Knowledge-based innovation and collaboration: A triple-helix approach in Saudi Arabia

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 311-326

  Shin, Jung Cheol ^a   Lee, Soo Jeung ^a   Kim, Yangson ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Knowledge based innovation; Patent; Publication; Saudi Arabia; Science intensity; Triple helix

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655183713     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0518-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Alshumaimri, A., Aldridge, T., & Audretsch, D. B. (2010). The university technology transfer revolution in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 585-596.
2. Arimoto, A. (2009). The competitive environment of academic productivity and the academic research enterprise in the case of Japan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(1), 29-46.
3. Bush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier. Washington: Government Printing Office.
4. Chang, D., Wu, C., Ching, G. S., & Tang, C. (2009). An evaluation of the dynamics of the plan to develop first-class universities and top-level research centers in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(1), 47-57.
5. Cummings, W. (1994). From knowledge seeking to knowledge creation: The Japanese university's challenges. Higher Education, 27, 399-415.
6. Deem, R., & Lucas, L. (2007). Research and teaching cultures in two contrasting UK policy contexts: Academic life in education departments in five English and Scottish universities. Higher Education, 54, 115-133.
7. Dill, D., & van Vught, F. A. (2010). National innovation and the academic research enterprise: Public policy in global perspective. MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
8. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Francis Pinter.
9. Feder, T. (2007, August). Saudi Arabia sets up research University. Physics today, 33. Retrieved May 13, 2011 from http://physicstoday. org/resource/1/phtoad/v60/i8/p33_s1?is.
10. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
11. Guan, J., & He, Y. (2007). Patent-bibliometric analysis on the Chinese science-technology linkages. Scientometrics, 72(3), 403-425.
12. Jakulin, A., & Bratko, I. (2004). Quantifying and visualizing attribute interactions: An approach based on entropy. Retrieved May 2, 2011 from http://arxiv. org/abs/cs. AI/0308002.
13. Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea's technological learning. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
14. Kwon, K. (2011). The co-evolution of universities' academic research and knowledge-transfer activities: the case of South Korea. Science and Public Policy, 38(6), 493-503.
15. Kwon, K. S., Park, H. W., So, M., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Has globalization strengthened South Korea's national research system? National and international dynamics of the triple helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea. Scientometrics, (this issue).
16. Leistyte, L., Enders, J., & Boer, H. (2009). The balance between teaching and research in Dutch and English universities in the context of university governance reforms. Higher Education, 57(4), 509-531.
17. Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, L. (2009). National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 778-788.
18. Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Francis Printer.
19. McGill, W. J. (1954). Multivariate information transmission. Psychometrika, 19(2), 97-116.
20. Meyer, M. (2000). What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics, 47(2), 93-124.
21. Ministry of Economy and Planning, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2004). The eighth development plan (1425/1430).
22. Ministry of Higher Education, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2011). Higher Education Indicators in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia [Brochure].
23. Narin, F., Hamilton, K. S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and science. Research Policy, 26, 317-330.
24. Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. OECD. (2008). Compendium of patent statistics. Paris: OECD.
26. Onsman, A. (2010). Dismantling the perceived barriers to the implementation of national higher education accreditation guidelines in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 32(5), 511-519.
27. Park, H. W., Hong, H. D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and The Netherlands using triple helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65(1), 3-27.
28. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39(5), 640-649.
29. Ribeiro, L. C., Ruiz, R. M., Bernardes, A. T., & Albuquerque, E. M. (2010). Matrices of science and technology interactions and patterns of structured growth: implications for development. Scientometrics, 83, 55-75.
30. Schmoch, U. (1997). Indicators and the relations between science and technology. Scientometrics, 26(4), 325-336.
31. Schmoch, U., Laville, F., Patel, P., & Frietsch, R. (2003). Linking technology areas to industrial sectors. Final report to the European Commission, DG Research.
32. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(379-423), 623-656.
33. Shin, J. (2009). Building world-class research university: the Brain Korea 21 project. Higher Education, 58, 669-688.
34. Shin, J. (in press). Foreign PhDs and Korean PhDs: How They are different in their academic activity, performance, and culture. In Deane Neubauer, & Kazuo Koroda (eds.), Mobility and migration in Asian Pacific higher education. Palgreve.
35. Shin, J., & Harman, G. (2009). New challenges for higher education: Asia-Pacific and global perspectives. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(1), 1-13.
36. Simmons, M. (2005). Twilight in the desert: The coming Saudi oil shock and the world economy. New York: Wiley.
37. Tijssen, R. J. W., Buter, R. K., & van Leeuwen, Th. N. (2000). Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics, 47(2), 389-412.
38. US National Science Board. (2010). Science and engineering indicators: 2010. Accessed March 1, 2011 at http://www. nsf. gov/statistics/seind10/.
39. van Looy, B., Zimmermann, E., Veugelers, R., Verbeek, A., Mello, J., & Debackere, K. (2003). Do science-technology interactions pay off when developing technology? An exploratory investigation of 10 science-intensive technology domains. Scientometrics, 57(3), 355-367.
40. Wong, C. H., & Goh, K. L. (2010). Growth behavior of publications and patents: A comparative study on selected Asian economies. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 460-474.