In vivo and in vitro evaluation of class II composite resin restorations with different matrix systems

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 127-132

  Cenci, Maximiliano Sérgio ^a   Lund, Rafael Guerra ^a   Pereira, Cecília Luiz ^b   De Carvalho, Ricardo Marins ^c   Demarco, Flávio Fernando ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Class II restorations; Clinical trials; Dental leakage; Matrix bands

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTAL ALLOY; FILTEK P60 COMPOSITE RESIN; FILTEK Z250; POLYESTER; RESIN; SINGLE BOND;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEMENTUM; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MATERIALS TESTING; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE; WOOD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTUM; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; MATRIX BANDS; MIDDLE AGED; POLYESTERS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WOOD;

EID: 33646247606     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001;26:60-69.
2. Cvitko E, Denehy G, Boyer DB. Effect of matrix systems and polymerization techniques on microleakage of Class II composite restorations. Am J Dent 1992;5:321-323.
3. Francchi C, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Carrilho MRO. A novel filling technique for packable composite resin in Class II restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14:149-157.
4. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
5. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997;28:135-144.
6. Keogh TP, Bertolotti RL. Creating tight, anatomically correct interproximal contacts. Dent Clin North Am 2001;45:83-102.
7. Kreulen CM, Van Amerogen WE, Akerboom HBM, Borgmeijer PJ, Gruythuysen RJM. Radiographic assessment of Class II resin composite in a clinical study: baseline results. J Dent Child 1992;59:97-107.
8. Leinfelder KF. Is it possible to control the directional shrinkage of resin-based composites? J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:782-783.
9. Lösche GM. Marginal adaptation of Class II composite fillings: Guided polymerization vs reduced light intensity. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:31-39.
10. Lutz F, Krejci I, Lüscher B, Oldenburg TR. Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986;17:659-664.
11. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. Dent Mater 1991;7:107-113.
12. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. Restoration quality in relation to wedge-mediated light channeling. Quintessence Int 1992a;23:763-767.
13. Lutz F, Krejci I, Barbakow F. The importance of proximal curing in posterior composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1992b;23:605-609.
14. Mjor IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int 1998;29:313-317.
15. Mullejans R, Badawi MO, Raab WH, Lang H. An in vitro comparison of metal and transparent matrices used for bonded class II resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2003;28:122-126.
16. Neiva IF, de Andrada MAC, Baratieri LN, Monteiro Junior S, Ritter AV. An in vitro study of the effect of restorative technique on marginal leakage in posterior composites. Oper Dent 1998;23:282-289.
17. Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Feilzer AJ, Smale I. A radiographic and scanning electron microscopic study of approximal margins of Class II composite resin restorations placed in vivo. J Dent 1998;26:319-327.
18. Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 1998;26:555-562.
19. Rueggeberg F. Contemporary issues in photocuring. Compendium 1999;20:4-15.
20. Santini A, Plasschaert AJM, Mitchel S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent 2001;14:132-136.
21. Szep S, Frank H, Kenzel B, Gerhardt T, Heidemann D. Comparative study of composite resin placement: centripetal buildup versus incremental technique. Pract Proc Aesth Dent 2001;13:243-250.
22. Verluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Do dental composites always shrink toward the light? J Dent Res 1998;77:1435-1445.
23. Wibowo G, Stockton L. Microleakage of Class II composite restorations. Am J Dent 2001;14:177-185.
24. Wilson MA, Cowan AJ, Randall RC, Crisp RJ, Wilson NH. A practice-based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results. Oper Dent 2002;27:423-429.