Influence of the femoral head size on early postoperative gait restoration after total hip arthroplasty

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 122, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1513-1516

  Zhou, Yin Xin ^a   Guo, Sheng Jie ^a   Liu, Qing ^a   Tang, Jing ^a   Li, Yu Jun ^a  

^a Jishuitan Orthopaedic College of Tsinghua University   (China)

Author keywords

Femoral head size; Gait analysis; Harris Hip Score; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; BONE SIZE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR HEAD; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; GAIT; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WALKING SPEED;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMUR HEAD; GAIT; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 70349546237     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2009.13.007     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Branson JJ, Goldstein WM. Primary total hip arthroplasty. AORN J 2003; 78: 947-953
2. Huo MH, Gilbert NF, Parvizi J. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 1874-1885.
3. Lavigne M, Masse V, Girard J, Roy AG, Vendittoli PA. Return to sport after hip resurfacing or total hip arthroplasty: a randomized study. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2008; 94: 361-367.
4. Sliwinski M, Sisto S. Gait, quality of life, and their association following total hip arthroplasty. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2006; 29: 10-17.
5. Nankaku M, Tsuboyama T, Kakinoki R, Kawanabe K, Kanzaki H, Mito Y, et al. Gait analysis of patients in early stages after total hip arthroplasty: effect of lateral trunk displacement on walking efficiency. J Orthop Sci 2007; 12: 550-554.
6. Anissian HL, Stark A, Gustafson A, Good V, Clarke IC. Metal-on-metal bearing in hip prosthesis generates 100-fold less wear debris than metal-on-polyethylene. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70: 578-582.
7. Goldsmith AA, Dowson D, Isaac GH, Lancaster JG. A comparative joint simulator study of the wear of metal-on-metal and alternative material combinations in hip replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 2000; 214: 39-47.
8. McCrory JL, White SC, Lifeso RM. Vertical ground reaction forces: objective measures of gait following hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 2001; 14: 104-109.
9. Brown M, Hislop HJ, Waters RL, Porell D. Walking efficiency before and after total hip replacement. Phys Ther 1980; 60: 1259-1263.
10. Mattsson E, Brostrom LA, Linnarsson D. Walking efficiency after cemented and noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; (254): 170-179.
11. Crowninshield RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (429): 102-107.
12. Peter CL, McPherson E, Jackson JD, Erickson JA. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007; 22(6 Suppl 2): 140-144.
13. Amstutz HC, Lodwig RM, Schurman DJ, Hodgson AG. Range of motion studies for total hip replacements: a comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975; (111): 124-130.
14. Burroughs BR, Hallstrom B, Golladay GJ, Hoeffel D, Harris WH. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20: 11-19.
15. Davis KE, Ritter MA, Berend ME, Meding JB. The importance of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 465: 180-184.
16. He RX, Yan SG, Wu LD, Wang XH, Dai XS. Position of the prosthesis and the incidence of dislocation following total hip replacement. Chin Med J 2007; 120: 1140-1144.
17. Mont MA, Seyler TM, Raqland PS, Starr R, Erhart J, Bhave A. Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthropalsty 2007; 22: 100-108.