Influence of total hip design on dislocation: A computer model and clinical analysis

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 447, Issue , 2006, Pages 48-52

  Padgett, Douglas E ^a,b   Lipman, Joseph ^a   Robie, Bruce ^c   Nestor, Bryan J ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; HIP DISLOCATION; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; UNITED STATES; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION; FEMUR NECK; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HISTOLOGY; INSTRUMENTATION; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; JOINT INSTABILITY; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMUR NECK; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS FITTING; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33746068695     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218748.30236.40     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Bader R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, Zimmerman S, Busch R, Mittelmeier W. The influence of head and neck geometry on stability of total hip replacement: A mechanical test study. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:415-421.
2. Barrack RL, Butler RA, Laster DR, Andrews P. Stem design and dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results and computer modeling. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(8 Suppl):8-12.
3. Barrack RL, Lavernia C, Ries M, Thornberry R, Tozakoglou E. Virtual reality computer animation of the effect of component position and design on stability after total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:569-577.
4. Bartz RL, Nobel PC, Kadakia NR, Tullos HS. The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1300-1307.
5. D'Lima DD, Urquhart AG, Buehler KO, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:315-321.
6. Jolles BM, Zangger P, Leyvraz PF. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: A multivariate analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17:282-288.
7. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217-220.
8. Padgett DE, Warashina H. The unstable total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;420:72-79.
9. Scifert CF, Brown TD, Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ. A finite element analysis of factors influencing total hip dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;355:152-162.
10. Shon W, Wright T, Baldini T, Peterson M, Salvati EA. Impingement in total hip arthroplasty: A study of retrieved acetabular components. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:427-435.
11. Yoshimine F. The safe-zones for combined and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements. J Biomech. 2005;12. [Epub ahead of print]
12. Yoshimine F, Ginbayashi K. A mathematical formula to calculate the theoretical range of motion for total hip replacement. J Biomech. 2002;35:989-993.