From the inside: Scientists' own experience of good (and bad) management

R and D Management

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 473-482

  Sapienza, Alice M ^a  

^a SIMMONS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28444483610     PISSN: 00336807     EISSN: 14679310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2005.00404.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Afuah, A. (1998) Innovation Management. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Baenninger, A., Costa e Silva, J.A., Hindmarch, I., Moeller, H.J. and Rickels, K. (2004) Good Chemistry. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Bliss, M. (1982) The Discovery of Insulin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Catalyst (1999) Women scientists in industry: a winning formula for companies. Catalyst Report R38, New York.
5. Cohen, C. (1997) Proposal to the National Science Foundation. GPG NSF, 95-27.
6. Day, S. (2002). The leadership practices of project scientists at the national aeronautics and space administration. University of Maryland Dissertation Draft, December 12.
7. Elizer, R.M. (2000) Professional leadership and management for the 21st century. Institute of Transportation Engineers Journal, 70, 5, 22-26.
8. Erlandson, D.A., Harris, E.L., Skipper, B.L. and Allen, S.D. (1993) Doing Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
9. Hitt, E. (2003) New Faces at the National Academy. The Scientist, May 12. http://www.biomedicalcentral.com/news/20030512/02.
10. Holton, G. (1978) The Scientific Imagination. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Katz, R. (ed.) (1997) The Human Side of Managing Technological Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Kreeger, K.Y. (1997) Researchers setting up labs must learn skills on the fly. The Scientist, 11, 5, 14-15.
13. Marshall, C. and Grossman, G.B. (1995) Designing Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
14. Medawar, Sir P. (1979) Advice to a Young Scientist. New York: Basic Books Inc. Publishers.
15. NAAS (1995). Report from the committee on science, engineering and public policy of the national academy of arts and sciences. Washington, DC.
16. NSF (2002) Science and Engineering Indicators: report of the US National Science Foundation. Washington, DC.
17. PM Network (2004) The upperhand. Project Management Network, 18, 2, 36-42.
18. Sanides, S. (2004) Cell biologist multitasks for women. The Scientist, 18, 2, 50. http://www.the-scientist.com/yr2004/mar/prof2_040315.html.
19. Sapienza, A.M. (1986) The Paradox of a Successful Drug Discovery. Boston: Harvard School of Public Health Case Study.
20. Science (2003) Nine women make 2003 a record year, p.1217. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/300/5623/1217a?etoc.
21. Smith Kline & French (1982) The Discovery of Histamine H2-Receptors and Their Antagonists. Distributed at the World Congress of Gastroenterology, Stockholm. Smith Kline and French International Co.
22. Sonnert, G. and Holton, G. (1996) Gender Differences in Scientific Careers. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
23. Thorne, P. (1992) Organizing Genius: The Pursuit of Corporate Creativity and Innovation. Oxford: Blackwell Business.
24. Turner, B.S. (1987) Medical Power and Social Knowledge. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
25. Whatmore, J. (1999) Releasing Creativity: How Leaders Develop Creative Potential in their Teams. London: Kogan Page Ltd.