Mapping the dynamics of knowledge base of innovations of R&D in Bangladesh: Triple helix perspective

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 57-83

  Hossain, Md Dulal ^a   Moon, Junghoon ^a   Kang, Hyoung Goo ^b   Lee, Sung Chul ^a   Choe, Young Chan ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Hanyang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bangladesh government; Industry; Innovations; Research development; Triple helix; University

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655187214     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0507-6     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abramson, N. (1963). Information theory and coding. New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Bertelsmann Stiftung (BTI 2010). Bangladesh country report. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2009.
3. Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(1), 56-67.
4. Chatziparadeisis, A. (2003). The R&D indicators in the knowledge-based economy: The research paradox, at http://www. urenio. org/wp-content/The_Research_Paradox. pdf.
5. Dzisah, J., & Etzkowitz, H. (2009). Triple helix circulation: The heart of innovation and development. In: A theme paper presented at the 2009 triple-helix annual conference. Glasgow, UK, 16-18 June, 2009.
6. Etzkowitz, H., & Brisolla, S. N. (1999). Failure and success: The fate of industrial policy in Latin America and South East Asia. Research Policy, 28, 337-350.
7. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdoref, L. (Eds.). (1997). Universities in the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Pinter.
8. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(22), 109-123.
9. Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29(2), 313-330.
10. Fritsch, M. (2004). R&D-cooperation and the efficiency of regional innovation activities. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, 829-846.
11. Granstrand, O. (1999). The economics and management of intellectual property: Towards intellectual capitalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
12. Hall, B. H., Grilliches, Z., & Hausman, J. (1986). Patents and R&D: Is there a lag? International Economic Review, 27, 265-283.
13. Haque, M. M., & Islam, M. N. N. (1997). Promoting industrial competitiveness through technological capability building in Bangladesh. Dhaka: Mimeo.
14. Hwang, Y.-S., Kim, S.-S., Byun, B.-M., Lee, K.-H., & Lee, H. (2004). Strategies of promoting industry-academia-research institute R&D partnerships to cope with new technologies-focusing on industry-research institute, interfirm R&D partnerships. In: Policy research report R03-25. STEPI (Science & Technology Policy Institute), Seoul, written in Korean.
15. Iqbal, Muhammed Zafar 'Only 1000 PhD'. (2011). (Prothom Alo (Banglaseshi daily Newspaper), Dhaka, Monday, 6 June, 2011.
16. Islam, K. N. (2001). Strengthening technological capability for industrial competitiveness in Bangladesh. Science, Technology and Society, 6(1), 133-158.
17. Krishna, V. V. (2006). Mapping research systems in developing countries: Country report: The science and technology system in Bangladesh. Published with the support of UNESCO Forum for higher education, research and knowledge by CREST. France: South Africa and IRD.
18. Leydesdorff, L. (2001). Indicators of innovation in a knowledge-based economy. Cybermetrics, 5(1), 1-21.
19. Leydesdorff, L. (2003). The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the triple helix dynamics. Scientometrics, 58(2), 445-467.
20. Leydesdorff, L., & Fritsch, M. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a triple helix dynamics. Research Policy, 35(10), 1538-1553.
21. Leydesdorff, L., & Scharnhorst, A. (2003). Measuring the knowledge base: A program of innovation studies. Report to the "Förderinitiative science policy studies" of the German Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften; at http://sciencepolicystudies. de/Leydesdorff&Scharnhorst. pdf.
22. Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international Co-authorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 778-788.
23. Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3), 617-630.
24. Leydesdorff, L., Dolfsma, W., & van der Panne, G. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among technology, organization, and territory. Research Policy, 35(2), 181-199.
25. Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.). (1998). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349-369) London: Pinter.
26. Mahbuba, D., & Rousseau, R. (2010). Scientific research in the indian subcontinent: Selected trends and indicators 1973-2007 comparing Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka with India, the local giant. Scientometrics, 84, 403-420.
27. Mahmud, I. (2006). Science and technology development in Bangladesh: Failure in policy implementation, http://www. bdiusa. org/Publications/JBS/Volumes/Volume8/jbs8. 2-1-comm3. pdf.
28. Mcaleer, M., & Slottje, D. (2005). A new measure of innovation: The patent success ratio. Scientometrics, 63(3), 421-429.
29. Momtaz, U. A. (2004). Promoting business and technology incubation for improved competitiveness of small and medium-sized industries through application of modern and efficient technologies in Bangladesh. proceedings and papers presented at the national workshops on promoting business and technology incubation for improved competitiveness of small and medium-sized industries through application of modern and efficient technologies, New York, United Nations.
30. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39, 640-649.
31. Park, H. W., Hong, H. D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using triple helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65(1), 3-27.
32. Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (Eds.). (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Shannon, C. E. (1948). Amathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423 and 623-356.
34. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
35. Shapiro, M. (2007). The triple helix paradigm in Korea: A test for new capital. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 6(3), 171-191.
36. Sun, Y., & Negishi, M. (2010). Measuring the relationships among university, industry and other sectors in Japan's national innovation system: A comparison of new approaches with mutual information indicators. Scientometrics, 82, 677-685.
37. Theil, H. (1972). Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
38. Trotter, I. I. R. T., Briody, E. K., Sengir, G. H., & Meerwarth, T. L. (2008). The life cycle of collaborative partnerships: Evolution of structure and roles in industry-university research networks. Connections, 28(1), 40-58.
39. Wagner, C. S. (2008). The new invisible college. Washington: Brookings Press.
40. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.