The effects of guided elaboration in a CSCL programme on the learning outcomes of primary school students from Dutch and immigrant families

Educational Research and Evaluation

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 39-57

  Prinsen, Fleur Ruth ^a   Terwel, Jan ^b   Zijlstra, Bonne J H ^c   Volman, Monique M L ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

CSCL; outcomes; participation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876117213     PISSN: 13803611     EISSN: 17444187     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2012.744694     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Ausubel, D. P. 1968. Educational psychology: A cognitive view, New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2. Bereiter, C. and Scardamalia, M. 1985. "Development of dialectical processes in composition". In Literacy, language, and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing, Edited by: Olson, D. R., Torrance, N. and Hildyard, A. 307-329. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Brown, A. L. and Palincsar, A. S. 1989. "Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition". In Knowing, learning and instruction. Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, Edited by: Resnick, L. B. 393-451. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Bruner, J. 1985. "Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective". In Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives, Edited by: Wertsch, J. 21-34. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Constantino-Gonzalez, M. A., Suthers, D. D. and Escamilla de los Santos, J. G. 2003. Coaching webbased collaborative learning based on problem solution differences and participation. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13: 263-299.
6. Dewiyanti, S. 2005. Learning together: A positive experience. The effect of reflection on group process in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environment, Maastricht, The Netherlands: Open University. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
7. Dillenbourg, P. and Tchounikine, P. 2007. Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23: 1-13. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00191.x)
8. Doise, W., Mugny, G. and Pérez, J. A. 1998. "The social construction of knowledge: Social marking and socio-cognitive conflict". In The psychology of the social, Edited by: Flick, U. 77-90. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9. Droop, M. and Verhoeven, L. 2003. Language proficiency and reading ability in first- and second-language learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 38: 78-103. (doi:10.1598/RRQ.38.1.4)
10. Fischer, F. and Mandl, H. 2005. Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representation tools. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14: 405-441. (doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1403_3)
11. Fischer, G. and Ostwald, J. L. 2002. Transcending the information given: Designing learning environments for informed participation. Computers in Education, 1: 378-381.
12. Gillies, R. M. and Ashman, A. F. 2003. Co-operative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups, London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
13. Häkkinen, P. and Järvelä, S. 2006. Sharing and constructing perspectives in web-based conferencing. Computers & Education, 47: 433-447. (doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.015)
14. Hara, N., Bonk, C. and Angeli, C. 2000. Content analyses of on-line discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28: 115-152. (doi:10.1023/A:1003764722829)
15. Hattie, J. and Timperley, H. 2007. The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77: 81-112. (doi:10.3102/003465430298487)
16. Heemskerk, I., Brink, A., Volman, M. and Ten Dam, G. 2005. Inclusiveness and ICT in education: A focus on gender, ethnicity and social class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21: 1-16. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00106.x)
17. Hewitt, J. and Tevlops, C. An analysis of growth patterns in computer conferencing threads. Proceedings of CSCL'99: The third international conference on computer support for collaborative learning. Edited by: Roschelle, J. and Hoadley, C. pp.368-375. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Hoadley, C. M. and Linn, M. C. 2000. Teaching science through online, peer discussions: SpeakEasy in the Knowledge Integration Environment. International Journal of Science Education, 22: 839-858. (doi:10.1080/095006900412301)
19. Hoek, D., Van den Eeden, P. and Terwel, J. 1999. The effects of integrated social and cognitive strategy instruction on the mathematics achievement in secondary education. Learning and Instruction, 9: 427-448. (doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00026-7)
20. Kirschner, P. A. 2002. "Can we support CSCL? Educational, social and technological affordances for learning. Inaugural Address". In Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL?, Edited by: Kirschner, P. A., Jochems, W., Dillenbourg, P. and Kanselaar, G. 7-49. Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland.
21. Kirschner, P. A., Buckingham Shum, S. J. and Carr, C. S. 2003. Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making, 97-115. London, UK: Springer.
22. Krol, K., Janssen, J., Veenman, S. and Van der Linden, J. 2004. Effects of a cooperative learning program on the elaborations of students working in dyads. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10: 205-237. (doi:10.1076/edre.10.3.205.30269)
23. Lave, J. 1988. Cognition in practice, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Leechor, C. 1988. How high and low achieving students differentially benefit from working together in cooperative small groups, Stanford, CA: Stanford University. (Dissertation)
25. Leseman, P. P. M. and De Jong, P. F. 1998. Home literacy: Opportunity, instruction, cooperation, and social-emotional quality predicting early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 33: 294-318. (doi:10.1598/RRQ.33.3.3)
26. Leseman, P. P. M. and De Jong, P. F. 2001. Lasting effects of home literacy on reading achievement in school. Journal of School Psychology, 39: 389-414. (doi:10.1016/S0022-4405(01)00080-2)
27. Leseman, P. P. M., Scheele, A. F., Mayo, A. Y. and Messer, M. H. 2007. Home literacy as a special language environment to prepare children for school. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 10: 334-355. (doi:10.1007/s11618-007-0040-9)
28. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J. and Hakkarainen, K. 2003. Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13: 487-509. (doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7)
29. Lockhorst, D., Admiraal, W. F., Pilot, A. and Veen, W. 2002. Design elements for a CSCL environment in a teacher training programme. Education and Information Technologies, 7: 377-384. (doi:10.1023/A:1020973823969)
30. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C. and d'Appollonia, S. 2001. Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71: 449-521. (doi:10.3102/00346543071003449)
31. McCaslin, M. and Burross, H. L. 2011. Research on individual differences within a sociocultural perspective: Co-regulation and adaptive learning. Teachers College Record, 113: 325-349.
32. Muukkonen, H., Lakkala, M. and Hakkarainen, K. 2005. Technology-mediation and tutoring: How do they shape progressive inquiry discourse?. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14: 527-565. (doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1404_3)
33. Nurmela, K. A., Lehtinen, E. and Palonen, T. Evaluating CSCL log files by social network analysis. Proceedings of the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL) conference. Edited by: Hoadley, C. M. and Roschelle, J. pp.434-444. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
34. O'Donnell, A. M. and O'Kelly, J. 1994. Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review, 6: 321-349. (doi:10.1007/BF02213419)
35. Palincsar, A. S. and Brown, A. L. 1989. "Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension". In Advances in research on teaching, Edited by: Brophy, J. 35-72. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
36. Pels, T., Nijsten, C., Oosterwegel, A. and Vollebergh, W. 2006. "Myths and realities of diversity in child rearing. Minority families and indigenous Dutch families compared". In Child rearing in six ethnic families: The multi-cultural Dutch experience, Edited by: Dekovic, M., Pels, T. and Model, S. 213-245. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
37. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J. and Kirschner, P. A. 2010. Awareness of group performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 151-161. (doi:10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.011)
38. Prinsen, F. R., Terwel, J., Volman, M. and Fakkert, M. 2008. "Feedback and reflection to promote student participation in computer supported collaborative learning: A multiple case study". In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Series. Vol. 8. The teacher's role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom, Edited by: Gillies, R., Ashman, A. and Terwel, J. 132-162. New York, NY: Springer.
39. Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M. L. L., Terwel, J. and Van den Eeden, P. 2009. Effects on participation of an experimental CSCL-programme to support elaboration: Do all students benefit?. Computers & Education, 52: 113-125. (doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.001)
40. Saab, N. 2005. Chat and explore. The role of support and motivation in collaborative scientific discovery learning, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam. (Doctoral thesis)
41. Scardamalia, M. and Bereiter, C. 1996. "Computer support for knowledge-building communities". In CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm, Edited by: Koschmann, T. 249-268. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Schellens, T. and Valcke, M. 2006. Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers & Education, 46: 349-370. (doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.010)
43. Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., Valcke, M. and De Wever, B. 2007. Learning in asynchronous discussion groups: A multilevel approach to study the influence of student, group and task characteristics. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26: 55-71. (doi:10.1080/01449290600811578)
44. Snel, M. J., Terwel, J., Aarnoutse, C. A. J. and Van Leeuwe, J. F. J. 2012. Effectiveness of guided co-construction versus direct instruction for beginning reading instruction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18: 353-374. (doi:10.1080/13803611.2012.682803)
45. Soller, A. and Lesgold, A. 2007. The role of technology in CSCL. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9: 63-86.
46. Stahl, G. 2000. Collaborative information environments to support knowledge construction by communities. AI & Society, 14: 1-27. (doi:10.1007/BF01206129)
47. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. and Suthers, D. 2006. "Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective". In Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, Edited by: Sawyer, R. K. 409-426. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L. and Jochems, W. M. G. 2004. Designing for interaction: Six steps to designing computer-supported group-based learning. Computers & Education, 42: 403-424. (doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.10.004)
49. Suthers, D. D. and Hundhausen, C. D. 2001. "Learning by constructing collaborative representations: An empirical comparison of three alternatives". In European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning, Edited by: Dillenbourg, P., Eurelings, A. and Hakkarainen, K. 577-584. Maastricht, The Netherlands: Universiteit Masstricht.
50. Suthers, D. D. and Hundhausen, C. D. 2003. An empirical study of the effects of representational guidance on collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12: 183-219. (doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_2)
51. Terwel, J. 2003. "Cooperative learning in secondary education: A curriculum perspective". In Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups, Edited by: Gillies, R. M. and Ashman, A. F. 54-68. London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
52. Terwel, J., Gillies, R. M., Van den Eeden, P. and Hoek, D. 2001. Co-operative learning processes of students: A longitudinal multilevel perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71: 619-645. (doi:10.1348/000709901158703)
53. Ulicsak, M. H. 2004. "How did it know we weren't talking?": An investigation into the impact of self-assessments and feedback in a group activity. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20: 205-211. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00083.x)
54. Van der Linden, J. L., Erkens, G., Schmidt, H. and Renshaw, P. 2000. "Collaborative learning". In New learning, Edited by: Simons, P. R. J., Van der Linden, J. L. and Duffy, T. 1-19. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
55. Van der Meijden, H. 2005. Knowledge construction through CSCL: Student elaborations in synchronous, asynchronous, and three-dimensional learning environments, Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Radboud University. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
56. Veldhuis-Diermanse, A. E. 2002. CSCLearning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education, Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
57. Volman, M., Van Eck, E., Heemskerk, I. and Kuiper, E. 2005. New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils' use of ICT in primary and secondary education. Computers & Education, 45: 35-55.
58. Webb, N. M. 2008. "Teacher practices and small-group dynamics in cooperative learning classrooms". In Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Series. Vol. 8. The teacher's role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom, Edited by: Gillies, R., Ashman, A. and Terwel, J. 205-225. New York, NY: Springer.
59. Webb, N. M. and Farivar, S. 1994. Promoting helping behavior in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 31: 369-395.
60. Webb, N. M. and Farivar, S. 1999. "Developing productive group interaction in middle school". In Cognitive perspectives on peer learning, Edited by: O'Donnell, A. M. and King, A. 117-149. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. Weinberger, A. and Fischer, F. 2006. A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 46: 71-95. (doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.04.003)
62. Weinberger, A., Reiserer, M., Ertl, B., Fischer, F. and Mandl, H. 2003. "Facilitating collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated learning with structuring tools". In Barriers and biases in network-based knowledge communication in groups, Edited by: Bromme, R., Hesse, F. and Spada, H. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.