, Sen R and Giri B, Commercializing lignocellulosic bioethanol: technology bottlenecks and possible remedies. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 4:77-93 (2009).
113. Laser M, Jin H, Jayawardhana K, Dale BE and Lynd LR, Coproduction of ethanol and power from switchgrass. Biofuels Bioprod Bioref 3:195-218 (2009).
114. Sassner P, Galbe M and Zacchi G, Techno-economic evaluation of bioethanol production from three different lignocellulosic materials. Biomass Bioenerg 32:422-430 (2008).