Professional networks, science ability, and gender determinants of three types of leadership in academic science and engineering

Leadership Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 332-348

  Parker, Marla ^a   Welch, Eric W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic science; Gender and social networks; Leadership; Productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875113889     PISSN: 10489843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (111)

1. Agars M.D. Reconsidering the impact of gender stereotypes on the advancement of women in organizations. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2004, 28(2):103-111.
2. Ahlquist J.S., Levi M. Leadership: What it means, what it does, and what we want to know about it. Annual Review of Political Science 2011, 14(1):1-24.
3. Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly 2000, 45(3):425-455.
4. Aldrich H., Herker D. Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. Academy of Management Review 1977, 2(2):217-230.
5. Allison P.D., Long J.S., Krauze T.K. Cumulative advantage and inequality in science. American Sociological Review 1982, 47(5):615-625.
6. AAPOR (The American Association for Public Opinion Research) Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. AAPOR 2009, 6th edition.
7. Arora A., David P.A., Gambardella A. Reputation and competence in publicly funded science: Estimating the effects on research group productivity. Annals of Economics and Statistics 1998, 49:163-198.
8. Avolio Bruce J. Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building. American Psychologist 2007, 62(1):25-33.
9. Balkundi P., Kilduff M. The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 2005, 16(6):941-961.
10. Ben-David A.J., Sullivan T.A. Sociology of science. Annual Review of Sociology 1975, 1:203-222.
11. Bensimon E.M. A feminist reinterpretation of presidents' definitions of leadership. Peabody Journal of Education 1989, 66(3):143-156.
12. Blackmore J. Educational leadership: A feminist critique and reconstruction. Critical perspectives on educational leadership 1989, 63-87. The Falmer Press, Bristol.
13. Bland C.J., Ruffin M.T. Characteristics of a productive research environment: Literature review. Academic Medicine Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges 1992, 67(6).
14. Boardman P.C., Ponomariov B.L. Reward systems and NSF university research centers: The impact of tenure on university scientists' valuation of applied and commercially relevant research. The Journal of Higher Education 2007, 78(1):51-70.
15. Borins S. Leadership and innovation in the public sector. Leadership & Organization Development 2002, 23(8):467-476.
16. Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education 1985, 241-258. Greenwood, New York. J.G. Richardson (Ed.).
17. Bozeman B., Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 2004, 33(4):599-616.
18. Bass B.M., Bass R. The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications 2008, Free Press.
19. Brass D.J. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of influence in an individual organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 1984, 29(4):518-539.
20. Brass D.J. Men's and women's networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. The Academy of Management Journal 1985, 28(2):327.
21. Brass D.J., Krackhardt D. Social capital of 20th century leaders. Out of the box leadership challenges for the 21st century 1999, 179-194. J.G. Hunt, R.L. Phillips (Eds.).
22. Bryman A. Effective leadership in higher education: A literature review. Studies in Higher Education 2007, 32(6):693-710.
23. Burke C., Sims D., Lazzara E., Salas E. Trust in leadership: A multi-level review and integration. The Leadership Quarterly 2007, 18(6):606-632.
24. Burt R.S. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior 2000, 22:345-423.
25. Burt R.S., Kilduff M., Tasselli S. Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Review of Psychology 2013, 64(1):527-547.
26. Burt R.S., Minor M.J. Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction 1983, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills.
27. Burt R.S. Structural holes: The social structure of competition 1992, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
28. Burt R.S., Celotto N. The network structure of management roles in a large matrix firm. Evaluation and Program Planning 1992, 15(3):303-326.
29. Chamberlain M. Women in academe: Progress and prospects 1988, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
30. Carless S.A. Gender differences in transformational leadership: An examination of superior, leader, and subordinate perspectives 1998, 39.
31. Cialdini R.B., Borden R.J., Thorne A., Walker M.R., Freeman S., Sloan L.R. Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1976, 34(3):366-375.
32. Cialdini R.B., Nicholas M.E.D. Self-presentation by association. Journal of Personality 1989, 57(4):626-631.
33. Coleman J.S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology 1988, 94(s1):S95.
34. Crane D. Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review 1965, 30(5):699-714.
35. Cross R., Sproull L. More than an answer: Information relationships for actionable knowledge. Organization Science 2004, 15(4):446-462.
36. Day D. Leadership development: A review in context. The Leadership Quarterly 2001, 11(4):581-613.
37. Del Favero M. Disciplinary variation in preparation for the academic dean role. Higher Education Research and Development 2006, 25(3):277-292.
38. de Melo-Martín I. Patenting and the gender gap: Should women be encouraged to patent more?. Science and engineering ethics 2012, 10.1007/s11948-011-9344-5.
39. Dentith A.M., Peterlin B. Leadership education from within a feminist ethos. Journal of Research on Leadership Education 2011, 6(2):36-58.
40. DuBrin A.J. Leadership: Research findings, practice, and skills 2012, South-Western Pub.
41. Eagle K., Garson J., Beller G., Sennett C. Closing the gap between science and practice: The need for professional leadership. Health Affairs 2003, 22(2):196-201.
42. Elkins T., Keller R. Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework. The Leadership Quarterly 2003, 14(4-5):587-606.
43. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L.A. Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations 1997, Pinter, Tucson.
44. Etzkowitz H. The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy 1998, 27(8):823-833.
45. Fields I., Greenwood R., Suddaby R., Hinings C.R. Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. The Academy of Management Journal 2002, 45(1):58-80.
46. Frankel M.S. Professional codes: Why, how, and with what impact?. Journal of Business Ethics 1989, 8(2-3):109-115.
47. Friedkin N. Information flow through strong and weak ties in intraorganizational social networks. Social Networks 1982, 3:273-285.
48. Gieryn T.F. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 1983, 48(6):781-795.
49. Glatter R. Leadership and leadership development in education. Leadership in organizations: Current Issues and key trends 2004, 206-225. Routledge, London.
50. Glazer J.S. Feminism and professionalism in teaching and educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly 1991, 27(3):321-342.
51. Graen G.B., Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly 1995, 6(2):219-247.
52. Granovetter M. The strength-of-weak-ties. American Journal of Sociology 1973, 78(6):1360-1380.
53. Grogan M. Laying the groundwork for a reconception of the superintendency from feminist postmodern perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly 2000, 36(1):117-142.
54. Hargens L., Hagstrom W. Scientific consensus and academic status attainment patterns. Sociology of Education 1982, 55(4):183-196.
55. Hansen M.T., Podolny J.M., Pfeffer J. So many ties, so little time: A task contingency perspective on corporate social capital in organizations. Social Capital of Organizations 2001, 18:21-57.
56. Hemphill J.K. Leadership behavior associated with college departments. Educational Psychology 1955, 46(7).
57. Hind R.R., Dornbusch S.M., Scott W.R. A theory of evaluation applied to a university faculty. Sociology of Education 1974, 47(1):114.
58. Hinds P., McGrath C. Structures that work: social structure, work structure and coordination ease in geographically distributed teams. ACM 2006, 343-352.
59. Hollingsworth R., Hollingsworth E.J. Major discoveries and biomedical research organizations: Perspectives on interdisciplinarity, nurturing leadership, and integrated structure and culture. Practising interdisciplinarity 2000, 215-244. University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
60. Hopewell L., McNeely C.L., Kuiler E.W., Hahm J.O. University leaders and the public agenda: Talking about women and diversity in STEM fields. Review of Policy Research 2009, 26(5):589-607.
61. Ibarra H. Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 1992, 37:422-447.
62. Ibarra H. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. The Academy of Management Journal 1993, 36(3):471-501.
63. Ibarra H. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. The Academy of Management Review 1993, 18:56-87.
64. Jain R.K., Triandis H.C. Management of research and development organizations: Managing the unmanageable 1997, Wiley, New York. 2nd. ed.
65. Jindal-Snape D., Snape J.B. Motivation of scientists in a government research institute: Scientists' perceptions and the role of management. Management Decision 2006, 44(10):1325-1343.
66. Jones B.F., Wuchty S., Uzzi B. Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science 2008, 322(5905):1259.
67. Judge T.A., Bono J.E., Ilies R., Gerhardt M.W. Personality and leadership: A qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of applied psychology 2002, 87(4):765.
68. Kaplan N. The role of the research administrator. Administrative Science Quarterly 1959, 4(1):20.
69. Keller R.T., Holland W.E. Boundary-spanning roles in a research and development organization: An empirical investigation. The Academy of Management Journal 1975, 18(2):388-393.
70. Kilduff M., Krackhardt D. Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal 1994, 37(1):87-108.
71. Krackhardt D. The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations. Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action 1992, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. N. Nohria, R. Eccles (Eds.).
72. Krackhardt D., Stern R.N. Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly 1988, 51(2):123.
73. Lin N. Social capital: A theory of social structure and action 2002, 278.
74. Marin A. Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics? Implications for name generator data. Social Networks 2004, 26:289-307.
75. Marsden Peter V. Network methods in social epidemiology. Methods in Social Epidemiology 2006, 1(2006):267-286.
76. Merton R. Priorities in scientific discovery: A chapter in the sociology of science. American Sociological Review 1957, 22:635-659.
77. Merton R.K. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations 1973, University Of Chicago Press, Chicago.
78. Mcmillan G.S., Deeds D.L. The role of reputation in the recruitment of scientists. R & D Management 1998, 299-304.
79. McGuire G.M. Gender, race, ethnicity, and networks: The factors affecting the status of employees' network members. Work and Occupations 2000, 27:500-523.
80. Morris N. The developing role of departments. Research Policy 2002, 31(5):817-833.
81. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. The Academy of Management Review 1998, 23(2):242.
82. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering 2006, National Academies Press, Washington (DC).
83. O'leary R. Managing scientific and technical personnel. Public Works Management & Policy 1999, 3(3):241-254.
84. Pellegrino E.D., Relman A.S. Professional medical associations. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 1999, 282(10):984-986.
85. Podolny J.M., Baron J.N. Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American sociological review 1997, 673-693.
86. Pfeffer J. The ambiguity of leadership. The Academy of Management Review 1977, 2(1):104.
87. Ridgeway C.L. Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues 2002, 57(4):637-655.
88. Rindova V.P., Williamson I.O., Petkova A.P., Sever J.M. Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. The Academy of Management Journal 2005, 48(6):1033.
89. Rosser S.V. The science glass ceiling: Academic women scientists and the struggle to succeed 2004, Routledge.
90. Russ G.S., Galang M.C., Ferris G.R. Power and influence of the human resources function through boundary spanning and information management. Human resource management review 1998, 8(2):125-148.
91. Sapienza A.M. From the inside: Scientists' own experience of good (and bad) management. R and D Management 2005, 35(5):473-482.
92. Shapin S. The scientific life: A moral history of a late modern vocation 2008, University Of Chicago Press, Chicago.
93. Siegel D. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 2003, 14(1):111-133.
94. Siegel D., Waldman D., Atwater L., Link A. Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 2004, 21(1-2):115-142.
95. Smith-Doerr L. Flexibility and fairness: Effects of the network form of organization on gender equity in life science careers. Sociological Perspectives 2004, 47(1):25-54.
96. Sorenson O., Fleming L. Science and the diffusion of knowledge. Research Policy 2004, 33(10):1615-1634.
97. Spekman R. Influence and information: An exploratory investigation of the boundary role person's basis of power. The Academy of Management Journal 1979, 22(1):104-117.
98. Stern S. Do scientists pay to be scientists?. Management Science 2004, 50(6):835-853.
99. Straits B.C. Ego's important discussants or significant people: An experiment in varying the wording of personal network name generators. Social Networks 2000, 22(2):123-140.
100. Swan J., Newell S. The role of professional associations in technology diffusion. Organization Studies 1995, 16(5):847-874.
101. Timberlake S. Social capital and gender in the workplace. Journal of Management Development 2005, 24(1):34-44.
102. Treadway D.C., Breland J.W., Williams L.A., Yang J., Williams L. Political skill, relational control, and the self in relational leadership processes. Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives 2012.
103. Tushman M., Scanlan T. Boundary spanning individuals: Their role in information transfer and their antecedents. The Academy of Management Journal 1981, 24(2):289-305.
104. Tushman M., Scanlan T. Characteristics and external orientations of boundary spanning individuals. The Academy of Management Journal 1981, 24(1):83-98.
105. Twale D., Shannon D. Professional service involvement of leadership faculty: An assessment of gender, role, and satisfaction. Sex Roles 1996, 34(1-2):117-126.
106. Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American sociological review 1996, 674-698.
107. Van Vugt M. Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2006, 10(4):354-371.
108. Vecchio R. Leadership and gender advantage. The Leadership Quarterly 2002, 13(6):643-671.
109. Vehovar V., Lozar Manfreda K., Koren G., Hlebec V. Measuring ego-centered social networks on the web: Questionnaire design issues. Social networks 2008, 30(3):213-222.
110. Wasserman S., Faust K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications 1994, Cambridge University Press, New York.
111. Xie Y., Shauman K.A. Women in science: Career processes and outcomes (Vol. 26, No. 73.4) 2003, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.