Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives

Research Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 640-649

  Park, Han Woo ^a   Leydesdorff, Loet ^b  

^a Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Longitudinal analysis; National research system; Scientometrics; Triple helix

Indexed keywords

COAUTHORSHIP; COLLABORATION PATTERNS; GOVERNMENT RELATIONS; IN-NETWORK; INSTITUTIONAL COLLABORATION; LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS; NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS; NETWORK DYNAMICS; NETWORK EFFECTS; PUBLIC DOMAINS; RESEARCH GROUPS; RESEARCH POLICIES; RESEARCH SYSTEM; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; SCIENCE CITATION INDEX; SCIENTOMETRICS; SOUTH KOREA; TRIPLE HELIXES;

PUBLISHING;

RESEARCH;

EID: 77951141976     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abramson N. Information Theory and Coding (1963), McGraw-Hill, New York
2. Introduction: factors and indices are one thing, deciding who is scholarly, why they are scholarly, and the relative value of their scholarship is something else entirely. In: Browman H.I., and Stergiou K.I. (Eds). ESEP (Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics), A Theme Issue on the Use and Misuse of Bibliometric Indices in Evaluating Scholarly Performance vol. 8 (1) (2008). http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v8/n1/
3. Carlsson B. Internationalization of innovation systems: a survey of the literature. Research Policy 35 1 (2006) 56-67
4. Choi S.-D. National report for Korea. UNESCO Asia-Pacific Sub-regional Preparatory Conference for the 2009 World Conference on Higher Education. Macao, 24-26 September 2008 (2008). http://west-pac.unescobkk.org/fileadmin/user_upload/apeid/workshops/macao08/papers/3-p-6-4.pdf
5. Coleman M.S. Partner or Perish? Universities as agents of change. AAAS-CSPO S&T Policy Review: Highlights of the 2007 Forum on S&T Policy (2007). http://www.umich.edu/pres/speeches/070503aaas.html
6. Dzisah J., and Etzkowitz H. Triple helix circulation: the heart of innovation and development. A Theme Paper Presented at the 2009 Triple-Helix Annual Conference. Glasgow, UK, 16-18 June, 2009 (2009)
7. Etzkowitz H. Triple Helix Innovation: Industry, University, and Government in Action (2008), Routledge, London/New York
8. Etzkowitz H., and Brisolla S.N. Failure and success: the fate of industrial policy in Latin America and South East Asia. Research Policy 28 (1999) 337-350
9. Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy 29 22 (2000) 109-123
10. Freeman C. Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan (1987), Pinter, London
11. Freeman C. Japan, a new system of innovation. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R.R., Silverberg G., and Soete L. (Eds). Technical Change and Economic Theory (1988), Pinter, London 31-54
12. Garner W.R., and McGill W.J. The relation between information and variance analyses. Psychometrika 21 3 (1956) 219-228
13. Hwang Y.-S. Techno-economic paradigm shift and evolution of STI policy in Korea and the United States. Policy Research Report R02-12 (2002), STEPI (Science & Technology Policy Institute), Seoul
14. Hwang Y.-S., Kim S.-S., Byun B.-M., Lee K.-H., and Lee H. Strategies of promoting Industry-Academia-Research Institute R&D Partnerships to Cope with New Technologies-Focusing on Industry-Research Institute, Interfirm R&D Partnerships. Policy Research Report R03-25 (2004), STEPI (Science & Technology Policy Institute), Seoul written in Korean
15. Hong Y.S. Evolution of the Korean national innovation system: towards an integrated model. Organisation for economic co-operation and development (2005). Governance of Innovation Systems, Case Studies in Innovation Policy 65-85 vol. 2 (2005). http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/48/35734108.pdf
16. Irvine J., and Martin B.R. Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners (1984), Frances Pinter, London
17. Jakulin A., and Bratko I. Quantifying and Visualizing Attribute Interactions: An Approach Based on Entropy (2004). http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.AI/0308002 (retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.AI/0308002)
18. Kim S.H. Public research institutes: universality and peculiarity. Science and Technology Policy 16 5 (2006) 102-114
19. Kim S.H. How to promote a university's technology transfer. 2007 Research Policy (2008), Korea Research Foundation, Seoul pp. 88-95, written in Korean
20. In: Kim L., and Nelson R.R. (Eds). Technology, Learning and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
21. Korea Research Foundation. A White Paper about University-Industry Cooperation in 2007 (2008), Korea Research Foundation, Seoul written in Korean
22. Kwon K.-S. The co-evolution of academic research and knowledge-transfer activities of universities in catch-up countries: in the case of Korea. Paper Presented at the 7th Triple Helix Conference. Glasgow, 17-19 June, 2009 (2009)
23. Kwon K.-S. Emergence of research and entrepreneurial activities of Korean universities. Paper Presented at the Conference on University-Industry Linkages and Economic Performance. College of Social Sciences, Seoul National University, February 27, 2009 (2009)
24. Lee W.-Y. The role of science and technology policy in Korea's industrial development. In: Kim L., and Nelson R.R. (Eds). Technology Learning and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies (2000), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
25. Lee J.S. Korea's science & technology policy. Paper Presented at the AAAS Annual Conference. Chicago, IL (2009)
26. Lee Y.-G. Mismatch between high R&D capability and low commercialization activity in Korean public sectors: current status and plans for the future. A Paper Presented to the Triple Helix 2009 Conference (2009)
27. Lee Y.-G. Patent licensability and life: a study of U.S. patents registered by South Korean public research institutes. Scientometrics 75 3 (2008) 463-471
28. Lee B.-H., and Kwun S.K. Public policy toward the innovation-driven economy in Korea. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 3 3 (2003) 267-281
29. Leydesdorff L. The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: an indicator of the triple helix dynamics. Scientometrics 58 2 (2003) 445-467
30. Leydesdorff L., Dolfsma W., and Panne G.v.d. Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among 'technology, organization, and territory'. Research Policy 35 2 (2006) 181-199
31. Leydesdorff L., and Fritsch M. Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a triple helix dynamics. Research Policy 35 10 (2006) 1538-1553
32. Leydesdorff L., and Sun Y. National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: university-industry-government versus international co-authorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60 4 (2009) 778-788
33. Leydesdorff L., and Zhou P. Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science?. Scientometrics 63 3 (2005) 617-630
34. Lundvall B.-A. Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi G., Freeman C., Nelson R., Silverberg G., and Soete L. (Eds). Technical Change and Economic Theory (1988), Pinter, London 349-369
35. Mahmood I.P., and Singh J. Technological dynamism in Asia. Research Policy 32 (2003) 10.31-1054
36. Mahlich J., and Pascha W. Introduction: Korea as a newly advanced economy and the role of technology and innovation. In: Jorg Mahlich, and Werner Pascha (Eds). Innovation and Technology in Korea: Challenges of a Newly Advanced Economy (2007), Springer, Berlin 1-10
37. McGill W.J. Multivariate information transmission. Psychometrika 19 2 (1954) 97-116
38. Mirowski P., and Sent E.M. The commercialization of science, and the response of STS. In: Hackett E.J., Amsterdamska O., Lynch M., and Wajcman J. (Eds). Handbook of Science, Technology and Society Studies (2007), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London 635-689
39. Moon M., and Kim K.-S. A case of Korean higher education reform: the Brain Korea 21 project. Asia Pacific Education Review 2 2 (2001) 96-105
40. Moon H.-S., and Lee J.-D. A fuzzy set theory approach to national composite S&T indices. Scientometrics 64 1 (2005) 67-83
41. Oberdorfer D. The Two Koreas: A Contemporary History (2002), Basic Books
42. Park H.W., and Leydesdorff L. Korean journals in the science citation index: what do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea?. Scientometrics 75 3 (2008) 439-462
43. Park H.W., Hong H.D., and Leydesdorff L. A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using triple helix indicators. Scientometrics 65 1 (2005) 3-27
44. RAND. Brain Korea 21 Phase II-A New Evaluation Model (2007). http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2008/RAND_MG711.sum.pdf (retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2008/RAND_MG711.sum.pdf (last visited on 12.08.09))
45. Savage M., and Burrows R. The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology 41 5 (2007) 885-899
46. Shannon C.E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27 (1948) 379-423 and 623-356
47. Shannon C.E., and Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication (1949), University of Illinois Press, Urbana
48. Song Y.-I., Lee D.-H., Lee Y.-G., and Chung Y.-C. Managing uncertainty and ambiguity in frontier R&D projects: a Korean case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 24 3 (2007) 231-250
49. Shapiro M. The triple helix paradigm in Korea: a test for new capital. International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development 6 3 (2007) 1474-2748
50. Soon C., and Park H.W. The rise of e-science in Asia: dreams and realities for social science research. Case studies of Singapore and South Korea. In: Jankowski N. (Ed). E-research: Transformations in Scholarly Practice (2009), Routledge, London 109-128
51. Surowiecki J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter than the Few (2005), Little Brown, London
52. Theil H. Statistical Decomposition Analysis (1972), North-Holland, Amsterdam/London
53. Thrift N. Knowing Capitalism (2005), Sage, London
54. Trotter I.I.R.T., Briody E.K., Sengir G.H., and Meerwarth T.L. The life cycle of collaborative partnerships: evolution of structure and roles in industry-university research networks. Connections 28 1 (2008) 40-58
55. Wade R. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (1990), Princeton University Press, Princeton
56. Wagner C.S. The New Invisible College (2008), Brookings Press, Washington, DC
57. Yamauchi I. Long range strategic planning in Japanese R&D. In: Freeman C. (Ed). Design, Innovation and Long Cycles in Economic Development (1986), Pinter, London 169-185
58. Yang J.M. Supporting interdisciplinary research projects. 2007 Research Policy (2008), Korea Research Foundation, Seoul pp. 130-141, written in Korean
59. Yeung R.W. Information Theory and Network Coding (2008), Springer, New York, NY. http://iest2.ie.cuhk.edu.hk/~whyeung/post/main2.pdf (retrieved from http://iest2.ie.cuhk.edu.hk/∼whyeung/post/main2.pdf)