National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 778-788

  Leydesdorff, Loet ^a   Sun, Yuan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CO AUTHORSHIPS; GOVERNMENT RELATIONS; INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIONS; MUTUAL INFORMATIONS; NATIONAL LEVELS; TRIPLE-HELICES;

EID: 64149113493     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20997     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abramson, N. (1963). Information theory and coding. New York: McGraw- Hill.
2. DeBeaver, D., & Rosen, R. (1978). Studies in scientific collaboration. Part III. Professionalization and the Natural History of Modern Scientific Co- Authorship. Scientometrics, 1(3), 231-245.
3. Danell, R., & Persson, O. (2003). Regional R&D activities and interaction in the Swedish Triple Helix. Scientometrics, 58(2). 205-218.
4. Etzkowitz, H. (2002). MIT and the rise of entrepreneurial science. London: Routledge.
5. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: university-industry-government innovation in action. London: Routledge.
6. Etzkowitz. H.. & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and 'mode 2' to a Triple Helix of university- industrygovernment relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
7. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter.
8. Garner, W.R., & McGill, W.J. (1956). The relation between information and variance analyses. Psychometrika, 21(3), 219-228.
9. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
10. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific coauthorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.
11. Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy, 29(2), 273-278.
12. Hicks, D., & Katz, J.S. (1996). Science policy for a highly collaborative science system. Science and Public Policy, 23(1), 39-44.
13. Irvine, J., & Martin, B.R. (1984). Foresight in science: Picking the winners. London: Frances Pinter.
14. Jakulin, A., & Bratko, I. (2004). Quantifying and visualizing attribute interactions: An approach based on entropy. Retrieved May 23, 2008, from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.AI/0308002
15. King, D.A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(15 July 2004), 311-316.
16. Kostoff, R. (2004). The (scientific) wealth of nations. The Scientist, 18(18), 10.
17. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533.
18. Lengyel, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Measuring the knowledge base in Hungary: Triple Helix dynamics in a transition economy. Paper presented at the 6th Triple Helix Conference, 16-19 May 2007, Singapore.
19. Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement, and self-organization of scientific communications. Leiden: DSWO Press, Leiden University. Retrieved on February 20, 2008, from http://www.universal-publishers.com/book.php?method=ISBN&book= 1581126816
20. Leydesdorff, L. (2003). The mutual information of university- industrygovernment relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics. Scientometrics, 58(2), 445-467.
21. Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The knowledge-based economy: Modeled, measured, simulated. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.
22. Leydesdorff, L., Dolfsma, W., & Van der Panne, G. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of an economy in terms of triple-helix relations among "technology, organization, and territory." Research Policy, 35(2), 181-199.
23. Leydesdorff, L., & Fritsch, M. (2006). Measuring the knowledge base of regional innovation systems in Germany in terms of a Triple Helix dynamics. Research Policy, 35(10). 1538-1553.
24. Lucio-Arias, D., & Leydesdoff, L. (2008). Mutual information as an indicator of cognitive development in research specialties. In J. Gorraiz & E. Schiebel (Eds.), 10th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 112-114). Vienna: Austrian Research Centers.
25. Lundvall, B.-Å. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From userproducer interaction to the national system of innovation. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 349-369). London: Pinter.
26. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values 17(1), 101-126.
27. Luukkonen, T., Tijssen, R.J.W., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1993). The measurement of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 28(1), 15-36.
28. May, R.M. (1976). Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature, 261(June 10), 459-467.
29. May, R.M., & Leonard, W.J. (1975). Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 29(2), 243-253.
30. McGill, W.J. (1954). Multivariate information transmission. Psychometrika, 19(2), 97-116.
31. Mirowski, P., & Sent, E.M. (2007). The commercialization of science, and the response of STS. In E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch & J. Wajcman (Eds.), Handbook of science, technology and society studies (pp. 635-689). Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
32. Narin, F., Hamilton, K.S., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing link between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317-330.
33. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
34. Odagiri, H., & Goto, A. (1993). The Japanese system of innovation: Past, present, and future. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 76-114). New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35. Park, H.W., Hong, H.D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using Triple Helix indicators. Scientometrics, 65(1), 3-27.
36. Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423 and 323-356.
37. Shannon, C.E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
38. Skolnikoff, E.B. (1993). The elusive transformation: Science, technology and the evolution of international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Sonis, M. (2000). Nonlinear socio-ecological dynamics and first principles of collective choice behavior of "homo socialis." Progress of Theoretical Physics, 139(Supplement No. 139), 257-269.
40. Sun, Y., Negishi, M., & Nisizawa, M. (2007). Co-authorship linkages between universities and industry in Japan. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 299-309.
41. Sun, Y., Negishi, M., Nishizawa, M., & Watanabe, K. (2006). Research linkage between university and industry in Japan: Comparison based on NCR-J and CJP databases. Journal of Japan Society of Information and Knowledge, 16(2), 7-12.
42. Theil. H. (1972). Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam/London: North-Holland.
43. Tijssen, R.J.W. (2006). University-industry interactions and university entrepreneurial science: Towards measurement models and indicators. Research Policy, 35(10), 1569-1585.
44. Wagner, C.S. (2008). The new invisible college. Washington, DC: The Brookings Press.
45. Wagner, C.S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2003). Seismology as a dynamic, distributed area of scientific research. Scientometrics, 58(1), 91-114. Wagner, C.S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1(2), 185-208.
46. Zhou, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). The emergence of China as a leading nation in science. Research Policy, 35(1), 83-104.
47. Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47(3), 627-657.