Multi-locus phylogenetic analysis reveals the pattern and tempo of bony fish evolution

PLoS Currents

Volumn , Issue APR 2013, 2013, Pages

  Broughton, Richard E ^a   Betancur R , Ricardo ^b   Li, Chenhong ^c   Arratia, Gloria ^d   Ortí, Guillermo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SHANGHAI OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIODIVERSITY; BOOTSTRAPPING; CALIBRATION; CARTILAGINOUS FISH; CODON; EVOLUTION; EVOLUTIONARY HOMOLOGY; FISH; FOSSIL; GAR; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 84876312266     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21573999     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/currents.tol.2ca8041495ffafd0c92756e75247483e     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Amores A, Force A, Yan YL, Joly L, Amemiya C, et al. (1998) Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282: 1711-1714.
2. Hoegg S, Brinkmann H, Taylor JS, Meyer A (2004) Phylogenetic timing of the fish-specific genome duplication correlates with the diversification of teleost fish. Journal of Molecular Evolution 59: 190-203.
3. Shubin N, Tabin C, Carroll S (1997) Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388: 639-648.
4. Alfaro ME, Santini F, Brock CD (2007) Do Reefs Drive Diversification in Marine Teleosts? Evidence from the Pufferfish and Their Allies (Order Tetraodontiformes). Evolution 61: 2104-2126.
5. Betancur R.R, Ortí G, Stein AM, Marceniuk AP, Pyron RA (2012) Apparent signal of competition limiting diversification after ecological transitions from marine to freshwater habitats. Ecol Lett 15: 822-830.
6. Vega GC, Wiens JJ (2012) Why are there so few fish in the sea? Proceedings Royal Society B 279: 2323-2329.
7. Mank J, Avise J (2006) Comparative phylogenetic analysis of male alternative reproductive tactics in ray-finned fishes. Evolution 60: 1311-1316.
8. Morrow JM, Lazic S, Chang BSW (2011) A novel rhodopsin-like gene expressed in zebrafish retina. Visual Neuroscience.
9. Rose GJ (2004) Insights into neural mechanisms and evolution of behavior from electric fish. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5: 943-951.
10. Thornton JW (2001) Evolution of vertebrate steroid receptors from an ancestral estrogen receptor by ligand exploitation and serial genome expansions. PNAS 98: 5671-5676.
11. Arterbery AS, Fergus DJ, Fogarty EA, Mayberry J, Deitcher DL, et al. (2011) Evolution of ligand specificity in vertebrate corticosteroid receptors. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11: 14.
12. Zakon HH (2012) Adaptive evolution of voltage-gated sodium channels: The first 800 million years. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 10619-10625.
13. Lowe CB, Kellis M, Siepel A, Raney BJ, Clamp M, et al. (2011) Three periods of regulatory innovation during vertebrate evolution. Science 333: 1019-1024.
14. Lemons D, McGinnis W (2006) Genomic Evolution of Hox Gene Clusters. Science 313: 1918-1922.
15. Jarvik E (1980) Basic structure and evolution of vertebrates. London: Academic Press.
16. Rosen DE, Forey PL, Gardiner BG, Patterson C (1981) Lungfishes, tetrapods, paleontology, and plesiomorphy. Bull Amer Mus Nat Hist 167: 159-276.
17. Brinkmann H, Venkatesh B, Brenner S, Meyer A (2004) Nuclear protein-coding genes support lungfish and not the coelacanth as the closest living relatives of land vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 4900-4905.
18. Zhu M, Schultze H-P (2001) Interrelationships of basal osteichthyans. In: P A, editor. Major Events in Early Vertebrate Evolution. London: Taylor & Francis. pp. 289-314.
19. Patterson C (1973) Interrelationships of holosteans. In: Greenwood PH, Miles RS, Patterson C, editors. Interrelationships of fishes. London: Academic Press. pp. 233-305.
20. Patterson C, Rosen DE (1977) Review of ichthyodectiform and other Mesozoic teleost fishes and the theory and practice of classifying fossils. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 158: 83-172.
21. Greenwood PH, Rosen D, Weitzman SH, Meyers GS (1966) Phyletic studies of teleostean fishes, with a provisional classification of living forms. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 131: 339-456.
22. Santini F, Harmon LJ, Carnevale G, Alfaro ME (2009) Did genome duplication drive the origin of teleosts? A comparative study of diversification in ray-finned fishes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9: 194.
23. Stiassny MLJ, Wiley EO, Johnson GD, de Carvalho MR (2004) Gnathostome fishes. In: Cracraft J, Donoghue MJ, editors. Assembling the Tree of Life. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 410-429.
24. Nelson JS (2006) Fishes of the World, 4th Ed. New York: Wiley & Sons.
25. Wiley EO, Johnson GD (2010) A teleost classification based on monophyletic groups. In: Nelson JS, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil. pp. 123-182.
26. Broughton RE (2010) Phylogeny of teleosts based on mitochondrial DNA sequences. In: Nelson JS, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts. München: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil. pp. 61-76.
27. Hurley IS, Lockridge-Mueller R, Dunn KA, Schmidt EJ, Friedman M, et al. (2007) A new time-scale for ray-finned fish evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 274: 489-498.
28. Cloutier R, Arratia G (2004) Early diversification of actinopterygians. In: Arratia G, Wilson MVH, Cloutier R, editors. Recent Advances in the Origin and Early Radiation of Vertebrates Munchen: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil.
29. Inoue JG, Miya M, Tsukamoto K, Nishida M (2003) Basal actinopterygian relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogeny of the ancient fish. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26: 110-120.
30. Inoue JG, Miya M, Venkatesh B, Nishida M (2005) The mitochondrial genome of Indonesian coelacanth Latimeria menadoensis (Sarcopterygii: Coelacanthiformes) and divergence time estimation between the two coelacanths. Gene 349: 227-235.
31. Near TJ, Eytan RI, Dornburg A, Kuhn KL, Moore JA, et al. (2012) Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 13698-13703.
32. Zou M, Guo B, Tao W, Arratia G, He S (2012) Integrating multi-origin expression data improves the resolution of deep phylogeny of ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii). Scientific Reports 2.
33. IUCN (2010) IUCN Red List version 2010.1 Table 1. International Union for Conservation of Nature.
34. Schultze H-P (1994) Comparison of hypotheses on the relationships of sarcopterygians. Systematic Biology 43: 155-173.
35. Rokas A, Carroll SB (2006) Bushes in the tree of life. PLoS Biology 4: 1899-1904.
36. Felsenstein J (1978) Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Systematic Zoology 27: 401-410.
37. Li C, Ortí G, Zhang G, Lu G (2007) A practical approach to phylogenomics: the phylogeny of ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii) as a case study. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 44.
38. Kikugawa K, Katoh K, Kuraku S, Sakurai H, Ishida O, et al. (2004) Basal jawed vertebrate phylogeny inferred from multiple nuclear DNA-coded genes. BMC Biology 2: 1-11.
39. Venkatesh B, Erdmann MV, Brenner SE (2001) Molecular synapomorphies resolve evolutionary relationships of extatn jawed vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 11382-11387.
40. Diogo R (2007) The Origin of Higher Clades: Osteology, Myology, Phylogeny and Evolution of Bony Fishes and the Rise of Tetrapods. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers.
41. Schultze H-P, Cumbaa S (2001) Dialipina and the characters of basal actinopterygians. In: Ahlberg PE, editor. Major events in Early Vertebrate Evolution, Paleontology, Phylogeny, Genetics and Development. London: Taylor & Francis. pp. 315-332.
42. Gardiner BG, Schaeffer B (1989) Interrelationships of lower actinopterygian fishes. Zoological Journal Linnean Society 97: 135-187.
43. Olsen PE (1984) The skull and pectoral girdle of the parasemionotid fish Watsonulus eugnathoides from the early Triassic Sakamena Group of Madagascar, with comments on the relationships of the holostean fishes. Journal Vertebrate Paleontology 4: 481-499.
44. Arratia G (2001) The sister-group of Teleostei: consensus and disagreements. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 21: 767-773.
45. Li C, Lu G, Orti G (2008) Optimal Data Partitioning and a Test Case for Ray-Finned Fishes (Actinopterygii) Based on Ten Nuclear Loci. SystBiol 57: 519-539.
46. Grande L (2010) An empirical synthetic pattern study of gars (Lepisosteiformes) and closely related species, based mostly on skeletal anatomy: the resurrection of Holostei. Lawrence, KS: American Society of Ichthylogists and Herpetologists.
47. de Pinna MCC (1996) Teleostean monophyly. In: Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Johnson.G.D., editors. Interrelationships of fishes. New York: Academic. pp. 147-162.
48. Arratia G (1999) The monophyly of telostei and stem-group teleosts. In: Arratia G, Schultze H-P, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 2: Systematics and Fossil Record. Munchen: Pfeil. pp. 265-334.
49. Arratia G (2000) New teleostean fishes from southern Germany and the systematic problems concerning the pholidophoriforms. Paläontol Z 74: 113-143.
50. Arratia G (2000) Phylogenetic relationships of Teleostei. Past and present. Estudios Oceanologicos 19: 19-51.
51. Arratia G (2010) Critical analysis of the impact of fossils on teleostean phylogenies, especially that of basal teleosts. In: Elliott D, Maisey J, Yu Y, Miao D, editors. Morphology, Phylogeny and Paleobiogeography of Fossil Fishes. München: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil. pp. 247-274.
52. Inoue J, Miya M, Tsukamoto K, Nishida M (2001) A mitogenomic perspective on the basal teleostean phylogeny: resolving higher-level relationships with longer DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20: 275-285.
53. Le HLV, Lecointre G, Perasso R (1993) A 28S rRNA-based phylogeny of the gnathostomes: first steps in the analysis of conflict and congruence with morphologically based cladograms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2: 31-51.
54. Arratia G (1997) Basal teleosts and teleostean phylogeny. Munich: Pfeil.
55. Lauder GV, Liem KF (1983) The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian fishes. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 150: 95-197.
56. Nelson JS (1994) Fishes of the world, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley & Sons.
57. Arratia G (1991) The caudal skeleton of Jurassic teleosts; a phylogenetic analysis. In: Chang M-m, Liu Y-h, G.-r. Z, editors. Early Vertebrates and Related Problems of Evolutionary Biology. Beijing: Science Press. pp. 249-340.
58. Arratia G (2008) Actinopterygian postcranial skeleton with special reference to the diversity of fin ray elements, and the prolem of identifying homologies. In: Arratia G, Schultze H-P, Wilson MVH, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 4 - Homology and Phylogeny. München: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil. pp. 49-101.
59. Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips M, Rambaut A (2006) Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biology 4: e88.
60. Blair JE, Hedges SB (2005) Molecular Phylogeny and Divergence Times of Deuterostome Animals. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 2275-2284.
61. Azuma Y, Kumazawa Y, Miya M, Mabuchi K, Nishida M (2008) Mitogenomic evaluation of the historical biogeography of cichlids toward reliable dating of teleostean divergences. BMC Evolutionary Biology: 215-228.
62. Lavoue S, Miya M, Arnegard ME, Sullivan JP, Hopkins CD, et al. (2012) Comparable ages for the independent origins of electrogenesis in African and South American weakly electric fishes. PLOS One 7.
63. Alfaro ME, Faircloth BC, Sorenson L, Santini F (2012) A phylogenomic perspective on the radiation of ray-finned fishes based upon targeted sequencing of ultraconserved elements. arXiv:12100120 [q-bioPE].
64. Li C, Ortí G (2007) Molecular phylogeny of Clupeiformes (Actinopterygii) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44: 386-398.
65. Maddison WP, Maddison DR (2011) Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.75. http://mesquiteproject.org.
66. Nylander JAA (2004) MrAIC.pl. Program distributed by the author.: Uppsala University.
67. Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688-2690.
68. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539-542.
69. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, Guindon S PartitionFinder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol 29: 1695-1701.
70. Kubatko LS, Carstens BC, Knowles LL (2009) STEM: species tree estimation using maximum likelihood for gene trees under coalescence. Bioinformatics 25: 971-973.
71. Maddison WP (1997) Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46: 523-536.
72. Edwards SV, Liu L, Pearl DK (2007) High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 5936-5941.
73. Liu L, Yu L, Pearl DK, Edwards SV (2009) Estimating species phylogenies using coalescence times among sequences. Systematic Biology 58: 468-477.
74. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2007) BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7: 214.
75. Ho SYW, Phillips MJ (2009) Accounting for calibration uncertainty in phylogenetic estimation of evolutionary divergence times. Systematic Biology 58: 367-380.
76. Lukoscheck V, Keogh JS, Avise JC (2012) Evaluating fossil calibrations for dating phylogenies in light of rates of molecular evolution: a comparison of three approaches. SystBiol 61: 22-43.
77. Patterson C (1982) Morphology and interrelationships of primitive actinopterygian fishes. American Zoologist 22: 241-259.
78. Dutra MFA, Malabarba CSL (2001) Peixes do Albiano-Cenomaniano do Grupo Itapecuru no estado do Maranhão, Brasil. In: Rossett DF, Góes AM, Truckenbrodt T, editors. O Cretáceo da Bacia de São Luis-Grajaú, MPEQ. pp. 191-208.
79. Dutheil DB (1999) An overview of the freshwater fish fauna from the Kem Kem beds (Late Cretaceous: Cenomanian) of southeast Morocco. In: Arratia G, Schultze H-P, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 2- Systematics and Fossil Record. München: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil. pp. 553-563.
80. Gayet M, Meunier FJ (2002) Diversification of Polypteriformes and special comparisosn with Lepisosteiformes. Paleontology 45: 361-376.
81. Benton MJ, Donoghue PCJ, Asher RJ (2009) Calibrating and constraining molecular clocks. In: Hedges SB, Kumar S, editors. The Timetree of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 35-86.
82. Botella H, Blom H, Dorka M, Ahlberg PE, Janvier P (2007) Jaws and teeth of the earliest bony fishes. Nature 448: 585-586.
83. Cloutier R, Ahlberg PE (1996) Morphology, characters, and the interrelationships of basal sarcopterygians. In: Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Johnson GD, editors. Interrelationships of fishes. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 445-479.
84. Northcutt RG (1986) Lungfish neural characters and their bearing on sarcoptergian phylogeny. In: Bemis WE, Burggren WW, Kemp NE, editors. The biology and evolution of lungfishes. New York: Alan R Liss. pp. 277-297.
85. Forey PL, Gardiner BG, Patterson C (1991) The lungfish, the coelacanth and the cow revisited. In: Schultze HP TL, editor. Origins of the higher groups of tetrapods: controversy consensus. New York: Cornell University Press. pp. 145-172.
86. Takezaki N, Figueroa F, Zaleska-Rutczynska Z, Takahata N, Klein J (2004) the phylogenetic relationship of tetrapod, coelacanth, and lungfish revealed by the sequences of forty-four nuclear genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1512-1524.
87. Shan Y, Gras R (2011) 43 genes support the lungfish-coelacanth grouping related to the closest living relative of tetrapods with the Bayesian method under the coalescence model. BMC Research Notes 4: 49.
88. Long JA (1989) A new rhizodontiform fish from the Early Carboniferous of Victoria, Australia, with remarks on the phylogenetic position of the group. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 9: 1-17.
89. M, Schultze H-P (1997) The oldest actinopterygian fish. Lethaia 30: 293-304.
90. Forey P (1998) History of the coelacanth fishes. London: Chapman & Hall.
91. Ahlberg P (1991) A re-examination of sarcopterygian interrelationships, with special reference to the Porolepiformes. Zoological Journal Linnean Society 103: 241-287.
92. Zhu M, Yu X, Lu J, Qiao T, Zhao W, et al. (2012) Earliest known coelacanth skull extends the range of anatomically modern coelacanths to the Early Devonian. Nature Communications 3: 772.
93. Yu X (1998) A new porolepiform-like fish, Psarolepis romeri, gen. et ap. nov. (Sarcopterygiii, Osteichthyes) from the Lower Devonian of Yunnan, China. Journal Vertebrate Paleontology 18: 261-274.
94. Smith AG, Smith DG, Funnell BM (1994) Atlas of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Coastlines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
95. Nelson G (1969) Gill arches and the phylogeny of fishes, with notes on the classification of vertebrates. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 141: 475-552.
96. Jessen HL (1973) Interrelationships of actinopterygians and brachiopterygians: Evidence from pectoral anatomy. In: Greenwood PH, Miles RS, Patterson C, editors. Interrelationships of Fishes. London: Academic Press. pp. 227-232.
97. Lehman P (1966) Actionopterygii. In: Piveteau J, editor. Traité de Paléontologie IV, vol 3: Zhu Actinoptérygiens, Crossoptérygiens, Dipneustes. Paris: Masson et Cie.
98. Grande L, Bemis W (1998) A comprehensive phylogenetic study of amiid fishes (Amiidae) based on comparative skeletal anatomy. An empirical search for interconnected patterns of natural history. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 18: 1-690.
99. Dunkle DH (1939) A new palaeoniscid fish from the Texas Permian. American Journal of Sciences 237: 262-274.
100. Taylor JS, Van de Peer Y, Braasch I, Meyer A (2001) Comparative genomics provides evidence for an ancient genome duplication event in fish. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 356: 1661-1679.
101. Christoffels A, Koh EGL, Chia J, Brenner SE, Aparicio S, et al. (2004) Fugu genome analysis provides evidence for a shole-genome duplication early during the evolution of ray-finned fishes. Mol Biol Evol 21: 1146-1151.
102. Vandepoele K, De Vos W, Taylor JS, Meyer A, Van de Peer Y (2004) Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: Paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 1638-1643.
103. Shen M (1996) Fossil osteoglossomorphs in East Asia and their implications in teleostean phylogeny. In: Arratia G, Viohl G, editors. Mesozoic fishes: systematics and plaleoecology. München: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil. pp. 261-272.
104. Zhang J-G (1998) Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of Kuntulunia (Teleostei: Osteoglossomorpha). Journal Vertebrate Paleontology 18: 280-300.
105. Li G-Q, Wilson MVH (1999) Early divergence of Hiodontiformes sensu stricto in East Asia and phylogeny of some Late Mesozoic teleosts from China. In: Arratia G, Schultze H-P, editors. Mesozoic Fishes 2 - Systematics and Fossil Record. München: Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil. pp. 369-384.
106. Patterson C (1998) Comments on basal teleosts and teleostean phylogeny, by Gloria Arratia. Copeia 1998: 1107-1113.
107. Müller J (1845) Über den Bau and die Grenzer der Ganoiden and über das natürliche System dei Fische. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 11 (1844): 91-141.
108. Cavin L (2010) Diversity of Mesozoic semionotiform fishes and the origin of gars (Lepisosteidae). Naturwissenschaften 57: 1017-1022.
109. Benton MJ (2005) When life nearly died: the greatest mass extinction of all time. London: Thames & Hudson.
110. Lehrmann DJ, Ramezani J, Bowring SA, Martin MW, Montgomery P, et al. (2006) Timing of recovery from the end-Permian extinction: Geochronologic and biostratigraphic constraints from south China. Geology 34: 1053-1056.
111. Sahney S, Benton MJ (2008) Recovery from the most profound mass extinction of all time. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B 275: 759-765.