Research groups as 'quasi-firms': The invention of the entrepreneurial university

Research Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 109-121

  Etzkowitz, Henry ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic entrepreneurship; Conflict of interest; Innovation; Technology transfer

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867950883     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arrow, K.; 1962. Economics of welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson, R. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
2. Clark, B.; 1998. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Pergamon Press, New York.
3. Coleman, J.; 1997. The Foundations of Social Theory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
4. David, P.; 2001. The consequences for Internet-mediated research collaborations of broadening IPR protections. European Commission STRATA-ETAN Workshop on IPR Aspects of Internet Collaborations, February.
5. David, P.; Foray, D.; 1995. Accessing and expanding the science and technology knowledge base. 16 STI Review.
6. Eisinger, P.; 1988. The Rise of the Entrepreneurial State: State and Local Economic Development Policy in the United States. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.
7. H. Etzkowitz Conflicts of Interest and commitment in academic science in the United States Minerva 34 3 1996 258 277
8. Etzkowitz, H.; 2002. MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science. Routledge, London.
9. H. Etzkowitz, and C. Kemelgor The role of research centres in the collectivisation of academic science Minerva 36 3 1998 271 288
10. Etzkowitz, H.; Gulbrandsen, M.; Levitt, J.; 2001. Public Venture Capital: Sources of Government Funding Sources for Technology Entrepreneurs, 2nd Edition. Kluwer Academic Press, New York.
11. Freeman, C.; Soete, L.; 1997. The Economics of Industrial Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, p. 3.
12. Geiger, R.; 1986. To Advance Knowledge: The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900-1940. Oxford University Press, New York.
13. Gibbons, M.; et al.; 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. Sage, Beverly Hills.
14. Herrera, S.; 2001. Academic research is the engine of Europe's biotech industry. Red Herring 108, 72-74.
15. Jencks, C.; Reisman, D.; 1968. The Academic Revolution. Doubleday, New York.
16. Jones-Evans, D.; Klofsten, M.; 1997. Technology, Innovation and Enterprise: The European Experience. Macmillan Press, London.
17. Kneller, R.; 1999. Different Linkages between Universities and Biomedical Industries in Japan and the US NATO Advanced Research Workshop: Industry as a Stimulator of Technology Transfer. Warsaw/Bialystock, 23-26 September.
18. S. Krimsky Academic-corporate ties in biotechnology: a quantitative study Science Technology and Human Values 16 1991 275 287
19. Latour, B.; Woolgar, S.; 1989. Laboratory Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
20. Leydesdorff, L.; Etzkowitz, H.; 2001. The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology 5 (4), www.sociology.org/content/vol005.004/th.html.
21. Machlup, F.; 1962. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
22. Margolis, J.; 1979. Conflict of Interest and conflicting interests. In: Beauchamp, T.; Bowie, N. (Eds.), Ethical Theory and Business. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
23. Merton, R.K.; 1938. Science, Technology and Society in 17th Century England. St. Catherines Press, Bruges.
24. Metzger, W.; 1955. Academic Freedom in the Age of the University. Columbia University Press, New York.
25. National Science Foundation, 1999. Science and Technology Indicators, www.nsf.gov.
26. Norberg, A.; 1976. The origins of the electronics industry on the Pacific coast. Proceedings of the IEEE 64 (9).
27. M. Odza What does the AUTM licensing survey mean? Technology Access Report 20 1999 13 14
28. Office of Technology Assessment, 1984. Commercial biotechnology: an international analysis. Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC.
29. Oleson, A.; Voss, J.; 1987. The Organization of Knowledge in Modern America. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
30. Schmookler, J.; 1966. Invention and Economic Growth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
31. Schumpeter, J.; 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University, Press, Cambridge, p. 92.
32. Schumpeter, J.; 1949. Economic theory and entrepreneurial history. In: Essays on Economic Topics of J.A. Schumpeter. Kennikat Press, Port Washington, NY, p. 255 (reprint).
33. Slaughter, S.; Leslie, L.; 1997. Academic Capitalism. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
34. Soete, L.; 1999. The Challenges and the Potential of the Knowledge Based Economy in a Globalised World Background Paper of the Portuguese Presidency of the European Union. MERIT, Maastricht.
35. Storr, R.; 1952. The Beginnings of Graduate Education in America. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
36. Veysey, L.; 1965. The Emergence of the American University. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
37. L. Zucker, M. Darby, and M. Brewer Intellectual human capital and the birth of US Biotechnology Enterprises American Economic Review 88 1 1998 290 306