Cancer biology and the nuclear envelope: A convoluted relationship

Seminars in Cancer Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 125-137

  De las Heras, Jose I ^a   Batrakou, Dzmitry G ^a   Schirmer, Eric C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cancer; Genome stability; Lamins; NETs; Nuclear envelope

Indexed keywords

EMERIN; ENVELOPE PROTEIN; LAMIN; LAMIN A; LAMIN B; LAMIN B1; LAMIN B2; RETINOBLASTOMA PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR E2F; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CANCER PROGNOSIS; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMAL LOCALIZATION; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; EPIGENETICS; G1 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; METASTASIS POTENTIAL; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR LAMINA; NUCLEAR PORE COMPLEX; NUCLEAR SHAPE; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; TELOMERE; THIN FILAMENT; TUMOR CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; LAMINS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NEOPLASMS; NUCLEAR ENVELOPE; ORGANELLE SHAPE;

EID: 84875604713     PISSN: 1044579X     EISSN: 10963650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.01.008     Document Type: Review

References (194)

1. Callan H.G., Tomlin S.G. Experimental studies on amphibian oocyte nuclei. I. Investigation of the structure of the nuclear membrane by means of the electron microscope. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1950, 137:367-378.
2. Dechat T., Pfleghaar K., Sengupta K., Shimi T., Shumaker D.K., Solimando L., et al. Nuclear lamins: major factors in the structural organization and function of the nucleus and chromatin. Genes Dev 2008, 22:832-853.
3. Mattout-Drubezki A., Gruenbaum Y. Dynamic interactions of nuclear lamina proteins with chromatin and transcriptional machinery. Cell Mol Life Sci 2003, 60:2053-2063.
4. Schirmer E.C. The epigenetics of nuclear envelope organization and disease. Mutat Res 2008, 647:112-121.
5. Suntharalingam M., Wente S.R. Peering through the pore: nuclear pore complex structure, assembly, and function. Dev Cell 2003, 4:775-789.
6. Hetzer M.W., Walther T.C., Mattaj I.W. Pushing the envelope: structure, function, and dynamics of the nuclear periphery. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2005, 21:347-380.
7. Prunuske A.J., Ullman K.S. The nuclear envelope: form and reformation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2006, 18:108-116.
8. Capelson M., Liang Y., Schulte R., Mair W., Wagner U., Hetzer M.W. Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell 2010, 140:372-383.
9. Kalverda B., Pickersgill H., Shloma V.V., Fornerod M. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 2010, 140:360-371.
10. Lammerding J., Schulze P., Takahashi T., Kozlov S., Sullivan T., Kamm R., et al. Lamin A/C deficiency causes defective nuclear mechanics and mechanotransduction. J Clin Invest 2004, 113:370-378.
11. Liu J., Ben-Shahar T., Riemer D., Treinin M., Spann P., Weber K., et al. Essential roles for Caenorhabditis elegans lamin gene in nuclear organization, cell cycle progression, and spatial organization of nuclear pore complexes. Mol Biol Cell 2000, 11:3937-3947.
12. Schirmer E.C., Gerace L. The stability of the nuclear lamina polymer changes with the composition of lamin subtypes according to their individual binding strengths. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:42811-42817.
13. Schirmer E.C., Guan T., Gerace L. Involvement of the lamin rod domain in heterotypic lamin interactions important for nuclear organization. J Cell Biol 2001, 153:479-489.
14. Jenkins H., Whitfield W.G., Goldberg M.W., Allen T.D., Hutchison C.J. Evidence for the direct involvement of lamins in the assembly of a replication competent nucleus. Acta Biochim Pol 1995, 42:133-143.
15. Ellis D.J., Jenkins H., Whitfield W.G., Hutchison C.J. GST-lamin fusion proteins act as dominant negative mutants in Xenopus egg extract and reveal the function of the lamina in DNA replication. J Cell Sci 1997, 110:2507-2518.
16. Moir R., Spann T., Herrmann H., Goldman R. Disruption of nuclear lamin organization blocks the elongation phase of DNA replication. J Cell Biol 2000, 149:1179-1192.
17. Spann T.P., Moir R.D., Goldman A.E., Stick R., Goldman R.D. Disruption of nuclear lamin organization alters the distribution of replication factors and inhibits DNA synthesis. J Cell Biol 1997, 136:1201-1212.
18. Johnson B.R., Nitta R.T., Frock R.L., Mounkes L., Barbie D.A., Stewart C.L., et al. A-type lamins regulate retinoblastoma protein function by promoting subnuclear localization and preventing proteasomal degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:9677-9682.
19. Kumaran R.I., Muralikrishna B., Parnaik V.K. Lamin A/C speckles mediate spatial organization of splicing factor compartments and RNA polymerase II transcription. J Cell Biol 2002, 159:783-793.
20. Hoffmann K., Dreger C., Olins A., Olins D., Shultz L., Lucke B., et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the lamin B receptor produce an altered nuclear morphology in granulocytes (Pelger-Huet anomaly). Nat Genet 2002, 31:410-414.
21. Lammerding J., Hsiao J., Schulze P.C., Kozlov S., Stewart C.L., Lee R.T. Abnormal nuclear shape and impaired mechanotransduction in emerin-deficient cells. J Cell Biol 2005, 170:781-791.
22. Morgan J.T., Pfeiffer E.R., Thirkill T.L., Peng G., Fridolfsson H.N., Douglas G.C., et al. Nesprin-3 regulates endothelial cell morphology, perinuclear cytoskeletal architecture, and flow-induced polarization. Mol Biol Cell 2011.
23. Oda Y., Fukuda H. Dynamics of Arabidopsis SUN proteins during mitosis and their involvement in nuclear shaping. Plant J 2011, 66:629-641.
24. Holaska J.M., Lee K., Kowalski A.K., Wilson K.L. Transcriptional repressor germ cell-less (GCL) and barrier to autointegration factor (BAF) compete for binding to emerin in vitro. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:6969-6975.
25. Holaska J.M., Rais-Bahrami S., Wilson K.L. Lmo7 is an emerin-binding protein that regulates the transcription of emerin and many other muscle-relevant genes. Hum Mol Genet 2006, 15:3459-3472.
26. Nili E., Cojocaru G.S., Kalma Y., Ginsberg D., Copeland N.G., Gilbert D.J., et al. Nuclear membrane protein LAP2beta mediates transcriptional repression alone and together with its binding partner GCL (germ-cell-less). J Cell Sci 2001, 114:3297-3307.
27. Somech R., Shaklai S., Geller O., Amariglio N., Simon A.J., Rechavi G., et al. The nuclear-envelope protein and transcriptional repressor LAP2beta interacts with HDAC3 at the nuclear periphery, and induces histone H4 deacetylation. J Cell Sci 2005, 118:4017-4025.
28. Markiewicz E., Tilgner K., Barker N., van de Wetering M., Clevers H., Dorobek M., et al. The inner nuclear membrane protein emerin regulates beta-catenin activity by restricting its accumulation in the nucleus. EMBO J 2006, 25:3275-3285.
29. Osada S., Ohmori S.Y., Taira M. XMAN1, an inner nuclear membrane protein, antagonizes BMP signaling by interacting with Smad1 in Xenopus embryos. Development 2003, 130:1783-1794.
30. Pan D., Estevez-Salmeron L.D., Stroschein S.L., Zhu X., He J., Zhou S., et al. The integral inner nuclear membrane protein MAN1 physically interacts with the R-Smad proteins to repress signaling by the transforming growth factor-{beta} superfamily of cytokines. J Biol Chem 2005, 280:15992-16001.
31. Korfali N., Wilkie G.S., Swanson S.K., Srsen V., Batrakou D.G., Fairley E.A., et al. The leukocyte nuclear envelope proteome varies with cell activation and contains novel transmembrane proteins that affect genome architecture. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, 9:2571-2585.
32. Wilkie G.S., Korfali N., Swanson S.K., Malik P., Srsen V., Batrakou D.G., et al. Several novel nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins identified in skeletal muscle have cytoskeletal associations. Mol Cell Proteomics 2011, 10. M110 003129.
33. Beale L.S. Examination of sputum from a case of cancer of the pharynx and the adjacent parts. Arch Med Lond 1860, 2:44.
34. Prokocimer M., Margalit A., Gruenbaum Y. The nuclear lamina and its proposed roles in tumorigenesis: projection on the hematologic malignancies and future targeted therapy. J Struct Biol 2006, 155:351-360.
35. Foster C.R., Przyborski S.A., Wilson R.G., Hutchison C.J. Lamins as cancer biomarkers. Biochem Soc Trans 2010, 38:297-300.
36. Broers J.L., Machiels B.M., Kuijpers H.J., Smedts F., van Den Kieboom R., Raymond Y., et al. A- and B-type lamins are differentially expressed in normal human tissues. Histochem Cell Biol 1997, 107:505-517.
37. Stewart C., Burke B. Teratocarcinoma stem cells and early mouse embryos contain only a single major lamin polypeptide closely resembling lamin B. Cell 1987, 51:383-392.
38. Rober R.A., Weber K., Osborn M. Differential timing of nuclear lamin A/C expression in the various organs of the mouse embryo and the young animal: a developmental study. Development 1989, 105:365-378.
39. Rober R.A., Gieseler R.K., Peters J.H., Weber K., Osborn M. Induction of nuclear lamins A/C in macrophages in in vitro cultures of rat bone marrow precursor cells and human blood monocytes, and in macrophages elicited in vivo by thioglycollate stimulation. Exp Cell Res 1990, 190:185-194.
40. Rober R.A., Sauter H., Weber K., Osborn M. Cells of the cellular immune and hemopoietic system of the mouse lack lamins A/C: distinction versus other somatic cells. J Cell Sci 1990, 95:587-598.
41. Hass R., Giese G., Meyer G., Hartmann A., Dork T., Kohler L., et al. Differentiation and retrodifferentiation of U937 cells: reversible induction and suppression of intermediate filament protein synthesis. Eur J Cell Biol 1990, 51:265-271.
42. Venables R.S., McLean S., Luny D., Moteleb E., Morley S., Quinlan R.A., et al. Expression of individual lamins in basal cell carcinomas of the skin. Br J Cancer 2001, 84:512-519.
43. Kaufmann S.H., Mabry M., Jasti R., Shaper J.H. Differential expression of nuclear envelope lamins A and C in human lung cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 1991, 51:581-586.
44. Agrelo R., Setien F., Espada J., Artiga M.J., Rodriguez M., Perez-Rosado A.P., et al. Inactivation of the Lamin A/C gene by CpG island promoter hypermethylation in hematologic malignancies, and its association with poor survival in nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:3940-3947.
45. Falco J.P., Baylin S.B., Lupu R., Borges M., Nelkin B.D., Jasti R.K., et al. v-rasH induces non-small cell phenotype, with associated growth factors and receptors, in a small cell lung cancer cell line. J Clin Invest 1990, 85:1740-1745.
46. Jansen M., Machiels B., Hopman A., Broers J., Bot F., Arends J., et al. Comparison of A and B-type lamin expression in reactive lymph nodes and nodular sclerosing Hodgkin's disease. Histopathology 1997, 31:304-312.
47. Moss S.F., Krivosheyev V., de Souza A., Chin K., Gaetz H.P., Chaudhary N., et al. Decreased and aberrant nuclear lamin expression in gastrointestinal tract neoplasms. Gut 1999, 45:723-729.
48. Machiels B.M., Broers J.L., Raymond Y., de Ley L., Kuijpers H.J., Caberg N.E., et al. Abnormal A-type lamin organization in a human lung carcinoma cell line. Eur J Cell Biol 1995, 67:328-335.
49. Meier R., Muller P.R., Hirt A., Leibundgut K., Ridolfi-Luthy A., Wagner H.P. Differential phosphorylation of lamin B2 in normal and leukemic cells. Leuk Res 1997, 21:841-847.
50. Dyer J.A., Kill I.R., Pugh G., Quinlan R.A., Lane E.B., Hutchison C.J. Cell cycle changes in A-type lamin associations detected in human dermal fibroblasts using monoclonal antibodies. Chromosome Res 1997, 5:383-394.
51. Kill I.R., Hutchison C.J. S-phase phosphorylation of lamin B2. FEBS Lett 1995, 377:26-30.
52. Wilson E.B. The karyoplasmic ratio. The Cell in Development and Heredity 1925, The Macmillan Company, New York, pp. 727-733. third ed.
53. Cavalier-Smith T. Economy, speed and size matter: evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion. Ann Bot 2005, 95:147-175.
54. Harris H. The reactivation of the red cell nucleus. J Cell Sci 1967, 2:23-32.
55. Rowden G. Ultrastructural studies of keratinized epithelia of the mouse III. Determination of the volumes of nuclei and cytoplasm of cells in murine epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 1975, 64:1-3.
56. Sipe C.R., Chanana A.D., Cronkite E.P., Gulliani G.L., Joel D.D. Studies on lymphocytes XIII. Nuclear volume measurement as a rapid approach to estimate proliferative fraction. Scand J Haematol 1976, 16:196-201.
57. Ishizuka Y., Oota K., Masubachi K. Practical Cytodiagnosis 1972, Lippincott, Philadelphia.
58. Weibel E.R. The value of stereology in analysing structure and function of cells and organs. J Microsc 1972, 95:3-13.
59. Helander K., Hofer P.A., Holmberg G. Karyometric investigations on urinary bladder carcinoma, correlated to histopathological grading. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol 1984, 403:117-125.
60. Czerniak B., Koss L.G., Sherman A. Nuclear pores and DNA ploidy in human bladder carcinomas. Cancer Res 1984, 44:3752-3756.
61. White F.H., Codd R.M., Gohari K. An ultrastructural morphometric study of cellular and nuclear volume alterations during experimental oral carcinogenesis. J Submicrosc Cytol 1985, 17:481-493.
62. Sorensen F.B. Quantitative analysis of nuclear size for objective malignancy grading: a review with emphasis on new, unbiased stereologic methods. Lab Invest 1992, 66:4-23.
63. Fukuzawa S., Hashimura T., Sasaki M., Yamabe H., Yoshida O. Nuclear morphometry for improved prediction of the prognosis of human bladder carcinoma. Cancer 1995, 76:1790-1796.
64. Madsen C., Schroder H.D. Stereological estimation of nuclear mean volume in invasive meningiomas. APMIS 1996, 104:103-107.
65. Ladekarl M., Boek-Hansen T., Henrik-Nielsen R., Mouritzen C., Henriques U., Sorensen F.B. Objective malignancy grading of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Stereologic estimates of mean nuclear size are of prognostic value, independent of clinical stage of disease. Cancer 1995, 76:797-802.
66. Maeshima K., Iino H., Hihara S., Funakoshi T., Watanabe A., Nishimura M., et al. Nuclear pore formation but not nuclear growth is governed by cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) during interphase. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2010, 17:1065-1075.
67. Huber M.D., Gerace L. The size-wise nucleus: nuclear volume control in eukaryotes. J Cell Biol 2007, 179:583-584.
68. Drummond S.P., Wilson K.L. Interference with the cytoplasmic tail of gp210 disrupts close apposition of nuclear membranes and blocks nuclear pore dilation. J Cell Biol 2002, 158:53-62.
69. Hetzer M., Meyer H.H., Walther T.C., Bilbao-Cortes D., Warren G., Mattaj I.W. Distinct AAA-ATPase p97 complexes function in discrete steps of nuclear assembly. Nat Cell Biol 2001, 3:1086-1091. [see comment].
70. Yang L., Guan T., Gerace L. Lamin-binding fragment of LAP2 inhibits increase in nuclear volume during the cell cycle and progression into S phase. J Cell Biol 1997, 139:1077-1087.
71. Gant T.M., Harris C.A., Wilson K.L. Roles of LAP2 proteins in nuclear assembly and DNA replication: truncated LAP2beta proteins alter lamina assembly, envelope formation, nuclear size, and DNA replication efficiency in Xenopus laevis extracts. J Cell Biol 1999, 144:1083-1096.
72. Su A.I., Cooke M.P., Ching K.A., Hakak Y., Walker J.R., Wiltshire T., et al. Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:4465-4470.
73. Wu C., Orozco C., Boyer J., Leglise M., Goodale J., Batalov S., et al. BioGPS: an extensible and customizable portal for querying and organizing gene annotation resources. Genome Biol 2009, 10:R130.
74. Su A.I., Welsh J.B., Sapinoso L.M., Kern S.G., Dimitrov P., Lapp H., et al. Molecular classification of human carcinomas by use of gene expression signatures. Cancer Res 2001, 61:7388-7393.
75. Richter K., Nessling M., Lichter P. Macromolecular crowding and its potential impact on nuclear function. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008, 1783:2100-2107.
76. DeMay R.M. The Art and Science of Cytopathology 1996, American Society of Clinical Pathologists Press, Chicago.
77. Lenz-Bohme B., Wismar J., Fuchs S., Reifegerste R., Buchner E., Betz H., et al. Insertional mutation of the Drosophila nuclear lamin Dm0 gene results in defective nuclear envelopes, clustering of nuclear pore complexes, and accumulation of annulate lamellae. J Cell Biol 1997, 137:1001-1016.
78. Young S.G., Fong L.G., Michaelis S., Prelamin A. Zmpste24, misshapen cell nuclei, and progeria - new evidence suggesting that protein farnesylation could be important for disease pathogenesis. J Lipid Res 2005, 46:2531-2558.
79. Gruber J., Lampe T., Osborn M., Weber K. RNAi of FACE1 protease results in growth inhibition of human cells expressing lamin A: implications for Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. J Cell Sci 2005, 118:689-696.
80. Kelland L.R., Smith V., Valenti M., Patterson L., Clarke P.A., Detre S., et al. Preclinical antitumor activity and pharmacodynamic studies with the farnesyl protein transferase inhibitor R115777 in human breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2001, 7:3544-3550.
81. Rao L., Perez D., White E. Lamin proteolysis facilitates nuclear events during apoptosis. J Cell Biol 1996, 135:1441-1455.
82. Janmey P.A., Euteneuer U., Traub P., Schliwa M. Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks. J Cell Biol 1991, 113:155-160.
83. Stuurman N., Heins S., Aebi U. Nuclear lamins: their structure, assembly, and interactions. J Struct Biol 1998, 122:42-66.
84. Starr D.A., Fischer J.A. KASH 'n Karry: the KASH domain family of cargo-specific cytoskeletal adaptor proteins. Bioessays 2005, 27:1136-1146.
85. Starr D.A., Han M. Role of ANC-1 in tethering nuclei to the actin cytoskeleton. Science 2002, 298:406-409.
86. Crisp M., Liu Q., Roux K., Rattner J.B., Shanahan C., Burke B., et al. Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex. J Cell Biol 2006, 172:41-53.
87. Schirmer E.C., Foisner R. Proteins that associate with lamins: many faces, many functions. Exp Cell Res 2007, 313:2167-2179.
88. Mirkovitch J., Mirault M.E., Laemmli U.K. Organization of the higher-order chromatin loop: specific DNA attachment sites on nuclear scaffold. Cell 1984, 39:223-232.
89. Luderus M.E., de Graaf A., Mattia E., Den Blaauwen J.L., Grande M.A., de Jong L., et al. Binding of matrix attachment regions to lamin B1. Cell 1992, 70:949-959.
90. Luderus M.E., Den Blaauwen J.L., de Smit O.J., Compton D.A., van Driel R. Binding of matrix attachment regions to lamin polymers involves single-stranded regions and the minor groove. Mol Cell Biol 1994, 14:6297-6305.
91. Taniura H., Glass C., Gerace L. A chromatin binding site in the tail domain of nuclear lamins that interacts with core histones. J Cell Biol 1995, 131:33-44.
92. Goldberg M., Harel A., Brandeis M., Rechsteiner T., Richmond T.J., Weiss A.M., et al. The tail domain of lamin Dm0 binds histones H2A and H2B. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:2852-2857.
93. Glass C.A., Glass J.R., Taniura H., Hasel K.W., Blevitt J.M., Gerace L. The alpha-helical rod domain of human lamins A and C contains a chromatin binding site. EMBO J 1993, 12:4413-4424.
94. Shoeman R.L., Traub P. The in vitro DNA-binding properties of purified nuclear lamin proteins and vimentin. J Biol Chem 1990, 265:9055-9061.
95. Gerace L., Burke B. Functional organization of the nuclear envelope. Annu Rev Cell Biol 1988, 4:335-374.
96. Guelen L., Pagie L., Brasset E., Meuleman W., Faza M.B., Talhout W., et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 2008, 453:948-951.
97. Peric-Hupkes D., Meuleman W., Pagie L., Bruggeman S.W., Solovei I., Brugman W., et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell 2010, 38:603-613.
98. Kind J., van Steensel B. Genome-nuclear lamina interactions and gene regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2010.
99. Wen B., Wu H., Shinkai Y., Irizarry R.A., Feinberg A.P. Large histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylated chromatin blocks distinguish differentiated from embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2009, 41:246-250.
100. Hansen K.D., Timp W., Bravo H.C., Sabunciyan S., Langmead B., McDonald O.G., et al. Increased methylation variation in epigenetic domains across cancer types. Nat Genet 2011, 43:768-777.
101. Polioudaki H., Kourmouli N., Drosou V., Bakou A., Theodoropoulos P.A., Singh P.B., et al. Histones H3/H4 form a tight complex with the inner nuclear membrane protein LBR and heterochromatin protein 1. EMBO Rep 2001, 2:920-925.
102. Ye Q., Worman H.J. Interaction between an integral protein of the nuclear envelope inner membrane and human chromodomain proteins homologous to Drosophila HP1. J Biol Chem 1996, 271:14653-14656.
103. Guarda A., Bolognese F., Bonapace I.M., Badaracco G. Interaction between the inner nuclear membrane lamin B receptor and the heterochromatic methyl binding protein, MeCP2. Exp Cell Res 2009, 315:1895-1903.
104. Ng H.H., Bird A. DNA methylation and chromatin modification. Curr Opin Genet Dev 1999, 9:158-163.
105. Cheng P.Y., Lin Y.P., Chen Y.L., Lee Y.C., Tai C.C., Wang Y.T., et al. Interplay between SIN3A and STAT3 mediates chromatin conformational changes and GFAP expression during cellular differentiation. PLoS One 2011, 2011.
106. Ballestar E., Paz M.F., Valle L., Wei S., Fraga M.F., Espada J., et al. Methyl-CpG binding proteins identify novel sites of epigenetic inactivation in human cancer. EMBO J 2003, 22:6335-6345.
107. Furukawa K. LAP2 binding protein 1 (L2BP1/BAF) is a candidate mediator of LAP2-chromatin interaction. J Cell Sci 1999, 112:2485-2492.
108. Cai M., Huang Y., Ghirlando R., Wilson K.L., Craigie R., Clore G.M. Solution structure of the constant region of nuclear envelope protein LAP2 reveals two LEM-domain structures: one binds BAF and the other binds DNA. EMBO J 2001, 20:4399-4407.
109. Zheng R., Ghirlando R., Lee M.S., Mizuuchi K., Krause M., Craigie R. Barrier-to-autointegration factor (BAF) bridges DNA in a discrete, higher-order nucleoprotein complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:8997-9002.
110. Heessen S., Fornerod M. The inner nuclear envelope as a transcription factor resting place. EMBO Rep 2007, 8:914-919.
111. Mansharamani M., Wilson K.L. Direct binding of nuclear membrane protein MAN1 to emerin in vitro and two modes of binding to barrier-to-autointegration factor. J Biol Chem 2005, 280:13863-13870.
112. Haraguchi T., Holaska J.M., Yamane M., Koujin T., Hashiguchi N., Mori C., et al. Emerin binding to Btf, a death-promoting transcriptional repressor, is disrupted by a missense mutation that causes Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Eur J Biochem 2004, 271:1035-1045.
113. Ishii K., Arib G., Lin C., Van Houwe G., Laemmli U.K. Chromatin boundaries in budding yeast: the nuclear pore connection. Cell 2002, 109:551-562.
114. Schmid M., Arib G., Laemmli C., Nishikawa J., Durussel T., Laemmli U.K. Nup-PI: the nucleopore-promoter interaction of genes in yeast. Mol Cell 2006, 21:379-391.
115. Taddei A., Van Houwe G., Hediger F., Kalck V., Cubizolles F., Schober H., et al. Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature 2006, 441:774-778.
116. Brown C.R., Kennedy C.J., Delmar V.A., Forbes D.J., Silver P.A. Global histone acetylation induces functional genomic reorganization at mammalian nuclear pore complexes. Genes Dev 2008, 22:627-639.
117. Makatsori D., Kourmouli N., Polioudaki H., Shultz L.D., McLean K., Theodoropoulos P.A., et al. The inner nuclear membrane protein lamin B receptor forms distinct microdomains and links epigenetically marked chromatin to the nuclear envelope. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:25567-25573.
118. Kourmouli N., Theodoropoulos P.A., Dialynas G., Bakou A., Politou A.S., Cowell I.G., et al. Dynamic associations of heterochromatin protein 1 with the nuclear envelope. EMBO J 2000, 19:6558-6568.
119. Rodriguez-Paredes M., Esteller M. Cancer epigenetics reaches mainstream oncology. Nat Med 2011, 17:330-339.
120. Croft J.A., Bridger J.M., Boyle S., Perry P., Teague P., Bickmore W.A. Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol 1999, 145:1119-1131.
121. Parada L.A., McQueen P.G., Misteli T. Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes. Genome Biol 2004, 5:R44.
122. Simonis M., Kooren J., de Laat W. An evaluation of 3C-based methods to capture DNA interactions. Nat Methods 2007, 4:895-901.
123. van Steensel B., Dekker J. Genomics tools for unraveling chromosome architecture. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:1089-1095.
124. Fullwood M.J., Ruan Y. ChIP-based methods for the identification of long-range chromatin interactions. J Cell Biochem 2009, 107:30-39.
125. Lieberman-Aiden E., van Berkum N.L., Williams L., Imakaev M., Ragoczy T., Telling A., et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 2009, 326:289-293.
126. Simonis M., Klous P., Splinter E., Moshkin Y., Willemsen R., de Wit E., et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet 2006, 38:1348-1354.
127. Chiarle R., Zhang Y., Frock R.L., Lewis S.M., Molinie B., Ho Y.J., et al. Genome-wide translocation sequencing reveals mechanisms of chromosome breaks and rearrangements in B Cells. Cell 2011, 147:107-119.
128. Parada L.A., McQueen P.G., Munson P.J., Misteli T. Conservation of relative chromosome positioning in normal and cancer cells. Curr Biol 2002, 12:1692-1697.
129. Aquiles Sanchez J., Karni R.J., Wangh L.J. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of the relationship between chromosome location and nuclear morphology in human neutrophils. Chromosoma 1997, 106:168-177.
130. Schmitt J., Benavente R., Hodzic D., Hoog C., Stewart C.L., Alsheimer M. Transmembrane protein Sun2 is involved in tethering mammalian meiotic telomeres to the nuclear envelope. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:7426-7431.
131. Esponda P., Gimenez-Martin G. The attachment of the synaptonemal complex to the nuclear envelope. An ultrastructural and cytochemical analysis. Chromosoma 1972, 38:405-417.
132. Scherthan H., Weich S., Schwegler H., Heyting C., Harle M., Cremer T. Centromere and telomere movements during early meiotic prophase of mouse and man are associated with the onset of chromosome pairing. J Cell Biol 1996, 134:1109-1125.
133. Bupp J.M., Martin A.E., Stensrud E.S., Jaspersen S.L. Telomere anchoring at the nuclear periphery requires the budding yeast Sad1-UNC-84 domain protein Mps3. J Cell Biol 2007, 179:845-854.
134. Chikashige Y., Tsutsumi C., Yamane M., Okamasa K., Haraguchi T., Hiraoka Y. Meiotic proteins bqt1 and bqt2 tether telomeres to form the bouquet arrangement of chromosomes. Cell 2006, 125:59-69.
135. Rogakou E.P., Nieves-Niera W., Boon C., Pommier Y., Bonner W.M. Histone H2AX serine-139 phosphorylation is induced by the introduction of the initial breaks into DNA as a result of the apoptotic endonuclease. Mol Biol Cell 1998, 9:109a-110a.
136. Mladenov E., Iliakis G. Induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks: the increasing spectrum of non-homologous end joining pathways. Mutat Res 2011, 711:61-72.
137. Toczyski D.P., Galgoczy D.J., Hartwell L.H. CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell 1997, 90:1097-1106.
138. Oza P., Jaspersen S.L., Miele A., Dekker J., Peterson C.L. Mechanisms that regulate localization of a DNA double-strand break to the nuclear periphery. Genes Dev 2009, 23:912-927.
139. Nagai S., Dubrana K., Tsai-Pflugfelder M., Davidson M.B., Roberts T.M., Brown G.W., et al. Functional targeting of DNA damage to a nuclear pore-associated SUMO-dependent ubiquitin ligase. Science 2008, 322:597-602.
140. Kalocsay M., Hiller N.J., Jentsch S. Chromosome-wide Rad51 spreading and SUMO-H2A.Z-dependent chromosome fixation in response to a persistent DNA double-strand break. Mol Cell 2009, 33:335-343.
141. Dellaire G., Kepkay R., Bazett-Jones D.P. High resolution imaging of changes in the structure and spatial organization of chromatin, gamma-H2A.X and the MRN complex within etoposide-induced DNA repair foci. Cell Cycle 2009, 8:3750-3769.
142. Ozaki T., Saijo M., Murakami K., Enomoto H., Taya Y., Sakiyama S. Complex formation between lamin A and the retinoblastoma gene product: identification of the domain on lamin A required for its interaction. Oncogene 1994, 9:2649-2653.
143. Ivorra C., Kubicek M., Gonzalez J.M., Sanz-Gonzalez S.M., Alvarez-Barrientos A., O'Connor J.E., et al. A mechanism of AP-1 suppression through interaction of c-Fos with lamin A/C. Genes Dev 2006, 20:307-320.
144. Markiewicz E., Dechat T., Foisner R., Quinlan R., Hutchison C. Lamin A/C binding protein LAP2alpha is required for nuclear anchorage of retinoblastoma protein. Mol Biol Cell 2002, 13:4401-4413.
145. Hellemans J., Preobrazhenska O., Willaert A., Debeer P., Verdonk P.C., Costa T., et al. Loss-of-function mutations in LEMD3 result in osteopoikilosis, Buschke-Ollendorff syndrome and melorheostosis. Nat Genet 2004, 36:1213-1218.
146. Couto A.R., Bruges-Armas J., Peach C.A., Chapman K., Brown M.A., Wordsworth B.P., et al. A novel LEMD3 mutation common to patients with osteopoikilosis with and without melorheostosis. Calcif Tissue Int 2007, 81:81-84.
147. Behrens J., Lustig B. The Wnt connection to tumorigenesis. Int J Dev Biol 2004, 48:477-487.
148. Lustig B., Behrens J. The Wnt signaling pathway and its role in tumor development. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2003, 129:199-221.
149. Fuxe J., Vincent T., de Herreros A.G. Transcriptional crosstalk between TGF beta and stem cell pathways in tumor cell invasion. Role of EMT promoting Smad complexes. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:2363-2374.
150. Rao L., Modha D., White E. The E1B 19K protein associates with lamins in vivo and its proper localization is required for inhibition of apoptosis. Oncogene 1997, 15:1587-1597.
151. Korfali N., Srsen V., Waterfall M., Batrakou D.G., Pekovic V., Hutchison C.J., et al. A flow cytometry-based screen of nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins identifies NET4/Tmem53 as involved in stress-dependent cell cycle withdrawal. PLoS One 2011, 6:e18762.
152. Fairley E., Riddell A., Ellis J., Kendrick-Jones J. The cell cycle dependent mislocalisation of emerin may contribute to the Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy phenotype. J Cell Sci 2002, 115:341-354.
153. Bakay M., Wang Z., Melcon G., Schiltz L., Xuan J., Zhao P., et al. Nuclear envelope dystrophies show a transcriptional fingerprint suggesting disruption of Rb-MyoD pathways in muscle regeneration. Brain 2006, 129:996-1013.
154. Melcon G., Kozlov S., Cutler D.A., Sullivan T., Hernandez L., Zhao P., et al. Loss of emerin at the nuclear envelope disrupts the Rb1/E2F and MyoD pathways during muscle regeneration. Hum Mol Genet 2006, 15:637-651.
155. Dechat T., Gotzmann J., Stockinger A., Harris C.A., Talle M.A., Siekierka J.J., et al. Detergent-salt resistance of LAP2alpha in interphase nuclei and phosphorylation-dependent association with chromosomes early in nuclear assembly implies functions in nuclear structure dynamics. EMBO J 1998, 17:4887-4902.
156. Templeton D.J. Nuclear binding of purified retinoblastoma gene product is determined by cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 1992, 12:435-443.
157. Zarkowska T., Mittnacht S. Differential phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein by G1/S cyclin-dependent kinases. J Biol Chem 1997, 272:12738-12746.
158. Genovese C., Trani D., Caputi M., Claudio P.P. Cell cycle control and beyond: emerging roles for the retinoblastoma gene family. Oncogene 2006, 25:5201-5209.
159. Dorner D., Vlcek S., Foeger N., Gajewski A., Makolm C., Gotzmann J., et al. Lamina-associated polypeptide 2alpha regulates cell cycle progression and differentiation via the retinoblastoma-E2F pathway. J Cell Biol 2006, 173:83-93.
160. Pekovic V., Harborth J., Broers J.L., Ramaekers F.C., van Engelen B., Lammens M., et al. Nucleoplasmic LAP2alpha-lamin A complexes are required to maintain a proliferative state in human fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 2007, 176:163-172.
161. Naetar N., Korbei B., Kozlov S., Kerenyi M.A., Dorner D., Kral R., et al. Loss of nucleoplasmic LAP2alpha-lamin A complexes causes erythroid and epidermal progenitor hyperproliferation. Nat Cell Biol 2008, 10:1341-1348.
162. McGee M.D., Stagljar I., Starr D.A. KDP-1 is a nuclear envelope KASH protein required for cell-cycle progression. J Cell Sci 2009, 122:2895-2905.
163. Schirmer E.C., Florens L., Guan T., Yates J.R., Gerace L. Nuclear membrane proteins with potential disease links found by subtractive proteomics. Science 2003, 301:1380-1382.
164. Haffner C., Dettmer U., Weiler T., Haass C. The nicastrin-like protein nicalin regulates assembly and stability of the nicalin-nodal modulator (NOMO) membrane protein complex. J Biol Chem 2007, 282:10632-10638.
165. Malik P., Korfali N., Srsen V., Lazou V., Batrakou D.G., Zuleger N., et al. Cell-specific and lamin-dependent targeting of novel transmembrane proteins in the nuclear envelope. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010, 67:1353-1369.
166. Gerace L., Blobel G. The nuclear envelope lamina is reversibly depolymerized during mitosis. Cell 1980, 19:277-287.
167. Heald R., McKeon F. Mutations of phosphorylation sites in lamin A that prevent nuclear lamina disassembly in mitosis. Cell 1990, 61:579-589.
168. Peter M., Nakagawa J., Doree M., Labbe J.C., Nigg E.A. In vitro disassembly of the nuclear lamina and M phase-specific phosphorylation of lamins by cdc2 kinase. Cell 1990, 61:591-602.
169. Ward G.E., Kirschner M.W. Identification of cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation sites on nuclear lamin C. Cell 1990, 61:561-577.
170. Ohba T., Nakamura M., Nishitani H., Nishimoto T. Self-organization of microtubule asters induced in Xenopus egg extracts by GTP-bound Ran. Science 1999, 284:1356-1358. [see comment].
171. Wiese C., Wilde A., Moore M.S., Adam S.A., Merdes A., Zheng Y. Role of importin-beta in coupling Ran to downstream targets in microtubule assembly. Science 2001, 291:653-656.
172. Belgareh N., Rabut G., Bai S.W., van Overbeek M., Beaudouin J., Daigle N., et al. An evolutionarily conserved NPC subcomplex, which redistributes in part to kinetochores in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 2001, 154:1147-1160.
173. Tsai M.Y., Wang S., Heidinger J.M., Shumaker D.K., Adam S.A., Goldman R.D., et al. A mitotic lamin B matrix induced by RanGTP required for spindle assembly. Science 2006, 311:1887-1893.
174. Buch C., Lindberg R., Figueroa R., Gudise S., Onischenko E., Hallberg E. An integral protein of the inner nuclear membrane localizes to the mitotic spindle in mammalian cells. J Cell Sci 2009, 122:2100-2107.
175. Ulbert S., Platani M., Boue S., Mattaj I.W. Direct membrane protein-DNA interactions required early in nuclear envelope assembly. J Cell Biol 2006, 173:469-476.
176. Zuleger N., Kelly D.A., Richardson A.C., Kerr A.R., Goldberg M.W., Goryachev A.B., et al. System analysis shows distinct mechanisms and common principles of nuclear envelope protein dynamics. J Cell Biol 2011, 193:109-123.
177. Harpole D.H., Herndon J.E., Wolfe W.G., Iglehart J.D., Marks J.R. Prognostic model of recurrence and death in Stage-I nonsmall cell lung-cancer utilizing presentation, histopathology, and oncoprotein expression. Cancer Res 1995, 55:51-56.
178. Beer D.G., Kardia S.L.R., Huang C.C., Giordano T.J., Levin A.M., Misek D.E., et al. Gene-expression profiles predict survival of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Nat Med 2002, 8:816-824.
179. Willis N.D., Cox T.R., Rahman-Casans S.F., Smits K., Przyborski S.A., van Den Brandt P., et al. Lamin A/C is a risk biomarker in colorectal cancer. PLoS One 2008, 3:e2988.
180. Delanote V., Vandekerckhove J., Gettemans J. Plastins: versatile modulators of actin organization in (patho)physiological cellular processes. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2005, 26:769-779.
181. Giganti A., Plastino J., Janji B., Van Troys M., Lentz D., Ampe C., et al. Actin-filament cross-linking protein T-plastin increases Arp2/3-mediated actin-based movement. J Cell Sci 2005, 118:1255-1265.
182. Lombardi M.L., Jaalouk D.E., Shanahan C.M., Burke B., Roux K.J., Lammerding J. The interaction between nesprins and sun proteins at the nuclear envelope is critical for force transmission between the nucleus and cytoskeleton. J Biol Chem 2011, 286:26743-26753.
183. Wang N., Tytell J.D., Ingber D.E. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10:75-82.
184. Jaalouk D.E., Lammerding J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10:63-73.
185. Brachner A., Reipert S., Foisner R., Gotzmann J. LEM2 is a novel MAN1-related inner nuclear membrane protein associated with A-type lamins. J Cell Sci 2005, 118:5797-5810.
186. Chen I.H., Huber M., Guan T., Bubeck A., Gerace L. Nuclear envelope transmembrane proteins (NETs) that are up-regulated during myogenesis. BMC Cell Biol 2006, 7:38.
187. Rolls M.M., Stein P.A., Taylor S.S., Ha E., McKeon F., Rapoport T.A. A visual screen of a GFP-fusion library identifies a new type of nuclear envelope membrane protein. J Cell Biol 1999, 146:29-44.
188. Lin F., Blake D.L., Callebaut I., Skerjanc I.S., Holmer L., McBurney M.W., et al. MAN1, an inner nuclear membrane protein that shares the LEM domain with lamina-associated polypeptide 2 and emerin. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:4840-4847.
189. Worman H.J., Yuan J., Blobel G., Georgatos S.D. A lamin B receptor in the nuclear envelope. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988, 85:8531-8534.
190. Senior A., Gerace L. Integral membrane proteins specific to the inner nuclear membrane and associated with the nuclear lamina. J Cell Biol 1988, 107:2029-2036.
191. Foisner R., Gerace L. Integral membrane proteins of the nuclear envelope interact with lamins and chromosomes, and binding is modulated by mitotic phosphorylation. Cell 1993, 73:1267-1279.
192. Hodzic D.M., Yeater D.B., Bengtsson L., Otto H., Stahl P.D. Sun2 is a novel mammalian inner nuclear membrane protein. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:25805-25812.
193. Apel E.D., Lewis R.M., Grady R.M., Sanes J.R. Syne-1, a dystrophin- and Klarsicht-related protein associated with synaptic nuclei at the neuromuscular junction. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:31986-31995.
194. Clements L., Manilal S., Love D.R., Morris G.E. Direct interaction between emerin and lamin A. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000, 267:709-714.