Has globalization strengthened South Korea's national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea

Scientometrics

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 163-176

  Kwon, Ki Seok ^a   Park, Han Woo ^b   So, Minho ^c   Leydesdorff, Loet ^d  

^a Kyungil University   (South Korea)

^b Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

^c Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Co authorship; Globalization; Innovation; International collaboration; National research system; R D internationalization; South Korea; Triple Helix; University industry government relationship

Indexed keywords

EID: 82655172370     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0512-9     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., & Pugini, F. (2007). The measurement of Italian universities' research productivity by a non parametric-bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics, 76, 225-244.
2. Abramson, N. (1963). Information theory and coding. New York: McGraw-Hill.
3. Adams, S. J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., Paula, E., & Stephan, P. E. (2005). Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: Evidence from U. S. universities, 1981-1999. Research Policy, 34(3), 259-285.
4. Albuquerque, E. M. (2001). Scientific infrastructure and catching-up process: Notes about a relationship illustrated by science and technology statistics. Revista Brasileira de Economia, 55(4), 545-566.
5. Altbach, P. (2007). Empires of knowledge and development. In P. Altbach & J. Balán (Eds.), World class worldwide: Transforming research universities in Asia and Latin America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Bak, H. J. (2006). Characteristics and transformation of Korean academic science: Focusing on the trend of academic R&D expenditure since 1980s. Social Theory, 30, 213-244.
7. Bordons, M., Gómez, I., Fernández, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Méndez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research. Scientometrics, 37(2), 279-295.
8. Braun, T., & Glänzel, W. (1996). International collaboration: Will it be keeping alive East European Research? Scientometrics, 36(2), 247-254.
9. Chung, S. (2005). Catch up through international linkage, science, technology and the Korean experience. Science and Public Policy, 29(6), 431-437.
10. Chung, S. H., & Seol, S. S. (2010). Stages and drivers for the development of basic scientific research in Korea. Korean Journal of Technology Innovation Society, 13(3), 587-616.
11. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(22), 109-123.
12. Georghiou, L. (1998). Global cooperation in research. Research Policy, 27(6), 611-626.
13. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51, 69-115.
14. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2010). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship, Chapter 11. In Moed, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257-276). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
15. Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy, 29(2), 273-278.
16. Gómez, I., Bordons, M., Fernández, M. T., & Morillo, F. (2009). Structure and research performance of Spanish universities. Scientometrics, 79(1), 131-146.
17. Gordon, M. D. (1980). A critical reassessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publications. Scientometrics, 2, 193-201.
18. He, Z. L. (2009). International collaboration does not have greater epistemic authority. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2151-2164.
19. Hwang, K. (2007). International collaboration in multilayered center-periphery in the globalization of science and technology. Science Technology Human Values, 33, 101-133.
20. Jakulin, A., & Bratko, I. (2004). Quantifying and visualizing attribute interactions: An approach based on entropy. Retrieved May 23, 2008, from http://arxiv. org/abs/cs. AI/0308002.
21. Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. M. (1996). A systemic view of British Science. Scientometrics, 35, 133-154.
22. Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541-554.
23. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1-18.
24. KICOS. (2008). Statistics on International R&D Program. Seoul: Korea Foundation for International Cooperation of Science and Technology.
25. Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea's technological learning. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
26. Kim, M. J. (2005). Korean science and international collaboration, 1995-2000. Scientometrics, 63(2), 321-339.
27. 2nIF). Asian Research Policy, 1, 27-42.
28. Krippendorff, K. (2009). Information of interactions in complex systems. International Journal of General Systems, 38(6), 669-680.
29. Kwon, K. S. (2009, Feb 27). Emergence of research and entrepreneurial activities of Korean universities. Paper presented at the conference on university-industry linkages and economic performance, College of Social Science, Seoul National University.
30. Laudel, G. (2002). What do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11(1), 3-15.
31. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673-702.
32. Lee, M., Kim, K., Choi, Y., Song, C., & Kim, E. (2008). Exploratory study on the international S&T cooperation with developing countries. Washington, DC: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
33. Lemarchand, G. A. (2010). The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks. Iberoamerican Countries (1973-2006). arXiv: 1001. 2837v1.
34. Lengyel, B., & Leydesdorff, L. (2011). Regional innovation systems in Hungary: The failing synergy at the national level. Regional Studies, 45(5), 677-693.
35. Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Redundancy in systems which entertain a model of themselves: Interaction information and the self-organization of anticipation. Entropy, 12(1), 63-79. doi: 10. 3390/e12010063.
36. Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2011). How do emerging technologies conquer the world? An exploration of patterns of diffusion and network formation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(5), 846-860.
37. Leydesdorff, L., & Sun, Y. (2009). National and international dimensions of the triple helix in Japan: University-industry-government versus international co-authorship relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 778-788.
38. Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317-325.
39. McGill, W. J. (1954). Multivariate information transmission. Psychometrika, 19(2), 97-116.
40. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorship. Scientometrics, 36, 363-377.
41. MOE. (1974). Report on students studying abroad. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Education.
42. MOST. (2001). 2000 Science and technology annual. Seoul: Korean Ministry of Science and Technology.
43. MOST. (2003). The 20 years of HAN Project. Seoul: Ministry of Science and Technology.
44. Narin, F. (1991). Globalization of research, scholarly information, and patents-ten year trends. The Serials Librarian, 21(2), 33-44.
45. Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. S. (1991). Scientific co-operation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21, 323.
46. NSF-NSB. (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Board, National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics.
47. Ordonez, G. (2008). International research collaboration, research team performance, and scientific and technological capabilities in Colombia-a bottom-up perspective. PhD dissertation in public policy. Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
48. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Korean journals in the Science Citation Index: What do they reveal about the intellectual structure of S&T in Korea? Scientometrics, 75(3), 439-462.
49. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Longitudinal trends in networks of university-industry-government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy, 39, 640-649.
50. Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometrics values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421-432.
51. Ponds, R. (2009). The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 76-94.
52. Ramsden, P. (1994). Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education, 28, 207-226.
53. Rigby, J., & Edler, J. (2005). Peering inside research networks: Some observations on the effect of the intensity of collaboration on the variability of research quality. Research Policy, 34(6), 784-794.
54. Savanur, K., & Srikanth, R. (2010). Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics, 84(2), 365-371.
55. Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361-377.
56. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379-423, 623-656.
57. Shapiro, M., So, M. H., & Park, H. W. (2010). Quantifying the national innovation system: Inter-regional collaboration networks in South Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. A special issue on Triple Helix, 22(7), 845-857.
58. Shin, J. C., & Cummings, W. K. (2010). Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: Research preference, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics, 85, 581-594.
59. Shrum, W., & Campion, P. (2000). Are scientists in developing countries isolated? Science Technology Society, 5, 1-34.
60. Smeby, J., & Try, S. (2005). Departmental contexts and faculty research activity in Norway. Research in Higher Education, 46(6), 593-619.
61. Theil, H. (1972). Statistical decomposition analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
62. van Raan, A. F. J. (1998). The influence of international collaboration of the impact of the research results. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423-428.
63. Wagner, C. S. (2008). The new invisible college. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
64. Wagner, C. S., Brahmakulam, I., Jackson, B., & Wong, A. (2001). Science and technology collaboration: Building capacity in developing countries? Prepared for the World Bank, RAND.
65. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34(10), 1608-1618.
66. Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Measuring the globalization of knowledge networks. Blue sky. Manuscript submitted in September 2006, p. 12.
67. Yim, D., Kim, K., Chung, S., & Lee, J. (2008), Globalization of science and technology and the responses of the Korean government. In Summer conference of Korean Technology Innovation Society, South Korea.
68. Yu, S., Yim, D., Park, I., & Youn, J. (1999). A policy research on Korea's international cooperative R&D activities. Seoul: Science and Technology Policy Institute.
69. Yun, M., & Ahn, K. (2002). The characteristics of structure and level of science activity in Korea: An analysis by SCI. Seoul: STEPI.