Similar range of motion and function after resurfacing large-head or standard total hip arthroplasty: 2-year results from a randomized clinical trial

Acta Orthopaedica

Volumn 84, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 246-253

  Penny, Jeannette Østergaard ^a,b,c   Ovesen, Ole ^a,c   Varmarken, Jens Erik ^b   Overgaard, Søren ^a,c  

^a ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b NAESTVED HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQ 5D SCORE; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD PROSTHESIS; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL LEAVE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REHABILITATION CARE; RESURFACING HIP ARTHROPLASTY; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; UCLA ACTIVITY SCORE; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84876356173     PISSN: 17453674     EISSN: 17453682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2013.788435     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Amstutz H C, Beaule P E, Dorey F J, Le Duff M J, Campbell P A, Gruen T A. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004; 86: 28-39. (Pubitemid 38057333)
2. Anissian H L, Stark A, Gustafson A, Good V, Clarke I C. Metal-on-metal bearing in hip prosthesis generates 100-fold less wear debris than metal-on-polyethylene. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70: 578-82. (Pubitemid 30040002)
3. Bader R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, Zimmermann S, Busch R, Mittelmeier W. The infuence of head and neck geometry on stability of total hip replacement: a mechanical test study. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75: 415-21. (Pubitemid 39179526)
4. Beaule P E, Schmalzried T P, Udomkiat P, Amstutz H C. Jumbo femoral head for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2002; 84: 256-63. (Pubitemid 37127487)
5. Bellamy N, Buchanan W W, Goldsmith C H, Campbell J, Stitt L W. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988; 15: 1833-40. (Pubitemid 19037656)
6. Bengs B C, Sangiorgio S N, Ebramzadeh E. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs. Acta Orthop 2008; 79: 755-62.
7. Bohannon R W. Number of pedometer-assessed steps taken per day by adults: a descriptive meta-analysis 3. Phys Ther 2007; 1642-50. (Pubitemid 350230752)
8. Bryant M J, Kernohan W G, Nixon J R, Mollan R A. A statistical analysis of hip scores. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75: 705-9. (Pubitemid 23267931)
9. Burroughs B R, Hallstrom B, Golladay G J, Hoeffel D, Harris W H. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 11-9. (Pubitemid 40127098)
10. Costa M L, Achten J, Parsons N R, Edlin R P, Foguet P, Prakash U, Griffn D R. Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2012; 344: e2147.
11. Daniel J, Ziaee H, Pradhan C, McMinn D J. Six-year results of a prospective study of metal ion levels in young patients with metal-on-metal hip resur-facings. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2009; 91: 176-9.
12. Davis K E, Ritter M A, Berend M E, Meding J B. The importance of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2007; (465): 180-4. (Pubitemid 350306513)
13. Dela Rosa A, Silva M, Heisel C, Reich M, Schmalzried P. Range of motion after total hip resurfacing. Orthopeadics 2007; 30: 352-7. (Pubitemid 46860768)
14. Garbuz D S, Tanzer M, Greidanus N V, Masri B A, Duncan C P. The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop 2010; (468) (2): 318-25
15. Garellick G, Rogmark C, Karrholm J, Herberts P. Annual report 2009. The Swedish hip register, 2011.
16. Graves S, Davidson D, Tomkins A. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide:AOA; 2011 http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/documents/AnnualReports2011/ AnnualReport-2011-WebVersion.pdf. 2011.
17. Hakkinen A, Borg H, Kautiainen H, Anttila E, Hakkinen K, Ylinen J, Kivi-ranta I. Muscle strength and range of movement defcits 1 year after hip resurfacing surgery using posterior approach. Disabil Rehabil 2010; 32: 483-91.
18. Hing C B, Back D L, Bailey M, Young D A, Dalziel R E, Shimmin A J. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of fve years: An independent prospective review of the frst 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2007; 89: 1431-8. (Pubitemid 350273235)
19. Holm I, Bolstad B, Lutken T, Ervik A, Rokkum M, Steen H. Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of hip ROM in patients with osteoarthrosis. Physiother Res Int 2000; 5: 241-8.
20. Howie D W, McGee M A, Costi K, Graves S E. Metal-on-metal resurfacing versus total hip replacement-the value of a randomized clinical trial. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 195-201.
21. Jensen C, Aagaard P, Overgaard S. Recovery in mechanical muscle strength following resurfacing vs standard total hip arthroplasty-a randomised clinical trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011; 19: 1108-16.
22. Johanson P E, Fenstad A M, Furnes O, Garellick G, Havelin L I, Overgaard S, Pedersen A B, Karrholm J. Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty. Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007. Acta Orthop 2010; 81: 535-41.
23. Karrholm J, Garellick G, Rogmark C, Herberts P. The Swedish hip register. Annual Report 2007. http://www.shpr.se/sv/Publications/DocumentsRe-ports.aspx. The Swedish hip register. 2008: 58-9. 18-11-2008.
24. Kluess D, Zietz C, Lindner T, Mittelmeier W, Schmitz K P, Bader R. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter. Acta Orthop 2008; 79: 748-54.
25. Kuijer P P, de Beer M J, Houdijk J H, Frings-Dresen M H. Benefcial and limiting factors affecting return to work after total knee and hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2009; 19: 375-81.
26. Lavigne M, Therrien M, Nantel J, Roy A, Prince F, Vendittoli P A. The John Charnley Award: The Functional Outcome of Hip Resurfacing and Large-head THA Is the Same: A Randomized, Double-blind Study. Clin Orthop 2010; (468) (2): 326-36.
27. Lavigne M, Ganapathi M, Mottard S, Girard J, Vendittoli P A. Range of motion of large head total hip arthroplasty is greater than 28 mm total hip arthroplasty or hip resurfacing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon ) 2011; 26: 267-73.
28. Le Duff M J, Wisk L E, Amstutz H C. Range of motion after stemmed total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing-a clinical study. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009; 67: 177-81.
29. Mobasheri R, Gidwani S, Rosson J W. The effect of total hip replacement on the employment status of patients under the age of 60 years. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2006; 88: 131-3.
30. Nissen T, Douw K, Overgaard S. Patient-reported outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and standard total hip replacement after short-term follow-up. Dan Med Bull 2011; 58: A4310.
31. Overgaard S, Lucht U, Varmarken J E, Pedersen A B, Bartels P. The Danish Hip arthroplasty register. Annual report 2007. The Danish Hip arthroplasty register, 2008. 18-11-2008.
32. Padgett D E, Lipman J, Robie B, Nestor B J. Infuence of total hip design on dislocation: a computer model and clinical analysis. Clin Orthop 2006; (447): 48-52. (Pubitemid 44324892)
33. Porter M, Borroff M, Gregg P, Howard P, MacGregor A, Tucker K. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 8th. annual report 2011. Surgical data to December 31st. 2010 http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/Por-tals/0/Documents/ NJR%208th%20Annual%20Report%202011.pdf. 2012.
34. Schmalzried T P, Shepherd E F, Dorey F J, Jackson W O, dela R M, Fa'vae F, McKellop H A, McClung C D, Martell J, Moreland J R, Amstutz H C. The John Charnley Award. Wear is a function of use, not time. Clin Orthop 2000; (381): 36-46.
35. Schneider P L, Crouter S E, Lukajic O, Bassett D R, Jr. Accuracy and reliability of 10 pedometers for measuring steps over a 400-m walk. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1779-84. (Pubitemid 37221913)
36. Sharma V, Morgan P M, Cheng E Y. Factors infuencing Early rehabilitation after THA: A systematic review. Clin Orthop 2009; (467) (6): 1400-11.
37. Spieker F, Plougsing J. SOCIO-The socioeconomical classifcation from Statistics Denmark (in Danish). 1. edition., 1-16. 1997. Statistics Denmark. 1-12-2009.
38. Stulberg B N, Fitts S M, Bowen A R, Zadzilka J D. Early Return to Function After Hip Resurfacing Is It Better Than Contemporary Total Hip Arthroplasty? J Arthroplasty 2010; 25 (5): 748-53.
39. Swank M L, Alkire M R. Minimally invasive hip resurfacing compared to minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2009; 67: 113-5.
40. The Danish ministry of Occupation. Analysis of the Danish Sick abcense (Danish). 1-80. 2001. The Danish ministry of Occupation.
41. Vail T P, Mina C A, Yergler J D, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Compares Favorably with THA at 2 Years Followup. Clin Orthop 2006; (453): 123-31. (Pubitemid 44900970)
42. van der Wegen, Hoekstra H J, Sijbesma T, Bos E, Schemitsch E H, Poolman R W. Survival of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011; 93: 298-306.
43. Vendittoli P A, Lavigne M, Roy A, Lusignan D. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal on metal total hip arthroplasty and metal on metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old. Hip International 2006; 16: 73-81.
44. Wittrup-Jensen K U, Lauridsen J, Gudex C, Pedersen K M. Generation of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health states. Scand J Public Health 2009; 37: 459-66.
45. Zahiri C A, Schmalzried T P, Szuszczewicz E S, Amstutz H C. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13: 890-5. (Pubitemid 29016797)
46. Zhou Y X, Guo S J, Liu Q, Tang J, Li Y J. Infuence of the femoral head size on early postoperative gait restoration after total hip arthroplasty. Chin Med J (Engl ) 2009; 122: 1513-6.
47. Zijlstra W P, van d A-S, I, Zee M J, van Raay J J. No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty? Int Orthop 2011; 35: 1771-6.