In vitro microleakage of biodentine as a dentin substitute compared to fuji II LC in cervical lining restorations

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 535-542

  Raskin, Anne ^a,b   Eschrich, Geoffroy ^c   Dejou, Jacques ^a,b   About, Imad ^a,d  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b TIMONE HOSPITAL   (France)

^c UMR ^*  (France)

^d CNRS INEE IMEP (National Center of Scientific Research   (France)

Author keywords

Ca3SiO5 based dentin substitute; Microleakage; Resin modified glass ionomer cement

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM DERIVATIVE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FUJI II LC CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; OPTIBOND SOLO PLUS; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICATE; TRICALCIUM SILICATE;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; POLYMERIZATION; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

CALCIUM COMPOUNDS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; POLYMERIZATION; PULP CAPPING AND PULPECTOMY AGENTS; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILANES; SILICATES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 84874412533     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a25690     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Kieri C. Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years. Am J Dent 2004;17: 43-50.
2. Auschill TM, Koch CA, Wolkewitz M, Hellwig E, Arweiler NB. Occurrence and causing stimuli of postoperative sensitivity in composite restorations. Oper Dent 2009;34: 3-10.
3. Bedran de Castro AK, Pereira PN, Pimenta LA, Thompson JY. Effect of thermal and mechanical load cycling on nanoleakage of Class II restorations. J Adhes Dent 2004;6: 221-226.
4. Bedran-Russo AK. Critical appraisal. Class II composite resin restorations with gingival margins in dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 171-177.
5. Besnault C, Attal JP. Simulated oral environment and microleakage of Class II resin-based composite and sandwich restorations. Am J Dent 2003;16: 186-190.
6. Cenci MS, Lund RG, Pereira CL, de Carvalho RM, Demarco FF. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems. J Adhes Dent 2006;8: 127-132.
7. Civelek A, Ersoy M, L’Hotelier E, Soyman M, Say EC. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites. Oper Dent 2003;28: 635-641.
8. Curtis AR, Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Shortall AC, Marquis PM. The mechanical properties of nanofilled resin-based composites: characterizing discrete filler particles and agglomerates using a micromanipulation technique. Dent Mater 2009;25: 180-187.
9. Dejou J, Sindres V, Camps J. Influence of criteria on the results of in vitro evaluation of microleakage. Dent Mater 1996;12: 342-349.
10. Dejou J, Colombani J, About I. Physical, chemical and mechanical behavior of a new material for direct posterior fillings. European Cells Materials 2005;10(suppl 4): 22.
11. Deliperi S, Bardwell DN, Wegley C. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2007;32: 179-184.
12. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005;84: 118-132.
13. Duarte S Jr, Perdigão J, Lopes MM. Effect of dentin conditioning time on nanoleakage. Oper Dent 2006;31: 500-511.
14. Duquia Rde C, Osinaga PW, Demarco FF, de V Habekoat L, Conceicao EN. Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: In vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite. Oper Dent 2006;31: 682-687.
15. Fruits TJ, Knapp JA, Khalotia SS. Microleakage in the proximal walls of direct and indirect posterior resin slot restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31: 719-727.
16. Giachetti L, Scaminaci Russo D, Bambi C, Nieri M, Bertini F. Influence of operator skill on microleakege of total-etch and self-etch bonding systems. J Dent 2008;36: 49-53.
17. Grobler SR, Rossouw RJ, Oberholzer TG. Microleakage and confocal laser studies of 2 single-step self-etching bonding agents/systems. Quintessence Int 2007;38: 334-341.
18. Islam I, Chng HK, Yap AU. Comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of MTA and portland cement. J Endod 2006;32: 193-197.
19. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: a review. J Dent 1976;4: 199-206.
20. Laurent P, Camps J, De Méo M, Dejou J, About I. Induction of specific cell responses to a Ca3-SiO5-based posterior restorative material. Dent Mater 2008;24: 1486-1494.
21. Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. Am J Dent 2003;16: 33-36.
22. McLean JW, Powis DR, Prosser HJ, Wilson AD. The use of glassionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine. Br Dent J 1985;158: 410-414.
23. Mitsui FH, Bedran-de-Castro AK, Ritter AV, Cardoso PE, Pimenta LA. Influence of load cycling on marginal microleakage with two self-etching and two one-bottle dentin adhesive systems in dentin. J Adhes Dent 2003;5: 209-216.
24. Özel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N.Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;9: 65-72.
25. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21: 864-881.
26. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Five-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 2007;9: 7-10.
27. Qvist V, Poulsen A, Teglers PT, Mjör IA. Fluorides leaching from restorative materials and the effect on adjacent teeth. Int Dent J 2010;60: 156-160.
28. Ritter AV, Swift EJ Jr, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr. An eight-year clinical evaluation of filled and unfilled one-bottle dental adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140: 28-37.
29. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Marginal leakage of filled dentin adhesives used with wet and dry bonding techniques. Am J Dent 2000;13: 93-97.
30. Schweikl H, Schmalz G, Weinmann W. The induction of gene mutations and micronuclei by oxiranes and siloranes in mammalian cells in vitro. J Dent Res 2004;83: 17-21.
31. Sidhu SK. Clinical evaluations of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Dent Mater 2010;26: 7-12.
32. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, van Dijken JW, Lindberg A, Hörstedt P. Interfacial adaptation of a calcium aluminate cement used in class II cavities, in vivo. Clin Oral Investig 2004;8: 75-80.
33. Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Pintado MR, DeLong R, Douglas WH Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration. Dent Mater 2004;20: 535-542.
34. Tantbirojn D, Rusin RP, Bui HT, Mitra SB. Inhibition of dentin demineralization adjacent to a glass-ionomer/composite sandwich restoration. Quintessence Int 2009;40: 287-294.
35. Thomsen KB, Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites: strength of the bond to dentin versus mechanical properties. Clin Oral Investig 2007;11: 45-49.
36. Venhoven BAM, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Polymerization contraction and conversion of light-curing bis-GMA-based methacrylate resins. Biomaterials 1993;14: 871-875.
37. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Lee MS, Tu LS, Delong R. Can hygroscopic expansion compensate polymerization shrinkage? Part I. Deformation of restored teeth. Dent Mater 2011;27: 126-133.
38. Weinmann W, Talacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater 2005;21: 68-74.
39. Welbury RR, Murray JJ. A clinical trial of the glass-ionomer cementcomposite resin "sandwich" technique in Class II cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth. Quintessence Int 1990;21: 507-512.
40. Zhao W, Wang J, Zhai W, Wang Z, Chang J. The self-setting properties and in vitro bioactivity of tricalcium silicate. Biomaterials 2005;26: 6113-6121.