In-depth study of the protein molecular structures of different types of dried distillers grains with solubles and their relationship to digestive characteristics

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Volumn 93, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1438-1448

  Liu, Bo ^a   Thacker, Philip ^a   Mckinnon, John ^a   Yu, Peiqiang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

helix; sheet; Amide I; Amide II; Dried distillers grains with solubles; DRIFT; Protein structure; SFTIRM; Synchrotron

Indexed keywords

AMIDE; AMIDE I;

Α-HELIX; Β-SHEET; AMIDE II; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CEREAL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIGESTION; DRIED DISTILLERS GRAINS WITH SOLUBLES; DRIFT; INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; INTESTINE ABSORPTION; MAIZE; METABOLISM; POACEAE; PROTEIN INTAKE; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RUMINANT STOMACH; SFTIRM; SMALL INTESTINE; SYNCHROTRON; WHEAT;

Α-HELIX; Β-SHEET; AMIDE I; AMIDE II; DRIED DISTILLERS GRAINS WITH SOLUBLES; DRIFT; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SFTIRM; SYNCHROTRON;

AMIDES; ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CEREALS; DIETARY PROTEINS; DIGESTION; INTESTINAL ABSORPTION; INTESTINE, SMALL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; POACEAE; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; RUMEN; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; TRITICUM; ZEA MAYS;

BOS; BOVIDAE; HORDEUM; MEDICAGO SATIVA; TRITICOSECALE; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84875579006     PISSN: 00225142     EISSN: 10970010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.5912     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ørskov ER and McDonald I, The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J Agric Sci 92:499-503 (1979).
2. AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC (1990).
3. Tamminga S, Van Straalen WM, Subnel APJ, Meijer RGM, Steg A, Wever CJG, et al, The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livest Prod Sci 40:139-155 (1994).
4. NRC (National Research Council), Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle (7th edn). National Academy Press, Washington, DC (2001).
5. Yu P, Block HC and Doiron K, Understanding the differences in molecular conformation of carbohydrate and protein in endosperm tissues of grains with different biodegradation kinetics using advanced synchrotron technology. Spectrochim Acta A 71:1837-1844 (2009).
6. Yu P, Protein secondary structures (α-helix and β-sheet) at a cellular level and protein fractions in relation to rumen degradation behaviours of protein: a new approach. Br J Nutr 94:655-665 (2005).
7. Yu P, Synchrotron IR microspectroscopy for protein structure analysis: potential and questions. Spectroscopy 20:229-251 (2006).
8. Yu P, Plant-based food and feed protein structure changes induced by gene-transformation, heating and bio-ethanol processing: a synchrotron-based molecular structure and nutrition research program. Mol Nutr Food Res 54:1535-1545 (2010).
9. Yu P and Nuez-Ortín WG, Relationship of protein molecular structure to metabolisable proteins in different types of dried distillers grains with solubles: a novel approach. Br J Nutr 104:1429-1437 (2010).
10. Doiron KJ, Yu P, McKinnon JJ, Christensen C and Christensen DA, Heat-induced protein structure and subfractions in relation to protein degradation kinetics and intestinal availability in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 92:3319-3330 (2009).
11. Yu P, Jonker A and Gruber M, Molecular basis of protein structure in proanthocyanidin and anthocyanin-enhanced Lc-transgenic alfalfa in relation to nutritive value using synchrotron-radiation FTIR microspectroscopy: a novel approach. Spectrochim Acta A 73:846-853 (2009).
12. Liu N and Yu P, Using DRIFT molecular spectroscopy with uni- and multivariate spectral techniques to detect protein molecular structure differences among different genotypes of barley. J Agric Food Chem 58:6264-6269 (2010).
13. Yu P, Relationship of carbohydrate molecular spectroscopic features to carbohydrate nutrient profiles in co-products from bioethanol production. J Dairy Sci 95:2091-2096 (2012).
14. Azarfar A, Jonker A, Hettiarachchi-Gamage IK and Yu P, Nutrient profile and availability of co-products from bioethanol processing. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 96:450-458 (2012).
15. Zhang X, Beltranena E, Christensen C and Yu P, Use of a dry fractionation process to manipulate the chemical profile and nutrient supply of a coproduct from bioethanol processing. J Agric Food Chem 60:6846-6854 (2012).
16. Zhang X and Yu P, Molecular basis of protein structure in combined feeds (hulless barley with bioethanol coproduct of wheat dried distillers grains with solubles) in relation to protein rumen degradation kinetics and intestinal availability in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 95:3363-3379 (2012).
17. Nichols NN and Bothast RJ, Production of ethanol from grain, in Genetic Improvement of Bioenergy Crops, ed. by Vermerris W. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 75-88 (2008).
18. Nuez-Ortín WG and Yu P, Nutrient variation and availability of wheat DDGS, corn DDGS and blend DDGS from bioethanol plants. J Sci Food Agric 89:1754-1761 (2009).
19. Nuez-Ortín WG and Yu P, Estimation of ruminal and intestinal digestion profiles, hourly effective degradation ratio and potential N to energy synchronization of co-products from bioethanol processing. J Sci Food Agric 90:2058-2067 (2010).
20. Nuez-Ortín WG and Yu P, Effects of bioethanol plant and coproduct type on the metabolic characteristics of the proteins in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 93:3775-3783 (2010).
21. Wuthrich K, Protein structure determination in solution by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Science 243:45-50 (1989).
22. Kallen J, Spitzfaden C, Zurini MGM, Wider G, Widmer H, Wüthrich K, et al, Structure of human cyclophilin and its binding site for cyclosporin A determined by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. Nature 353:276-279 (1991).
23. Hering JA and Haris PI, FTIR spectroscopy for analysis of protein secondary structure, in Biological and Biomedical Infrared Spectroscopy, ed. by Barth A and Haris PI. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp. 129-167 (2009).
24. Kong J and Yu S, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic analysis of protein secondary structures. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin 39:549-559 (2007).
25. Surewicz WK and Mantsch HH, New insight into protein secondary structure from resolution-enhanced infrared spectra. Biochim Biophys Acta 952:115-130 (1988).
26. Stuart BH, Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications. Wiley, Chichester (2004).
27. Surewicz WK, Mantsch HH and Chapman D, Determination of protein secondary structure by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy: a critical assessment. Biochemistry 32:389-394 (1993).
28. Georget DM and Belton PS, Effects of temperature and water content on the secondary structure of wheat gluten studied by FTIR spectroscopy. Biomacromolecules 7:469-475 (2006).
29. Miller LM, Infrared microspectroscopy and imaging. [Online]. National Synchrotron Light Source, Brookhaven National Laboratory. Available: http://www.nsls.bnl.gov/newsroom/publications/otherpubs/imaging/workshopmillerhighres.pdf [15 August 2011].
30. Nelson DL and Cox MM, Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. W.H. Freeman, New York, NY (2008).
31. Miller LM, Carr GL, Jackson, Dumas P and Williams GP, The impact of infrared synchrotron radiation in biology: past, present and future. Synchrotron Radiat News 13:31-38 (2005).
32. Jackson M and Mantsch HH, Protein secondary structure from FT-IR spectroscopy: correlation with dihedral angles from three-dimensional Ramachandran plots. Can J Chem 69:1639-1642 (1991).
33. Jackson M and Mantsch HH, Infrared spectroscopy ex vivo tissue analysis, in Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry, ed. by Meyers RA. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 131-156 (2000).
34. Kauppinen JK, Moffatt DJ, Mantsch HH and Cameron DG, Fourier self-deconvolution: a method for resolving intrinsically overlapped bands. Appl Spectrosc 35:271-276 (1981).
35. Griffiths PR and Pariente GL, Introduction to spectral deconvolution. Trends Anal Chem 5:209-215 (1986).
36. Yu P, An emerging method for rapid characterization of feed structures and feed component matrix at a cellular level and relation to feed quality and nutritive value. Arch Anim Nutr 60:229-244 (2006).
37. CytoSpec, CytoSpec, Software for IR Imaging. [Online]. Available: http://www.cytospec.com/pdf/presentation.pdf [20 October 2011].
38. Yu P, Application of cluster analysis (CLA) in feed chemical imaging to accurately reveal structural-chemical features of feeds and plants within cellular dimension. J Agric Food Chem 53:2872-2880 (2005).
39. Yu P, Application of advanced synchrotron radiation-based Fourier transform infrared (SR-FTIR) microspectroscopy to animal nutrition and feed science: a novel approach. Br J Nutr 92:869-885 (2004).
40. Halford N and Shewry P, The structure and expression of cereal storage protein genes, in Endosperm: Developmental and Molecular Biology, ed. by Olsen OA. Springer, Berlin, pp. 195-218 (2007).
41. Yu P, Molecular chemical structure of barley proteins revealed by ultra-spatially resolved synchrotron light sourced FTIR microspectroscopy: comparison of barley varieties. Biopolymers 85:308-317 (2007).
42. Doiron KJ, Characterization of autoclaved flaxseed as feed for ruminants using conventional and mid-IR spectroscopic based approaches. MSc Thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon (2008).
43. Yu P, Niu Z and Damiran D, Protein molecular structures and protein fraction profiles of new coproducts from bioethanol production: a novel approach. J Agric Food Chem 58:3460-3464 (2010).
44. Doiron KJ, Yu P, Christensen CR, Christensen DA and McKinnon JJ, Detecting molecular changes in Vimy flaxseed protein structure using synchrotron FTIRM and DRIFT spectroscopic techniques: structural and biochemical characterization. Spectroscopy 23:307-322 (2009).