Fluorides leaching from restorative materials and the effect on adjacent teeth

International Dental Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 156-160

  Qvist, Vibeke ^a   Poulsen, Agneta ^b   Teglers, Poul Thorpen ^c   Mjör, Ivar A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjacent surfaces; Caries development; Caries progression; Class II restorations; Fluorides; Operative dentistry; Primary and permanent teeth

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOMER; DENTAL ALLOY; FLUORIDE; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN CEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHILD; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DISEASE COURSE; DRUG EFFECT; ENAMEL; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MOLAR TOOTH; PATHOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH;

ADOLESCENT; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPOMERS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FLUORIDES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; TOOTH; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 77954803020     PISSN: 00206539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1922/IDJ-2425Mjor05     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Mjör IA, Moorhead JE, Dahl JE. Reasons for replacement of restorations in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Int Dent J 2000 50: 360-366.
2. Mjör IA. Reasons for replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 2005 30: 409-416.
3. Mjör IA. Glass ionomer restorations and secondary caries. A preliminary report Quintessence Int 1996 27: 171-174.
4. Comments on preliminary report on glass ionomer restorations. Swift EJ, Bader JD Shugars DA. Quintessence Int 1996 27: 581-582 and
5. Mount GJ. Quintessence Int 1996 27: 582-583
6. Forsten L. Quintessence Int 1996 27: 791.
7. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A et al. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. J Dent Res1997 76: 1387-1396
8. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A et al. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 2004 62: 37-45.
9. Qvist V, Manscher E, Teglers PT. Resin-modified and conventional glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth: 8-year results. J Dent 2004 32: 285-294.
10. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Class II restorations in primary teeth: 7-year study on three resin-modified glass ionomer cement and compomer. Eur J Oral Sci 2004 112: 188-1969.
11. Qvist V, Poulsen A, Teglers PT et al. The longevity of different restorations in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010 20: 1-7.
12. Poulsen S, Pedersen MM. Dental caries in Danish children: 1988-2001. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2002 3: 195-198.
13. Collett D. Modelling survival data in medical research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1994.
14. Norusis MJ/ SPSS Inc SPSS/PC+ Advanced StatisticsTM. Version 5.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc 1992
15. Mjör LA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int 2000 31: 165-179.
16. Chadwick BL, Dummer PMH, Dunstan F et al. The longevity of dental restorations. A systematic review. York: NHS Centre for reviews and dissemination, University of York, 2001.
17. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G et al. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004 29: 481-508.
18. Hickel R, Kaaden C, Paschos E et al. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. Am J Dent 2005 18: 198-211.