Range of motion of large head total hip arthroplasty is greater than 28 mm total hip arthroplasty or hip resurfacing

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 267-273

  Lavigne, Martin ^a,b   Ganapathi, Muthu ^c   Mottard, Sophie ^a   Girard, Julien ^a   Vendittoli, Pascal André ^b  

^a MAISONNEUVE ROSEMONT HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c YSBYTY GWYNEDD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Function; Hip resurfacing; Large diameter head total hip arthropalsty; Range of motion

Indexed keywords

ARTHROPLASTIES; COMPARATIVE STUDIES; DIAMETER RATIO; DIGITAL PHOTOGRAPHS; EXTERNAL ROTATION; HIP ARTHROPLASTIES; HIP FLEXION; HIP RESURFACING; LARGE DIAMETER; LARGE DIAMETER HEAD TOTAL HIP ARTHROPALSTY; LOWER-LIMB FUNCTION; RANGE OF MOTION; RANGE OF MOTIONS; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY;

OPTIMIZATION; PHOTOGRAPHY;

ORTHOPEDICS;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FEMUR NECK; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79952704513     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Amstutz, H.C., Lodwig, R.M., Schurman, D.J., Hodgson, A.G., 1975. Range of motion studies for total hip replacements. A comparative study with a new experimental apparatus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 124-130.
2. Bellamy, N., Buchanan, W.W., Goldsmith, C.H., Campbell, J., Stitt, L.W., 1988. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15, 1833-1840. (Pubitemid 19037656)
3. Bengs, B.C., Sangiorgio, S.N., Ebramzadeh, E., 2008. Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs. Acta Orthop 79, 755-762.
4. Bryant, M.J., Kernohan, W.G., Nixon, J.R., Mollan, R.A., 1993. A statistical analysis of hip scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75, 705-709. (Pubitemid 23267931)
5. Burroughs, B.R., Hallstrom, B., Golladay, G.J., Hoeffel, D., Harris, W.H., 2005. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty 20, 11-19. (Pubitemid 40127098)
6. Chandler, D.R., Glousman, R., Hull, D., Mcguire, P.J., Kim, I.S., Clarke, I.C., Sarmiento, A., 1982. Prosthetic hip range of motion and impingement. The effects of head and neck geometry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 284-291.
7. Clarke, I.C., 1982. Symposium on surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Biomechanics: mutifactorial design choices - an essential compromise? Orthop Clin North Am 13, 681-707.
8. Davis, K.E., Ritter, M.A., Berend, M.E., Meding, J.B., 2007. The importance of range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 465, 180-184. (Pubitemid 350306513)
9. Dela Rosa, M.A., Silva, M., Heisel, C., Reich, M., Schmalzried, T.P., 2007. Range of motion after total hip resurfacing. Orthopedics 30, 352-357. (Pubitemid 46860768)
10. D'lima, D.D., Urquhart, A.G., Buehler, K.O., Walker, R.H., Colwell JR., C.W., 2000. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82, 315-321.
11. Escalante, A., Lichtenstein, M.J., Dhanda, R., Cornell, J.E., Hazuda, H.P., 1999. Determinants of hip and knee flexion range: results from the San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging. Arthritis Care Res 12, 8-18. (Pubitemid 29507592)
12. Girard, J., Lavigne, M., Vendittoli, P.A., Roy, A.G., 2006. Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88, 721-726. (Pubitemid 43971134)
13. Gondi, G., Roberson, J.R., Ganey, T.M., Shahriari, A., Hutton, W.C., 1997. Impingement after total hip arthroplasty related to prosthetic component selection and range of motion. J South Orthop Assoc 6, 266-272.
14. Imai, H., Mashima, N., Takahashi, T., Yamamoto, H., 2009. The relationship between increased hip range of motion, wear, and locking mechanism failure in the harris-galante acetabular component. J Arthroplasty 24, 892-897.
15. Johnston, R.C., Smidt, G.L., 1970. Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living. Clin Orthop Relat Res 72, 205-215.
16. Kessler, O., Patil, S., Wirth, S., Mayr, E., Colwell JR., C.W., D'lima, D.D., 2008. Bony impingement affects range of motion after total hip arthroplasty: a subject-specific approach. J Orthop Res 26, 443-452.
17. Klassbo, M., Harms-Ringdahl, K., Larsson, G., 2003. Examination of passive RoM and capsular patterns in the hip. Physiother Res Int 8, 1-12.
18. Kluess, D., Zietz, C., Lindner, T., Mittelmeier, W., Schmitz, K.P., Bader, R., 2008. Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter. Acta Orthop 79, 748-754.
19. Lavigne, M., Boddu Siva Rama, K.R., Roy, A., Vendittoli, P.A., 2008. Painful impingement of the hip joint after total hip resurfacing: a report of two cases. J Arthroplasty 23, 1074-1079.
20. Le Duff, M.J., Wisk, L.E., Amstutz, H.C., 2009. Range of motion after stemmed total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing - a clinical study. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 67, 177-181.
21. Lea, R.D., Gerhardt, J.J., 1995. Range-of-motion measurements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77, 784-798.
22. Matsushita, A., Nakashima, Y., Jingushi, S., Yamamoto, T., Kuraoka, A., Iwamoto, Y., 2009. Effects of the femoral offset and the head size on the safe range of motion in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24, 646-651.
23. Mcgrory, B.J., Freiberg, A.A., Shinar, A.A., Harris, W.H., 1996. Correlation of measured range of hip motion following total hip arthroplasty and responses to a questionnaire. J Arthroplasty 11, 565-571. (Pubitemid 26307026)
24. Mulholland, S.J., Wyss, U.P., 2001. Activities of daily living in non-Western cultures: range of motion requirements for hip and knee joint implants. Int J Rehabil Res 24, 191-198. (Pubitemid 32803695)
25. Odding, E., Valkenburg, H.A., Algra, D., Vandenouweland, F.A., Grobbee, D.E., Hofman, A., 1996. The association of abnormalities on physical examination of the hip and knee with locomotor disability in the Rotterdam Study. Br J Rheumatol 35, 884-890.
26. Park, K.K., Chang, C.B., Kang, Y.G., Seong, S.C., Kim, T.K., 2007. Correlation of maximum flexion with clinical outcome after total knee replacement in Asian patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89, 604-608. (Pubitemid 46958767)
27. Ritter, M.A., Campbell, E.D., 1987. Effect of range of motion on the success of a total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2, 95-97. (Pubitemid 17133520)
28. Rossi, M.D., Hasson, S., Kohia, M., Pineda, E., Bryan, W., 2006. Mobility and perceived function after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21, 6-12. (Pubitemid 43162979)
29. Steultjens, M.P., Dekker, J., Van Baar, M.E., Oostendorp, R.A., BIJLSMA, J.W., 2000. Range of joint motion and disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39, 955-961.
30. Vail, T.P., Mina, C.A., Yergler, J.D., Pietrobon, R., 2006. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453, 123-131. (Pubitemid 44900970)
31. Vendittoli, P.A., Lavigne, M., Girard, J., Roy, A.G., 2006. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88, 997-1002.
32. Vendittoli, P.A., Ganapathi, M., Nuno, N., Plamondon, D., Lavigne, M., 2007. Factors affecting hip range of motion in surface replacement arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 22, 1004-1012. (Pubitemid 47430194)
33. Weeden, S.H., Schmidt, R., 2007. A randomized, prospective study of primary total knee components designed for increased flexion. J Arthroplasty 22, 349-352. (Pubitemid 46484003)
34. Widmer, K.H., Majewski, M., 2005. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech 20, 723-728. (Pubitemid 40917242)
35. Williams, D., Royle, M., Norton, M., 2009. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement. J Arthroplasty 24, 144-151.
36. Woo, R.Y., Morrey, B.F., 1982. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64, 1295-1306. (Pubitemid 13169598)
37. Woolson, S.T., Maloney, W.J., Schurman, D.J., 1985. Time-related improvement in the range of motion of the hip after total replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67, 1251-1254. (Pubitemid 16222969)