Towards hybrid triple helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors

Scientometrics

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 321-350

  Meyer, Martin ^a,b,c   Siniläinen, Tatiana ^a   Utecht, Jan Timm ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c SYO   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1142307674     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026240727851     Document Type: Review

References (34)

1. R. R. NELSON (Ed.), National Innovation Systems - A Comparative Analysis, Oxford University Press, 1993.
2. B. A. LUNDVALL (Ed.), National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter: London, 1992.
3. A. GRANBERG, On the pursuit of systemic technology policies in an unstable environment: reflections on a Swedish case, Research Evaluation, 6 (1996) 143-157.
4. OECD, National Innovation Systems. Paris, 1997.
5. H. ETZKOWITZ, L. LEYDESDORFF, The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry- government relations, Research Policy, 29 (2000) 109-123.
6. H. ETZKOWITZ, A. WEBSTER, P. HEALEY (Eds), Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia, Albany: SUNY Press (1998).
7. J. SENKER, W. FAULKNER, L. VELHO, Science and technology knowledge flows between industrial and academic research: a comparative study. In: ETZKOWITZ, H., WEBSTER, A., HEALEY, P. (Eds), Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia, Albany: SUNY Press, 1998, pp. 111-132.
8. M. MEYER, Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems - an informetric perspective on future research on science-based innovation. Economic Systems Research, 14 (2002) 323-343.
9. M. MEYER, Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems, Scientometrics, 54 (2002) 193-212.
10. G. SIRILLI, Conceptualising and Measuring Technological Innovation, IDEA Report, STEP Group: Oslo, 1998.
11. L. LEYDESDORFF, M. MEYER, The Triple Helix of university-industry- government relations: a model for innovation in the "knowledge-based" economy. Scientometrics, 58 (2003): 445-467.
12. M. GIBBONS, C. LIMOGES, H. NOWOTNY, S. SCHWARTZMAN, P. SCOTT, M. TROW, The New Production of Knowledge, Sage, London, 1994.
13. L. LEYDESDORFF, The Triple Helix: an evolutionary model of innovations. Research Policy, 29 (2000) 243-255.
14. H. ETZKOWITZ, A. WEBSTER, C. GEBHARDT, B. R. CANTISANO TERRA, The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29 (2000) 313-330.
15. M. BENNER, U. SANDSTRÖM, Institutionalizing the Triple Helix: research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy, 29 (2000) 291-301.
16. B. MARTIN, The evolution of the university - a new triple helix or return to an earlier social contract? Presentation at the 4th International Triple Helix Conference, Copenhagen.
17. K. SMITH, (Ed.), Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators A Guide for Policy-Makers, IDEA Report 5, 1998.
18. F. NARIN, K. S. HAMILTON, D. OLIVASTRO, Linkage between agency supported research and patented industrial technology. Research Evaluation, 5 (1995) 183-187.
19. F. NARIN, K. S. HAMILTON, D. OLIVASTRO, The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy, 26 (1997) 317-330.
20. S. BHATTACHARYA, H. KRETSCHMER, M. MEYER, Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology. Scientometrics, 58 (2003): 369-390.
21. M. MEYER, Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29 (2000) 409-434.
22. R. J. W. TIJSSEN, R. K. BUTER, T. N. VAN LEEUWEN, Technological relevance of science: An assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics, 47 (2000) 389-412.
23. B. GODIN, The Relationship Between Science and Technology: A Bibliometric Analysis of Papers and Patents in Innovative Firms, unpublished D Phil thesis. University of Sussex, 1993.
24. B. GODIN, Research and the practice of publication in industries, Research Policy, 25 (1995) 587-606.
25. R. J. W. TIJSSEN, Science dependence of technologies: evidence from inventions and their inventors, Research Policy, 31 (2002) 509-526.
26. M. MEYER, Academic patents as an indicator of useful research? A new approach to measure academic inventiveness. Research Evaluation, 12 (2003): 17-27.
27. I. SCHILD, A Regional Patent Study to Investigate Inventive Activity in East Gothia. Tema-T Working Paper No.207, April 1999, Linköping University.
28. F. MEYER-KRAHMER, U. SCHMOCH, Chemistry, Information Technology, Biotechnology, and Production Technology: A Comparison of Linking Mechanisms in Four Fields. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, Karlsruhe, 1997.
29. M. MEYER, T. GOLOUBEVA, J. T. UTECHT, O. PERSSON, J. HONG, Tracing Knowledge Flows in the Finnish Innovation System. Tekes Technology Reports Series, Helsinki (forthcoming). To be downloaded at www.tekes.fi. See also www.knowledgeflows.com
30. P. DAVID, Second thoughts on American patenting: Lessons from America Presentation, The Intellectual Property Forum 2003 - The Commercial Exploitation of Academic Science: A contradiction? Oxford, 25 April.
31. B. MARTIN, A. SALTER, D. HICKS, K. PAVITT, J. SENKER, M. SHARP, N. VON TUNZELMANN, The Relationship between Publicly Funded Basic Research and Economic Performance: A SPRU Review. HM Treasury, London, 1996.
32. M. MEYER, J. T. UTECHT, T. GOLOUBEVA, Free patent information as a resource for policy analysis. World Patent Information, 25 (2003) 223-231.
33. H. ETZKOWITZ, E. SCHULER, M. MEYER, J. FELDMAN, The evolution of the incubator from support structure to regional inovation organizer. Paper presented at the 3rd International Triple Helix Conference, Rio de Janeiro, April 24-29, 2000.
34. L. G. SOETE, S. WYATT, The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator, Scientometrics, 5 (1983) 31-54.