Range of motion after stemmed total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing: A clinical study

Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 177-181

  Le Duff, Michel J ^a   Wisk, Lauren E ^a   Amstutz, Harlan C ^a,b  

^a ST VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Joint Replacement Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METAL;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS; BONE NECROSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIPHYSIOLYSIS; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; PATIENT POSITIONING; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL PATIENT; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ACETABULUM; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649472805     PISSN: 19369719     EISSN: 19369727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Amstutz H, Le Duff M. Background of metal-on-metal resurfacing. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H]. 2006;220(2):85-94.
2. Wright JG, Rudicel S, Feinstein AR. Ask patients what they want. Evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(2):229-234 (Pubitemid 24083238)
3. Amstutz H, Beaulé P, Dorey F, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up. J Bone and Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:28-39. (Pubitemid 38057333)
4. Back D, Dalziel R, Young D, Shimmin A. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(3):324-329
5. Beaulé P, Dorey F, Le Duff M, et al. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal on metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2004;(418):87-93. (Pubitemid 38140428)
6. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn D. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:177-188 (Pubitemid 38386853)
7. De Smet K. Belgium experience with metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36(2):203-213 (Pubitemid 40503998)
8. Mont M, Ragland P, Etienne G, et al. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(8):454-463
9. Vendittoli P, Lavigne M, Roy A, Lusignan D. A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old. Hip Int. 2006;16(Suppl 4):73-81. (Pubitemid 44130369)
10. Naal F, Maffiuletti N, Munzinger U, Hersche O. Sports after hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2007; Epub ahead of print.
11. Schmalzried T, Le Duff M. Rehabilitation and Activity Following Total Hip Resurfacing. In: Amstutz HC (ed): Hip Resurfacing: Principles, Indications, Technique and Results. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2008, pp. 245-251.
12. Bengs B, Sangiorgio S, Ebramzadeh E. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs. Acta Orthop. 2008;79(6):755-762
13. Kluess D, Zietz C, Lindner T, et al. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter. Acta Orthop. 2008;79(6):748-754
14. Vail T, Mina C, Yergler J, Pietrobon R. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;(453):123-131 (Pubitemid 44900970)
15. Amstutz H, Thomas B, Jinnah R, et al. Treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the hip. A comparison of total joint and surface replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1984;66(2):228-241 (Pubitemid 14150389)
16. Le Duff M, Dorey F. Outcome studies and data collection. In: Amstutz HC (ed): Hip Resurfacing: Principles, Indications, Technique and Results. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2008, pp. 61-76.
17. Johnson C. A new method for roentgenographic examination of the upper end of the femur. J Bone and Joint Surg Am. 1932;14:859-866
18. Brooker A, Bowerman J, Robinson R, Riley L. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55(8):1629-1632
19. Boone D, Azen S. Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(5):756-759 (Pubitemid 9232034)
20. Roaas A, Andersson G. Normal range of motion of the hip, knee and ankle joints in male subjects, 30-40 years of age. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53(2):205-208
21. Svenningsen S, Terjesen T, Auflem M, Berg V. Hip motion related to age and sex. Acta Orthop Scand. 1989;60(1):97-100. (Pubitemid 19090571)
22. dela Rosa M, Silva M, Heisel C, et al. Range of motion after total hip resurfacing. Orthopedics. 2007;30(5):352-357
23. Lavigne M, Boddu Siva Rama K, Roy A, Vendittoli P. Painful impingement of the hip joint after total hip resurfacing: a report of two cases. J Arthroplasty. 2008; Epub ahead of print.
24. Williams D, Royle M, Norton M. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(1):144-151