A conversation analytic perspective on the role of quantification and generalizability in second language acquisition

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 12, Issue , 2006, Pages 135-162

  Markee, Numa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877305872     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (167)

1. Aston, G. (1986). Trouble-shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics, 7, 128-143.
2. Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structures of social action. Cambridge: CUP.
3. Boden, D. & Zimmerman, D. H. (Eds.). (1991). Talk and social structure. Cambridge: Polity Press.
4. Brock, C., Crookes, G., Day, R., & Long, M. H. (1986). The differential effects of corrective feedback in native speaker/non-native speaker conversation. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 229-236). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
5. Button, G. (Ed.). (1991). Ethnomethodology and the human sciences. Cambridge: CUP.
6. Bygate, M. (1988). Units of oral expression and language learning in small group interaction. Applied Linguistics, 9, 59-82.
7. Caroll, S. & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit feedback. An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.
8. Chaudron, C. (1977). A descriptive model of discourse in the corrective treatment of learners' errors. Language Learning, 27, 29-46.
9. Chaudron, C. (1987). The role of error correction in second language teaching. In B. K. Das (Ed.), Patterns of classroom interaction in South East Asia (pp. 17-50). Singapore: SEAMEO-RELC Regional Language Centre.
10. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms. Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: CUP.
11. Clayman, S. & Heritage, J. (2002). Questioning Presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarialness in the press conferences of Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication, 52, 749-777.
12. Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367-383.
13. Crookes, G. & Rulon, K. A. (1988). Topic and feedback in native speaker/non-native speaker conversation. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 675-681.
14. Crookes, G. & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469-512.
15. Dillon, J. T. (1981). Duration of response to teacher questions and statements. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 1-11.
16. Dillon, J. T. (1988). The remedial status of student questioning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 20, 197-210.
17. Dörnyei, Z. (2000). Motivation. London: Longman.
18. Dörnyei, Z. & Csizér, K. (2002). Some dynamics of language attitudes and motivation: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23, 421-462.
19. Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431-469
20. Doughty, C. & Pica, T. (1986). “Information gap” tasks: An aid to second language acquisition? TESOL Quarterly, 20, 305-325.
21. Doughty, C. & Varela, C. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
22. Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom language acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.
23. Drew. P. & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1992a). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: CUP.
24. Duff, P. A. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 147-181). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
25. Edge, J. & Richards, K. (1998). May I see your warrant please? Justifying outcomes in qualitative research. Applied Linguistics, 19, 334-356.
26. Ellis, R. (1985). Teacher-pupil interaction in second language development. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 69-85). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
27. Firth, A. & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 285-300.
28. Foster, P. (1998). A classroom perspective on the negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 1-23.
29. Foster, P. & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning on performance in task-based learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299-324.
30. Gaskill, W. (1980). Correction in native speaker - non-native speaker conversation. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 125-137). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
31. Gass, S. M. (1988). Integrating research areas: A framework for second language studies. Applied Linguistics, 9, 198-217.
32. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Gass, S. M. (1998). Apples and oranges: Or, why apples are not oranges and don't need to be. A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 83-90.
34. Gass, S. M. (2001). SLA: A 2001 space odyssey. Plenary address to the Annual AAAL Conference, St. Louis, MI, March 2001.
35. Gass S. M. & Varonis, E. M. (1984). The effect of familiarity on the comprehensibility of non-native speech. Language Learning, 34, 65-89.
36. Gass, S. M. & Varonis, E. M. (1986). Sex differences and in non-native speaker/native speaker interaction. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 327-351). Cambridge, MA: Newbury House.
37. Gass, S. M. & Varonis, E. M. (1994). Input, interaction and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.
38. Gregg, K. R. (1984). Krashen's monitor and Occam's razor. Applied Linguistics, 5, 79-100.
39. Gregg, K. R. (1993). Taking explanation seriously; or, let a couple of flowers bloom. Applied Linguistics, 14, 276-294.
40. Gregg, K. R. (1996). The logical and developmental problems of second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 49-81). New York: Academic Press.
41. Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10, 331-359.
42. Hatch, E. M. (1978). Discourse analysis and second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 402-435). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
43. Hawkins, B. (1985). Is an 'appropriate' response always so appropriate? In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.162-178). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
44. Heath, C. (1989). Pain talk: The expression of suffering in the medical consultation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 113-125.
45. Heritage, J. (1984). A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 299-345). Cambridge: CUP & Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
46. Heritage, J. & Roth, A. L. (1995). Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28, 1-60.
47. Jefferson, G. (1987). On exposed and embedded correction in conversation. In G. Button & R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and social interaction (pp. 86-100). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
48. Kasper, G. (1997). “A” stands for acquisition: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 307-312.
49. Kasper, G. (2002). Conversation analysis as an approach to second language acquisition: Old wine in new bottles? Invited talk, SLATE speaker series, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, March 13, 2002.
50. Kasper, G. & Ross, S. (2001). Is drinking a hobby, I wonder: Other-initiated repair in language proficiency interviews. Paper presented at the Annual AAAL Conference, St. Louis, MI. March 2001.
51. Kormos, J. (2001). The role of attention in monitoring second language production. Language Learning, 50, 343-384.
52. Koshik, I. (2002a). Designedly incomplete utterances: A pedagogical practice for eliciting knowledge displays in error correction sequences. Research on social interaction, 35(3), 277-309.
53. Koshik, I. (2002b). A conversation analytic study of yes/no questions which imply reversed polarity assertions. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1851-1877.
54. Koshik, I. (2003). Wh questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies, 5, 51-77.
55. Kowal, M. & Swain, M. (1994). Using collaborative production tasks to promote students' language awareness. Language Awareness, 3, 73-93.
56. Krashen, S. D. (1980). The input hypothesis. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Current issues in bilingual education (pp. 168-180). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
57. Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
58. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.
59. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.
60. Krashen, S. D. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. Modern Language Journal, 73, 440-464.
61. Lerner, G. H. (1995). Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes, 19, 111-131.
62. Lazaraton, A. (2003). Incidental displays of cultural knowledge in the nonnative-English-speaking teacher's classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 213-245.
63. Lazaraton, A. (2004). Gesture and speech in the vocabulary explanations of one ESL teacher: A microanalytic inquiry. Journal of Language Learning, 54(1), 79-117.
64. Liddicoat, A. (1997). Interaction, social structure, and second language use: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 313-317.
65. Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (1990). Focus-on-form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching: Effects on second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 429-448.
66. Long, M. H. (1980). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. PhD Dissertation, University of California at Los Angeles.
67. Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition (pp. 259-278). Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259-278.
68. Long, M. H. (1983a). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126-141.
69. Long, M. H. (1983b). Linguistic and conversational adjustments of non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5, 177-193.
70. Long, M. H. (1985a). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
71. Long, M. H. (1985b). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language training. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77-99). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
72. Long, M. H. (1989). Task, group, and task-group interactions. University of Hawai'i Working papers in ESL, 8, 1-26.
73. Long, M. H. (1990) The least a second language acquisition theory needs to explain. TESOL Quarterly, 24, 649-666.
74. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in perspective (pp. 39-51). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
75. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 414-468). New York, NY: Academic Press.
76. Long, M. H. (1997). Construct validity in SLA research: A response to Firth and Wagner. The Modern Language Journal, 81, 318-323.
77. Long, M. H. (1998). SLA: Breaking the siege. Plenary address, PacSLRF 3, Tokyo, Japan: Aoyama Gakuin University, March, 1998. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL, 17(1), 79-129.
78. Long, M. H., Adams, L. McLean, M., & Castaños, F. (1976). Doing things with words - Verbal interaction in lockstep and small group classroom situations. In J. F. Fanselow & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL'76 (pp. 137-153). Washington, DC: TESOL.
79. Long, M. H. & Crookes, G. (1992) Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quarterly, 26, 27-56.
80. Long, M. H. & Crookes G. (1993) Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-54). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
81. Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 357-371.
82. Long, M. H. & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 207-228.
83. Long, M. H. & Sato, C. (1983). Classroom foreigner talk discourse: Forms and functions of teachers' questions. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom-oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 268-285). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
84. Lyster, R. (1998). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
85. Lyster, R. & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
86. Mackey, A. & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second-language development: Recasts, responses and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
87. Markee, N. (1994). Toward an ethnomethodological respecification of second language acquisition studies. In E. Tarone, S. Gass, & A. Cohen (Eds.), Research methodology in second language acquisition (pp. 89-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
88. Markee, N. (1995). Teachers' answers to students' questions: Problematizing the issue of making meaning. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 63-92.
89. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
90. Markee, N. (2003). Qualitative Research Guidelines (Conversation Analysis). In C. Chapelle & P. Duff (Eds.), Some guidelines for conducting quantitative and qualitative research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 169-172.
91. Markee, N. (2004). Zones of interactional transition. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 583-596.
92. Markee, N. (2005a). Conversation analysis for second language acquisition. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 355-374). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
93. Markee, N. (2005b). The organization of off-task talk in second language classrooms. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 197-213). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
94. McGroarty, M. (1998). Constructive and constructivist challenges for applied linguistics. Language Learning, 48, 591-622.
95. McHoul, A. (1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183-213.
96. McHoul, A. (1990). The organization of repair in classroom talk. Language in Society, 19, 349-377.
97. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
98. Mehnert, U. (1998). The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 83-108.
99. Mori, J. (2002). Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a Japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 23, 323-347.
100. Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673.
101. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
102. Nunan, D. (1993). Task-based syllabus design: Selecting, grading and sequencing tasks. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 55-68). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
103. Ohta, A. (2001a). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
104. Ohta, A. (2001b). Confirmation checks: A conversation analytic reanalysis. Paper presented as part of the colloquium on Unpacking negotiation: A conversation analytic perspective on L2 interactional competence, Annual AAAL Conference, St. Louis, MI, March 2001.
105. Oliver, R. (1995). Negative feedback in child NS-NNS conversation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 459-481.
106. Oliver, R. (1998). Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. Modern Language Journal, 82, 372-386.
107. Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pair work. Language Learning, 50, 119-151.
108. Olsher, D. (2001). Negotiating plans of action in small group interaction. Paper presented as part of the colloquium on Unpacking negotiation: A conversation analytic perspective on L2 interactional competence, Annual AAAL Conference, St. Louis, MI, March 2001.
109. Peck, S. (1978). Child-child discourse in second language acquisition. In E. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 383-400). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
110. Peck, S. (1980). Language play in child second language acquisition. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 154-164). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
111. Pica, T. (1987). Second language acquisition, social interaction and the classroom. Applied Linguistics, 8, 3-21.
112. Pica, T. (1992). The textual outcomes of native speaker/non-native speaker negotiation. What do they reveal about second language learning? In C. Kramsch & S. McConnellGinet (Eds.), Text in context: Crossdisciplinary perspectives on language study (pp. 198-237). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
113. Pica, T. & Doughty, C. (1985). The role of group work in classroom second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 233-248.
114. Pica, T., Doughty, C., & Young, R. (1986). Making input comprehensible: Do interactional modifications help? IRAL, 72, 1-25.
115. Pica, T., Holliday, A., Lewis, L., & Morgenthaler, L. (1989). Comprehensible output as an outcome of linguistic demands on the learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 63-90.
116. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
117. Porter, P. (1986). How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centered discussions. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 200-222). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
118. Robinson, J. D. (1998). Getting down to business: Talk, gaze and body orientation during openings of doctor-communication consultations. Human Communications Research, 25, 97-123.
119. Robinson, P. J. (1995). Attention, memory and the 'noticing' hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
120. Roger, D. & Bull, P. (1988). Introduction. In D. Roger & P. Bull (Eds.), Conversation (pp. 21-47). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
121. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
122. Salica, C. (1981). Testing a model of corrective feedback. MA thesis, University of California at Los Angeles.
123. Sato, C. (1986). Conversation and interlanguage development: Rethinking the connection. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 23-45). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
124. Sato, C. (1988). Origins of complex syntax in interlanguage development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10, 371-395.
125. Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist, 70, 1075-1095.
126. Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. In T. Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, Volume 12: Discourse and Syntax (pp. 261-286). New York, NY: Academic Press.
127. Schegloff, E. A. (1991). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In L. R. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Socially shared cognition (pp. 150-171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
128. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1295-1345.
129. Schegloff, E. A. (1993). Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 99-128.
130. Schegloff, E. A. (1997a). Third turn repair. In G. R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin, & J. Baugh (Eds.), Towards a social science of language: papers in honor of William Labov. Volume 2: Social interaction and discourse structures (pp. 31-40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
131. Schegloff, E. A. (1997b). Practices and actions: Boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes, 23, 499-545.
132. Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When “others” initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21, 205-243.
133. Schegloff, E. A. & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289-327.
134. Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361-382.
135. Schegloff, E. A., Koshik, I., Jacoby, S., & Olsher, D. (2002). Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. In M. McGroarty (Ed.), ARAL, 22, Discourse and dialog, 3-31.
136. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 17-46.
137. Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 206-226.
138. Schmidt, R. (Ed.). (1994). Deconstructing consciousness in search of useful definitions for applied linguistics. AILA Review, 11, 11-26.
139. Schmidt, R. & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
140. Schwartz, J. (1980). The negotiation for meaning: Repair in conversations between second language learners of English. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed.), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 138-153). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
141. Seedhouse, P. (1997). The case of the missing “No”: The relationship between pedagogy and interaction. Language Learning, 47, 547-583.
142. Seedhouse, P. (1999). The relationship between context and the organization of repair in the L2 classrooom. IRAL, XXXVII, 59-80.
143. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the L2 learner. Second Language Research, 7, 118-132.
144. Sharwood-Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165-179.
145. Shehadeh, A. (1999). Non-native speakers' production of modified comprehensible output and second language learning. Language Learning, 49, 627-675.
146. Sinclair, J. & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. Oxford: OUP.
147. Skehan, P. & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185-221.
148. Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom laboratory research. Language Teacher, 30, 73-87.
149. Spada, N. & Lightbown, P. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205-224.
150. Stivers, T. (2001). Negotiating who presents the problem: Next speaker selection in pediatric encounters. Journal of Communication, 51, 252-282.
151. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
152. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-144). Oxford: OUP.
153. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
154. Tarone, E. & Liu, G. (1995). Situational context, variation, and second language acquisition. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhoffer (Eds.), Principles and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 107-124). Oxford: OUP.
155. Tomasello, M. & Herron, C. (1988). Down the garden path: Inducing and correcting over-generalization errors in the foreign language classroom. Applied Psycholinguistics, 9, 237-246.
156. VanPatten, B. (1988). How juries get hung: Problems with the evidence for a focus on form in teaching. Language Learning, 38, 243-260.
157. Varonis, E. M. & Gass, S. M. (1985a). Miscommunication in native/nonnative conversation. Language in Society, 14, 327-343.
158. Varonis, E. M. & Gass, S. M. (1985b). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.
159. Wagner, J. (1996). Foreign language acquisition through interaction: A critical review of research on conversational adjustments. Journal of Pragmatics, 23, 215-235.
160. White, J. & Lightbown, P. M. (1984). Asking and answering in ESL classrooms. Canadian Modern Language Review, 40, 228-244.
161. White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of second language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95-110.
162. White, L. (1989). Universal grammar and second language acquisition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
163. White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-161.
164. White, L., Spada, N., Lightbown, P., & Ranta, L. (1991). Input enhancement and L2 question formation. Applied Linguistics, 12, 416-432.
165. Willey. B. (2001). Examining a “communications strategy” from a conversation analytic perspective: Eliciting help from native speakers inside and outside of word search sequences. MA thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
166. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49, 583-625.
167. Yule, G. & McDonald, D. (1990). Resolving referential conflicts in L2 interaction: The effect of proficiency and interactive role. Language Learning, 40, 539-556.