Basal jawed vertebrate phylogeny inferred from multiple nuclear DNA-coded genes

BMC Biology

Volumn 2, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Kikugawa, Kanae ^a   Katoh, Kazutaka ^a   Kuraku, Shigehiro ^a,b   Sakurai, Hiroshi ^c   Ishida, Osamu ^c   Iwabe, Naoyuki ^a   Miyata, Takashi ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b RIKEN   (Japan)

^c Tokyo Zoological Park Society   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL NUCLEUS DNA; COMPLEMENTARY DNA;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYCLOSTOME; FISH; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CODE; HYPOTHESIS; JAW; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MITOCHONDRION; MOLECULAR CLONING; MORPHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PARAPHYLY; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE DATABASE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; TELEOST; VERTEBRATE; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; CELL NUCLEUS; GENE; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES; JAW; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 3242720295     PISSN: 17417007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-2-3     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Rasmussen AS, Arnason U: Phylogenetic studies of complete mitochondrial molecules place cartilaginous fishes within the tree of bony fishes. J Mol Evol 1999, 48:118-123.
2. Rasmussen AS, Arnason U: Molecular studies suggest that cartilaginous fishes have a terminal position in the piscine tree. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:2177-2182.
3. Arnason U, Gullberg A, Janke A: Molecular phylogenetics of gnathostomous (jawed) fishes: old bones, new cartilage. Zool Scripta 2001, 30:249-249.
4. Naylor GJP, Brown WM: Structural biology and phylogenetic estimation. Nature 1997, 388:527-528.
5. Cao Y, Waddell PJ, Okada N, Hasegawa M: The complete mitochondrial sequence of the shark Mustelus manazo: evaluating rooting contradictions to living bony vertebrates. Mol Biol Evol 1998, 15:1637-1646.
6. Zardoya R, Meyer A: Vertebrate phylogeny: limits of inference of mitochondrial genome and nuclear rDNA sequence data due to an adverse phylogenetic signal/noise ratio. In Major Events in Early Vertebrate Evolution Edited by: Ahlberg PE. London: Taylor & Francis; 2001:135-155.
7. Cotton JA, Page RD: Going nuclear: gene family evolution and vertebrate phylogeny reconciled. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2002, 269:1555-1561.
8. Rivera MC, Lake JA: Evidence that eukaryotes and eocyte prokaryotes are immediate relatives. Science 1992, 257:74-76.
9. Venkatesh B, Erdmann MV, Brenner S: Molecular synapomorphies resolve evolutionary relationships of extant jawed vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:11382-11387.
10. Dimmick WW: Spliceosomal introns and fish phylogeny: a critical reanalysis. Copeia 2001, 2001:536-541.
11. Martin A: The phylogenetic placement of chondrichthyes: inferences from analysis of multiple genes and implications for comparative studies. Genetica 2001, 111:349-357.
12. Hedges SB: Molecular evidence for the early history of living vertebrates. In Major Events in Early Vertebrate Evolution Edited by: Ahlberg PE. London: Taylor & Francis; 2001:119-134.
13. Takezaki N, Figueroa F, Zaleska-Rutczynska Z, Klein J: Molecular phylogeny of early vertebrates: monophyly of the agnathans as revealed by sequences of 35 genes. Mol Biol Evol 2003, 20:287-292.
14. Nelson JS: Fish of the World 3rd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1994.
15. Arratia G: The sister-group of teleostei: consensus and disagreements. J Vertebr Paleontol 2001, 21:767-773.
16. Inoue JG, Miya M, Tsukamoto K, Nishida M: Basal actinopterygian relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogeny of the 'ancient fish'. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2003, 26:110-120.
17. Normark BB, McCune AR, Harrison RG: Phylogenetic relationships of neopterygian fishes, inferred from mitochondrial sequences. Mol Biol Evol 1991, 8:819-834.
18. Lê HL, Lecointre G, Perasso R: A 28s rRNA-based phylogeny of the gnathostomes: first steps in the analysis of conflict and congruence with morphologically based cladograms. Mol Phylogenet Evol 1993, 2:31-51.
19. Takezaki N, Gojobori T: Correct and incorrect vertebrate phylogenies obtained by the entire mitochondrial sequences. Mol Biol Evol 1999, 16:590-601.
20. Iwabe N, Kuma K, Nikoh N, Miyata T: Molecular clock for dating of divergence between animal phyla. Jpn J Genet 1995, 70:687-692.
21. Nikoh N, Iwabe N, Kuma K, Ohno M, Sugiyama T, Watanabe Y, Yasui K, Shi-cui Z, Hori K, Shimura Y, Miyata T: An estimate of divergence time of parazoa and eumetazoa and that of cephalochordata and vertebrata by aldolase and triose phosphate isomerase clocks. J Mol Evol 1997, 45:97-106.
22. Merritt TJ, Quattro JM: Evidence for a period of directional selection following gene duplication in a neurally expressed locus of triosephosphate isomerase. Genetics 2001, 159:689-697.
23. Felsenstein J: Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst Zool 1978, 27:401-410.
24. Zhang R, Yatsuki H, Kusakabe T, Iwabe N, Miyata T, Imai T, Yoshida M, Hori K: Structures of cDNAs encoding the muscle-type and non-muscle-type isozymes of lamprey fructose bisphosphate aldolases and the evolution of aldolase genes. J Biochem (Tokyo) 1995, 117:545-553.
25. Kuraku S, Hoshiyama D, Katoh K, Suga H, Miyata T: Monophyly of lampreys and hagfishes supported by nuclear-coded genes. J Mol Evol 1999, 49:729-735.
26. Katoh K, Kuma K, Miyata T: Genetic algorithm-based maximum-likelihood analysis for molecular phylogeny. J Mol Evol 2001, 53:477-484.
27. Buckley T: Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: evidence from empirical data sets. Syst Biol 2001, 51:509-523.
28. Suzuki Y, Glazko GV, Nei M: Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by bayesian phylogenetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:16138-16143.
29. Strimmer K, von Haeseler A: Quartet puzzling: a quartet maximum-likelihood method for reconstructing tree topologies. Mol Biol Evol 1996, 13:964-969.
30. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F: MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:754-755.
31. Thomas WK, Beckenbach AT: Variation in salmonid mitochondrial: evolutionary constraints and mechanisms of substitution. J Mol Evol 1989, 29:233-245.
32. Adachi J, Cao Y, Hasegawa M: Tempo and mode of mitochondrial evolution in vertebrates at the amino acid sequence level: rapid evolution in warm-blooded vertebrates. J Mol Evol 1993, 36:270-281.
33. Meyer A, Wilson AC: Origin of tetrapods inferred from their mitochondrial affiliation to lungfish. J Mol Evol 1990, 31:359-364.
34. Gorr T, Kleinschmidt T, Fricke H: Close tetrapod relationships of the coelacanth latimeria indicated by haemoglobin sequences. Nature 1991, 351:394-397.
35. Zardoya R, Cao Y, Hasegawa M, Meyer A: Searching for the closest living relative(s) of tetrapods through evolutionary analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear data. Mol Biol Evol 1998, 15:506-517.
36. Zardoya R, Meyer A: Evolutionary relationships of the coelacanth, lungfishes, and tetrapods based on the 28s ribosomal gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:5449-5454.
37. Tohyama Y, Ichimiya T, Kasama-Yoshida H, Cao Y, Hasegawa M, Kojima H, Tamai Y, Kurihara T: Phylogenetic relation of lungfish indicated by the amino acid sequence of myelin dm20. Mol Brain Res 2000, 80:256-259.
38. Romer AS, Persons TS: The Vertebrate Body 6th edition. New York: WB Saunders Co; 1986.
39. Zhu M, Yu X, Ahlberg PE: A primitive sarcopterygian fish with an eyestalk. Nature 2001, 410:81-84.
40. Zhu M, Yu X: A primitive fish close to the common ancestor of tetrapods and lungfish. Nature 2002, 418:767-770.
41. Kumar S, Hedges SB: A molecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 1998, 392:917-920.
42. Olsen PE: The skull and pectoral girdle of the parasemionotid fish watsonulus eugnathoides from the early triassic sakamena group of madagascar, with comments on the relationships of the holostean fishes. J Vertebr Paleontol 1984, 4:481-499.
43. Waddell PJ, Kishino H, Ota R: Very fast algorithms for evaluating the stability of ML and Bayesian phylogenetic trees from sequence data. Ser Workshop Genome Inform 2002, 13:82-92.
44. Janvier P: Early Vertebrates Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1996.
45. Grande L, Bemis WE: Interrelationships of Acipenseriformes, with comments on "Chondrostei". In Interrelationships of Fishes Edited by: Stiassny MLJ, Parenti LR, Johnson GD. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996:85-115.
46. Venkatesh B, Ning Y, Brenner S: Late changes in spliceosomal introns define clades in vertebrate evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:10267-10271.
47. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T: MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30:3059-3066.
48. Adachi J, Hasegawa M: MOLPHY version 2.3: Programs for molecular phylogenetics based on maximum likelihood. In Computer Science Monographs Volume 28. Tokyo: Inst Stat Math; 1996.
49. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM: The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 1992, 8:275-282.
50. Yang Z: Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol 1994, 39:306-314.
51. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4:406-425.
52. Kishino H, Miyata T, Hasegawa M: Maximum likelihood inference of protein phylogeny, and the origin of chloroplasts. J Mol Evol 1990, 31:151-160.
53. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M: CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:1246-1247.
54. Stock DW, Whitt GS: Evidence from 18s ribosomal sequences that lampreys and hagfishes form a natural group. Science 1992, 257:787-789.