Inhibition of dentin demineralization adjacent to a glass-ionomer/composite sandwich restoration

Quintessence International

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 287-294

  Tantbirojn, Daranee ^a   Rusin, Richard P ^b   Bui, Hoa T ^b   Mitra, Sumita B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b 3M COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Demineralization; Dentin; Glass ionomer liner; Open sandwich restoration

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; FLUORIDE; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; EVALUATION; METHODOLOGY; MICRORADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH DISEASE;

ANIMALS; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; CATTLE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; FLUORIDES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; MICRORADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH DEMINERALIZATION;

EID: 67649814986     PISSN: 00336572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Fontana M, Gonzalez-Cabezas C. Secondary caries and restoration replacement: An unresolved problem. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000; 21: 15-30.
2. Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Donly K, Flaitz C. Fluoridereleasing restorative materials and secondary caries. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46: 247-276.
3. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000; 50: 361-366.
4. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc 2007; 138: 775-783.
5. Tyas MJ, Anusavice KJ, Frencken JE, Mount GJ. Minimal intervention dentistry-A revie. FDI Commission Project 1-97. Int Dent J 2000; 50: 1-12.
6. Randall RC, Wilson NH. Glass-ionomer restoratives:A systematic review of a secondary caries treatment effect. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 628-637.
7. Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Placement and replacement of restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 25-28.
8. Mjör IA. Glass-ionomer cement restorations and secondary caries: A preliminary report. Quintessence Int 1996; 27: 171-174.
9. Donly KJ, Segura A, Kanellis M, Erickson RL. Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 1459-1466.
10. Tyas MJ. Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement:A five-year clinical study. Aust Dent J 1991; 36: 236-239.
11. McComb D, Erickson RL, Maxymiw WG, Wood RE. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 430-437.
12. Haveman CW, Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Carlson K. Three restorative materials and topical fluoride gel used in xerostomic patients: A clinical comparison. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 177-184.
13. McLean JW, Powis DR, Prosser HJ, Wilson AD. The use of glass-ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentine. Br Dent J 1985; 158: 410-414.
14. Mount GJ. Clinical requirements for a successful 'sandwich'-Dentine to glass ionomer cement to composite resin. Aust Dent J 1989; 34: 259-265.
15. Croll TP. The "sandwich" technique. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004; 16: 210-212.
16. Andersson-Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW, Hörstedt P. Modified Class II open sandwich restorations:Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and influence of different restorative techniques. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110: 270-275.
17. Vilkinis V, Hörsted-Bindslev P, Baelum V. Two-year evaluation of class II resin-modified glass ionomer cement/composite open sandwich and composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2000; 4: 133-139.
18. van Dijken JW, Kieri C, Carlén M. Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 1319-1325.
19. Knibbs PJ. The clinical performance of a glass polyalkenoate (glass ionomer) cement used in a 'sandwich' technique with a composite resin to restore Class II cavities. Br Dent J 1992; 172: 103-107.
20. Croll TP, Nicholson JW. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: Review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 423-429.
21. Mitra SB. In vitro fluoride release from a light-cured glass-ionomer liner/base. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 75-78.
22. Forss H, Seppä L. Prevention of enamel demineralization adjacent to glass ionomer filling materials. Scand J Dent Res 1990; 98: 173-178.
23. Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH, Versluis A. Inhibitive effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on remote enamel artificial caries. Caries Res 1997; 31: 275-280.
24. Tantbirojn D, Feigal RJ, Ko CC, Versluis A. Remineralized dentin lesions induced by glass ionomer demonstrate increased resistance to subsequent acid challenge. Quintessence Int 2006; 37: 273-281.
25. Angmar B, Carlstrom D, Glas JE. Studies on the ultrastructure of dental enamel. IV.The mineralization of normal human enamel. J Ultrastruct Res 1963; 8: 12-23.
26. Thewlis J. The structure of teeth as shown by x-ray examination. Medical Research Council Special Report Series 1940; 238: 5-82.
27. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM, Silverstone LM. Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer restorations. Quintessence Int 1986; 17: 527-532.
28. ten Cate JM, van Duinen RN. Hypermineralization of dentinal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1266-1271.
29. Donly KJ, Segura A, Wefel JS, Hogan MM. Evaluating the effects of fluoride-releasing dental materials on adjacent interproximal caries. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 817-825.
30. Kielbassa AM, Schulte-Monting J, Garcia-Godoy F, Meyer-Lueckel H. Initial in situ secondary caries formation:Effect of various fluoride-containing restorative materials. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 765-772.
31. 3M ESPE Dental Products.Vitrebond Plus Light Cure Liner/Base Technical Product Profile. St Paul: 3M, 2005.
32. Müller U, Kielbassa AM, Schulte-Mönting J, Hellwig E. Fluoride release from light-curing restorative materials. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 301-304.
33. Tantbirojn D. Surface modulation of dental hard tissues [thesis]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, 1998.
34. Nikiforuk G. Understanding Dental Caries. Vol 1: Etiology and Mechanisms, Basic and Clinical Aspects. Basel: Karger, 1985:92.
35. Berg JH, Farrell JE, Brown LR. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci. Pediatr Dent 1990; 12: 20-23.
36. Kreulen CM, de Soet JJ, Weerheijm KL, van Amerongen WE. In vivo cariostatic effect of resin modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam on dentine. Caries Res 1997; 31: 384-389.