Minimally invasive hip resurfacing compared to minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 113-115

  Swank, Michael L ^a   Alkire, Martha R ^a  

^a Cincinnati Orthopaedic Research Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTTRAUMATIC ARTHROPATHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649494707     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (2)

1. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jan;86(1):28-39.
2. Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M, et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Nov;89(11):1431-1438 (Pubitemid 350273235)