Driving factors of external funding and funding effects on academic innovation performance in university-industry-government linkages

Scientometrics

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 1077-1098

  Chen, Ssu Han ^a   Huang, Mu Hsuan ^a   Chen, Dar Zen ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Partial least squares estimation; Structural equation modeling; Triple helix; University industry government collaboration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873749123     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-012-0864-9     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adams, J. D., & Griliches, Z. (1998). Research productivity in a system of universities. Annales d'Economie et de Statisque, 49(50), 127-162.
2. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E. G., Causino, N., & Louis, K. S. (1996). Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734-1739.
3. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008). University patenting and scientific productivity: a quantitative study of Italian academic inventors. European Management Review, 5(2), 91-110.
4. Chatelin, Y. M., Vinzi, V. E., Tenenhaus, M. (2002). State-of-art on PLS modeling through the available software. Working paper 764/2002, Haute Études Commerciales Graduate Business School, Jouy en Josas.
5. Chen, S. H., Huang, M. H., & Chen, D. Z. (2012). Identifying and visualizing technology evolution: a case study of smart grid technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1099-1110.
6. Cherchye, L., & Vanden Abeele, P. (2005). On research efficiency: a micro-analysis of Dutch university research in economics and business management. Research Policy, 34(4), 495-516.
7. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). London: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
8. Chin, W. W., & Dibbern, J. D. (2010). An introduction to a permutation based procedure for multi-group PLS analysis: Results of tests of differences on simulated data and a cross cultural analysis of the sourcing of information system services between Germany and the USA. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related fields (pp. 171-193). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
9. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
10. Diamantopoulos, A. D., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL. London: Sage Publications.
11. Dunn, S. C., Seaker, R. F., & Waller, M. A. (1994). Latent variables in business logistics research: scale development and validation. Journal Business Logistics, 15(2), 145-172.
12. Etzkowitz, H. (1994). Technology centers and industrial policy: the emergence of the interventionist state in the USA. Science and Public Policy, 21(2), 79-87.
13. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121.
14. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Triple helix innovation: industry, university, and government in action. London: Routledge.
15. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
16. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
17. Garson, D. (2007). Structural Equation Modeling. Working paper. http://faculty. chass. ncsu. edu/garson/PA765/structur. htm. Accessed 5 December 2011.
18. Geuna, A., & Nesta, L. (2006). University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence. Research Policy, 35(6), 790-807.
19. Godin, B. (1998). Writing performative history: the new New Atlantis? Social Studies of Science, 28(3), 465-483.
20. Goldfarb, B. (2008). The effect of government contracting on academic research: does the source of funding affect scientific output? Research Policy, 37(1), 41-58.
21. Götz, O., Liehr-Gobbers, K., & Krafft, M. (2010). Evaluation of structural equation models using the partial least squares (PLS) approach. In V. E. Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, & H. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications in marketing and related fields (pp. 691-711). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
22. Grewal, R., Cote, J. A., & Baumgartner, H. (2004). Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: implications for theory testing. Marketing Science, 23(4), 519-529.
23. Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932-950.
24. Himanen, L., Auranen, O., Hanna-Mari, P., & Mika, N. (2009). Influence of research funding and science policy on university research performance: a comparison of five countries. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 419-430.
25. Hossain, M. D., Moon, J., Kang, H. G., Lee, S. C., & Choe, Y. C. (2012). Mapping the dynamics of knowledge base of innovations of R& D in Bangladesh: triple helix perspective. Scientometrics, 90(1), 57-83.
26. Hu, M. C. (2009). Developing entrepreneurial universities in Taiwan: the effects of research funding sources. Science, Technology & Society, 14(1), 35-57.
27. Hu, M. C., & Mathews, J. A. (2009). Estimating the innovation effects of university-industry-government linkages: the case of Taiwan. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(2), 138-154.
28. Huang, Z., Chen, H., Yan, L., & Roco, M. C. (2005). Longitudinal nanotechnology development (1991-2002): national science foundation funding and its impact on patents. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7(4-5), 343-376.
29. Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204.
30. Jensen, R., Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2010). University-industry spillovers: the government funding and industrial consulting. NBER Working paper 15732.
31. Jerome, L. W., & Jordan, P. J. (2010). Building an institute for triple-helix research innovation. Working paper. http://www. triplehelixinstitute. org/thi/ithi_drupal/sites/default/files/uploaded/documents/TripleHelix_BuildingAnInstitute. pdf. Accessed 16 December 2011.
32. Jongbloed, B. (2008). Funding higher education: a view from Europe. seminar on funding higher education: a comparative overview. http://www. utwente. nl/mb/cheps/summer_school/Literature/Brazil%20funding%20vs2. pdf. Accessed 16 December 2011.
33. Jöreskog, K. G., & Wold, H. (1982). The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: Historical and comparative aspects. In H. Wold, & K. G. Jöreskog (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: causality, structure, prediction. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
34. Kaiser, F., Vossensteyn, H., & Koelman, J. (2001). Public funding of higher education: a comparative study of funding mechanisms in ten countries. Working paper, Enschede: Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
35. Khan, G. F., Cho, S. E., & Park, H. W. (2012). A comparison of the Daegu and Edinburgh musical industries: a triple helix approach. Scientometrics, 90(1), 85-99.
36. Khan, G. F., & Park, H. W. (2011). Measuring the triple helix on the web: longitudinal trends in the university-industry-government relationship in Korea. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2443-2455.
37. Khan, G. F., & Park, H. W. (2012). Editorial: triple-helix and innovation in Asia using scientometrics, webometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 90(1), 1-7.
38. Kim, H., Huang, M., Jin, F., Bodoff, D., Moon, J., & Choe, Y. C. (2012). Triple helix in the agricultural sector of Northeast Asian countries: a comparative study between Korea and China. Scientometrics, 90(1), 101-120.
39. Kivistö, J. (2005). The government-higher education institution relationship: theoretical considerations from the perspective of agency theory. Tertiary Education and Management, 11(1), 1-17.
40. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
41. Kwon, K. S., Park, H. W., So, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2012). Has globalization strengthened South Korea's national research system? National and international dynamics of the triple helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, 90(1), 163-176.
42. Lei, X. P., Zhao, Z. Y., Zhang, X., Chen, D. Z., Huang, M. H., & Zhao, Y. H. (2012). The inventive activities and collaboration pattern of university-industry-government in China based on patent analysis. Scientometrics, 90(1), 231-251.
43. Leydesdorff, L. (2003). The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: an indicator of the triple helix dynamics. Scientometrics, 58(2), 445-467.
44. Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2003). The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Scientometrics, 58(2), 191-203.
45. Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 778-788.
46. Liu, X. (2003). Policy tools for allocative efficiency of health services. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
47. Mathews, J. A., & Hu, M. C. (2007). Universities and public research institutions as drivers of economic development in Asia. In S. Yusuf, & K. Nabeshima (Eds.), How universities promote economic growth (pp. 91-109). Washington, D. C.: The World Bank.
48. Meissner, C. (2010). University research and industry involvement. Three essays on the effects and determinants of industry collaboration and commercialization in academia. Dissertation, Department of Economics, City University, London.
49. Meyer, M., Siniläinen, T., & Utecht, J. T. (2003). Towards hybrid triple helix indicators: a study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors. Scientometrics, 58(2), 321-350.
50. Miroiu, A., & Aligica, P. D. (2003). Public higher education financing: a comparison of the historical and formula-based mechanism. Working paper. http://unpan1. un. org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/NISPAcee/UNPAN009148. pdf. Accessed 14 January 2012.
51. Mowery, D., & Sampat, B. (2005). The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments? Essays in Honor of Edwin Mansfield, 4, 233-245.
52. Park, H. W., Hong, H. D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using triple helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65(1), 3-27.
53. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: the role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640-649.
54. Payne, A. A., & Siow, A. (2003). Does federal research funding increase university research output? Advances in Economic Analysis & Policy, 3(1), Article 1.
55. Perng, D. B., & Chen, S. H. (2011). Directional textures auto-inspection using discrete cosine transform. International Journal of Production Research, 49(23), 7171-7187.
56. Pirouz, D. M. (2006). An overview of partial least squares. Working paper. http://www. merage. uci. edu/~dpirouz04/research/pls/PLS. pdf. Accessed 10 June 2011.
57. Priego, J. L. O. (2003). A vector space model as a methodological approach to the triple helix dimensionality: a comparative study of biology and biomedicine centres of two European national research councils from a webometric view. Scientometrics, 58(2), 429-443.
58. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Will, A. (2005). SmartPLS-Version 2. 0. Germany: university at Hamburg. http://www. smartpls. de. Accessed 5 September 2011.
59. Sambamurthy, V., & Chin, W. W. (1994). The effects of group attitudes toward alternative GDSS designs on the decision-making performance of computer-supported groups. Decision Sciences, 25, 215-241.
60. Severson, J. A. (2004). Models of university-industry cooperation. Journal of Industry-Academia-Government Collaboration, 2, 1-6.
61. Shin, J. C., Lee, S. J., & Kim, Y. (2012). Knowledge-based innovation and collaboration: a triple-helix approach in Saudi Arabia. Scientometrics, 90(1), 311-326.
62. Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159-205.
63. Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (2011). Faculty participation in licensing: implications for research. Research Policy, 40(1), 20-29.
64. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 177-196.
65. Wold, H. (1975). Path models with latent variables: The NIPALS approach. In H. M. Blalock, A. Aganbegian, F. M. Borodkin, R. Boudon, & V. Capecchi (Eds.), Quantitative sociology: International perspectives on mathematical and statistical modeling (pp. 307-357). NewYork: Academic.
66. Yue, W., & Wilson, C. S. (2004). Measuring the citation impact of research journals in clinical neurology: a structural equation modeling analysis. Scientometrics, 60(3), 317-332.
67. Zajkowski, M. E. (2003). Institutional structure and the Australian research director: a qualitative study. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 25(2), 203-212.
68. Zhang, Y. (2009). A study of corporate reputation's influence on customer loyalty based on PLS-SEM model. International Business Research, 2(3), 28-35.