Patient-reported outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and standard total hip replacement after short-term follow-up

Danish Medical Bulletin

Volumn 58, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 7-

  Nissen, Tina ^a   Douw, Karla ^b   Overgaard, Søren ^c  

^a Region Syddanmark Regional Udvikling   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c ODENSE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WALKING;

EID: 80053602741     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16039629     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Sundhedsstyrelsen. Center for evaluering og medicinsk teknologivurdering. Kommenteret varsel om ny medicinsk teknologi. Kommentar til: Hip Resurfacing 2006;3:1.
2. Corten K, MacDonald SJ. Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: What do they tell us? What do they not tell us? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;468:351-7.
3. Johanson PE, Fenstad AM, Furnes O et al. Inferior outcome after hip resurfacing arthroplasty than after conventional arthroplasty. Evidence from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA) database, 1995 to 2007. Acta Orthopaedica 2010;81:535-41.
4. Ryan M, Nunley MD, Craig J et al. Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:56-65.
5. Overgaard S, Ovesen O, Penny J et al. Metal on Metal (MoM) Udredningsprogram for patienter med MoM standard THA med stort hoved eller resurfacing THA. Dansk Selskab for Hofte-og knæalloplastik. Holte: Dansk Ortopædisk Selskab, 2010.
6. Mabilleau G, Kwon Y, Pandit H et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A review of periprosthetic biological Reactions. Acta Orthopaedica 2008;79:734-47.
7. Jones CA, Beaupre LA, Johnston DW et al. Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts o patient outcomes after surgery. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2007;33:71-86.
8. Hall DP, Srikantharajah D, Anakwe RE et al. Patient-reported outcome following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip and total hip replacement. Hip Int 2009;19:245-50.
9. Mont MA, Marker DR, Smith JM et al. Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:66-71.
10. Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 1997;45:1829-43.
11. Mainz J. Problemidentifikation og kvalitetsvurdering i sundhedsvæsenet. København: Munksgaard, 1995.
12. Donabedian A. The quality of care. JAMA 1998;260:1743-8.
13. Carr-Hill RA. The measurement of patient satisfaction. J Public Health Med 1992;14:236-49.
14. Zywiel MG, Marker DR, McGrath MS et al. Resurfacing matched to standard hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels-a comparison of postoperative outcomes. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67:116-9.
15. Lingard EA, Muthumayandi K, Holland JP. Comparison of patient-reported outcomes between hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:1550-4.
16. Röder C, Parvizi J, Eggli S et al. Demographic factors affecting long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;417:62-73.
17. McMurray A, Grant S, Griffeths S et al. Mapping recovery after total hip replacement surgery: health-related quality of life after three years. Aust J Adv Nurs 2005;22:20-5.
18. Ortopædkirurgisk Afdeling O, Odense Universitetshospital. Patientinformation kunstigt hofteled. Odense Universitetshospital, Region Syddanmark 2009.