3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 33-36

  Lindberg, Anders ^a,b,c   Van Dijken, Jan W V ^d   Lindberg, Marianne ^b  

^a Public Dental Health Clinic   (Sweden)

^b Public Dental Health Clinic   (Sweden)

^c UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; PREMOLAR TOOTH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BICUSPID; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0042404142     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-440.
2. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 146-148.
3. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoratives. J Dent Res 1987; 66: 1636-1639.
4. Knibbs P. The clinical performance of a glass polyalkenoate (glass ionomer) cement used in a "sandwich" technique with a composite resin to restore Class II cavities. Br Dent J 1992; 172: 102-107.
5. Davidson CL. Glass ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esthetic Dent 1994; 6: 223-224.
6. Dijken van JWV. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement. Composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52: 368-376.
7. Welbury RR, Murray JJ. A clinical trial of the glass ionomer cement-composite resin "sandwich" technique in Class II cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth. Quintessence Int 1990; 21: 507-512.
8. Lindberg A, Dijken van JWV, Hörstedt P. Interfacial adaptation of a Class II polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite laminate restoration in vivo. Acta Odont Scand 2000; 58: 77-84.
9. Bertracchini SM, Abate PF, Blank A, et al. Solubility and fluoride release in ionomers and compomers. Quintessence Int 1999;30:193-197.
10. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 203-209.
11. Dijken van JWV. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfilier and hybrid composite resin fillings. A six year follow-up study. Acta Odont Scand 1986; 44: 357-367.
12. Isokangas P, Alanen P, Tiekso J. The clinician's ability to identify caries risk subjects without saliva tests-a pilot study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21: 8-10.
13. Seppä L, Hausen H, Pöllänen L, et al. Past caries recording made in public dental clinics as predictors of caries prevalence in early adolescence. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989; 17: 277-281.
14. Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956; 166-172.
15. Krejci I, Sparr D, Lutz F. A three-sited light curing technique for conventional Class II composite resin restorations Quintessence Int 1987; 18; 125-131.
16. Dijken van JWV, Hörstedt P, Waern R. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: Interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities. Am J Dent. 1998; 11, 165-172.
17. Dijken van JWV, Kieri C, Carlén M. Longevity of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement J Dent Res 1999; 78: 1319-1325.
18. Knibbs P. The clinical performance of glass polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cement used in a "sandwich" technique with a composite resin to restore Class II cavities. Br Dent J 1992; 172: 102-107.
19. Dijken van JWV. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994; 52: 368-376.
20. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 658-664.
21. Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM et al. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 1999;27: 119-128.
22. Dietrisch T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, et al. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 401-410.
23. Rasmusson CG, Lundin SÅ. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: Five-year results. Swed Dent J 1995;19:173-182.
24. Köhler B, Rasmusson C-G, Ödman P. A five-year clinical evaluation of Class II composite resin restorations. J Dent 2000; 28: 111-116.
25. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997; 25: 229-232.
26. Perry RD, Kugel G, Habib CM et al. A two-year clinical evaluation of TPH for restoration of Class II carious lesions in permanent teeth. Gen Dent 1997: 344-349.