Influence of location of the gingival margin on the microleakage and internal voids of nanocomposites

Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 065-072

  Ozel, Emre ^b   Korkmaz, Yonca ^a   Attar, Nuray ^a  

^a HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Gingival level; Microleakage; Nanocomposite; Void

Indexed keywords

NANOCOMPOSITE; RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; GINGIVA; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; POROSITY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING, LIGHT-CURED; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GINGIVA; HUMANS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MOLAR, THIRD; NANOCOMPOSITES; POROSITY; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 55849112243     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15263711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-9-7-65     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aguiar FH, Santos AJ, Groppo FC, Lovadino JR. Quantitative evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques. Oper Dent 2002; 27:475-9.
2. Attar N, Turgut MD, Gungor HC. The effect of flowable resin composites as gingival increments on the microleakage of posterior resin composites. Oper Dent 2004; 29:162-7.
3. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N. Effect of Flowable Composite Lining on Microleakage and Internal Voids in Class II Composite Restorations. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9:189-94.
4. Tredwin CJ, Stokes A, Moles DR. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites. Oper Dent 2005; 30:32-8.
5. Attar N. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8:27-35.
6. Ergucu Z, Turkun LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007; 32:185-92.
7. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 1984; 63:1396-9.
8. Attar N, Korkmaz Y. Effect of two light-emitting diode (LED) and one halogen curing light on the microleakage of Class V flowable composite restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8:80-8.
9. Tjan AH, Bergh BH, Lidner C. Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:62-6.
10. Kidd EAM. Microleakage: a review. J Dent 1976; 4:199-206.
11. Coli P, Brannstrom M. The marginal adaptation of four different bonding agents in Class II composite resin restorations applied in bulk or in two increments. Quintessence Int 1993; 24:583-91.
12. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB. Influence of flowable composite lining on Class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 2004; 29:301-8.
13. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, Liao FP, Chen YH. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85:177-83.
14. Araujo Fde O, Vieira LC, Monteiro Junior S. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations. Oper Dent 2006; 31:556-61.
15. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent 1999; 27:89-99.
16. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 1995; 20:18-25.
17. Yap AU, Mok BY, Pearson G. An in vitro microleakage study of the 'bonded-base' restorative technique. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24:230-6.
18. Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 1996; 21:17-24.
19. Demarco FF, Ramos OL, Mota CS, Formolo E, Justino LM. Influence of different restorative techniques on microleakage in Class II cavities with gingival wall in cementum. Oper Dent 2001; 26:253-9.
20. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 1998; 26:555-62.
21. Stockton LW, Tsang ST. Microleakage of Class II posterior composite restorations with gingival margins placed entirely within dentin. J Can Dent Assoc 2007; 73:255.
22. Civelek A, Ersoy M, L'Hotelier E, M Soyman, Say EC. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II cavities of various resin composites. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(5):635-641.
23. Lopes GC, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Vieira LC. Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int 2002; 33:213-24.
24. Olmez A, Oztas N, Bodur H. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 2004; 29:713-9.
25. Nash RW, Lowe RA, Leinfelder K. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132:1099-104.
26. Wahab FK, Shaini FJ. Evaluation of the microleakage at the proximal walls of Class II cavities restored using resin composite and precured composite inserts. Quintessence Int 2003; 34:600-6.
27. Ferracane JL. Using posterior composites appropriately. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123:53-58.
28. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66:1636-9.
29. Kinamoto Y, Torii M. Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stres in resin composite restorations. J Dent 1998; 26:165-71.
30. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001; 26:60-9.
31. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 1997; 28:135-44.
32. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent 2001; 14:132-6.