Cervical microleakage in MOD restorations: In vitro comparison of indirect and direct composite

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 682-687

  Duquia, R C S ^a   Osinaga, P W R ^a   Demarco, F F ^a,c   Habekost, L V ^a   Conceicao E N ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PELOTAS   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^c Gonçalves Chaves ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTGLASS (DENTAL COMPOSITE); BELLEGLASS; FILTEK Z250; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PHASE TRANSITION; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MOLAR, THIRD; PHASE TRANSITION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 33845371290     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/05-132     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY & Hickel R (2000) Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light-cured packable composite resins Dental Materials 16(1) 33-40.
2. Plasmans PJ, van't Hof MA & Creugers NH (1992) Fabrication times for indirect composite resin restorations Journal of Dentistry 20(1) 27-32.
3. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Rodrigues Filho LE & Busato AL (2001) One-year clinical evaluation of posterior packable resin composite restorations Operative Dentistry 26(5) 427-434.
4. Hasanreisoglu U, Sonmez H, Uctasli S & Wilson HJ (1996) Microleakage of direct and indirect inlay/onlay systems Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 23(1) 66-71.
5. Wendt SL Jr (1987) The effect of heat used as secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. II. Wear, hardness, and color stability Quintessence International 18(5) 351-356.
6. Liberman R, Ben-Amar A, Herteanu L & Judes H (1997) Marginal seal of composite inlays using different polymerization techniques Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 24(1) 26-29.
7. Mandikos MN, McGivney GP, Davis E, Bush PJ & Carter JM (2001) A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 85(4) 386-395.
8. Leinfelder KF (1997) New developments in resin restorative systems Journal of the American Dental Association 128(5) 573-581.
9. Trushkowsky RD (1997) Ceramic optimized polymer: The next generation of esthetic restorations - Part 1 Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 18(11) 1101-1106.
10. Peutzfeldt A (2001) Indirect resin and ceramic systems Operative Dentistry (Supplement 6) 153-176.
11. Cesar PF, Meyer Faara PM, Miwa Caldart R, Gastaldoni Jaeger R & da Cunha Ribeiro F (2001) Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on Artglass using different surface treatments American Journal of Dentistry 14(6) 373-377.
12. Freiberg RS & Ferracane JL (1998) Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite American Journal of Dentistry 11(5) 214-218.
13. Hilton TJ (2002) Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1 American Journal of Dentistry 15(3) 198-210.
14. Hilton TJ (2002) Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2 American Journal of Dentistry 15(4) 279-289.
15. Thordrup M, Isidor F & Hörsted-Bindslev P (1994) Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: An in vitro study Journal of Dentistry 22(3) 147-153.
16. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G & Hickel R (2004) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition Operative Dentistry 29(5) 481-508.
17. Cenci M, Demarco F & de Carvalho R (2005) Class II composite resin restorations with two polymerization techniques: Relationship between microtensile bond strength and marginal leakage Journal of Dentistry 33(7) 603-610.
18. Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB & Powers JM (2003) Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements Journal Adhesive Dentistry 5(1) 63-70.
19. Barros GK, Aguiar FH, Santos AJ & Lovadino JR (2003) Effect of different intensity light curing modes on microleak-age of two resin composite restorations Operative Dentistry 28(5) 642-646.
20. Nash RW (2002) Processed composite resin - a versatile restorative material Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry 23(2) 142-144, 146, 148 passim.
21. Raskin A, D'Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M & Dejou J (2001) Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: A literature review Journal Adhesive Dentistry 3(4) 295-308.
22. Alani AH & Toh CG (1997) Detection of microleakage around dental restorations: A review Operative Dentistry 22(4) 173-185.
23. Scares CJ, Martins LR, Fernandes Neto AJ & Giannini M (2003) Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems Operative Dentistry 28(6) 689-694.
24. Awliya W, Oden A, Yaman P, Dennison JB & Razzoog ME (1998) Shear bond strength of a resin cement to densely sintered high-purity alumina with various surface conditions Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 56(1) 9-13.
25. Romao W Jr, Miranda WG Jr, Cesar PF & Braga RR (2004) Correlation between microleakage and cement thickness in three Class II inlay ceramic systems Operative Dentistry 29(2) 212-218.
26. Cho L, Choi J, Yi YJ & Park CJ (2004) Effect of finish line variants on marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceramic optimized polymer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 91(6) 554-560.
27. Braga RR, Cesar PF & Gonzaga CC (2002) Mechanical properties of resin cements with different activation modes Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 29(3) 257-262.
28. el-Mowafy OM, Rubo MH & el-Badrawy WA (1999) Hardening of new resin cements cured through a ceramic inlay Operative Dentistry 24(1) 38-44.
29. Douglas WH, Fields RP & Fundingsland J (1989) A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems Journal of Dentistry 17(4) 184-188.
30. Milleding P (1992) Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. An in vitro comparison with the direct technique Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 50(5) 295-301.
31. Robinson PB, Moore BK & Swartz ML (1987) Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro Operative Dentistry 12(3) 113-116.
32. Monaco C, Baldissara P, dall'Orologio GD & Scotti R (2001) Short-term clinical evaluation of inlay and onlay restorations made with a ceromer International Journal of Prosthodontics 14(1) 81-86.
33. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ & Mitchell S (2001) Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents American Journal of Dentistry 14(3) 132-136.
34. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH & Robinson SJ (1997) Current concepts on adhesion to dentin Critical Reviews of Oral Biology and Medicine 8(3) 306-335.
35. Pallesen U & Qvist V (2003) Composite resin fillings and inlays. An 11-year evaluation Clinical Oral Investigations 7(2) 71-79.
36. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P & Vanherle G (2003) Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges Operative Dentistry 28(3) 215-235.