Integrating multi-origin expression data improves the resolution of deep phylogeny of ray-finned fish (Actinopterygii)

Scientific Reports

Volumn 2, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Zou, Ming ^a,b   Guo, Baocheng ^c,d   Tao, Wenjing ^a,b   Arratia, Gloria ^e   He, Shunping ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF HYDROBIOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^d SWISS INSTITUTE OF BIOINFORMATICS   (Switzerland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FISH; GENETICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; FISHES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MARKOV CHAINS; MODELS, GENETIC; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, NUCLEIC ACID; TRANSCRIPTOME;

EID: 84867187121     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep00665     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Nelson, J. S. Fishes of the World, 4th Edition. Wiley, New York (2006).
2. Hurley, I. A. et al. A new time-scale for ray-finned fish evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 274, 489-498 (2007). (Pubitemid 47055521)
3. Santini, F., Harmon, L. J., Carnevale, G. & Alfaro, M. E. Did genome duplication drive the origin of teleosts? A comparative study of diversification in ray-finned fishes. BMC Evol Biol 9, 194 (2009).
4. Grande, L. An Empirical Synthetic Pattern Study of Gars (Lepisosteiformes) and Closely Related Species, Based Mostly on Skeletal Anatomy. The Resurrection of Holostei. Copeia, 1-863 (2010).
5. Lauder, G. V. & Liem, K. F. The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian fishes. Bulletin of The Museum of Comparative Zoology 150, 103 (1983).
6. Miya, M. et al.Major patterns of higher teleostean phylogenies: a new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26, 121-138 (2003). (Pubitemid 36029259)
7. Wiley, E. O., Johnson, G. D. & Dimmick, W. W. The interrelationships of Acanthomorph fishes: A total evidence approach using molecular and morphological data. Biochemical systematics and ecology 28, 319-350 (2000). (Pubitemid 30191012)
8. Inoue, J. G., Miya, M., Tsukamoto, K. & Nishida, M. Basal actinopterygian relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogeny of the "ancient fish". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26, 110-120 (2003). (Pubitemid 36029258)
9. Ishiguro, N. B., Miya, M. & Nishida, M. Basal euteleostean relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogenetic reality of the "Protacanthopterygii". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 27, 476-488 (2003). (Pubitemid 36631736)
10. Chen, W. J., Bonillo, C. & Lecointre, G. Repeatability of clades as a criterion of reliability: a case study for molecular phylogeny of Acanthomorpha (Teleostei) with larger number of taxa. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26, 262-288 (2003). (Pubitemid 36264257)
11. Dettai, A. & Lecointre, G. Further support for the clades obtained by multiple molecular phylogenies in the acanthomorph bush. Comptes Rendus Biologies 328, 674-689 (2005). (Pubitemid 40903701)
12. MasonGamer, R. J. & Kellogg, E. A. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular data sets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Systematic biology 45, 524-545 (1996).
13. Kopp, A. & True, J. R. Phylogeny of the oriental Drosophila melanogaster species group: A multilocus reconstruction. Systematic biology 51, 786-805 (2002). (Pubitemid 35294809)
14. Rokas, A., Williams, B. L., King, N. & Carroll, S. B. Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425, 798-804 (2003). (Pubitemid 37355944)
15. Phillips, M. J., Delsuc, F. & Penny, D. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Molecular biology and evolution 21, 1455-1458 (2004). (Pubitemid 38823748)
16. Philippe, H., Lartillot, N. & Brinkmann, H. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. Molecular biology and evolution 22, 1246-1253 (2005). (Pubitemid 40577762)
17. Steinke, D., Salzburger, W. &Meyer, A. Novel relationships among ten fish model species revealed based on a phylogenomic analysis using ESTs. Journal of molecular evolution 62, 772-784 (2006). (Pubitemid 43847227)
18. Rokas, A. & Carroll, S. B. More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phylogenetic accuracy. Molecular biology and evolution 22, 1337-1344 (2005). (Pubitemid 40577772)
19. Rosenberg, M. S. & Kumar, S. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 10751-10756 (2001). (Pubitemid 32878693)
20. Wolsan,M. &Sato, J. J. Effects of data incompleteness on the relative performance of parsimony and Bayesian approaches in a supermatrix phylogenetic reconstruction of Mustelidae and Procyonidae (Carnivora). Cladistics 26, 168-194 (2010).
21. Philippe, H. et al. Phylogenomics of eukaryotes: Impact of missing data on large alignments. Molecular biology and evolution 21, 1740-1752 (2004). (Pubitemid 39096890)
22. Driskell, A. C. et al. Prospects for building the tree of life from large sequence databases. Science 306, 1172-1174 (2004). (Pubitemid 39488993)
23. Wiens, J. J. Missing data, incomplete taxa, and phylogenetic accuracy. Systematic Biology 52, 528-538 (2003). (Pubitemid 36990380)
24. Hughes, J. et al.Dense taxonomic EST sampling and its applications for molecular systematics of the Coleoptera (beetles). Molecular biology and evolution 23, 268-278 (2006). (Pubitemid 43100041)
25. Gerhold, D. & Caskey, C. T. It's the genes! EST access to human genome content. Bioessays 18, 973-981 (1996). (Pubitemid 27017195)
26. Witek, A. et al. EST based phylogenomics of Syndermata questions monophyly of Eurotatoria. BMC evolutionary biology 8,-(2008).
27. Roeding, F. et al. EST sequencing of Onychophora and phylogenomic analysis of Metazoa. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 45, 942-951 (2007). (Pubitemid 350110621)
28. Dunn, C. W. et al. Broad phylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal tree of life. Nature 452, 745-U745 (2008).
29. Hittinger, C. T., Johnston, M., Tossberg, J. T. & Rokas, A. Leveraging skewed transcript abundance by RNA-Seq to increase the genomic depth of the tree of life. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 1476-1481 (2010).
30. Posada, D. & Buckley, T. R. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: Advantages of akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Syst Biol 53, 793-808 (2004). (Pubitemid 39568279)
31. Arratia, G. The Sister-group of Teleostei: Consensus and Disagreements. Journal of Vertertebrate Paleontology 21, 767-773 (2001).
32. ARRATIA, G. Mesozoic halecostomes and the early radiation of teleosts. In Arratia G, Tintori A (Eds.), Mesozoic Fishes 3-Systematics, Paleoenvironments and Biodiversity. Verlag Dr. F. Pfeil, Muenchen, 279-315 (2004).
33. Nelson, G. J. Gill arches and the phylogeny of fishes : with notes on the classification of vertebrates. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 141, 477-552 (1969).
34. Lê, H. L., Lecointre, G. & Perasso, R. A 28S rRNA-based phylogeny of the gnathostomes: first steps in the analysis of conflict and congruence with morphologically based cladograms. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2, 31-51 (1993).
35. Azuma, Y., Kumazawa, Y., Miya, M., Mabuchi, K. & Nishida, M. Mitogenomic evaluation of the historical biogeography of cichlids toward reliable dating of teleostean divergences. Bmc Evolutionary Biology 8 (2008).
36. Inoue, J. G., Kumazawa, Y.,Miya, M.&Nishida, M. The historical biogeography of the freshwater knifefishes using mitogenomic approaches: A Mesozoic origin of the Asian notopterids (Actinopterygii: Osteoglossomorpha). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51, 486-499 (2009).
37. Setiamarga, D. H. E. et al.Divergence time of the two regional medaka populations in Japan as a new time scale for comparative genomics of vertebrates. Biology Letters 5, 812-816 (2009).
38. Venkatesh, B., Erdmann, M. V. & Brenner, S. Molecular synapomorphies resolve evolutionary relationships of extant jawed vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 11382-11387 (2001). (Pubitemid 32928737)
39. Study of the dorsal gill-arch musculature of teleostome fishes, with special reference to the Actinopterygii,Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington 11,200 (2004).
40. Diogo, R., Doadrio, I. & Vandewalle, P. Teleostean Phylogeny Based on Osteological and Myological Characters. International Journal of Morphology 26, 463-522 (2008).
41. López, J. A., Chen, W. J. & Orti, G. Esociform phylogeny. Copeia, 449-464 (2004).
42. Johnson, G. D. & Patterson, C. Relationships of lower euteleostean fishes. In: Stiassny M. L. J., Parenti, L. R., Johnson G. D. (Eds.), Interrelationships of Fishes. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 251-332 (1996).
43. Ramsden, S. D., Brinkmann, H., Hawryshyn, C.W. & Taylor, J. S. Mitogenomics and the sister of Salmonidae. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18, 607-610 (2003). (Pubitemid 37399478)
44. Rosen, D. E. Teleostean Interrelationships, Morphological Function and Evolutionary Inference. Amer. Zool. 22, 261-273 (1982).
45. Johnson, G. D. & Patterson, C. Percomorph Phylogeny-a Survey of Acanthomorphs and a New Proposal. Bulletin of Marine Science 52, 554-626 (1993).
46. Miya, M., Kawaguchi, A. & Nishida, M. Mitogenomic exploration of higher teleostean phylogenies: A case study for moderate-scale evolutionary genomics with 38 newly determined complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Biology and Evolution 18, 1993-2009 (2001). (Pubitemid 33026771)
47. Miya, M., Satoh, T. R. & Nishida, M. The phylogenetic position of toadfishes (order Batrachoidiformes) in the higher ray-finned fish as inferred from partitioned Bayesian analysis of 102 whole mitochondrial genome sequences. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 85, 289-306 (2005). (Pubitemid 40962719)
48. Setiamarga, D. H. et al. Interrelationships of Atherinomorpha (medakas, flyingfishes, killifishes, silversides, and their relatives): The first evidence based on whole mitogenome sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 49, 598-605 (2008).
49. Smith, W. L. & Wheeler, W. C. Polyphyly of the mail-cheeked fishes (Teleostei : Scorpaeniformes): evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32, 627-646 (2004). (Pubitemid 38836860)
50. Chen, W. J., Orti, G. &Meyer, A. Novel evolutionary relationship among four fish model systems. Trends in Genetics 20, 424-431 (2004). (Pubitemid 39094571)
51. Li, C. H., Lu, G. Q. & Orti, G. Optimal data partitioning and a test case for ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) based on ten nuclear loci. Systematic Biology 57, 519-539 (2008). (Pubitemid 351990196)
52. Li, B. et al. RNF213, a new nuclear marker for acanthomorph phylogeny. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 50, 345-363 (2009).
53. Mabuchi, K., Miya, M., Azuma, Y. & Nishida, M. Independent evolution of the specialized pharyngeal jaw apparatus in cichlid and labrid fishes. Bmc Evolutionary Biology 7 (2007).
54. Li, R. Q., Li, Y. R., Kristiansen, K. & Wang, J. SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 24, 713-714 (2008). (Pubitemid 351321217)
55. Schreiber, F., Pick, K., Erpenbeck, D., Worheide, G. & Morgenstern, B. OrthoSelect: a protocol for selecting orthologous groups in phylogenomics. BMC bioinformatics 10,-(2009).
56. Iseli, C., Jongeneel, C. V. & Bucher, P. ESTScan: a program for detecting, evaluating, and reconstructing potential coding regions in EST sequences. Proceedings/. International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology; ISMB, 138-148 (1999).
57. Birney, E.&Durbin, R. Dynamite: a flexible code generating language for dynamic programming methods used in sequence comparison. Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol 5, 56-64 (1997).
58. Tatusova, T. A.&Madden, T. L. BLAST 2 SEQUENCES, a new tool for comparing protein and nucleotide sequences. FemsMicrobiology Letters 174, 247-250 (1999). (Pubitemid 29217013)
59. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 1792-1797 (2004). (Pubitemid 38832724)
60. Durbin R, E. S., Krogh A. &Mitchison G. Biological sequence analysis Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2006).
61. Altekar, G., Dwarkadas, S., Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. Parallel metropolis coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 20, 407-415 (2004). (Pubitemid 38262773)
62. Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P. & Rougemont, J. A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers. Systematic biology 57, 758-771 (2008).
63. Tamura, K. et al. MEGA5: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Using Maximum Likelihood, Evolutionary Distance, and Maximum Parsimony Methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28, 2731-2739 (2011).
64. Abascal, F., Zardoya, R. & Posada, D. ProtTest: selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21, 2104-2105 (2005). (Pubitemid 40668057)
65. Shimodaira, H. & Hasegawa, M. CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection. Bioinformatics 17, 1246-1247 (2001). (Pubitemid 33735360)