Durability of extensive Class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after 6 years

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 43-50

  Andersson Wenckert, Ingrid E ^a,b   Van Dijken, Jan W V ^a   Kieri, Catharina ^c  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Division of Pedodontics   (Sweden)

^c Public Dental Health Service   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; VITREMER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIFE TABLE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVAL;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LIFE TABLES; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; RESIN CEMENTS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 3342955730     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Davidson CL, Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer-based restoratives. J Dent 1997;25:435-440.
2. Geurtsen W, Schoeler U. A 4-year retrospective clinical study of Class I and Class II composite restorations. J Dent 1997;25:229-232.
3. Rasmusson CG, Lundin SÅ. Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: Five-year results. Swed Dent J 1995;19:173-182.
4. Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int 1998;29:483-490.
5. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoratives. J Dent Res 1987;66:1636-1639.
6. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 1984;63:146-148.
7. Brännström M .Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 1984;9:57-68.
8. Mjör I A, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000;50:361-366.
9. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
10. Davidson CL. Glass ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esthet Dent 1994;6:223-224.
11. Welbury RR, Murray JJ. A clinical trial of the glass ionomer cement-composite resin "sandwich" technique in Class II cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth. Quintessence Int 1990;21:507-512.
12. Knibbs P. The clinical performance of a glass polyalkenoat (glass ionomer) cement used in a "sandwich" technique with a composite resin to restore Class II cavities. Br Dent J 1992;172:102-107.
13. Van Dijken JWV. A 6 year clinical evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:368-376.
14. Mathis RS, Francine JPL. Properties of a glass ionomer/resin composite hybrid material. Dent Mater 1989;5:355-358.
15. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 1996;27:203-209.
16. Uno S, Finger WA, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dent Mater 1996;12:64-69.
17. Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 1999;27:119-128.
18. Friedl K-H, Schmalz G, Hiller K-A. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 21-9.
19. Andersson-Wenckert I, van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Modified Class II open sandwich restorations: evaluation of interfacial adaptation and influence of different restorative techniques. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:270-275.
20. Vilkinis V, Hörstedt-Bindslev P, Baelum V. Two-year evaluation of Class II resin-modified glass ionomer cement/composite open sandwich and composite restorations. Clin Oral Invest 2000;4:133-139.
21. Van Dijken JWV, Kieri C, Carlén M. Longevity of extensive Class II open sandwich restorations with a resin- modified glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1999;78:1319-1325.
22. Burgess JO, Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Haveman CW, Nummikoski P, Iazetti G. Clinical evaluation of base, sandwich and bonded Class 2 restorations. J Dent Res 1999;78:531 (Abstr. 3405).
23. Burgess JO, Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Haveman CW, Nummikoski P. Clinical evaluation of base, sandwich and bonded Class 2 restorations. J Dent Res 2001;80:91 (Abstr. 445).
24. Van Dijken JWV. A clinical evaluation of anterior conventional, microfiller and hybrid composite resin fillings. A six year follow-up study. Acta Odontol Scand 1986;44:357-367.
25. Seppä L, Hausen H, Pöllänen L, Helasharju K, Karkkainen S. Past caries recording made in public dental clinics as predictors of caries prevalence in early adolescence. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989;17:277-281.
26. Isokangas P, Alanen P, Tiekso J. The clinician's ability to identify caries risk subjects without saliva tests - a pilot study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:8-10.
27. Barnes DM, Blank LW, Thompson VP, Holston AM, Gingell JC. A 5-and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1991;22:143-151.
28. Van Meerbeek B, Inoue S, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Enamel and dentin adhesion. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS, Fundamentals of operative dentistry, a contemporary approach. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co., 2001;178-235.
29. Perdigão J. An ultra-morphological study of human dentine exposed to adhesive systems. Thesis, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, 1995.
30. Perdigão J, Lopes M. Dentin bonding - Questions for the new millennium. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:191-209.
31. Van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P, Waern R. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique. Interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities. Am J Dent 1998;11;165-172.
32. Lindberg A, van Dijken JWV, Hörstedt P. Interfacial adaptation of a Class II polyacid-modified resin composite/ resin composite laminate restoration in vivo. Acta Odontol Scand 2000;58:77-84.
33. Lindberg A, van Dijken JWV, Lindberg M. 3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities. Am J Dent 2003;16:33-36.
34. Perry RD, Kugel G, Habib CM, McGarry P, Settembrini L. A two-year clinical evaluation of TPH for restoration of Class II carious lesions in permanent teeth. Gen Dent 1997;45:344-349.
35. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658-664.
36. Van Dijken JWV. Direct resin composite inlays/onlays: An 11 year follow-up. J Dent 2000;28:299-306.
37. Folkesson U, Andersson-Wenckert I, van Dijken JWV. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary molars. Swed Dent J 1999;23:1-9.
38. Pilebro C, van Dijken JWV, Stenberg R. Durability of tunnel restorations in general practice. A three-year multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:263-267.
39. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 1995;20:34-38.
40. Shellis RP, Duckworth RM. Studies on the cariostatic mechanisms of fluoride. Int Dent J 1994;44:263-273.
41. Van Dijken JWV, Kalfas S, Litra V, Oliveby A. Fluoride and mutans streptococci levels in plaque on aged restorations of resin modified glass ionomer cement, compomer and resin composite. Caries Res 1997;31:379-383.
42. ten Cate JM, van Duinen RN. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1997;74:1266-1271.
43. Van Dijken JWV. Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in Class III cavities. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:115-219.
44. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: Three-year results. J Dent Res 1997;76;1387-1396.
45. Mejáre I, Mjör IA. Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealant: A clinical study. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98:345-350.
46. Karlzén-Reuterving G, van Dijken JWV. A three-year follow up of a glass ionomer cement and resin fissure sealants. J Dent Child 1995;62,108-110.
47. Creanor SL, Saunders WP, Carruthers LM, Strang R, Foye RH. Effect of extrinsic fluoride concentration on the uptake and release of fluoride from two glass ionomer cements. Caries Res 1995;29:424-426.