Occurrence and causing stimuli of postoperative sensitivity in composite restorations

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-10

  Auschill, T M ^a   Koch, C A ^a   Wolkewitz, M ^b   Hellwig, E ^a   Arweiler, N B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CERAMX; NANOCOMPOSITE; OPTIBOND FL; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; DENTAL ANESTHESIA; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MASTICATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, DENTAL; BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PULP EXPOSURE; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NANOCOMPOSITES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; RISK FACTORS; RUBBER DAMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58649114908     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2341/08-7     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baratieri LN & Ritter AV (2001) Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 13(1) 50-57.
2. Fagundes TC, Barata TJ, Bresciani E, Cefaly DF, Jorge MF & Navarro MF (2006) Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: 2-year follow-up Clinical Oral Investigations 10(3) 197-203.
3. Roulet JF (1997) Benefits and disadvantages of tooth-coloured alternatives to amalgam Journal of Dentistry 25(6) 459-473.
4. Dietschi D, Magne P & Holz J (1994) Recent trends in esthetic restorations for posterior teeth Quintessence International 25(10) 659-677.
5. Hayashi M & Wilson NH (2003) Failure risk of posterior composites with post-operative sensitivity Operative Dentistry 28(6) 681-688.
6. Heymann HO, Wilder AD Jr, May KN Jr & Leinfelder KF (1986) Two-year clinical study of composite resins in posterior teeth Dental Materials 2(1) 37-41.
7. Leinfelder KF (1984) Posterior composites In Taylor DF (ed) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Posterior Composite Resins University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill 353.
8. Eick JD & Welch FH (1986) Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity Quintessence International 17(2) 103-111.
9. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ & Verdonschot EH (1998) Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class II resin composite restorations in vivo Journal of Dentistry 26(7) 555-562.
10. Unemori M, Matsuya Y, Akashi A, Goto Y & Akamine A (2001) Composite resin restoration and postoperative sensitivity: Clinical follow-up in an undergraduate program Journal of Dentistry 29(1) 7-13.
11. Gordan W & Mjör IA (2002) Short- and long-term clinical evaluation of post-operative sensitivity of a new resin-based restorative material and self-etching primer Operative Dentistry 27(6) 543-548.
12. Kaurani M & Bhagwat SV (2007) Clinical evaluation of postoperative sensitivity in composite resin restorations using various liners The New York State Dental Journal 73(2) 23-29.
13. Pashley DH & Carvalho RM (1997) Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion Journal of Dentistry 25(5) 355-372.
14. Murray PE, Windsor LJ, Hafez AA, Stevenson RG & Cox CF (2003) Comparison of pulp responses to resin composites Operative Dentistry 28(3) 242-250.
15. Casselli DS & Martins LR (2006) Postoperative sensitivity in Class I composite resin restorations in vivo The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 8(1) 53-58.
16. Brännström M & Astrom A (1972) The hydrodynamics of the dentine; its possible relationship to dentinal pain International Dental Journal 22(2) 219-227.
17. Matthews WG, Showman CD & Pashley DH (1993) Air blast induced evaporative water loss from human dentine, in vitro Archives of Oral Biology 38(6) 517-523.
18. Stanley HR Jr & Swerdlow H (1959) Reaction of the human pulp to cavity preparation: Results produced by eight different operative grinding techniques Journal of the American Dental Association 58(5) 49-59.
19. Brännström M & Johnson G (1978) The sensory mechanism in human dentin as revealed by evaporation and mechanical removal of dentin Journal of Dental Research 57(1) 49-53.
20. Tay FR & Pashley DH (2001) Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers Dental Materials 17(4) 296-308.
21. Scherman A & Jacobsen PL (1992) Managing dentin hypersensitivity: What treatment to recommend to patients Journal of the American Dental Association 123(4) 57-61.
22. Sobral MA, Garone-Netto N, Luz MA & Santos AP (2005) Prevention of postoperative tooth sensitivity: A preliminary clinical trial Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 32(9) 661-668.
23. Akpata ES & Behbehani J (2006) Effect of bonding systems on post-operative sensitivity from posterior composites American Journal of Dentistry 19(3) 151-154.
24. Tay FR, Sano H, Carvalho R, Pashley EL & Pashley DH (2000) An ultrastructural study of the influence of acidity of self-etching primers and smear layer thickness on bonding to intact dentin The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 2(2) 83-98.
25. Peutzfeldt A & Asmussen E (2002) Adhesive systems: Effect on bond strength of incorrect use The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 4(3) 233-242.
26. Magne P, So WS & Cascione D (2007) Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 98(3) 166-174.
27. Gordan VV, Mjör IA &Moorhead JE (1999) Amalgam restorations: Postoperative sensitivity as a function of liner treatment and cavity depth Operative Dentistry 24(6) 377-383.
28. Kuijs RH, Fennis WM, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJ, Creugers NH & Burgersdijk RC (2006) A randomized clinical trial of cusp-replacing resin composite restorations: Efficiency and short-term effectiveness The International Journal of Prosthodontics 19(4) 349-354.
29. Efes BG, Dorter C, Gomec Y & Koray F (2006) Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer and nanofill composite with and without a flowable liner The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 8(2) 119-126.
30. De Souza FB, Guimaraes RP & Silva CH (2005) A clinical evaluation of packable and microhybrid resin composite restorations: One-year report Quintessence International 36(1) 41-48.
31. Rosin M, Steffen H, Konschake C, Greese U, Teichmann D, Hartmann A & Meyer G (2003) One-year evaluation of an Ormocer restorative-a multipractice clinical trial Clinical Oral Investigations 7(1) 20-26.
32. Christensen GJ (2002) Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in Class I, II and V restorations Journal of the American Dental Association 133(2) 229-231.
33. Perdigão J, Anauate-Netto C, Carmo AR, Hodges JS, Cordeiro HJ, Lewgoy HR, Dutra-Correa M, Castilhos N & Amore R (2004) The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results Quintessence International 35(10) 777-784.
34. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ & Davidson CL (1987) Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration Journal of Dental Research 66(11) 1636-1639.
35. Ben-Amar A, Cardash HS & Judes H (1995) The sealing of the tooth/amalgam interface by corrosion products Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 22(2) 101-104.
36. Al-Omari WM, Al-Omari QD & Omar R (2006) Effect of cavity disinfection on postoperative sensitivity associated with amalgam restorations Operative Dentistry 31(2) 165-170.