Effects on participation of an experimental CSCL-programme to support elaboration: Do all students benefit?

Computers and Education

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 113-125

  Prinsen, F R ^a   Volman, M L L ^a   Terwel, J ^a   van den Eeden, P ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cooperative collaborative learning; Elementary education; Interactive learning environments; Pedagogical issues; Teaching learning strategies

Indexed keywords

CESIUM ALLOYS; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; EDUCATION; EXPERIMENTS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

COOPERATIVE/COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; ELEMENTARY EDUCATION; INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES; TEACHING/LEARNING STRATEGIES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 56549127607     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Barrett E., and Lally V. Gender differences in an online learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 15 (1999) 48-60
2. Berger J., Rosenholz S.J., and Zelditch Jr. M. Status organizing processes. Annual Review of Sociality 6 (1980) 479-508
3. Brown A.L., and Palincsar A.S. Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In: Resnick L.B. (Ed). Knowing, learning and instruction. essays in honour of Robert Glaser (1989), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 393-451
4. Bruner J. Vygotsky: An historical and conceptual perspective. Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (1985), Cambridge University Press, London pp. 21-4
5. Carr T., Cox L., Eden N., and Hanslo M. From peripheral to full participation in a blended trade bargaining simulation. British Journal of Educational Technology 35 (2004) 197-211
6. Cohen E.G. Interracial interaction disability. Human Relations 37 (1972) 648-655
7. Cohen E.G. Expectation states and interracial interaction in school settings. Annual Review of Sociology 8 (1982) 209-235
8. Cohen E.G. Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research 64 (1994) 1-35
9. Cohen E.G., and Lotan R.A. Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal 32 (1995) 99-120
10. Constantino-González, M. A., & Suthers, D. D. (2001). Coaching collaboration by comparing solutions and tracking participation. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning, Proceedings of the first european conference on CSCL (pp. 173-180), March 22-24, 2001. Universiteit Maastricht, the Netherlands.
11. Crook C. Computers and the collaborative experiences of learning (1994), Routledge, London
12. Dansereau D.F. Cooperative learning strategies. In: Weinstein C.E., Goetz E.T., and Alexander P.A. (Eds). Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation (1988), Academic Press, Orlando, FL 103-120
13. Dewiyanti, S. (2005). Learning together: A positive experience. The effect of reflection on group process in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Open Universiteit, Maastricht, Nederland.
14. Dillenbourg P. Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In: Kirschner P.A. (Ed). Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL (2002), Open Universiteit Nederland, Heerlen 61-91
15. Farivar S., and Webb N. Helping behaviour activities handbook (1991), University of California, Los Angeles
16. Gillies R.M., and Ashman A.F. Cooperative learning: The social and intellectual outcomes of learning in groups (2003), Routledge Farmer, London and New York (pp. 54-68)
17. Hara N., Bonk C., and Angeli C. Content analyses of on-line discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science 28 2 (2000) 115-152
18. Hooper S., and Hannafin M.J. The effects of group composition on achievement, interaction, and learning efficiency during computer-based cooperative instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 39 3 (1991) 27-40
19. Johnson D.W., and Johnson R.T. Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive and individualistic learning. 4th ed. (1994), Allyn and Bacon, Boston
20. King A. Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal 30 (1994) 338-368
21. Kirschner P.A., Buckingham Shum S.J., and Carr C.S. Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making (2003), Springer, London (pp. 97-115)
22. Lave J. Cognition in practice (1988), Cambridge, U.K., Cambridge University Press
23. Li Q. Gender and computer-mediated communication: An exploration of elementary students' mathematics and science learning. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 21 (2002) 341-359
24. Lipponen L., Rahikainen M., Hakkarainen K., and Palonen T. Effective participation and discourse through a computer network: Investigating elementary students' computer supported interaction. Journal of Educational Computing Research 27 (2003) 355-384
25. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2001). Analyzing patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' online science discussion. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer supported collaborative learning: proceedings of the first European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 421-428). Maastricht: Maastricht University. .
26. McConnell D. Interaction patterns of mixed sex groups in educational computer conferences. Gender and Education 9 (1997) 345-363
27. O'Donnell A.M., and O'Kelly J. Learning from peers: Beyond the rhetoric of positive results. Educational Psychology Review 6 (1994) 321-349
28. O'Donnell A.M., and Dansereau D.F. Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In: Hertz- Lazarowitz R., and Miller N. (Eds). Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning (1992), Cambridge University Press, New York 121-140
29. Palincsar A.S., and Brown A.L. Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. In: Brophy J. (Ed). Advances in research on teaching (1989), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT 35-72
30. Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M. L. L., & Terwel, J. (2006). The influence of learner characteristics on degree and type of participation in a CSCL environment. British Journal of Educational Technology (OnlineEarly Articles). .
31. Prinsen, F. R., Volman, M. L. L., & Terwel, J. (2007). Gender-related differences in computer mediated communication and computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (OnlineEarly Articles). .
32. Reder L.M. The role of elaboration in the comprehension and retention of prose: A critical review. Review of Educational Research 50 (1980) 5-53
33. Rourke L., Anderson T., Garrison D.R., and Archer W. Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12 (2001) 8-22
34. Saab, N. (2005). Chat and explore. The role of support and motivation in collaborative scientific discovery learning. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.
35. Savicki V., Kelley M., and Oesterreich E. Judgments of gender in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behaviour 15 (1999) 185-194
36. Scardamalia M., and Bereiter C. Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In: Koschmann T. (Ed). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (1996), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 249-268
37. Selfe C.L., and Meyer P.R. Testing claims for on-line conferences. Written Communication 8 (1991) 163-192
38. Slavin R. Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. 2nd ed (1995), Allyn and Bacon, Boston
39. Soller A., and Lesgold A. Modeling the process of collaborative learning. International workshop on new technologies in collaborative learning (2000), Awaji-Yumebutai, Japan
40. Stahl G. Contributions to a theoretical framework for CSCL. In: Stahl G. (Ed). Proceedings of CSCL 2002 (pp. 62-72). Boulder, Colorado (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
41. Strijbos J.W. The effect of roles on computer-supported collaborative learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (2004), Open University of the Netherlands, Heerlen, The Netherlands
42. Terwel J., Gillies R.M., Van den Eeden P., and Hoek D. Co-operative learning processes of students: A longitudinal multilevel perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology 71 (2001) 619-645
43. Ulicsak M.H. 'How did it know we weren't talking?': An investigation into the impact of self-assessments and feedback in a group activity. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 20 (2004) 205-211
44. Van der Linden J.L., Erkens G., Schmidt H., and Renshaw P. Collaborative learning. In: Simons P.R.J., Van der Linden J.L., and Duffy T. (Eds). New learning (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 1-19
45. Veldhuis-Diermanse A.E. CSCLearning? Participation, learning activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (2002), Wageningen University, the Netherlands
46. Vygotsky L. Mind in society (1978), Harvard University Press, London
47. Webb N.M. Group composition, group interaction, and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology 74 (1982) 475-484
48. Webb N.M. Student interaction and learning in small groups. In: Slavin R.E., Sharan S., Kagan S., Lazarowitz R.H., Webb C., and Schmuck R. (Eds). Learning to cooperate, cooperating to learn (1985), Plenum, New York
49. Webb N.M. Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research 13 (1989) 21-40
50. Webb N.M., and Farivar S. Developing productive group interaction in middle school. In: O'Donnell A.M., and King A. (Eds). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 117-149
51. Webb N.M., and Farivar S. Promoting helping behaviour in cooperative small groups in middle school mathematics. American Educational Research Journal 31 (1994) 369-395
52. Webb N.M., and Palincsar A.S. Group processes in the classroom. In: Calfee D.D.B.R. (Ed). Handbook of Educational Psychology (1996), Macmillan, NY 841-873
53. Weinberger A., and Fischer F. A framework to analyze argumentative knowledge construction in computer supported collaborative learning. Computers and Education 46 1 (2006) 71-95
54. Weinberger A., Fischer F., and Mandl H. Fostering computer supported collaborative learning with cooperation scripts and scaffolds. In: Stahl G. (Ed). Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 573-574
55. Weinstein C.E., and Mayer R.F. The teaching of learning strategies. In: Wittrock M.C. (Ed). Handbook of research on teaching (3) (1986), Macmillan, New York 315-327
56. Yager S., Johnson D.W., Johnson R.T., and Snider B. The impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative learning groups. The Journal of Social Psychology 126 (1996) 389-397