The inventive activities and collaboration pattern of university-industry-government in China based on patent analysis

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 231-251

  Lei, Xiao Ping ^a   Zhao, Zhi Yun ^a   Zhang, Xu ^a   Chen, Dar Zen ^b   Huang, Mu Hsuan ^b   Zhao, Yun Hua ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION OF CHINA   (China)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

China; Collaboration; Patent; Triple helix; University industry government

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655189326     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0510-y     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1989). Patents as a measure of innovative activity. Kyklos, 42(2), 171-180.
2. Atlan, T. (1987). Bring together industry and university engineering schools, "in getting more out of R&D and technology". The Conference Board, Research Report No. 904.
3. Belderbos, R. (2001). Overseas innovation by Japanese firms: An analysis of patent and subsidiary data. Research Policy, 20, 313-332.
4. Boardman, P. C., & Ponomariov, B. L. (2009). University researchers working with private companies. Technovation, 29(2), 142-153.
5. Bonsor, K. (2007). Thomson scientific broadens Chinese patent coverage in Derwent World Patents Index. Retrieved December 21, 2010, from http://science. thomsonreuters. com/press/2007/8418775/.
6. Chen, D. Z., Chang, H. W., Huang, M. H., & Fu, F. C. (2005). Core technologies and key industries in Taiwan from 1978 to 2002: A perspective from patent analysis. Scientometrics, 64(1), 31-53.
7. Chen, Z., & Guan, J. (2011). Mapping of biotechnology patents of China from 1995-2008. Scientometrics, 88(1), 73-89.
8. Dolfsma, W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Medium-tech' industries may be of greater importance to a local economy than High-tech' firms: New methods for measuring the knowledge base of an economic system. Medical Hypotheses, 71(3), 330-334.
9. Embassy of the People's Republic of China in the Republic of Iceland. (n. d.). Foreign investment in China. Retrieved July 15, 2011, from http://is. china-embassy. org/eng/zgjm/t98248. htm.
10. Etemad, H., & Lee, Y. (1999). The inherent complexities of revealed technological advantage as an index of cumulative technological specialization. In Proceedings of the international business division of Administrative Science Association of Canada's 1999 annual conference, June 1999, Symposium held in Saint John, New Brunswick.
11. Etemad, H., & Seguin-Dulude, L. (1987). Patenting patterns in 25 large multinational enterprises. Technovation, 7, 1-15.
12. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337.
13. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix of university-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge-based economic development. EASST Review, 14(1), 14-19.
14. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
15. Frietsch, R., & Grupp, H. (2006). There is a new man in town: The paradigm shift in optical technology. Technovation, 26(1), 463-472.
16. Gao, X., Guan, J., & Rousseau, R. (2011). Mapping collaborative knowledge production in China using patent co-inventorships. Scientometrics, 88(2), 343-362.
17. Granberg, A. (1996). On the pursuit of systemic technology policies in an unstable environment: Reflections on a Swedish case. Research Evaluation, 6, 143-157.
18. Hanel, P. (2006). Intellectual property rights business management practices: A survey of the literature. Technovation, 26(8), 895-931.
19. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
20. Klitkou, A., Nygaard, S., & Meyer, M. (2007). Tracking techno-science networks: A case study of fuel cells and related hydrogen technology R&D in Norway. Scientometrics, 70(2), 491-518.
21. Lee, Y. S. (1996). Technology transfer and research university: A search for the boundaries of university industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25(6), 843-863.
22. Leroy, D., & Doerig, C. (2008). Drugging the Plasmodium kinome: The benefits of academia-industry synergy. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 29(5), 241-249.
23. Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2003). The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Scientometrics, 58(2), 191-203.
24. Lin, H. Y., & Lin, H. W. (2002). From imitation to innovation: The study of patents from Taiwan. Taiwan Economic Research Monthly, 25, 23-35 (in Chinese).
25. Lundvall, B. A. (Ed.). (1992). National innovation systems: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.
26. Ma, Z., & Lee, Y. (2008). Patent application and technological collaboration in inventive activities: 1980-2005. Technovation, 29(1), 379-390.
27. Ma, Z., Lee, Y., & Chen, C. F. P. (2009). Booming or emerging? China's technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76, 787-796.
28. Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., Gutiérrez-Gracia, A., & Vega-Jurado, J. (2008). Coexistence of university-industry relations and academic research: Barrier to or incentive for scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 76(3), 561-576.
29. Meyer, M., Sinilainen, T., & Utecht, J. T. (2003). Towards hybrid triple helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors. Scientometrics, 58(2), 321-350.
30. Narin, F. (1991). Globalization of research, scholarly information and patents-ten years trend. In S. McMahon, P. Dunn, & M. Palm (Eds.), Proceedings of the North American Serials Interest Group (NASIG), June 1991 (pp. 33-44). New York: Haworth Press.
31. Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems-a comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Ortega, J. L. (2011). Collaboration patterns in patent networks and their relationship with the transfer of technology: The case study of the CSIC patents. Scientometrics, 87(3), 657-666.
33. Petruzzelli, A. M. (2011). The impact of technological relatedness, prior ties, and geographical distance on university-industry collaborations: A joint-patent analysis. Technovation, 31(7), 309-319.
34. Pilkington, A. (2004). Technology portfolio alignment as an indicator of commercialization: An investigation of fuel cell patenting. Technovation, 24(10), 761-771.
35. Pilkington, A., Dyerson, R., & Tissier, O. (2002). The electric vehicle: Patent data as indicators of technological development. World Patent Information, 24(1), 5-12.
36. Ruihua, Q. (2009). Privately-owned enterprise 30 years and the legislative dynamic study. Reformation and Strategy, 25(7), 27-30 (in Chinese).
37. Sábato, J., & Mackenzi, M. (1982). La Producción de Tecnología. Autónoma o Transnacional. Maxico: Nueva Imagen.
38. Scherer, F. M. (1984). Innovation and growth: Schumpeterian perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press.
39. Toedtling, F., Lehner, P., & Kaufmann, A. (2009). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, 29(1), 59-71.
40. Tong, X., & Frame, J. D. (1994). Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data. Research Policy, 23, 133-141.
41. Xu, G. (2010). State-owned enterprises in China: How big are they? Retrieved July 1, 2011, from http://blogs. worldbank. org/eastasiapacific/state-owned-enterprises-in-china-how-big-are-they.